throbber
2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________________________
`APPLE INC., )
`)
`Petitioner, )
`vs. ) Case No.:
`) IPR2021-00470
`GUI GLOBAL PRODUCTS, LTD., ) IPR2021-00471
`) IPR2021-00472
`Patent Owner. ) IPR2021-00473
`_____________________________________)
`
`REMOTE DEPOSITION OF HAMID A. TOLIYAT, Ph.D.
`(Taken by Petitioner)
`Thursday, February 24th, 2022
`9:47 a.m. Central Time
`
`Reported Stenographically by
`Amy A. Brauser, RPR, RMR, CRR
`
`______________________________________________________
`DIGITAL EVIDENCE GROUP
`1730 M Street, NW, Suite 812
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 232-0646
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1088
`Apple v. GUI
`IPR2021-00471
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 2
`
`REMOTE DEPOSITION OF HAMID A. TOLIYAT,
`Ph.D., a witness called on behalf of Petitioner,
`before Amy A. Brauser, Notary Public, in and for the
`Commonwealth of Virginia, on Thursday, the 24th day of
`February, 2022, commencing at 9:47 a.m. Central Time.
`* * * * * * * *
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`2
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` VIRTUAL APPEARANCES
`ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:
` SETH M. SPROUL, Esquire
` Fish & Richardson
` 12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
` San Diego, California 92130
` (858) 678-4343
` sproul@fr.com
` (AND)
` KENNETH W. DARBY, Esquire
` Fish & Richardson
` 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 810
` Austin, Texas 78701
` (512) 226-8126
` kdarby@fr.com
` (AND)
` ANDREW B. PATRICK, Esquire
` Fish & Richardson
` 7 Times Square, 20th Floor
` New York, New York 10036
` (202) 626-7735
` patrick@fr.com
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`3
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 4
`
` VIRTUAL APPEARANCES (con't)
`ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT:
` TAREK FAHMI, Esquire
` Ascenda Law Group, P.C.
` 2150 N. First Street, Suite 420
` San Jose, California 95131
` (866) 877-4883
` tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
` (AND)
` JOHN J. EDMONDS, Esquire
` Edmonds & Schlather
` 2501 Saltus Street
` Houston, Texas 77003
` (713) 364-5291
` jedmonds@ip-lit.com
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
` Joseph Cerda, Exhibit Technician
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`4
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
` INDEX OF EXAMINATIONS
`By Mr. Sproul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
`By Mr. Fahmi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 92
`
`Page 5
`
` INDEX OF EXHIBITS
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit A Declaration of Hamid Toliyat, 36
` Ph.D. Regarding Apple's Petition
` for Inter Partes Review of U.S.
` Patent No. 10,589,320
`Exhibit B Patent Owner's Preliminary Response 36
` to Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Exhibit C United States Patent No. 56
` US 10,589,320
`Exhibit D United States Patent No. 62
` US 10,259,020
`Exhibit E Miniature Communication Device, 67
` Bates APPLE 1004
`Exhibit F U.S. Patent Application Publication 95
` US2011/0317865 A1
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`5
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 6
`
` P R O C E E D I N G S
` THE EXHIBIT TECHNICIAN: We are now
` beginning this deposition. Today is
` February 24th, 2022. The time on the video
` record is 9:47 a.m. This is the video
` deposition -- or sorry, this is the deposition
` of Dr. Hamid Toliyat taken in the matter of
` Apple versus GUI Global Products, Limited.
` Will counsel, please, identify
` themselves for the record and whom they
` represent?
` MR. SPROUL: Counsel for Petitioner at
` Fish & Richardson, Seth Sproul. With me is
` Kenneth Darby and Andrew Patrick, who are also
` on the line.
` MR. FAHMI: This is Tarek Fahmi on
` behalf of the Patent Owner. Also on today's
` proceedings is John Edmonds.
` THE COURT REPORTER: Unless there is an
` objection to the following agreement, all
` parties to this deposition are appearing
` remotely and have agreed to the witness being
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`6
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 7
`
` sworn in remotely.
` HAMID TOLIYAT, Ph.D.,
`having been first duly sworn to tell the truth, was
`examined and testified as follows:
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Toliyat. Am I
`pronouncing that correctly?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Where do you live?
` A. I live in Texas.
` Q. What city?
` A. Mainly College Station where Texas A&M
`University is.
` Q. Where do you currently work?
` A. Texas A&M University. I'm a professor
`at Texas A&M.
` Q. What is your title?
` A. I'm an endowed chair professor, Raytheon
`endow professor.
` Q. Do you teach classes at Texas A&M?
` A. Yes, I do.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`7
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 8
`
` Q. What classes?
` A. I teach four different -- well, over the
`years, past almost 30 years, I have taught different
`classes. But in general, I teach classes in several
`area, meaning electric machines, power electronics,
`signal processing, and total signal processing
`(technical interruption.)
` (Discussion held off the record.)
` THE WITNESS: Hello?
` MR. SPROUL: Sounds good. Can you hear?
` THE COURT REPORTER: Proceed.
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. Can you hear me, Dr. Toliyat?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. Okay. So how long have you been a
`professor at Texas A&M?
` A. I have joined Texas A&M in 1994, so it's
`about 28 years.
` Q. Prior to that, where were you?
` A. Before that I was at professor in Iran,
`in my hometown, Mashhad.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`8
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 9
` Q. What institution did you -- or were you
`a professor at in Iran?
` A. It was Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
`I was there for two and a half years after I
`graduated from University of Wisconsin, Madison.
` Q. And you got -- what degree did you get
`at the University of Wisconsin?
` A. I got my Ph.D. in electrical and
`computer engineering.
` Q. And you -- where were you prior to
`University of Wisconsin?
` A. I was at West Virginia University. I
`did my master's degree over there.
` Q. And prior to West Virginia, what degree
`did you achieve?
` A. I got my bachelor of science degree from
`Sharif University of Technology, Iran.
` Q. Do you consider yourself an expert in
`any particular field?
` A. Yes, I do. I consider myself an expert
`in power electronics, electronics, electric
`machines, control, signal processing, and DSPs.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`9
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 10
`That's what I teach also. I have a book, in fact.
` Q. And your book is -- it relates to DSP
`processing?
` A. It does relate to DSP. Basically, I
`wrote this book with the help of Texas Instrument.
`It's out of print, of course. It's the only book,
`so to speak. And we offer courses and lab. It's
`basically a lab course, and then students learn to
`program DSPs for doing motor control, power
`electronics, power converters, things of that
`nature.
` Q. When you say "power electronics," what
`do you mean by that?
` A. Power electronics is -- it's enabling
`technology. It's where you sit almost in any
`device. It is considered to be -- and we are moving
`toward the force revolution in technology, which is
`electric vehicles and chargers and all that. These
`are all done by integration of magnetics,
`electronics and switching devices, circuits, and so
`on, so forth.
` So my specialty -- and I do teach
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`10
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 11
`courses in power electronics, of course, among my
`other courses, that deals with these various type of
`converters. Basically, in a nutshell, processing
`powers versus processing informations. That's if
`you like.
` Q. Throughout your career, have you focused
`on any particular application of power electronics
`over others?
` A. Yes. We have -- in fact, I have a very
`extensive lab probably -- if I'm not exaggerating,
`probably one of the best in North America. And we
`cover almost any -- anything related, any component,
`any device that you might see as working in
`aerospace, downhole oil industry, wind turbine,
`electric cars, hybrid cars.
` It is -- as I said, it's an enabling
`technology. We have a hardware lab. And so over
`the years, of course, because of the interest
`provided by -- from the industry, we move to
`various -- various product or technology. And for
`that matter, of course, we are doing a lot of work
`different areas.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`11
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 12
` Q. Would you say that your application of
`your research into power electronics focuses
`primarily on industrial applications?
` A. Depends on what you mean by
`"industrial." We do -- have done work for consumer
`electronics, appliances, national companies over the
`years. Yes, of course, we have done work for the
`various industries. We have done work for the
`federal government, aerospace industry, we are
`doing, in fact. And that -- so in general, I do not
`know -- I can't tell you what industry we haven't
`worked for, so to speak. And part of it because
`what we do is needed almost by any -- anyone who
`does -- who has to process power somehow.
` Q. Do the constraints and design
`considerations change from industrial applications
`to, for instance, consumer electronic product
`applications?
` A. Yes. You know, every industry has its
`own requirement and constraint. And, you know, for
`example, aerospace has certain requirements.
`Probably cost is not that important. Weight or
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`12
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 13
`reliability. Extreme temperature is important
`because of the, you know, when airplane, as they
`take off and landing, you have severe wear use of
`temperature. That's what we're dealing right now as
`we speak.
` And some consumer electronics are driven
`by extreme cost so cost is extremely important. Has
`to be low cost. So again, some industry like oil
`industry, they're cost-sensitive, but they're also,
`their environment is very hostile and very
`challenging. And we are operating in, you know --
`in -- you know, in deep seas or in west Texas, let's
`say, at 15, 20,000 feet underground. High
`temperature, you know, dirty environment, so to
`speak.
` So you're right, I mean, it is -- things
`are -- depends on the application and industry we
`have to look at various things or constraints.
` Q. You said you've done work for consumer
`electronic product companies. Could you -- could
`you name either the consumer electronic products
`you've worked on as part of your work with your
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`13
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 14
`
`power electronics lab?
` A. Yes, we have done work. If I recall, we
`worked for Whirlpool at one point of time on their
`washing machines. The new generation of their
`washing machines, high-end. We work with LG
`electronics on their air conditionings, variable
`speed-drive air conditionings. These are high-end
`air conditioning system. We work with Samsung
`electronics at one point of time with their advanced
`technology on -- if I recall correctly, it was on
`permanent magnets used in loaders. In fact, we did
`a few things -- oh, and the power converters also at
`one point of time.
` That's what I recall. It should be in
`my CV too, probably somewhere.
` Q. The work for Samsung that you did on
`permanent magnets and converters and motors, what
`sort of motors were those for?
` A. These are for traction for -- at one
`point of time, Samsung was looking into electric
`cars or hybrid cars, so we had people -- we work
`with them. In fact, you know, I graduate a lot of
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`14
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 15
`Ph.D. students over the years, so my Ph.D. students
`are almost everywhere in the companies, in Samsung,
`Capels (phonetic) GE, all over -- everywhere almost.
`Lucid, Tesla. And that's mainly because of the area
`that we are working on is -- you might say it's a
`core area in electrical engineering, power
`processing.
` Now that power could be for a little
`microchip on a PCB board or it could be a power for
`a submarine. We have work even on the submarine.
`Or aircraft.
` Q. You've testified as an expert in a
`number of cases over the years; is that right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And I'm -- I'll summarize for you, and
`you can tell me if I'm missing anything. You've
`testified as an expert in a case relating to wind
`turbine generators; is that right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Permanent magnet motors?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Or maybe I should say that differently.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`15
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 16
`
`Permanent magnets for motors?
` A. Permanent magnet motors for, I guess,
`for auto industry.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Yeah.
` Q. And drive train for hybrid electric
`vehicles?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. Motor drive associated with the sun
`room?
` A. Yes, the electronics, yes.
` Q. Pumps, designing an ESP?
` A. Yes. Those are for downhole
`applications. Like fuel pumps and has electronics
`and motors and communications.
` Q. And you've done consulting work as well
`for companies such as Baker Hughes relating to motor
`and controller pumps?
` A. That's correct, downhole, yes.
` Q. You've also consulted on the development
`of a generator for a locomotive or train?
` A. That's right. That's my -- that goes
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`16
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 17
`back 30 years ago when General Motors, EMD, you
`know, the new generation of locomotives were coming
`up, we work on their drives and motors.
` Q. And that was a diesel generator for a
`train?
` A. Yes.
` Q. The work you did with General Motors?
` A. Yes, diesel. All the locomotives are
`diesel, but the diesel generator generates power,
`and that power being processed in halt time or still
`would go to the different axle, and on each axle,
`whether it's a three-axle or two-axle, there are DC
`motor or brush DC, that's with the old technology
`that -- you know, that was bulk of the industry.
` General Motors decided to move into a
`similar technology which now Tesla is using on their
`car, Model S, in fact, induction. We back then
`develop, work on that, developing the induction
`motor for traction and the controller and the
`generator how to process the power from the --
`coming from the diesel generator.
` Q. So those diesel generator motor --
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`17
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`diesel generator, excuse me, were on a train,
`actually powers the train ultimately through
`electrical power; is that right?
` A. That's correct. The diesel generate --
`these are called "series hybrid." So the diesel
`runs a generator. Generator produces electric
`power. That electric power through a power
`converter gets processed, sent to every (technical
`interruption) which in old time, there were DC
`machines, DC brush. Now it's induction.
` Q. Are there any other consumer electronic
`products that you've worked on over the years or
`been involved with in any litigation?
` A. Within litigation. I am involved with
`some -- with some power supplies for various
`applications, meaning that on a -- in general, on
`a -- let's say as an example, if you take a laptop
`computer or a desktop, you have a PCB, you have a
`motherboard. That motherboard has to get power to
`where there is chips on that. So there is power
`supply that -- it's called "power management."
` So there is a case that I'm sort of
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`18
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 19
`involve as the consultant on the -- how to process
`power. And there are patents, of course, at issue.
`And that I recall. I mean, I have to look at my CV
`to make sure that I'm spelling everything out.
` Q. Besides that product you just mentioned
`relating to power conversions or computers, is there
`any other consumer electronics that you've worked on
`over the years?
` A. We have done some work on power
`supplies, various find. We are doing -- I have a
`Ph.D. student and he's working on power supplies,
`which are basically used in -- almost in every --
`you might say any electronics or any electrical
`device nowadays. We have our own topology and we
`have our own patents and we are developing our own
`technology on that.
` I cannot recall. There might be some
`others.
` Q. Have you done any work, research into,
`provided testimony related to earbuds or headsets?
` A. I do not recall, no.
` Q. Do you -- strike that.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`19
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 20
` Your primary job currently is as a
`professor at Texas A&M; is that correct?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. You also provide litigation consulting?
` A. Once in a while, yes.
` Q. And do you provide any other consulting
`or do you have any other job in addition to your job
`as professor and the litigation consulting that you
`do?
` A. No, not really. Most of my time is, as
`you probably seen my CV, I'm very active as a
`professor, so I write a lot of proposal and papers.
`So very busy. And once in a while, I do consulting,
`not every consulting. And once in a while, I do
`litigation, patent mainly. Not very often.
`Probably once every two years or so, whatever.
` Q. Who approached you for this case?
` A. I think Mr. Edmonds, if I recall. No,
`no, no, no. No, it was -- it was through
`Rubin Anders, if I recall correctly.
` Q. Approximately when were you contacted to
`be engaged in this matter?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`20
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 21
` A. I would say probably -- it was last
`year, of course. Maybe -- I'm just going from top
`of my head. Probably October something, maybe.
`October, November. Or maybe -- yeah. You know how
`these things are. You know, they send you an e-mail
`and then they ask you for this -- companies, they
`ask you for your résumé or interest. And then very
`vague -- and then anyhow. So you -- and then you
`send something back, and then after -- so initial
`things, e-mail, I do not know when it was, but I
`guess probably when things got really moving
`probably was November -- October, November time
`frame. October, November.
` Q. Are you aware that we had engaged a
`separate expert prior to you in this matter?
` A. I understand that, yes. I've seen
`that -- I have seen a report, if I recall correctly,
`yeah.
` Q. And do you know who that was?
` A. I want to say something like Horenstein,
`Horenstein or something. Or maybe . . .
` Q. What about Robert Stillman --
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`21
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 22
`
`Stillerman?
` A. Roberts, yeah.
` Q. Did you review any of the work done or
`the analysis provided by Dr. Stillerman?
` A. I do not recall. I might have glanced
`at it, but I don't recall.
` Q. Did you rely on any of the analysis
`provided by Dr. Stillerman in providing your
`opinions in this case?
` A. I don't recall. Whatever I relied on,
`which are, you know, a number of references, I
`listed in my declaration.
` Q. For the record, when I refer to "this
`case," I'm going to use that generally to refer to
`the four IPRs, IPR2021-00471, 472, 473, 470. I will
`break those into two groups eventually, and I will
`ask you separate questions about your opinions in
`the 470 matter relating to the 10,259,020 Patent,
`and a separate set of questions relating to the
`other three declarations, which primarily overlap
`and are very similar, relating to the '021, '077 and
`'320 Patents. Is that fair?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`22
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 23
`
` A. Yes, that's fair.
` Q. If you're ever unclear about what I'm
`talking about, please let me know.
` A. Sure.
` Q. And you've been deposed before; isn't
`that right?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. How many times approximately?
` A. I would say several times. Maybe in the
`order of plus-minus ten maybe, eight, ten, whatever.
` Q. And you know the ground rules generally?
` A. Sort of, yes. I mean, you might as well
`remind me if I missing something.
` Q. If you don't understand any question,
`please let me know. Otherwise, I will assume that
`you understand the question; is that fair?
` A. That's fair.
` Q. It's a little late now, but we should
`both endeavor not to speak over one another for the
`benefit of the record and madam court reporter; is
`that fair?
` A. Yes, sir.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`23
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 24
`
` Q. Those are the big ones, so . . .
` A. Okay.
` Q. Going back to Dr. Stillerman, did you
`ever talk to him?
` A. No, I personally do not know him.
` Q. Do you know why you were engaged and
`Dr. Stillerman was no longer used?
` A. No, I do not know.
` Q. What about Dr. Horenstein?
` A. No, I don't know him.
` Q. Did you ever talk to him as part of your
`development of your opinions in this case?
` A. No, I did not.
` Q. Did you ever read or consult or rely on
`any of his work that he put together or his
`analysis?
` A. I do not recall. I guess I mentioned
`something in my report, but it's quite been a while,
`so . . .
` Q. Are you aware whether your opinions are
`the same as or diverge from Dr. Stillerman's
`opinions?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`24
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 25
` A. I don't think it's different per se. I
`look at different -- or focus on, for example, in
`case of '320, I look at the wireless power transfer.
`Things of that nature.
` Q. And where you -- strike that.
` Your testimony is that you don't believe
`your opinion differs from Dr. Stillerman?
` MR. FAHMI: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: I guess depends on what
` specific topic you talk about. If you be more
` clear, then I can answer, I guess, better.
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. Let me ask you this: Do you know
`whether your opinions differ in any way from those
`provided by Dr. Stillerman?
` A. Again, I'm not sure which opinion of him
`you are pointing to. But in general, I don't recall
`one way or the other.
` Q. Is it your testimony that you did not
`review any of Dr. Stillerman's work in developing
`your own opinions?
` A. As I said, I look at them, but long ago,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`25
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 26
`I glance at them. But in forming my opinion, I
`reviewed the patent, of course, the prior arts. And
`whatever I reviewed as exhibits or whatever
`reference, I put them in my declarations.
` Q. I note that throughout your four
`declarations in these four separate matters, you do
`not mention or list Dr. Stillerman at all?
` A. Yeah, okay. That's why I didn't rely.
` Q. Is there a reason you don't mention or
`reference Dr. Stillerman in your declarations?
` A. No, not really, not that I can think of
`anything. I was told to look at the -- with
`reviewing the four patents and then the prior arts,
`and then prepared the four declarations, which, of
`course, three of them, as you mentioned, are almost
`similar and then one different.
` Q. I'd like to focus on the declaration you
`submitted in the 473 matter relating to the
`'320 Patent. And I don't believe that I'm going to
`get into questions that relate to any differences
`between those declarations for the patents and
`thereto.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`26
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 27
`
` A. Okay.
` Q. If you are aware of a difference, please
`let me know. But I'm not, at this time, intending
`to inquire about issues that might differ between
`those declarations.
` If I could direct you to -- for the
`record, you said you had a hard copy of your
`declarations?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. So if you could pull out your
`declaration in the 473 case related to the
`'320 Patent.
` A. '320, okay. Yes, I'm there.
` Q. And if I could direct you to --
` MR. SPROUL: I should note also that
` this is GUI Exhibit 2022 in the 473.
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. If I could direct you to Paragraph 16
`through 19.
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you list here in Paragraph 16
`through 19 materials you considered in putting
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`27
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 28
`
`together your declaration and developing your
`opinions?
` A. Uh-huh, that's correct.
` Q. In particular in Paragraph 16, you say
`that you considered GUI Exhibit 2003 through GUI
`Exhibit 2017.
` A. Yes.
` Q. And did these exhibits, GUI Exhibit 2003
`through 2017, form the basis for your opinions in
`this case?
` A. Well, as I said in here, I have reviewed
`this. So these, plus a lot of other references,
`that's how I -- and of course, the patent and the
`references clearly discuss that I have formed my
`opinion -- or they have formed my opinion.
` Q. You're familiar with the concept of a
`person of ordinary skill in the art?
` A. That's correct.
` Q. And you understand that a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would be deemed to have
`knowledge of the contents of, for instance, GUI
`Exhibits 2003 through 2017?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`28
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 29
`
` MR. FAHMI: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: I define what a POSITA, or
` person of ordinary skill in the art, is. And
` he or she would have bachelor degree in
` electrical or mechanical, and then -- and
` then -- am I looking at the wrong exhibit
` because this says 021?
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. Yeah, I'm sorry. What's been put here
`on the screen is --
` A. I'm looking at 320.
` Q. It has the correct exhibit number, it's
`for the wrong case, so . . .
` THE EXHIBIT TECHNICIAN: I apologize. I
` was trying to find it to bring it up. I can
` skip it, Mr. Sproul. I just want to identify
` it for the record.
` MR. SPROUL: Yeah, it's for the --
` Exhibit 2022 in the 473 case related to the
` '320 Patent, 10,589,320. So I believe the one
` you had up there was for the '021 Patent,
` which is the 471 case -- the numbers.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
`
`202-232-0646
`
`29
`
`

`

`2/24/2022
`
`Apple, Inc. v. GUI Global Products, Ltd.
`
`Hamid Toliyat, Ph.D.
`
`Page 30
` THE EXHIBIT TECHNICIAN: No worries.
`BY MR. SPROUL:
` Q. Had you finished answering my question,
`Dr. Toliyat?
` A. No. I guess, I -- okay, I was saying --
` Q. I can restate it if you would like.
` A. Perfect. Thank you.
` Q. Is it your understanding that one of
`ordinary skill would be deemed to be knowledgeable
`of the contents of GUI Exhibits 2003 through 2017?
` A. One thing which I don't remember right
`now is the Exhibit 2001 to 2003. I guess they are
`the -- is it the Gundlach and Lee and Bohbot
`exhibits or not?
` And the reason that I do not -- okay, I
`probably -- I printed -- I should say this. I have
`printed -- the exhibit that I have printed are
`Apple -- they have Apple number. And that's true
`for everything. It doesn't have the GUI number. So
`I do not -- I probably have a difficulty to
`correlate exhibit numbers from Apple to --
` Q. The Apple

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket