IPR2021-00472, No. 1114-141 Exhibit - Petitioners Demonstratives (P.T.A.B. May. 12, 2022)

Apple Inc. (Petitioner)
`v.
`GUI Global Products, LTD. (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2021-00471, -00472, -00473
`U.S. Patent Nos. 10,259,021, 10,562,077, 10,589,320
`Before Hon. Sally C. Medley, Sheila F. McShane, Monica S. Ullagaddi
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1114
`Apple v. GUI
`IPR2021-00472
`
`

`Table of Contents
`
`Issue 1: A POSITA Would Have Combined Gundlach and Lee
`
`Issue 2: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious “selectively couple…employing magnetic force”
`
`Issue 3: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious “activate, deactivate, or send into hibernation”
`
`Issue 4: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious the lid “recessed to configure to the electronic device”
`
`Issue 5: The POSITA Would Have Combined Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Issue 6: Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious “the lid has a second magnet disposed within it”
`
`Issue 7: Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious “the second or a third magnet is employed in the lid to actuate the
`electronic circuit”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`50
`
`59
`
`70
`
`75
`
`84
`
`87
`
`2
`
`

`Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would Have
`Combined Gundlach and Lee
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

`Overview of Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`IPR2021-00473 (“473”) APPLE-1003, ¶ 26.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 27.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 1
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11.
`
`4
`
`4
`
`

`Overview of Gundlach
`Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 26.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 28.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figures 2a-2d
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11.
`
`5
`
`5
`
`

`Overview of Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figures 18a-18b
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11
`
`6
`
`6
`
`

`Overview of Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 1:62-2:2.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 3:17-20.
`
`7
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 31.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`

`Overview of Lee
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 32.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), Figures 5, 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 6:31-38.
`
`8
`
`8
`
`

`Overview of Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 33.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 34.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), Figure 12
`473 Pet., 10-12; 472 Pet., 11-13; 471 Pet., 12-14.
`
`9
`
`9
`
`

`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Lee & Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 35.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 36.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 6:39-46, Figure 18; APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), ¶ [0080], Figure 18b
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶36.
`
`10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`

`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 37.¶
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 38.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 40.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 41.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 44.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 42.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 45.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶41; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶41; APPLE-1003, ¶41
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17; APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17
`
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24; APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`EX2032, p.1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶16; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶16; APPLE-1089, ¶16
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`15
`
`15
`
`

`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43; APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:62-2:2
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`APPLE-1006, 3:17-22
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20; APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20
`
`APPLE-1023 (U.S. 7,211,986), 1:39-60
`
`APPLE-1074 (US 6,661,197), 1:56-60
`APPLE 1074 (US 6 661 197) 1 56 60
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1070 (US 4,379,988), 5:22-26
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶21; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶21
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`
`18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`

`2. Inductive Charging Is More Convenient for the User
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶22; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶22; APPLE-1089, ¶22
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10; 472 Reply, 10; 471 Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`
`
`EX2032, p.1EX2032 1
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`2. Inductive Charging Is Safer for the User
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶23; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶23; APPLE-1089, ¶23
`
`APPLE-1023 (U.S. 7,211,986), 1:39-48
`
`
`
`APPLE-1074 (US 6,661,197), 1:56-60APPLE 10 4 (US 6 661 19 ) 1 6 60
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10; 472 Reply, 10; 471 Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`20
`
`

`3. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Was Advantageous, Predictable, and Feasible
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶44; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶44; APPLE-1003, ¶44
`
`APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`21
`
`

`3. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Was Advantageous, Predictable, and Feasible
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`US 2009/0052721 (APPLE-1081)
`Electric Toothbrush
`
`US 2008/0205678 (APPLE-1075)
`Wireless Hearing Aid
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21
`
`US 2010/0194336 (APPLE-1082)
`Headphones
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`22
`
`

`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶45; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶45; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶45
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`23
`
`

`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 POR, 17-18; 472 POR, 17-18; 471 POR, 17-18
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex. 2032, p.1
`
`24
`
`24
`
`

`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 17-18; 472 POR, 17-18; 471 POR, 17-18
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 9; 472 Sur-Reply, 9; 471 Sur-Reply, 9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`25
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶48; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶48; APPLE-1089, ¶48
`
`25
`
`

`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 472 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 471 Sur-Reply, 24-25
`
`APPLE-1005, [0066]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`26
`
`26
`
`

`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 472 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 471 Sur-Reply, 24-25
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 3b, 9b
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`27
`
`27
`
`

`Patent Owner’s Arguments Do Not Undermine the Petition
`
`i.
`
`Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`ii. Lee’s Approach Improves Gundlach’s Similar Headset in the Same Way
`
`iii. The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`iv. Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`v. Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`vi. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`vii. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`viii. The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`28
`
`

`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶42
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`29
`
`29
`
`

`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach & Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b; APPLE-1006, Figure 2
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`30
`
`

`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:39-46
`
`APPLE-1006, 3:17-22
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b; APPLE-1006, Figure 2
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:62-67
`
`31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`

`[ii] Lee’s Approach Improves Gundlach’s Similar Headset in the Same Way
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach & Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶36; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶36; APPLE-1003, ¶36
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶42; APPLE-1003, ¶42
`
`APPLE-1005, [0080], Figure 18b; APPLE-1006, 6:39-46, Figure 18
`473 Pet., 13; 472 Pet., 14; 471 Pet., 15
`473 Reply, 2-3; 472 Reply, 2-3; 471 Reply, 2-3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`32
`
`

`[iii] The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶37; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶37; APPLE-1003, ¶37
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶39; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶39; APPLE-1003, ¶39
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`473 Reply, 3; 472 Reply, 3; 471 Reply, 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`33
`
`

`[iii] The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶13; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶13; APPLE-1089, ¶13
`
`473 Reply, 3; 472 Reply, 3; 471 Reply, 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶10; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶10; APPLE-1089, ¶10
`
`34
`
`34
`
`

`[iv] Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`36
`
`

`[iv] Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1083)
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`
`38
`
`38
`
`

`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 28; 472 POR, 28; 471 POR, 28
`
`473 POR, 29; 472 POR, 29; 471 POR, 29
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38; APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`39
`
`

`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 28-29; 472 POR, 28-29; 471 POR, 28-29
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶36; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶36; APPLE-1089, ¶36
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 5-6; 472 Sur-Reply, 5-6; 471 Sur-Reply, 5-6
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`
`40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`

`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`APPLE-1005, [0056]
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, [0057]
`
`41
`
`41
`
`

`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`42
`
`

`[vi] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Declaration
`
`473 POR, 30-31; 472 POR, 30-31; 471 POR, 30-31
`
`473 Ex.2022, ¶¶145-146; 472 Ex.2022, ¶¶145-146; 471 Ex.2022, ¶¶144-145
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`43
`
`

`[vi] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 30-31; 472 POR, 30-31; 471 POR, 30-31
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶34; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶34; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶34
`
`44
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`

`[vii] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Declaration
`
`473 POR, 27; 472 POR, 27; 471 POR, 27
`
`473 Ex.2022, ¶136; 472 Ex.2022, ¶136; 471 Ex.2022, ¶136
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`45
`
`

`[vii] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 27; 472 POR, 27; 471 POR, 27
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶35; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶35; APPLE-1089, ¶35
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`46
`
`

`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`473 Reply, 11-12; 472 Reply, 11-12; 471 Reply, 11-12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27
`
`47
`
`

`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Refuting Evidence Submitted by Patent Owner
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`Ex.2032 at p.1
`
`473 Reply, 11-12; 472 Reply, 11-12; 471 Reply, 11-12
`
`Ex. 2033 at p.1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`48
`
`

`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`473 Reply, 5; 472 Reply, 5; 471 Reply, 5
`
`473 Reply, 6; 472 Reply, 6; 471 Reply, 6
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`49
`
`

`Issue 2
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`“selectively couple…employing magnetic force”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`50
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case and Headset Are Inductively and Physically Coupled
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`51
`
`51
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Selective Inductive Coupling Employs Magnetic Force
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 53-54.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`52
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Selective Physical Coupling Employs Magnetic Force
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 55-56.473 APPLE 1003 ¶¶ 55 56
`
`473 APPLE-1005,Figures 10a, 10c, ¶ [0068]; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 55.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 56.
`
`53
`
`53
`
`

`The POSITA Would Have Embedded Magnets in the Gundlach-Lee Case
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 56.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 57.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 59.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 60.
`
`54
`
`54
`
`

`Patent Owner’s Arguments Disregard Gundlach’s Text
`Gundlach
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), [0056].
`
`473 Reply, 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`55
`
`

`Patent Owner’s Arguments Disregard Gundlach’s Text
`Gundlach
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), [0068].
`
`473 Reply, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`56
`
`

`Patent Owner Fails to Address Predictable Advantages
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 Reply, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 20.
`
`57
`
`57
`
`

`The False Premise of Patent Owner’s Argument Against Inductive Coupling
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 Reply, 20.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`58
`
`58
`
`

`Issue 3
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`“activate, deactivate, or send into hibernation”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`59
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates/Deactivates the Wireless Headset
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 75.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`60
`
`60
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates/Deactivates the Wireless Headset
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 22.
`
`61
`
`61
`
`

`1. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates the Battery Charging Circuit
`Gundlach-Lee
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 76.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`62
`
`62
`
`

`2. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Triggers a Switch That Activates the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 4:1-7.4 3 APPLE 1001 (’320 P ) 4 1
`
`
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 77.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 78.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:12-26.
`
`63
`
`63
`
`

`3. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates the Wireless Headset
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 79.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`64
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`

`4. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Deactivates the Headset Circuit
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 80.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`65
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`65
`
`

`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Gundlach-LeeGundlach-Lee
`
`473 Reply, 22.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`66
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`66
`
`

`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 4:1-7.
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 18:13-18.
`
`67
`
`473 Reply, 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`

`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 Reply, 23-24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 82.
`
`68
`
`68
`
`

`Patent Owner Chose Not To Address the Institution Decision
`Institution Decision
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 ID, 28-29.
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Deposition Testimony
`
`473 POR, 50.
`
`473 Reply, 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1088, 45:19-22.
`
`69
`
`69
`
`

`Issue 4
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`the lid “recessed to configure to the electronic device”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`70
`
`70
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`71
`
`71
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`72
`
`72
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 Reply, 24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`73
`
`73
`
`

`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Replyp y
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 10:9-24.
`
`473 Reply, 25.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`74
`
`

`Issue 5
`
`The POSITA Would Have
`Combined Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`75
`
`

`Overview of Mak-Fan
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Mak-Fan (APPLE-1010)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶130; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶129; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶126
`
`473 Pet., 58-59; 472 Pet., 58-59; 471 Pet., 60.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`76
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 1
`
`76
`
`

`The Combination of Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶131-134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶¶130-133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶¶127-130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`77
`
`77
`
`

`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Is Applicable to Gundlach’s Case
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶131; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶130; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶127
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶132; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶131; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶128
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`78
`
`78
`
`

`The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶132; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶129
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`79
`
`79
`
`

`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Has Unique Benefits
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1054)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`80
`
`80
`
`

`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Has Unique Benefits
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1055)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`81
`
`81
`
`

`Patent Owner Left Multiple Motivation Rationales Unaddressed
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 62; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 65.
`
`473 POR, 63; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 62.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 16; 472 Reply, 16; 471 Reply, 16.
`
`82
`
`82
`
`

`Mak-Fan’s Lesser Closure Force Provides Predictable Advantages
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 62; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 65.
`
`473 Reply, 16-17; 472 Reply, 16-17; 471 Reply, 16-17.
`
`473 POR, 63; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 62.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`83
`
`83
`
`

`Issue 6
`
`Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious
`“the lid has a second magnet disposed within it”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`84
`
`84
`
`

`The Addition of Mak-Fan to Gundlach-Lee Provides a Magnet in the Lid
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent (Representative Language)
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 22:24-25; 472 APPLE-1001 (‘077 Patent), 22:24-25;
`471 APPLE-1001 (‘021 Patent), 22:22-23.
`Gundlach + Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶135; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶131
`
`473 Pet., 62-63; 472 Pet., 62-63; 471 Pet., 63-65.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`85
`
`85
`
`

`The Petition Did Not Misinterpret Mak-Fan
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 65; 472 POR, 64; 471 POR, 68.
`
`473 Reply, 26; 472 Reply, 26; 471 Reply, 26.
`Petition
`
`473 Pet., 58-59; 472 Pet., 58-59; 471 Pet., 60.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`8688
`
`86
`
`

`Issue 7
`
`Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious
`“the second or a third magnet is employed in
`the lid to actuate the electronic circuit”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`87
`
`87
`
`

`Mak-Fan’s Hall Effect Sensor Actuates the Gundlach-Lee Switch
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent (Representative Language)
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 22:40-42; 472 APPLE-1001 (‘077 Patent), 22:40-42;
`471 APPLE-1001 (‘021 Patent), 22:44-46.
`
`Mak-Fan (APPLE-1010)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶140; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶139; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶136
`
`473 Pet., 64-65; 472 Pet., 63-65; 471 Pet., 65-66.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`88
`
`88
`
`

`Integrating Mak-Fan’s Hall Effect Sensor Is Consistent With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 70; 472 POR, 69-70; 471 POR, 73.
`
`473 Reply, 27; 472 Reply, 27; 471 Reply, 27-28.
`
`89
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`89
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

Up-to-date information for this case.
Email alerts whenever there is an update.
Full text search for other cases.
Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.

Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

Still Working On It

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

This document could not be displayed.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

One Moment Please

Your document is on its way!

Sealed Document

We are redirecting youto a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

We are unable to display this document.

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases