`v.
`GUI Global Products, LTD. (Patent Owner)
`
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`
`Case Nos. IPR2021-00471, -00472, -00473
`U.S. Patent Nos. 10,259,021, 10,562,077, 10,589,320
`Before Hon. Sally C. Medley, Sheila F. McShane, Monica S. Ullagaddi
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1114
`Apple v. GUI
`IPR2021-00471
`
`1
`
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Issue 1: A POSITA Would Have Combined Gundlach and Lee
`
`Issue 2: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious “selectively couple…employing magnetic force”
`
`Issue 3: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious “activate, deactivate, or send into hibernation”
`
`Issue 4: Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious the lid “recessed to configure to the electronic device”
`
`Issue 5: The POSITA Would Have Combined Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Issue 6: Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious “the lid has a second magnet disposed within it”
`
`Issue 7: Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious “the second or a third magnet is employed in the lid to actuate the
`electronic circuit”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`50
`
`59
`
`70
`
`75
`
`84
`
`87
`
`2
`
`
`
`Issue 1
`
`A POSITA Would Have
`Combined Gundlach and Lee
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`3
`
`
`
`Overview of Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`IPR2021-00473 (“473”) APPLE-1003, ¶ 26.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 27.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 1
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11.
`
`4
`
`4
`
`
`
`Overview of Gundlach
`Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 26.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 28.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figures 2a-2d
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11.
`
`5
`
`5
`
`
`
`Overview of Gundlach
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 30.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figures 18a-18b
`473 Pet., 7-9; 472 Pet., 8-10; 471 Pet., 9-11
`
`6
`
`6
`
`
`
`Overview of Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 1:62-2:2.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 3:17-20.
`
`7
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 31.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`
`
`Overview of Lee
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 32.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), Figures 5, 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 6:31-38.
`
`8
`
`8
`
`
`
`Overview of Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 33.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 34.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), Figure 12
`473 Pet., 10-12; 472 Pet., 11-13; 471 Pet., 12-14.
`
`9
`
`9
`
`
`
`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Lee & Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 35.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 36.
`
`APPLE-1006 (Lee), 6:39-46, Figure 18; APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), ¶ [0080], Figure 18b
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶36.
`
`10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`
`
`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 37.¶
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 38.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`11
`
`
`
`The Gundlach-Lee Combination
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 40.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 41.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 44.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 42.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 45.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`
`
`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶41; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶41; APPLE-1003, ¶41
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17; APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17
`
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`13
`
`
`
`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24; APPLE-1089, ¶¶11-17, 24
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`14
`
`
`
`1. Inductive Charging Was a Known Alternative to Conductive Charging
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`EX2032, p.1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶16; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶16; APPLE-1089, ¶16
`473 Pet., 14; 472 Pet., 15; 471 Pet., 16
`473 Reply, 9-10; 472 Reply, 9-10; 471 Reply, 9-10
`
`15
`
`15
`
`
`
`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43; APPLE-1003, ¶¶42-43
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:62-2:2
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`APPLE-1006, 3:17-22
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`16
`
`
`
`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20; APPLE-1089, ¶¶19-20
`
`APPLE-1023 (U.S. 7,211,986), 1:39-60
`
`APPLE-1074 (US 6,661,197), 1:56-60
`APPLE 1074 (US 6 661 197) 1 56 60
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1070 (US 4,379,988), 5:22-26
`
`17
`
`17
`
`
`
`2. Inductive Charging Enhances Reliability
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶21; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶21
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10-11; 472 Reply, 10-11; 471 Reply, 10-11
`
`18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`
`
`2. Inductive Charging Is More Convenient for the User
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶22; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶22; APPLE-1089, ¶22
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10; 472 Reply, 10; 471 Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`
`
`EX2032, p.1EX2032 1
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`2. Inductive Charging Is Safer for the User
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶23; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶23; APPLE-1089, ¶23
`
`APPLE-1023 (U.S. 7,211,986), 1:39-48
`
`
`
`APPLE-1074 (US 6,661,197), 1:56-60APPLE 10 4 (US 6 661 19 ) 1 6 60
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 10; 472 Reply, 10; 471 Reply, 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`20
`
`
`
`3. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Was Advantageous, Predictable, and Feasible
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶44; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶44; APPLE-1003, ¶44
`
`APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`21
`
`
`
`3. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Was Advantageous, Predictable, and Feasible
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`US 2009/0052721 (APPLE-1081)
`Electric Toothbrush
`
`US 2008/0205678 (APPLE-1075)
`Wireless Hearing Aid
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21; APPLE-1089, ¶¶18-21
`
`US 2010/0194336 (APPLE-1082)
`Headphones
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`22
`
`
`
`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶45; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶45; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶45
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`23
`
`
`
`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 POR, 17-18; 472 POR, 17-18; 471 POR, 17-18
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex. 2032, p.1
`
`24
`
`24
`
`
`
`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 17-18; 472 POR, 17-18; 471 POR, 17-18
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 9; 472 Sur-Reply, 9; 471 Sur-Reply, 9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`25
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶48; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶48; APPLE-1089, ¶48
`
`25
`
`
`
`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 472 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 471 Sur-Reply, 24-25
`
`APPLE-1005, [0066]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`26
`
`26
`
`
`
`4. Interoperability: A Benefit of Lee’s Inductive Charging
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 472 Sur-Reply, 24-25; 471 Sur-Reply, 24-25
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 3b, 9b
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 14-15; 472 Reply, 14-15; 471 Reply, 14-15
`
`27
`
`27
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Arguments Do Not Undermine the Petition
`
`i.
`
`Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`ii. Lee’s Approach Improves Gundlach’s Similar Headset in the Same Way
`
`iii. The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`iv. Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`v. Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`vi. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`vii. Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`viii. The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`28
`
`
`
`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶42
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 14-15; 472 Pet., 15-16; 471 Pet., 16-17
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`29
`
`29
`
`
`
`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach & Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b; APPLE-1006, Figure 2
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`30
`
`
`
`[i] Lee Teaches and Suggests the Combination
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶9; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶9
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:39-46
`
`APPLE-1006, 3:17-22
`
`APPLE-1005, Figures 9a-9b; APPLE-1006, Figure 2
`473 Reply, 1-2; 472 Reply, 1-2; 471 Reply, 1-2
`
`APPLE-1006, 1:62-67
`
`31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`
`
`[ii] Lee’s Approach Improves Gundlach’s Similar Headset in the Same Way
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach & Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶36; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶36; APPLE-1003, ¶36
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶42; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶42; APPLE-1003, ¶42
`
`APPLE-1005, [0080], Figure 18b; APPLE-1006, 6:39-46, Figure 18
`473 Pet., 13; 472 Pet., 14; 471 Pet., 15
`473 Reply, 2-3; 472 Reply, 2-3; 471 Reply, 2-3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`32
`
`
`
`[iii] The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶37; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶37; APPLE-1003, ¶37
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶39; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶39; APPLE-1003, ¶39
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`473 Reply, 3; 472 Reply, 3; 471 Reply, 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`33
`
`
`
`[iii] The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶13; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶13; APPLE-1089, ¶13
`
`473 Reply, 3; 472 Reply, 3; 471 Reply, 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶10; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶10; APPLE-1089, ¶10
`
`34
`
`34
`
`
`
`[iii] The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶13; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶13; APPLE-1089, ¶13
`
`473 Reply, 3; 472 Reply, 3; 471 Reply, 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`35
`
`
`
`[iv] Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`36
`
`
`
`[iv] Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`37
`
`
`
`[iv] Aligning Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil Is a Routine Design Problem
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1083)
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 15; 472 Pet., 16; 471 Pet., 17
`473 Reply, 11-14; 472 Reply, 11-14; 471 Reply, 11-14
`
`38
`
`38
`
`
`
`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 28; 472 POR, 28; 471 POR, 28
`
`473 POR, 29; 472 POR, 29; 471 POR, 29
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38; APPLE-1089, ¶¶36-38
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`39
`
`
`
`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 28-29; 472 POR, 28-29; 471 POR, 28-29
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶36; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶36; APPLE-1089, ¶36
`
`473 Sur-Reply, 5-6; 472 Sur-Reply, 5-6; 471 Sur-Reply, 5-6
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`
`40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`
`
`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`APPLE-1005, [0056]
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶¶37-39
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1005, [0057]
`
`41
`
`41
`
`
`
`[v] Gundlach’s Form Factor Does Not Preclude Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`Gundlach
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶¶40-41
`
`473 Reply, 12-13; 472 Reply, 12-13; 471 Reply, 12-13
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`42
`
`
`
`[vi] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Declaration
`
`473 POR, 30-31; 472 POR, 30-31; 471 POR, 30-31
`
`473 Ex.2022, ¶¶145-146; 472 Ex.2022, ¶¶145-146; 471 Ex.2022, ¶¶144-145
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`43
`
`
`
`[vi] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Heat or Vibration Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 30-31; 472 POR, 30-31; 471 POR, 30-31
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶34; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶34; 471 APPLE-1089, ¶34
`
`44
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`
`
`[vii] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Declaration
`
`473 POR, 27; 472 POR, 27; 471 POR, 27
`
`473 Ex.2022, ¶136; 472 Ex.2022, ¶136; 471 Ex.2022, ¶136
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`45
`
`
`
`[vii] Lee’s Dual-Purpose Coil: No Evident Eddy Current Problems
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 27; 472 POR, 27; 471 POR, 27
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶35; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶35; APPLE-1089, ¶35
`
`473 Reply, 12; 472 Reply, 12; 471 Reply, 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`46
`
`
`
`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Dr. Cooperstock’s Second Declaration
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`473 Reply, 11-12; 472 Reply, 11-12; 471 Reply, 11-12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`473 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27; 472 APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27; APPLE-1089, ¶¶26-27
`
`47
`
`
`
`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Refuting Evidence Submitted by Patent Owner
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`Ex.2032 at p.1
`
`473 Reply, 11-12; 472 Reply, 11-12; 471 Reply, 11-12
`
`Ex. 2033 at p.1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`48
`
`
`
`[viii] The Efficiency Design Tradeoff Does Not Preclude Motivation
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 26; 472 POR, 26; 471 POR, 26
`
`473 Reply, 5; 472 Reply, 5; 471 Reply, 5
`
`473 Reply, 6; 472 Reply, 6; 471 Reply, 6
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`49
`
`
`
`Issue 2
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`“selectively couple…employing magnetic force”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`50
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case and Headset Are Inductively and Physically Coupled
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`51
`
`51
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Selective Inductive Coupling Employs Magnetic Force
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 53-54.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`52
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`52
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Selective Physical Coupling Employs Magnetic Force
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶ 55-56.473 APPLE 1003 ¶¶ 55 56
`
`473 APPLE-1005,Figures 10a, 10c, ¶ [0068]; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 55.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 56.
`
`53
`
`53
`
`
`
`The POSITA Would Have Embedded Magnets in the Gundlach-Lee Case
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 56.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 57.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 59.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 60.
`
`54
`
`54
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Arguments Disregard Gundlach’s Text
`Gundlach
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), [0056].
`
`473 Reply, 18.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`55
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Arguments Disregard Gundlach’s Text
`Gundlach
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), [0068].
`
`473 Reply, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`56
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Fails to Address Predictable Advantages
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 Reply, 19.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 20.
`
`57
`
`57
`
`
`
`The False Premise of Patent Owner’s Argument Against Inductive Coupling
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 Reply, 20.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`58
`
`58
`
`
`
`Issue 3
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`“activate, deactivate, or send into hibernation”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`59
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates/Deactivates the Wireless Headset
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 75.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`60
`
`60
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates/Deactivates the Wireless Headset
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 22.
`
`61
`
`61
`
`
`
`1. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates the Battery Charging Circuit
`Gundlach-Lee
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`APPLE-1005, Figure 2c; APPLE-1006, Figure 12
`473 Pet., 12-14; 472 Pet., 13-15; 471 Pet., 14-16
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 76.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`62
`
`62
`
`
`
`2. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Triggers a Switch That Activates the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 4:1-7.4 3 APPLE 1001 (’320 P ) 4 1
`
`
`
`Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 77.
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 78.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`APPLE-1006, 5:12-26.
`
`63
`
`63
`
`
`
`3. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Activates the Wireless Headset
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 79.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`64
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`
`
`4. Gundlach-Lee’s Case Deactivates the Headset Circuit
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 80.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`65
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`65
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Gundlach-LeeGundlach-Lee
`
`473 Reply, 22.
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 51.
`
`66
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`66
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 4:1-7.
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 18:13-18.
`
`67
`
`473 Reply, 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`67
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Leaves Petition Mappings Unrebutted
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`473 Reply, 23-24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 82.
`
`68
`
`68
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Chose Not To Address the Institution Decision
`Institution Decision
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`473 ID, 28-29.
`
`Dr. Toliyat’s Deposition Testimony
`
`473 POR, 50.
`
`473 Reply, 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1088, 45:19-22.
`
`69
`
`69
`
`
`
`Issue 4
`
`Gundlach-Lee Renders Obvious
`the lid “recessed to configure to the electronic device”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`70
`
`70
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`71
`
`71
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 18b; 473 APPLE-1003, ¶ 91.
`
`72
`
`72
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 Reply, 24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 21:38-22:18.
`
`73
`
`73
`
`
`
`Gundlach-Lee’s Case Includes a Lid Recessed to Accommodate the Headset
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Replyp y
`
`’320 Patent
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 10:9-24.
`
`473 Reply, 25.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`74
`
`74
`
`
`
`Issue 5
`
`The POSITA Would Have
`Combined Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`75
`
`75
`
`
`
`Overview of Mak-Fan
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Mak-Fan (APPLE-1010)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶130; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶129; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶126
`
`473 Pet., 58-59; 472 Pet., 58-59; 471 Pet., 60.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`76
`
`473 APPLE-1005 (Gundlach), Figure 1
`
`76
`
`
`
`The Combination of Mak-Fan With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶¶131-134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶¶130-133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶¶127-130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`77
`
`77
`
`
`
`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Is Applicable to Gundlach’s Case
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶131; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶130; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶127
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶132; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶131; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶128
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`78
`
`78
`
`
`
`The Combination Involves Simple Substitution of Known Elements
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Gundlach-Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶132; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶129
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`79
`
`79
`
`
`
`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Has Unique Benefits
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1054)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`80
`
`80
`
`
`
`Mak-Fan’s Magnetic Closure Has Unique Benefits
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`Corroborating Evidence (APPLE-1055)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶133; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶130
`
`473 Pet., 59-61; 472 Pet., 59-61; 471 Pet., 61-63.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`81
`
`81
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Left Multiple Motivation Rationales Unaddressed
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 62; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 65.
`
`473 POR, 63; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 62.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`473 Reply, 16; 472 Reply, 16; 471 Reply, 16.
`
`82
`
`82
`
`
`
`Mak-Fan’s Lesser Closure Force Provides Predictable Advantages
`Patent Owner’s Response
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 62; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 65.
`
`473 Reply, 16-17; 472 Reply, 16-17; 471 Reply, 16-17.
`
`473 POR, 63; 472 POR, 62; 471 POR, 62.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`83
`
`83
`
`
`
`Issue 6
`
`Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious
`“the lid has a second magnet disposed within it”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`84
`
`84
`
`
`
`The Addition of Mak-Fan to Gundlach-Lee Provides a Magnet in the Lid
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent (Representative Language)
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 22:24-25; 472 APPLE-1001 (‘077 Patent), 22:24-25;
`471 APPLE-1001 (‘021 Patent), 22:22-23.
`Gundlach + Lee + Mak-Fan
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶135; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶134; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶131
`
`473 Pet., 62-63; 472 Pet., 62-63; 471 Pet., 63-65.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`85
`
`85
`
`
`
`The Petition Did Not Misinterpret Mak-Fan
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 65; 472 POR, 64; 471 POR, 68.
`
`473 Reply, 26; 472 Reply, 26; 471 Reply, 26.
`Petition
`
`473 Pet., 58-59; 472 Pet., 58-59; 471 Pet., 60.
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`8688
`
`86
`
`
`
`Issue 7
`
`Gundlach-Lee-Mak-Fan Renders Obvious
`“the second or a third magnet is employed in
`the lid to actuate the electronic circuit”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`87
`
`87
`
`
`
`Mak-Fan’s Hall Effect Sensor Actuates the Gundlach-Lee Switch
`
`Dr. Cooperstock’s First Declaration
`
`’320 Patent (Representative Language)
`
`473 APPLE-1001 (’320 Patent), 22:40-42; 472 APPLE-1001 (‘077 Patent), 22:40-42;
`471 APPLE-1001 (‘021 Patent), 22:44-46.
`
`Mak-Fan (APPLE-1010)
`
`473 APPLE-1003, ¶140; 472 APPLE-1003, ¶139; 471 APPLE-1003, ¶136
`
`473 Pet., 64-65; 472 Pet., 63-65; 471 Pet., 65-66.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`88
`
`88
`
`
`
`Integrating Mak-Fan’s Hall Effect Sensor Is Consistent With Gundlach-Lee
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`Reply
`
`473 POR, 70; 472 POR, 69-70; 471 POR, 73.
`
`473 Reply, 27; 472 Reply, 27; 471 Reply, 27-28.
`
`89
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`89
`
`