throbber
Aerosolised prostacyclin in adult
`respiratory distress syndrome
`
`We studied the effects of aerosolised prostacyclin (PGI2) in
`three patients with acute severe adult respiratory distress
`syndrome. 17-50 ng/kg per min, nebulised into the afferent
`limb of the ventilator circuit, decreased mean pulmonary artery
`pressure (SEM) from 40 3 (13 5) to 32-0 (3 8) mm Hg
`(pulmonary vascular resistance fell by 30%); systemic arterial
`pressure decreased slightly from 76 8 (2-2) to 74 5 (6 1)
`mm Hg. Concomitantly, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial
`pressure to the fraction of inspired oxygen increased from 120
`(19) to 173 (18), mainly due to redistribution of blood flow
`from shunt areas to regions of normal ventilation-perfusion. All
`effects were reversed on drug withdrawal.
`Lancet 1993; 342: 961-62
`
`See Commentary page 941
`
`Essential features of adult respiratory distress syndrome
`(ARDS) include pulmonary hypertension (its level being
`related to the severity of microvascular injury), high-
`permeability lung oedema, and ventilation (VA)-perfusion
`(Q) mismatch with a predominance of right-to-left
`shunting of venous blood. Infused vasodilatory
`prostanoids, such as prostacyclin (PG 12) and prostaglandin
`E, (PGE,), have decreased lung microvascular pressure and
`thereby reduced pulmonary fluid filtration and right heart
`afterload. 1,2 However, the lack of selectivity of infused
`prostanoids has meant that vasorelaxation occurs in both
`pulmonary and systemic vessels, and also in ventilated and
`non-ventilated lung regions. Results of investigations with
`inhaled nitric oxide in an experimental model of ARD S,3 in
`patients with severe ARDS,4 and in patients with
`pulmonary hypertension5,6 have suggested that this method
`of administration can overcome a vasodilator’s lack of
`selectivity; vasorelaxation was restricted to the pulmonary
`circulation, and the improvement in arterial oxygenation
`indicated that vasodilation was predominantly in well-
`ventilated lung areas. We describe the effect of aerosolised
`PGI2, a substance of known efficacy, on haemodynamics
`and gas exchange in three patients with severe ARDS.
`The patients’ underlying diseases were haemorrhagic
`necrotising pancreatitis (X, 62 years; 3 days’ mechanical
`ventilation), septicaemia with Candida albicans and pre-existing
`pulmonary hypertension (Y, 22 years; 2 days’ ventilation), and
`widespread acute pulmonary Wegener’s granulomatosis with
`nosocomial pneumonia (Z, 53 years, 2 days’ ventilation). All
`patients had arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired
`oxygen (pa02/Fi02) values of less than 150 (A, 105/0-8; B, 98/0-7;
`C, 81/1-0) despite optimum ventilator settings for more than 24 h.
