throbber
CES: Hands On with the Kleer Wireless Earbuds | Gadget Lab | WIRED
`
`GEAR SCIENCE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS SECURITY DESIGN OPINION MAGAZINE VIDEO
`
`GADGET LAB
`
`CES 2007
`
`FOLLOW WIRED
`
`CES: Hands On with the Kleer Wireless
`Earbuds
`
`BY ROB BESCHIZZA 01.10.07 | 4:41 PM | PERMALINK
`
`0
`
`I’ve been testing Bluetooth headsets for a while, because I can’t
`stand the way headphone cords tangle and snag. But the ones
`I’ve tested have shared one big drawback: they get
`uncomfortable pretty quickly due to the weight of the batteries
`hanging from your ears. I’ve heard of a couple of models that
`sound a bit lighter, but the headphones would still have to be connected, ruling out an
`independent earbud design.
`
`Kleer, having operated in stealth mode for the past four years, showed of their new wireless
`earbuds that forgo Bluetooth for a 2.4 GHz digital RF signal that can be sent to each earbud
`wirelessly, obviating the need for a wire connecting the two. And these suckers are small –
`not much larger than traditional wired earbuds. Still, neither of those things would matter
`if they didn’t sound good. I tried Kleer’s reference earbuds on today at Kleer’s booth, and
`am happy to report that they sound excellent. These are the wireless earbuds I have been
`waiting for, and they’re only going to get better when more polished designs start showing
`up (I think they could use a rubber seal for sound isolation and remaining lodged in joggers’
`ears).
`
`There are a number of keys to Kleer’s ability to provide such an advanced wireless earbud.
`With the idea of keeping battery weight to a minimum, they designed the earbuds to use as
`little power as possible, and it appears they succeeded. The model I tried is rated for fve
`hours, which is more than enough considering that they can’t be used on planes anyway
`(Kleer is also working on a 10 hour model that’s slightly bigger, which Thomson/RCA will
`include with its Jet Stream player later this year).
`
`The transmitter has 16 channels to switch between, which helps avoid interference. My
`main worry with these earbuds was that they use the same frequency as Wi-Fi and would
`encounter interference, but these things sounded great even on the wireless-intensive CES
`show foor (if they work there, they’ll work anywhere). The transmitter uses lossless
`compression (16-bit, 44.1KHz), the data rate maxes out at 2.37 MB/sec, and multiple
`listeners can listen to the same transmitter at the same time. When I paused the iPod Nano
`the transmitter was connected to, I determined that the latency was under a quarter of a
`second or so, eliminating another potential problem with these earbuds.
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/20140721204820/http://www.wired.com/2007/01/ces_hands_on_wi/[2/3/2021 10:00:40 AM]
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1067
`
`

`

`CES: Hands On with the Kleer Wireless Earbuds | Gadget Lab | WIRED
`
`At a CES that many have found to be underwhelming from an innovation perspective, the
`Kleer earbuds gave me the only "aha!" moment I’ve had here yet. Kudos to Kleer, and also
`to Thomson/RCA for realizing the value of including them with the Jet Stream.
`
`-Eliot Van Buskirk
`
`0
`
`Tags: CES 2007
`Discuss |
`Permalink
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/20140721204820/http://www.wired.com/2007/01/ces_hands_on_wi/[2/3/2021 10:00:40 AM]
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket