1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:19-cv-05673-YGR Document 219 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`Ching-Lee Fukuda (Pro Hac Vice)
`Sharon Lee (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 839-5300
`Facsimile: (212) 839-5599
`Email: clfukuda@sidley.com
`Email: sharon.lee@sidley.com
`
`Kelley A. Conaty (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: (214) 981-3300
`Facsimile: (214) 981-3400
`Email: kconaty@sidley.com
`
`Brooke S. Zarouri (SBN 318372)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 West Fifth Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`Phone: (213) 896-6633
`Fax: (213) 896-6600
`Email: bzarouri@sidley.com
`
`Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
`Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, California 94104-1715
`Telephone:
`(415) 772-1200
`Facsimile:
`(415) 772-7400
`Email: irene.yang@sidley.com
`Email: vwinters@sidley.com
`
`David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`One South Dearborn
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Telephone: (312) 853-7359
`Facsimile: (312) 853-7036
`Email: dpritikin@sidley.com
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan (Pro Hac Vice)
`Thomas A. Broughan III (Pro Hac Vice)
`Hamilton C. Simpson (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 736-8000
`Facsimile: (202) 736-8711
`Email: jkushan@sidley.com
`Email: tbroughan@sidley.com
`Email: hsimpson@sidley.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant and Counter Claimant
`Apple Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`Case No.: 19-cv-05673-YGR
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER TO STAY PENDING
`RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S
`REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
`MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF
`STANDING MOTION [ECF 208] AND
`INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`OMNI MEDSCI, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff and Counter
`Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC,
`
`
`Defendant and Counter
`Claimant.
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S STANDING
`MOTION [ECF 208] AND INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS – CASE NO. 19-CV-05673-YGR
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1062, p. Cover
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05673-YGR Document 219 Filed 11/20/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiff Omni MedSci Inc. (“Omni”) and Defendant Apple
`Inc. (“Apple”), stipulate and agree as follows:
`
`WHEREAS Omni filed its Complaint against Apple in the U.S. District Court for the
`Eastern District of Texas (“Texas Court”) on October 15, 2018 alleging infringement of U.S.
`Patent Nos. 10,098,546 (the “’546 patent”), 9,861,286 (the “’286 patent”), and 9,885,698 (the
`“’698 patent”). (Dkt. 1.) On January 28, 2019, Omni filed an Amended Complaint adding
`allegations of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,188,299 (the “’299 patent”). (Dkt. 42.) On
`February 26, 2019, Omni filed a Second Amended Complaint adding allegations of infringement
`of U.S. Patent No. 10,213,113 (the “’113 patent”).
`WHEREAS on June 19, 2019, the parties stipulated to a dismissal with prejudice of all of
`Omni’s claims and without prejudice of all of Apple’s claims pertaining to the ’698 patent. (Dkt.
`119.) The Texas Court granted the parties’ stipulation. (Dkt. 123.)
`
`WHEREAS Omni asserts claims 16 and 19 of the ’286 patent, claims 1, 5, 8, 9, 11-13, 15,
`16, and 18 of the ’546 patent, claims 7 and 10-14 of the ’299 patent, and claims 1-6 and 22-25 of
`the ’113 patent.
`WHEREAS on April 10, 2019, Apple filed a request for inter partes review of all asserted
`claims of the ’286 patent, along with requests for inter partes reviews of patents that Omni is
`asserting against Apple in Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05924-YGR and are
`related to the ’546, ’299, and ’113 patents.
`
`WHEREAS on August 14, 2019, the Texas Court entered a Claim Construction
`Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Dkt. 152.) In that Memorandum, the Court determined that
`claims 2, 3, 4, and 23 of the ’113 patent are indefinite. (Dkt. 152.) Because other asserted claims
`of the ’113 patent depend on claims 2, 3, 4 or 23, they are also rendered indefinite by the Court’s
`Order. Accordingly, asserted claims 2-6 and 23-25 of the ’113 patent have been held indefinite.
`
`WHEREAS on August 14, 2019, the Texas Court granted Apple’s motion to transfer to the
`Northern District of California (Dkt. 154), and denied Apple’s motion to dismiss for lack of
`standing. (Dkt. 151). On August 16, 2019, the Texas Court granted the parties’ joint motion to
`stay certain deadlines pending transfer to the Northern District of California. (Dkt. 157.)
`1
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S STANDING
`MOTION [ECF 208] AND INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS – CASE NO. 19-CV-05673-YGR
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1062, p. 1
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05673-YGR Document 219 Filed 11/20/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`WHEREAS on September 11, 2019, the transferred case was received in the Northern
`
`District of California (Dkt. 167). The case was assigned to this Court on September 25, 2019.
`(Dkt. 173). On October 29, 2019, this Court granted Apple’s motion to relate this case with co-
`pending case, Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05924-YGR. (Dkts. 315, 316.) A
`case management conference is scheduled for December 16, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. 174.)
`
`WHEREAS between October 17, 2019 and November 6, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal
`Board (“PTAB”) issued decisions to institute inter partes review on the ’286 patent and patents
`that Omni is asserting against Apple in Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05924-
`YGR that are related to the ’546, ’299, and ’113 patents. See Exhibits 1-3. On October 17, 2019,
`Apple filed a request for inter partes review of all asserted claims of the ’546 patent. Apple
`intends to file requests for inter partes review of all asserted claims of the’299 and ’113 patents.
`
`WHEREAS on November 8, 2019, Apple filed a Civil Local Rule 7-9 Request for Leave to
`File Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 208) and a Motion to
`Stay Pending Resolution of Apple’s Standing Motion (ECF 208) (Dkt. 209).
`
`NOW THEREFORE, in light of the PTAB’s decisions to institute inter partes review on all
`asserted claims of the ’286 patent and patents related to the other asserted patents, and Apple’s
`intention to file requests for inter partes review on the remaining asserted patents, the parties by
`and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that:
`a) This case should be stayed in its entirety except for the Court’s consideration of
`Apple’s pending Request for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Subject-
`Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 208) and, if the Court grants Apple’s Request for Leave, except for
`proceedings related to that Request.
`b) If the Court does not dismiss this case based on subject-matter jurisdiction, the case
`should continue to be stayed until final resolution, including appeals, of all inter partes review
`proceedings in which the asserted patents are at issue.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`
`2
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S STANDING
`MOTION [ECF 208] AND INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS – CASE NO. 19-CV-05673-YGR
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1062, p. 2
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05673-YGR Document 219 Filed 11/20/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`Dated: November 19, 2019
`
`By: /s/ Thomas A Lewry
`Thomas A. Lewry (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`tlewry@brookskushman.com
`John S. LeRoy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jleroy@brookskushman.com
`Christopher C. Smith, State Bar No. 238882
`csmith@brookskushman.com
`John M. Halan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Jhalan@brookskushman.com
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`1000 Town Center, Twenty-Second Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`Tel. (248) 358-4400; Fax (248) 358-3351
`
`William E. Thomson, Jr., State Bar No. 47195
`wthomson@brookskushman.com
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 2080
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-5726
`Tel. (213) 622-3003; Fax (213) 622-3053
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
`Omni MedSci, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`By: /s/ Irene Yang
`Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
`Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 California Street, Suite 2000
`San Francisco, California 94104-1715
`Telephone:
`(415) 772-1200
`Facsimile:
`(415) 772-7400
`Email: irene.yang@sidley.com
`Email: vwinters@sidley.com
`
`David T. Pritikin (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`One South Dearborn
`Chicago, IL 60603
`Telephone: (312) 853-7359
`Facsimile: (312) 853-7036
`Email: dpritikin@sidley.com
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan (Pro Hac Vice)
`Thomas A. Broughan III (Pro Hac Vice)
`Hamilton C. Simpson (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 736-8000
`Facsimile: (202) 736-8711
`Email: jkushan@sidley.com
`Email: tbroughan@sidley.com
`Email: hsimpson@sidley.com
`
`Ching-Lee Fukuda (Pro Hac Vice)
`Sharon Lee (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 839-5300
`Facsimile: (212) 839-5599
`Email: clfukuda@sidley.com
`Email: sharon.lee@sidley.com
`
`Kelley A. Conaty (Pro Hac Vice)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`3
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S STANDING
`MOTION [ECF 208] AND INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS – CASE NO. 19-CV-05673-YGR
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1062, p. 3
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05673-YGR Document 219 Filed 11/20/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Telephone: (214) 981-3300
`Facsimile: (214) 981-3400
`Email: kconaty@sidley.com
`Brooke S. Zarouri (SBN 318372)
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`555 West Fifth Street
`Los Angeles, CA 90013
`Phone: (213) 896-6633/Fax: (213) 896-6600
`Email: bzarouri@sidley.com
`Attorneys for Defendant and Counter
`Claimant Apple Inc.
`
`CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a conformed
`
`signature (/s/). I have on file records to support this concurrence for production for the Court if so
`
`ordered.
`
`Dated: November 19, 2019
`
`/s/ Irene Yang
`Irene Yang
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
`
`Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05673-YGR, is hereby STAYED until
`
`resolution of Apple’s Request for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Subject-
`
`Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 208) and, if the Court grants Apple’s Request for Leave, the Court’s
`
`decision on the Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Subject-Matter Jurisdiction.
`
`If this case is not dismissed based on subject-matter jurisdiction, this case will continue to
`
`be STAYED until final resolution of all of the inter partes review proceedings in which the
`
`asserted patents are at issue.
`
`Dated:
`
`November 20, 2019
`
`
`By:
`
`
`Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`United States District Court Judge
`
`4
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPLE INC.’S STANDING
`MOTION [ECF 208] AND INTER PARTES REVIEW PETITIONS – CASE NO. 19-CV-05673-YGR
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1062, p. 4
`
`