`Routine monitoring included use of thermodilution pulmonary-
`artery and femoral-artery catheters. Gas exchange was assessed by
`the multiple inert-gas-elimination technique.? VA/Q distributions
`
`were calculated from the retention and excretion values of sulphur
`hexalfluoride, ethane, cyclopropane, halothane, diethyl ether, and
`acetone. Shunt-flow was defined as the fraction of blood perfusing
`unventilated lung regions (Vp/Q ratio<0-005),
`low VA/0 was
`defined as the fraction of blood perfusion in poorly ventilated
`regions (where 0-005 < VA/Q ratio < 0-1), 0-1 to 10 was taken as the
`normal range of VA/Q ratios. PGI2 (Flolan, dissolved in glycine
`buffer) was aerosolised with a jet nebuliser, which was driven with
`oxygen at a pressure of 82 kPa. This nebuliser delivered aerosol
`particles with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 2-7 11m
`(geometric standard deviation 2-1), as determined by a differential
`mobility analyser that was connected to a condensation nucleus
`counter. The aerosol was introduced into the afferent limb of the
`ventilator circuit. Oxygen in the aerosol mixture was balanced by
`reduction of both the pre-set ventilator tidal volume and the Fi02
`to maintain alveolar ventilation and inspired oxygen concentration
`(continuously monitored). Glycine buffer vehicle was aerosolised
`to obtain baseline values. Next, the PGI2 concentration in the
`buffer fluid was increased stepwise until there was a decrease in
`pulmonary artery pressure (PAP). PG 12 administration started at 5
`ng/kg per min and was increased to 17 (Y) and 50 (X and Z) ng/kg
`per min. Haemodynamics and gas exchange were assessed again
`(At in figure 1; done 25 min [Y] and 35 min [X and Z] after onset of
`PGI2 aerosol administration), and after 30 min continuous
`treatment with the maximum PGI2 dose (A2 in figure 1). The
`vehicle was then administered, and measurements made 60 and 120
`min after drug withdrawal. In the one patient with pre-existing
`
`Figure 1: Influence of PGI2 aerosol on haemodynamics and gas
`exchange
`PAP and SAP (mm Hg), cardiac output (CO, L/min), pa02/Fi02, and
`shunt-flow (% of perfusion) were assessed under baseline conditions
`( - 30, 0 min), during inhalation of PGI2 aerosol (Al, A,) and after
`withdrawal of the drug ( + 60, + 120 min) (8, patient X; ", Y; 8, Z).
`
`961
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1048
`Page 1
`
`

`

`vasodilation, together with reduced shunt-flow and
`improved arterial oxygenation, in patients with severe
`ARDS strongly suggest that the trans bronchial route of
`application allows targeting of prostanoid activity to lung
`vessels in well-ventilated areas. As a consequence,
`redistribution of blood flow from non-ventilated to aerosol-
`accessible areas occurs, together with improved matching
`of ventilation and perfusion. The doses of nebulised PGI2
`needed to induce substantial pulmonary vasodilation
`(17-50 ng/kg per min) are only slightly greater than those
`reported for intravenous PGI2 (5-35 ng/kg per min).2,9 This
`finding is remarkable, since the aerosol fraction deposited
`in the alveolar spaces is estimated to range from 10 to 20%.
`The efficacy of aerosolised PG 12 we observed compares
`favourably with that of inhaled nitric oxide in a larger group
`of patients with ARDS.4 There was, however, a larger
`decrease in systemic vascular resistance during PGI2
`aerosolisation than during nitric oxide inhalation. The
`action of nitric oxide is assumed to be completely restricted
`to the lung vasculature because of instantaneous binding to
`haemoglobin and inactivation on entry to the vascular
`compartment 3,4 but an increase in the dose of aerosolised
`PGI2 might cause "spillover" of the prostanoid into the
`systemic circulation. Titration of aerosolised PGI2 in
`individual patients might be necessary to produce selective
`vasodilation in well-ventilated lung areas.
`
`We thank Dr J Gebhart for measuring particle size.
`
`1
`
`References
`M&eacute;lot CH, Lejeune PH, Leeman M, Moraine J-J, Naeije R.
`Prostaglandin E1 in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Benefit for
`pulmonary hypertension and cost for pulmonary gas exchange. Am
`Rev Respir Dis 1989; 139: 106-16.
`2 Radermacher P, Santak B, W&uuml;st HJ, Tarrow J, Falke KJ, Prostacyclin
`and right ventricular functions in patients with pulmonary
`hypertension associated with ARDS. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16:
`227-32.
`3 Frostell C, Fratacci M-D, Wain JC, Jones R, Zapol WM. Inhaled
`nitric oxide. A selective pulmonary vasodilator reversing hypoxic
`pulmonary vasoconstriction. Circulation 1991; 83: 2038-47.
`4 Rossaint R, Falke KJ, L&oacute;pez F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM.
`Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl
`J Med 1993; 328: 399-405.
`5 Pepke-Zaba J, Higenbottam TW, Dinh-Xuan AT. Stone D, Wallwork
`J. Inhaled nitric oxide as a cause of selective pulmonary vasodilatation
`in pulmonary hypertension. Lancet 1991; 338: 1173-74.
`6 Kinsella JP, Neish SR, Shaffer E, Abman SH. Low-dose inhalational
`nitric oxide in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.
`Lancet 1992; 340: 819-20.
`7 Wagner PD, Saltzman HA, West JB. Measurement of continuous
`distributions of ventilation-perfusion ratios: theory. J Appl Physiol
`1974; 36: 588-99.
`8 Bihari D, Smithies M, Gimson A, Tinker J. The effects of vasodilation
`with prostacyclin on oxygen delivery and uptake in critically ill
`patients. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 397-403.
`9 Higenbottam T. The place of prostacyclin in the clinical management
`of primary pulmonary hypertension. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136:
`782-85.
`10 Hardy CC, Bradding P, Robinson C, Holgate ST. Bronchconstrictor
`and anti-bronchoconstrictor properties of inhaled prostacyclin in
`asthma. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64: 1567-74.
`
`Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig University Glessen,
`Klinikstrasse 36, D-6300 Glessen, Germany (D Walmrath MD,
`T Schneider MD, J Pilch MD, F Grimminger MD, Prof W Seeger MD)
`Correspondence to: Prof Werner Seeger
`
`Figure 2: Sequential application of PGI, via Intravenous and
`transbronchial route
`In a patient with pulmonary hypertension and septic ARDS (Y),
`haemodynamics and gas exchange were measured during an initial 30
`min baseline period, after 30 min infusion of PGI, (10 ng/kg per min), 30
`min after withdrawal of the intravenous PGI, (baseline 2), and 25 min
`after onset of administration PGIZ aerosol of up to 17 ng/kg per min.
`
`pulmonary hypertension (Y), the aerosolisation period was
`preceded by a therapeutic trial of intravenous PGI2 to reduce
`pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).
`PGIz reduced PAP in all patients (figure 1, mean [SEM]
`of all PAP values 40-3 [13’5] mm Hg at baseline and 32 0
`[3’8] during PGI2 aerosol administration). Since cardiac
`output and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were
`almost unchanged, this PAP reduction reflected a great
`decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (from 385 [101] ]
`to 270 [53] dyn.s/cm - 5). However, a substantial decrease in
`arterial pressure occurred in only one patient, and the mean
`value decreased only slightly from 76-8 (2-2) to 74 5 (6.1)
`mm Hg. Pa02/Fi02, an index of the efficiency of arterial
`oxygenation, greatly increased in response to PGI2 aerosol
`administration in all patients (mean baseline values 119-5
`[19 3] at baseline and 173 [17 7] during aerosol
`administration 173 [17 ’7]). The multiple inert-gas analysis
`showed that this beneficial effect was mainly due to a
`pronounced reduction in the shunt fraction (figure 1).
`Blood flow was redistributed to normal VA/Q areas in two
`of the patients (increases of 5 6 and 8 6 % ), and to both low
`areas (increased by 12-5%) and normal VA/0 areas
`(increased by 2-7%) in patient Z. Deadspace ventilation,
`arterial pH, and carbon dioxide concentration remained
`constant within narrow ranges. After PGI2 withdrawal,
`PAP and gas-exchange variables returned to pre-treatment
`values within 60 min. In contrast to the effects of PGI2 2
`aerosol, a therapeutic trial with intravenous PG 12
`administration increased shunt-flow (figure 2) and induced
`pulmonary vasodilation.
`The vasomotor and cellular effects of short and long term
`intravenous administration of PGI2 are well known.8.9
`Previous investigations that used aerosolised PGI2 in
`1 J.1g/kg per min)
`human beings (nebulised doses up to >
`addressed the bronchodilatory effect of this agent;10
`detailed studies of its effect on lung vasculature have not
`been reported. Our observations of pulmonary
`
`962
`
`Liquidia's Exhibit 1048
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket