`the Court's order in Slyce Acquisition Inc. v. Syte Visual Conception Ltd., No.
`6:19-cv-257-ADA, 2020 WL 278481 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2020), the Court does not
`believe this is one of the rare cases where it is appropriate to resolve the Section 101
`eligibility of the patents-in-suit as a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss. It is therefore
`ORDERED that Defendants' motion is denied WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants may
`refile their motion after the opening of fact discovery. Should Defendants elect to refile
`their motion at that time, the Court orders Defendants to brief the patent ineligibility of
`each asserted claim, i.e., not just representative claims. The Court will grant any
`reasonable request to extend the page limits for such a motion.To be clear, the Court
`takes no position on whether claim construction is necessary for any of the asserted
`claims. See MyMail, Ltd. v. ooVoo, LLC, 934 F.3d 1373, 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
`Furthermore, the Court takes no position on whether there are any factual disputes that
`preclude dismissal at the pleadings stage. See Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades
`Software, Inc., 882 F.3 d 1121, 1128-30 (Fed. Cir. 2018). (This is a text-only entry
`generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy) (Entered:
`07/25/2020)
`
`As of July 27, 2020, PACER did not contain a publicly available document associated
`with this docket entry. The text of the docket entry is shown above.
`
`Broadband iTV, Inc. v. DISH Network LLC
`6-19-cv-00716 (WDTX), 7/25/2020, docket entry
`
`Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
`
`BBiTV EX2013
`AT&T v. Broadband iTV
`IPR2021-00556
`
`