throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 198
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS
`CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 20-755 (RGA)
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`31
`This __ day of ________, 2020, the Court having conducted an initial Rule 16(b)
`July
`
`scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), and the parties having determined after
`
`discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation,
`
`or binding arbitration;
`
`IT IS ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the
`
`parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(l) on
`
`or before August 14, 2020.
`
`2.
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join other
`
`parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on or before June 4, 2021.
`
`3.
`
`Discovery.
`
`a.
`
`Discovery Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be initiated so that
`
`it will be completed on or before September 17, 2021.
`
`b.
`
`Document production. Document production shall be substantially
`
`complete by June 18, 2021.
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 199
`
`
`
`c.
`
`Requests for Admission. A maximum of 40 requests for admission are
`
`permitted for each side. These limitations do not apply to requests for admission directed to
`
`the authentication of documents under Federal Rule of Evidence 901 or the business record
`
`exception under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6), subject to objections to undue burden.
`
`d.
`
`Interrogatories. A maximum of 25 interrogatories, including contention
`
`interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
`
`e.
`
`Depositions.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery of Fact Witnesses.
`
`Each side is limited to a total of 100 hours of taking testimony by deposition upon oral
`
`examination. Individual depositions, including Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, are limited to seven (7)
`
`hours. For clarity, the hours limitations described in this paragraph do not apply to expert
`
`witnesses.
`
`ii.
`
`Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,
`
`director, managing agent, or 30(b)(6) designee) of a party filing a civil action in this district must
`
`ordinarily be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this
`
`district. Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court or by agreement of
`
`the parties. A defendant who becomes a cross-claimant or third-party plaintiff shall be
`
`considered as having filed an action in this Court for the purposes of this provision.
`
`iii.
`
`Remote Depositions. Should it become infeasible to conduct in-
`
`person depositions of a fact or expert witness due to safety, personal health, and/or public health
`
`concerns, (e.g., as resulting from a pandemic or other such emergency), the party offering the
`
`witness for deposition shall make
`
`the witness available for remote deposition via
`
`videoconference. The parties shall meet and confer 30 days in advance of, or as soon as possible
`
`2
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 200
`
`
`
`following notice of, any remote deposition to determine the procedures by which the deposition
`
`shall be conducted.
`
`f.
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders. Should
`
`counsel find they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute relating to a protective
`
`order, the parties involved in the discovery matter or protective order dispute shall contact the
`
`Court’s Case Manager to schedule an in-person conference/argument. Unless otherwise ordered,
`
`by no later than seven business days prior to the conference/argument, any party seeking relief
`
`shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its
`
`position on those issues. By no later than five business days prior to the conference/argument,
`
`any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining
`
`that party’s opposition. A party should include with its letter a proposed order with a detailed
`
`issue-by-issue ruling such that, should the Court agree with the party on a particular issue, the
`
`Court could sign the proposed order as to that issue, and the opposing party would be able to
`
`understand what it needs to do, and by when, to comply with the Court’s order. Any proposed
`
`order
`
`shall
`
`be
`
`e-mailed,
`
`in Word
`
`format,
`
`simultaneously with
`
`filing
`
`to
`
`rga_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`If a discovery-related motion is filed without leave of the Court, it will be denied without
`
`prejudice to the moving party’s right to bring the dispute to the Court through the discovery
`
`matters procedures set forth in this Order.
`
`g.
`
`Miscellaneous Discovery Matters.
`
`i.
`
`Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties or as set forth herein, the
`
`parties agree to follow the Court’s Default Standard. The parties agree to the timetable for initial
`
`patent disclosures as set forth in the chart attached as Exhibit A.
`
`3
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 201
`
`
`
`ii.
`
`The parties agree to modify the Default Standard such that:
`
`Paragraph 3 disclosures will be due on August 31, 2020; Paragraph 4(a) obligations will be due
`
`on August 31, 2020; Paragraph 4(b) obligations concerning the production of Defendant’s core
`
`technical documents will be due on September 11, 2020; Paragraph 4(c) obligations will be due
`
`on October 16, 2020; and Paragraph 4(d) obligations will be due on November 13, 2020.
`
`iii.
`
`The parties agree to reasonably cooperate to arrive at an agreed
`
`upon list of metadata fields, not to exceed the list of fields identified in Paragraph 5(e).
`
`iv.
`
`On March 30, 2020, Liquidia filed petitions to institute Inter
`
`Partes Review proceedings with respect to both U.S. Patent No. 9,593,066, and U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,604,901. Plaintiff does not yet have a comprehensive understanding of Defendant’s accused
`
`NDA product, and therefore cannot advise whether it expects to institute any further litigation
`
`within the next year. As Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent No. 10,716,793 issued on July 21, 2020,
`
`Defendant does not yet have a comprehensive understanding of Plaintiff’s claims regarding the
`
`ʼ793 patent, and therefore cannot advise whether it expects to file any further Inter Partes
`
`Review proceedings concerning the ʼ793 patent within the next year.
`
`v.
`
`Narrowing of the Asserted Claims and Prior Art References. The
`
`parties shall meet and confer regarding asserted claims and prior art narrowing, including limits
`
`on the number of Plaintiff’s asserted claims and Defendant’s asserted prior art references or
`
`combinations and any other relevant issue. The parties shall raise any unresolved issues with the
`
`Court pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 3(f), above, so as to be resolved sufficiently ahead
`
`of each deadline set forth below.
`
`vi.
`
`Within
`
`twenty-one days of
`
`the Court’s Order on claim
`
`construction, or if no claim construction is requested, on July 1, 2021, Plaintiff shall serve an
`
`4
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 202
`
`
`
`election of asserted claims, not to exceed a limit agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the
`
`Court.
`
`4.
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be
`
`necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the
`
`disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement
`
`on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court within ten days from the date of this
`
`Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, counsel
`
`must follow the provisions of Paragraph 3(f) above.
`
`Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the
`disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to
`preclude another court from finding that information may be
`relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
`party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to
`disclose another party's information designated as confidential
`pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion
`so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard
`on whether that information should be disclosed.
`
`5.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. When filing papers under seal, counsel shall deliver to
`
`the Clerk the required number of copies as directed in paragraph 6. A redacted version of any
`
`sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven days of the filing of the sealed
`
`document.
`
`6.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two courtesy copies of all
`
`briefs and one courtesy copy of any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e.,
`
`appendices, exhibits, declarations, affidavits etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed
`
`under seal.
`
`7.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On or before December 4, 2020, the
`
`parties shall exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction;
`
`5
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 203
`
`
`
`on or before December 18, 2020, the parties shall exchange their proposed claim construction of
`
`those term(s)/phrase(s). These documents will not be filed with the Court. Subsequent to
`
`exchanging those lists, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint Claim Construction
`
`Chart to be filed no later than January 8, 2021. The Joint Claim Construction Chart, in Word
`
`format shall be e-mailed simultaneously with filing to rga_civil@ded.uscourts.gov. The parties’
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of the claim(s)
`
`in issue, and should include each party’s proposed construction of the disputed claim language
`
`with citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed
`
`constructions. A copy of the patent(s) in issue as well as those portions of the intrinsic record
`
`relied upon shall be submitted with this Joint Claim Construction Chart. In this joint submission,
`
`the parties shall not provide argument.
`
`8.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing.1 Plaintiff shall serve, but not file, its opening brief,
`
`not to exceed 5,000 words, on February 5, 2021. Defendant shall serve, but not file, its
`
`answering brief, not to exceed 7,500 words, on March 5, 2021. Plaintiff shall serve, but not file,
`
`its reply brief, not to exceed 5,000 words, on April 2, 2021. Defendant shall serve, but not file
`
`its sur-reply brief, not to exceed 2,500 words, on April 23, 2021. No later than April 30, 2021,
`
`the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall copy and paste their
`
`unfiled briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term in sequential order, in
`
`substantially the form below.
`
`
`1 As each brief is written and provided to the opposing party, the individual responsible for
`verifying the word count will represent to the other party that it has so verified and by what
`means. These verifications should not be provided to the Court unless a dispute arises about
`them. Pictures, Figures copied from the patent, and other illustrations do not count against the
`word limit. Plaintiff should include with its opening brief one or more representative claims with
`the disputed terms italicized. Should Defendant want to add additional representative claims,
`Defendant may do so. The representative claims and the agreed-upon claim constructions do not
`count against the word limits.
`
`6
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 204
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
`
`I. Representative Claims
`
`II. Agreed-upon Constructions
`
`III. Disputed Constructions
`
`A. [TERM 1]
`
`1. Plaintiff's Opening Position
`
`2. Defendant's Answering Position
`
`3. Plaintiff's Reply Position
`
`4. Defendant's Sur-Reply Position
`
`B. [TERM 2]
`
`1. Plaintiff's Opening Position
`
`2. Defendant's Answering Position
`
`3. Plaintiff's Reply Position
`
`4. Defendant's Sur-Reply Position
`
`Etc. The parties need not include any general summaries of the law relating to claim
`
`construction. If there are any materials that would be submitted in an appendix, the parties shall
`
`submit them in a Joint Appendix.
`
`9.
`
`Hearing on Claim Construction. Beginning at 9:00 a.m. on May 24, 2021, the
`
`Court will hear argument on claim construction. Absent prior approval of the Court (which, if it
`
`is sought, must be done so by joint letter submission no later than the date on which answering
`
`claim construction briefs are due), the parties shall not present testimony at the argument, and the
`
`argument shall not exceed a total of three hours. When the Joint Claim Construction Brief is
`
`filed, the parties shall simultaneously file a motion requesting the above scheduled claim
`
`7
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 205
`
`
`
`construction hearing, state that the briefing is complete, and state how much total time the parties
`
`are requesting that the Court should allow for the argument.
`
`10.
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`a.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof on the
`
`subject matter, the initial Federal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before
`
`October 15, 2021. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence on the same
`
`matter identified by another party is due on or before November 12, 2021. Reply expert reports
`
`from the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before December 10, 2021. No other
`
`expert reports will be permitted without either the consent of all parties or leave of the Court. If
`
`any party believes that an expert report does not comply with the rules relating to timely
`
`disclosure or exceeds the scope of what is permitted in that expert report, the complaining party
`
`must notify the offending party within one week of the submission of the expert report. The
`
`parties are expected to promptly try to resolve any such disputes, and, when they cannot
`
`reasonably be resolved, use the Court's Discovery Dispute Procedure or the complaint will be
`
`waived.
`
`Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and
`
`times of their experts' availability for deposition. Depositions of experts shall be completed on or
`
`before January 14, 2022.
`
`b.
`
`Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to expert
`
`testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. ,
`
`509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made in the
`
`parties’ pre-trial submissions. The parties will meet and confer within 5 days of the close of
`
`expert discovery to address Daubert issues, if any, and proposed letter briefing schedule. The
`
`8
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 206
`
`
`
`Daubert request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each Daubert request
`
`may be supported by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be opposed by a
`
`maximum of three pages of argument, and the party making the Daubert request may add a
`
`maximum of one additional page in reply in support of its request.
`
`11.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions. No case dispositive motions shall be filed without
`
`leave of Court. The parties may file a request for leave of the Court to file any case dispositive
`
`motion(s) under Rule 56 no later than November 2, 2021.
`
`12.
`
`Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to
`
`the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
`
`required by Local Rule 7 .1.1.
`
`13.
`
`Pretrial Conference. On March 4, 2022, the Court will hold a Rule 16(e) final
`
`pretrial conference in Court with counsel beginning at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall file a joint
`
`proposed final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) no later than 5:00 p.m. on
`
`February 28, 2022. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the
`
`timeframes set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d) for the preparation of the proposed joint final pretrial
`
`order.
`
`14. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall be separately filed, with each motion
`
`containing all the argument described below in one filing for each motion. The parties will meet
`
`and confer within 5 days of the close of expert discovery to address in limine issues, if any, and
`
`proposed letter briefing schedule. Any supporting documents in connection with a motion in
`
`limine shall be filed in one filing separate from the motion in limine. Each party shall be limited
`
`to three in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine request and
`
`any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be supported
`
`9
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 207
`
`by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be opposed by a maximum of three pages of
`
`argument, and the party making the in limine request may add a maximum of one additional page
`
`in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing an in limine
`
`request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three page submission (and, if
`
`the moving party, a single one page reply). No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine
`
`requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court.
`
`15.
`
`Trial. This matter is scheduled for a three-day bench trial with trial days from
`
`8:30 to 5:00, commencing on March 28, 2022, subject to the Court’s availability. The trial will
`
`be timed, as counsel will be allocated a total of ten and one half (10½) hours in which to present
`
`their respective cases.
`
`16.
`
`ADR Process. This matter is referred to a magistrate judge to explore the
`
`possibility of alternative dispute resolution. This matter is referred to a magistrate judge to
`
`handle all discovery disputes including any that arise in connection with expert reports.
`
`17.
`
`Electronic Service. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(E), the
`
`parties agree to accept service by electronic means.
`
`/s/ Richard G. Andrews
`_______________________________
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`10
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 10 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 208
`
`EVENT
`Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures
`Deadline for Plaintiff’s’’ identification
`of the accused product(s), patents-in-
`suit, and production of file history of
`each patent-in-suit pursuant to Delaware
`Default Standard for Discovery
`Paragraph 4(a)
`Deadline to submit Protective Order
`Deadline for initial disclosures pursuant
`to Delaware Default Standard for
`Discovery Paragraph 3
`Deadline for production of Defendant’s
`core technical documents pursuant to
`Delaware Default Standard for
`Discovery Paragraph 4(b)
`Deadline for Plaintiff’s disclosure of
`asserted claims and initial infringement
`contentions pursuant to Delaware
`Default Standard for Discovery
`Paragraph 4(c)
`Deadline for Defendant’s initial
`invalidity contentions and production of
`invalidity references pursuant to
`Delaware Default Standard for
`Discovery Paragraph 4(d)
`Deadline to simultaneously exchange a
`list of claim term(s)/phrase(s) for
`construction
`Deadline to simultaneously exchange
`proposed constructions of identified
`term(s)/phrase(s)
`Deadline to submit Joint Claim
`Construction Chart
`Deadline to serve Plaintiff’s Opening
`Claim Construction Brief
`Deadline to serve Defendant’s
`Answering Claim Construction Brief
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`PROPOSED SCHEDULE (DISPUTES IDENTIFIED)
`August 14, 2020
`
`August 31, 2020
`
`Within 10 days of the date the Court enters this Order
`
`August 31, 2020
`
`September 11, 2020
`
`October 16, 2020
`
`November 13, 2020
`
`December 4, 2020
`
`December 18, 2020
`
`January 8, 2021
`
`February 5, 2021
`
`March 5, 2021
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 11 of 12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00755-RGA Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 12 of 12 PageID #: 209
`
`
`
`Deadline to serve Plaintiff’s Reply
`Claim Construction Brief
`Deadline to serve Defendant’s Sur-
`Reply Claim Construction Brief
`Deadline to file Joint Claim
`Construction Brief
`Substantial Completion of Document
`Production
`Claim Construction Hearing
`Plaintiff to serve Election of Asserted
`Claims, not to exceed a limit agreed
`upon by the parties or ordered by the
`Court
`Deadline for joinder of other parties and
`amendment of pleadings
`Deadline for completion of fact
`discovery
`Deadline for disclosure of expert
`testimony for the party who has the
`initial burden of proof on the subject
`matter
`Deadline for supplemental disclosure to
`contradict or rebut evidence on the same
`matter identified by another party
`(Responsive expert reports)
`Deadline for reply expert reports from
`the party with the initial burden of proof
`Deadline for parties to request leave of
`Court to file summary judgment
`motion(s) under Rule 56
`Deadline for completion of expert
`discovery
`Joint Proposed Final Pre-Trial Order
`Pretrial Conference
`Trial
`Expiration of 30-Month Stay
`
`
`April 2, 2021
`
`April 23, 2021
`
`April 30, 2021
`
`June 18, 2021
`
`May 24, 2021
`
`Within twenty-one (21) days of the Court’s order on
`claim construction, or if no claim construction is
`requested, on July 1, 2021
`
`June 4, 2021
`
`September 17, 2021
`
`October 15, 2021
`
`November 12, 2021
`
`December 10, 2021
`
`November 2, 2021
`
`January 14, 2022
`
`February 28, 2022
`March 4 2022
`March 28, 2022
`October 24, 2022
`
`2
`
`IPR2021-00406
`United Therapeutics EX2014
`Page 12 of 12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket