throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Kannappan, Deepa
`Maebius, Steve; Trials
`zLiquidiaIPR; UT-793; Houston, Michael R.; Doug Carsten; Milch, Erik
`RE: IPR2021-00406 || Request for Authorization to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information under 37
`CFR 42.123(b)
`Thursday, May 12, 2022 2:18:14 PM
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`
`If the Board were inclined to hear Patent Owner’s request below, Petitioner requests, in parallel,
`authorization to file a motion to submit supplemental information under 37 CFR 42.123(b) to
`provide to the Board a copy of:
`1. Testimony of Patent Owner’s experts Dr. Clark and Dr. Smyth from the district court trial in D.
`Del, Civ. A. No. 1:20-cv-00755, which is inconsistent with Patent Owner’s non-obviousness
`positions and Patent Owner’s Response at pp. 38-40 in relation to claims 4, 6 and 7; and
`2. Patent Owner’s forthcoming responsive brief, due June 1, 2022, to Petitioner’s Post-Trial
`Opening Brief Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,593,066 and 10,716,793, which
`Petitioner anticipates to be the same.
`
`Patent Owner opposes this request. Petitioner can address this issue on the call requested below by
`Patent Owner, or at the oral argument if preferable.
`
`Sincerely,
`Deepa Kannappan
`Admitted pro hac vice
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`Deepa Kannappan
`Cooley LLP
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
`+1 650 843 5673 office
`+1 650 849 7400 fax
`dkannappan@cooley.com
`
`www.cooley.com/dkannappan
`www.cooley.com/litigation
`https://www.cooley.com/landing/racial-justice
`
`Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn
`
`Cooley is one of Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For
`
`Cooley GO > Start and build your business
`
`IPR2021-00406
`Ex. 3002
`
`

`

`From: Maebius, Steve <SMaebius@foley.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 7:06 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: zLiquidiaIPR <zLiquidiaIPR@cooley.com>; UT-793 <UT-793@foley.com>; Houston, Michael R.
`<MHouston@foley.com>; Doug Carsten <dcarsten@mwe.com>; Milch, Erik <emilch@cooley.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2021-00406 || Request for Authorization to File Motion to Submit Supplemental
`Information under 37 CFR 42.123(b)
`Importance: High
`
`[External]
`
`Dear Board,
`
`Patent Owner requests authorization to file a motion to submit supplemental
`information under 37 CFR 42.123(b) to provide to the Board a copy of Petitioner’s
`Post-Trial Opening Brief Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,593,066 and
`10,716,793, D. Del Civ. A. No. 1:20-cv-00755, Dkt Entry 406, filed on May 4, 2022,
`which is inconsistent with Petitioner’s slide 12, served on May 9th and which supports
`the Patent Owner’s Response at pp. 38-40 in relation to claims 4, 6 and 7. Petitioner
`opposes this request.
`
`If the Board wishes to schedule a call with the parties ahead of the oral argument to
`discuss this request, the parties are available between 1 and 5 pm EST on May 12th.
`Alternatively, Patent Owner can address the issue at the oral argument if preferable.
`
`Sincerely,
`Steve Maebius
`Reg. No. 35,264
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Stephen B. Maebius
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3000 K St., NW
`Washington, DC 20007
`Office 202.672.5569
`Cell 202.352.0676
`
`View My Bio
`Visit Foley.com
`
`
`The information contained in this message, including but not limited to any attachments, may be
`confidential or protected by the attorney-client or work-product privileges. It is not intended for
`transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in error,
`please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase
`or destroy the message and any attachments or copies. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or
`reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited, and may be
`unlawful. Unintended transmission does not constitute waiver of the attorney-client privilege or any
`
`

`

`other privilege. Legal advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley
`& Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this
`message, and may not be relied upon by any other party. Unless expressly stated otherwise, nothing
`contained in this message should be construed as a digital or electronic signature, nor is it intended
`to reflect an intention to make an agreement by electronic means.
`
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
`unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
`email and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message
`is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's Email System Administrator.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket