throbber
Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`"
`
`fl
`
`Save big + get 3 months free! Sign up for ExpressVPN today
`
`We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
`
`Home / Opinions
`
`AT SCALE
`
`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but
`it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the
`alternatives
`Wireless charging wastes electricity, yes, but so does replacing cables, and
`sometimes, phones.
`
`JERRY HILDENBRAND
`
`7 Aug 2020
`
`! 26
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`TS
`
`ource: Ara Wagoner / Android Central
`
`here's a great article on OneZero from Eric Ravenscraft about how wireless charging's low
`e!ciency wastes so much electricity that its wide adoption could mean dozens of new
`power plants will need to be built across the globe. It's a really interesting read and highlights
`the thing that many people already suspected: wireless charging wastes a lot of energy
`compared to plugging something into a charger.
`
`Once you move past the hyperbolic headline and get to the meat of the matter you'll see just
`how ine!cient wireless charging really is. Every time you set your phone or something like a
`pair of wireless earbuds on a charging pad, you're using about 50% more energy to charge
`them compared to using a cable. Part of the reason is that it can be tough to align
`electromagnetic coils properly to transfer the full amount of energy they are capable of, but
`part of it is simply because wireless charging just uses more power.
`
`Android 12 DP3: What's new in final developer preview!
`
`
`
`# VPN Deals: Lifetime license for $16, monthly plans at $1 & more
`Don't miss out
`
`It's one of the design flaws, if you will, of inductive charging. You're sending power through
`coils that are aligned in a way to oscillate and create a magnetic field. If you know any basic
`electricity theory, that's very close to how a generator "creates" electricity when it builds a
`magnetic field around a conductor. The di"erence is that a much more conservative way to
`charge something like a phone battery exists, and that's just plugging it into a cable that's
`attached to a charger. You know, like the good ol' days.
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`Wireless charging wastes power because of its
`design.
`
`We're not going to go deep into electrical theory and talk about how all of this works or ways
`that energy-producing plants could become more e!cient. What we're concerned with is the
`things we do and how any action from us could contribute to what Ravenscraft calls a
`problem.
`
`Source: Android Central
`
`Whether you agree that this is a problem or not, it's not our problem to solve. Any discussion
`should start right there. Wireless charging isn't becoming popular because of its e!ciency, it's
`becoming popular because of its convenience. I think that the wasted energy from conductive
`charging is something that needs to be looked at but not by consumers.
`
`Consumers aren't the right group to investigate how
`to build high-efficiency chargers.
`
`Companies that design chargers, products that use them, and bodies that set
`standardsshould be investigating how to build equipment that doesn't waste power. And they
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`are. As consumers, all we need to understand is that using a wireless charger could cost us a
`few dollars more each year from higher utility bills and decide if the convenience is
`worthwhile.
`
`That convenience factor goes beyond not having to plug your phone in, too. Repeatedly
`plugging in a charging cable causes wear and tear on both the cable and whatever it is being
`plugged into. Many of us have seen a phone where you have to position the cable just right
`so that it can charge and that's because wear has made the connection less solid. This is
`exactly why I use wireless charging whenever I can — replacing USB ports in phones is tricky
`if you know what you're doing and expensive if you don't.
`
`Cables aren't that expensive. That's because they aren't built to be tough. A cable is a weak
`spot compared to a charger or a phone and I think almost all of us have a handful of them
`stashed somewhere. The sun will rot them while in your car, unplugging them out will cause
`the cable to pull out of the connector, and repeated contact with a socket will misshape the
`metal ends over time.
`
`Source: Android Central
`
`Charging bricks will last a lot longer, but they too can go bad before a phone does. They
`create heat which causes both internal parts to degrade as well as making the plastic shell
`brittle — sometimes brittle enough to crack. You'll have these problems whether you're using
`them to directly charge a phone or if you're using them to power a wireless charger. But
`problems with the connection no longer making contact can also happen when you're
`repeatedly plugging and unplugging a cable.
`
`These "problems" are minor. Nobody complains that they used a cable so much it needed to
`be replaced, and even a very high-quality cable isn't expensive compared to the device it's
`topping up. But like the wasted energy of wireless charging, scaling up the issue to include
`billions of users means it is a real problem all the same.
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`To do a fair study, the costs of making and selling
`replacement equipment needs to be factored.
`
`Nobody has done a study about how much electricity is used to manufacture and sell
`replacement cables, but I'm willing to bet it's at least as much as wireless chargers can waste.
`When you add in the cost of repairing or replacing phones because of a failed charging port,
`I'm certain it's more. These costs could all disappear if every phone used wireless charging as
`the only way to charge the battery.
`
`I hate to make light of anyone's work, and that's not what I am doing. The OneZero piece did
`a great job of parsing through data to reach his conclusion, and finding an angle to make your
`writing stand out from the rest of the internet is tough. There are a lot of discussions to be had
`about wireless charging, especially if the tech ever branches out from consumer electronics
`to things like home appliances or automobiles. But that's a discussion for engineers to have,
`not consumers.
`
`What we should be concerned about is that manufacturers try hard to provide us with the
`options we want to see at a price that reflects their true value. If you like wireless charging,
`buy a phone that supports it along with a good wireless charger and ignore the problems
`electrical engineers need to care about.
`
`Slim and simple
`
`RAVPower Fast Wireless Charger 10W
`Easy to use
`This charging pad delivers up to 10W charging and is universally compatible with most Qi
`devices. The silicon grips o"er added hold and this unit dissipates heat better to o"er more
`reliable charging. QC 3.0 charger comes included.
`
`$23 at Amazon
`
`We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
`
`HERE COMES THE BRAIN FEVER
`Bow to ungodly horrors or descend into madness in Cultist
`Simulator
`A complex card-based sim game, Cultist Simulator challenges you to embrace
`the horrors of the cosmos, or be consumed by them.
`
`THINKING OF THE FUTURE
`What comes next for foldables? Some next-gen folding
`ideas we'd love to see
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`From fantasy tech to mundane reality, foldables have shown us a world of mobile
`technology that's more versatile than we were used to. Here at Android Central,
`we had a bit of a think into just how much further they could take us.
`
`REIN IN THE RODEO, PLEASE
`Google desperately needs to take control of Android apps
`on Chromebooks
`We've now had Android apps on Chromebooks for five years, and while
`Chromebooks have come a long way in that time, app performance and
`optimization for Chrome OS have made significantly less progress.
`
`LOOK MA NO WIRES
`Charging is better than ever on the Pixel 5 with these
`wireless chargers
`Wireless charging on past Pixels was always a bit of a guessing game. Unique
`profiles and speeds meant that you had to search high and low to find chargers
`that worked. Thankfully with the Pixel 5, things are much more mainstream and
`chargers are more widely available.
`
`! Keep in Touch
`Sign up now to get the latest news, deals & more from Android Central!
`
`I would like to receive news and o"ers from other Future brands.
`Yes
`No
`
`I would like to receive mail from Future partners.
`Yes
`No
`
`SIGN ME UP
`No spam, we promise. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details without your permission.
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`Your Email Address
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`
`
`O N LY O N O L E DO N LY O N O L E D
`
`
`
`O N LY O N O L E DO N LY O N O L E DO N LY O N O L E DO N LY O N O L E D
`
`
`
`
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`!
`
`Opinions
`
` wireless charging
`
`!
`
`View Comments (26)
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

`

`Wireless charging may be inefficient, but it's only a catastrophe if you ignore the alternatives | Android Central
`
`5/15/21, 10:00 AM
`
`Sponsored Links
`
`by Taboola
`
`You May Like
`
`How to Banish Dark Spots (Takes Less Than a Minute a Day)
`Gundry MD
`
`This Pillowcase is Becoming The Must-Have Gift of 2021
`Blissy
`
`These Sleeves Might Transform Your Knees Back To 20 Years Ago
`Research Into Health
`
`See Everything from Miles Away Like You Are Standing Next to It
`Consumer Tech
`
`The Top 10 Attorneys in Ashland
`Lawyers | Search Ads
`
`Top Surgeon: This Simple Trick Empties Your Bowels Every Morning (Almost Immediately)
`Gundry MD Bio Complete 3 Supplement
`
`If Your Cat Vomits (Do This Every Day)
`Ultimate Pet Nutrition
`
`The 2021 GMC Lineup Is Turning Heads
`GMC's On Yahoo
`
`© Future US, Inc. • Terms & Conditions • Privacy Policy • Cookie Policy • Careers • Licensing • External Links Disclosure • Accessibility Statement
`
`https://www.androidcentral.com/wireless-charging-inefficient-only-if-you-ignore-alternatives
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Apple v. GUI Global Products
`IPR2021-00471 GUI Ex. 2016
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket