`
`
`In re Patent of: Michael J. Koss
`U.S. Patent No.:
`10,491,982 Attorney Docket No.: 50095-0019IP1
`Issue Date:
`November 26, 2019
`
`Appl. Serial No.: 16/528,701
`
`Filing Date:
`August 1, 2019
`
`Title:
`SYSTEM WITH WIRELESS EARPHONES
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`Declaration of Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock
`U.S. Patent No. 10,491,982
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1
`
`II. QUALIFICATIONS ..................................................................................... 2
`
`III. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 4
`
`IV. SUMMARY OF MY OPINIONS ................................................................ 6
`
`V. OVERVIEW OF THE ’982 PATENT ........................................................ 7
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`Brief Description ..................................................................................................... 7
`
`Summary Of The Prosecution History .................................................................. 14
`
`Interpretations of Claim Terms ............................................................................. 14
`
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art ....................................................................... 15
`
`VI. OVERVIEW OF PRIOR ART .................................................................. 16
`
`A.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey Combination....................................................................... 16
`
`1. Rosener ........................................................................................................... 16
`2. Hankey ........................................................................................................... 22
`3. Combination of Rosener and Hankey ............................................................ 27
`
`B.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Huddart Combination ........................................................ 34
`
`1. Dyer ................................................................................................................ 34
`2. Combination of Rosener, Hankey, and Dyer ................................................. 35
`
`C.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Haupt/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Haupt Combinations ......... 39
`
`1. Haupt .............................................................................................................. 39
`2. Combinations of Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Price...................................... 42
`
`D.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Price/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Price Combinations ............. 45
`
`1. Price ................................................................................................................ 45
`2. Combinations of Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Price...................................... 46
`
`E.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Paulson/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Paulson Combinations .... 49
`
`1. Paulson ........................................................................................................... 49
`2. Combinations of Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Paulson ................................. 51
`
`F.
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Huddart/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Huddart Combinations ... 51
`
`1. Huddart ........................................................................................................... 51
`2. Rosener-Hankey-Huddart/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Huddart Combinations ... 54
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Huddart-Vanderelli/Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Huddart-
`G.
`Vanderelli Combinations .................................................................................................. 57
`
`1. Vanderelli ....................................................................................................... 57
`2. Combinations with Vanderelli ....................................................................... 59
`
`VII. ANALYSIS OF THE PRIOR ART ........................................................... 59
`
`The Rosener-Hankey and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer Combinations Make Claims 1, 2,
`A.
`and 16-18 Obvious. ........................................................................................................... 59
`
`1. Claim 1 ........................................................................................................... 59
`2. Claims 2 and 18-20 ........................................................................................ 86
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Haupt and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Haupt Combinations
`B.
`make claims 3-5 Obvious.................................................................................................. 92
`
`1. Claims 3-5 ...................................................................................................... 92
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Price and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Price Combinations make
`C.
`Claim 14 Obvious. .......................................................................................................... 104
`
`2. Claim 14 ....................................................................................................... 104
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Paulson and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Paulson Combinations
`D.
`make Claim 15 Obvious.................................................................................................. 106
`
`1. Claim 15 ....................................................................................................... 106
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Huddart and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Huddart Combinations
`E.
`make Claims 16 and 17 Obvious. ................................................................................... 108
`
`1. Claim 16 and 17 ........................................................................................... 108
`2. Claim 17 ....................................................................................................... 108
`
`The Rosener-Hankey-Huddart and Rosener-Hankey-Dyer-Huddart Combinations
`F.
`make Claims 16 and 17 Obvious. ................................................................................... 111
`
`1. Claim 17 ....................................................................................................... 111
`
`VIII. LEGAL PRINCIPLES ............................................................................. 112
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`Perspective of One of Ordinary Skill in the Art ................................................. 112
`
`Anticipation......................................................................................................... 112
`
`Obviousness ........................................................................................................ 113
`
`ADDITIONAL REMARKS................................................................................ 115
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`Declaration of Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock
`U.S. Patent No. 10,491,982
`
`1.
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`I, Jeremy Cooperstock, of Montreal, Canada, declare that:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`I have been retained by Fish & Richardson, P.C., on behalf of Apple
`
`Inc. (“Petitioner”), as an independent expert consultant in this inter partes review
`
`(“IPR”) proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`(“PTO”).
`
`3.
`
`I have been asked by Petitioner’s counsel (“Counsel”) to consider
`
`whether certain references teach or suggest the features recited in Claims 1-5, and
`
`14-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10,491,982 (“the ’982 patent”) (APPLE-1001). My
`
`opinions and the bases for my opinions are set forth below. My opinions are based
`
`on my education and experience.
`
`4.
`
`In writing this Declaration, I have considered the following: my own
`
`knowledge and experience, including my teaching and work experience in the
`
`above fields; and my experience of working with others involved in those fields.
`
`5.
`
`I have no financial interest in either party or in the outcome of this
`
`proceeding. I am being compensated for my work as an expert on an hourly basis,
`
`for all tasks involved. My compensation is not dependent on the outcome of these
`
`proceedings or on the content of my opinions.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`II. QUALIFICATIONS
`
`6.
`
`I am a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer
`
`Engineering at McGill University. My curriculum vitae is provided as Appendix
`
`A.
`
`7.
`
`I received my B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of
`
`British Columbia, my M.Sc. in Computer Science from the University of Toronto
`
`in 1992, and my Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University
`
`of Toronto in 1996.
`
`8.
`
`I am a member of the Centre for Intelligent Machines, and a founding
`
`member of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and
`
`Technology at McGill University. I also direct the Shared Reality Lab at McGill,
`
`which focuses on computer mediation to facilitate high-fidelity human
`
`communication and the synthesis of perceptually engaging, multimodal, immersive
`
`environments. I led the development of the Intelligent Classroom, the world's first
`
`Internet streaming demonstrations of Dolby Digital 5.1, multiple simultaneous
`
`streams of uncompressed high-definition video, a high-fidelity orchestra rehearsal
`
`simulator, a simulation environment that renders graphic, audio, and vibrotactile
`
`effects in response to footsteps, and a mobile game treatment for amblyopia.
`
`9. My work on the Ultra-Videoconferencing system was recognized by
`
`an award for Most Innovative Use of New Technology from ACM/IEEE
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`Supercomputing and a Distinction Award from the Audio Engineering Society.
`
`The research I supervised on the Autour project earned the Hochhausen Research
`
`Award from the Canadian National Institute for the Blind and an Impact Award
`
`from the Canadian Internet Registry Association, and my Real-Time Emergency
`
`Response project won the Gold Prize (brainstorm round) of the Mozilla Ignite
`
`Challenge.
`
`10.
`
`I have worked with IBM at the Haifa Research Center, Israel, and the
`
`Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York, the Sony Computer
`
`Science Laboratory in Tokyo, Japan, and was a visiting professor at Bang &
`
`Olufsen, Denmark, where I conducted research on telepresence technologies as
`
`part of the World Opera Project. I led the theme of Enabling Technologies for a
`
`Networks of Centres of Excellence on Graphics, Animation, and New Media
`
`(GRAND) and I am an associate editor of the Journal of the AES.
`
`11.
`
`I have carried out significant research involving network
`
`communication protocols, including wireless communication employing IEEE
`
`802.11 (WiFi) and IEEE 802.15 (Bluetooth). My experience in these areas
`
`includes development of the Adaptive File Distribution Protocol (AFDP, 1995),
`
`analysis of the tradeoffs between bandwidth, power demands, and latency for audio
`
`streaming over WiFi, Bluetooth, and ultra-wideband protocols (2007), and
`
`assessment of the performance and scalability of wireless audio streaming for
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`applications requiring latency-optimized multimedia streaming (2008). I have led
`
`all aspects of development and experimentation in the Autour project (2009-2016),
`
`for which Bluetooth is typically used as a communication layer for audio between
`
`the user’s smartphone and a wireless headset, or, experimentally, to transmit user
`
`input acquired from a wireless game controller. I am currently leading a research
`
`project (MIMIC), which communicates sensor data between two coupled
`
`smartwatches using Bluetooth for local communication between the smartwatches
`
`and their peered smartphones, and the public Internet between the smartphones. I
`
`am also leading a project that uses both Bluetooth and WiFi communication
`
`between smartphones, a GPU-based physics engine, and a microelectronics
`
`architecture that renders vibrotactile effects on mobile footwear.
`
`12. My experience in academic and practical situations as well as my
`
`hands on experience with wireless communication systems such as Bluetooth
`
`systems provides me with an appreciation of the technology involved with U.S.
`
`Patent No. 10,491,982 (“the ’982 patent” or APPLE-1001).
`
`III. BACKGROUND
`
`13.
`
`I have reviewed the ’982 patent and relevant excerpts of the
`
`prosecution history of the ’982 patent (“the Prosecution History” or APPLE-1002).
`
`The ’982 patent claims priority through a string of applications that includes U.S.
`
`provisional application 61/123,265 filed on April 7, 2008. See APPLE-1001, Face.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`While I am not opining on whether the ’982 patent is entitled to this priority date,
`
`for purposes of this declaration and to review and apply prior art references only, I
`
`am using April 7, 2008 as the purported priority date (“Critical Date”).
`
`14.
`
`I have reviewed the following references:
`
`• U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2008/0076489 (“Rosener”) (APPLE-
`
`1004)
`
`• U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2008/0166001 (“Hankey”) (APPLE-
`
`1005)
`
`• U.S. Pat. No. 8,031,900 (“Dyer”) (APPLE-1006)
`
`• U.S. Pat. No. 7,627,289 (“Huddart”) (APPLE-1007)
`
`• U.S. Pat. App. No. 60,879,177 (“Hankey Provisional”) (APPLE-
`
`1008)
`
`• U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2006/0026304 (“Price”) (APPLE-1009)
`
`• U.S. Pat. No. 7,551,940 (“Paulson”) (APPLE-1010)
`
`• U.S. Pat. No. 5,371,454 (“Marek”) (APPLE-1011)
`
`• U.S. Pat. No. 7,027,311 (“Vanderelli”) (APPLE-1012)
`
`15. Counsel has informed me that I should consider these materials
`
`through the lens of a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA,” which is
`
`discussed further in Section V.D below) related to the ’982 patent at the time of the
`
`earliest purported priority date of the ’982 patent, and I have done so during my
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`review of these materials. Unless otherwise stated, my testimony below refers to
`
`the knowledge of a POSITA as of the Critical Date.
`
`IV. SUMMARY OF MY OPINIONS
`
`16. This Declaration explains the conclusions that I have formed based on my
`
`knowledge and experience and my review of the prior art references listed above.
`
`To summarize, I have concluded that:
`
`• Claims 1, 2, and 18-20 are obvious over Rosener and Hankey
`
`• Claims 1, 2, and 18-20 are obvious over Rosener, Hankey, and Dyer
`
`• Claims 3-5 are obvious over Rosener, Hankey, and Haupt
`
`• Claims 3-5 are obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Haupt
`
`• Claim 14 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, and Price
`
`• Claim 14 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Price
`
`• Claim 15 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, and Paulson
`
`• Claim 15 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and Paulson
`
`• Claims 16 and 17 are obvious over Rosener, Hankey, and Huddart
`
`• Claims 16 and 17 are obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, and
`
`Huddart
`
`• Claim 17 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Huddart, and Vanderelli
`
`• Claim 17 is obvious over Rosener, Hankey, Dyer, Huddart, and
`
`Vanderelli
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`V. OVERVIEW OF THE ’982 PATENT
`
`17.
`
`I have reviewed the ’982 patent, titled “System with Wireless
`
`Earphones.” APPLE-1001, 1:1. The ’982 patent includes 20 claims, of which
`
`claim 1 is independent. APPLE-1001, 18:7-40.
`
`A. Brief Description
`
`18. The ’982 patent relates to wireless earphones that receive streaming
`
`audio data over a network. APPLE-1001, 2:7-27. Figure 3 (reproduced below)
`
`shows components of earphone 10. Earphone 10 includes transceiver circuit 100
`
`and peripheral components, such as power source 102, microphone 104, one or
`
`more acoustic transducers 106, and antenna 108. Id., 6:34-60. Earphone 10 also
`
`includes a body housing transceiver circuit 100 and some or all of peripheral
`
`components. Id.
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`APPLE-1001, Figure 3
`
`
`
`19. The ’982 patent describes a wireless data communication system.
`
`Figures 1A and 1B (reproduced below) show examples of wireless earphones 10
`
`that are insertable into a user’s ear canal. APPLE-1001, 3:20-46.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`APPLE-1001, Figures 1A and 1B
`
`
`
`20. Earphone 10 includes body 12 with ear canal portion 14 insertable
`
`into a user’s ear canal. APPLE-1001, 3:20-46. Exterior portion 15 of body 12
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`includes knob 16, which operates as a user control for adjusting shape of ear canal
`
`portion 14 to assist with positioning within a user’s ear. Id.
`
`21. The ’982 patent describes a wireless data communication system
`
`including earphone 10. Figure 2A (reproduced below) shows one example with
`
`data source 20 communicating with earphone 10 via ad hoc wireless network 24.
`
`Id., 4:30-46.
`
`APPLE-1001, Figure 2A
`
`
`
`22. Earphone 10 communicates wirelessly with data source 20 using a
`
`transceiver circuit with wireless network adapter 22 for wirelessly transmitting
`
`digital audio. Id. Data source 20 can be a digital audio player (DAP) (e.g., mp3
`
`player, laptop, personal computer). Id. Wireless network adapter 22 can include a
`
`wireless network interface card (WNIC) to allow streaming of digital audio files
`
`via ad hoc wireless network 24. Id., 4:47-62.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`23. Figure 2B (reproduced below) shows an example with data source 20
`
`communicating with earphone 10 via access point 32.
`
`APPLE-1001, Figure 2B
`
`
`
`24. This example can be used when earphone 10 and data source 20 are
`
`out of range for ad hoc wireless network 24. Id., 5:16-33. Access point 32 is
`
`connected to wired and/or wireless data communication network 33 to permit
`
`communications using a network data protocol (e.g., Wi-Fi protocol) to provide
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`wireless local area network (WLAN) 30. Id., 5:34-56. Figure 2C (reproduced
`
`below) shows a configuration with multiple access points 32a-b.
`
`APPLE-1001, Figure 2C
`
`
`
`25.
`
`In this example, data source 20 communicates wirelessly with access
`
`point 32b and earphone communicates with access point 32a of the same wireless
`
`network 30 using WLAN 30. Id., 5:34-56.
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`26. Figure 2D (reproduced below) shows an example with data source 20
`
`communicating with earphone 10 when no common infrastructure wireless
`
`network is available.
`
`APPLE-1001, Figure 2D
`
`
`
`27.
`
`In this example, earphone 10 communicates with access point 32a for
`
`first WLAN 30a in range of earphone 10. Id., 5:57-6:8. Host server 40 is
`
`connected to WLAN 30a via electronic data communication network 42, such as
`
`the Internet. Id. In one example, host server 40 transmits streaming digital audio
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`via networks 33a, 42 to earphone 10. Id. In another example, host server 40
`
`transmits to earphone 10 a network address (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP) address) for
`
`streaming digital audio content server 70 on network 42. Id. Earphone 10 can use
`
`the IP address to connect to streaming digital audio content server 70 via networks
`
`30a, 42 to receive and process digital audio. Id.
`
`B.
`
`Summary Of The Prosecution History
`
`28. The ‘982 patent was filed on August 1, 2019, claiming priority
`
`through a chain of applications to a provisional application filed on April 7, 2008.
`
`See APPLE-1001, 1-2. In an examiner initiated telephonic interview on September
`
`12, 2019, the examiner requested a terminal disclaimer, which the applicant filed
`
`on September 16, 2019. Id., 17, 45-49. On September 24, 2019, the examiner
`
`issued a Notice of Allowance, and the patent issued on November 26, 2019. Id., 8-
`
`16, 2.
`
`C.
`
`Interpretations of Claim Terms
`
`29.
`
`I understand that, for purposes of my analysis in this inter partes
`
`review proceeding, the terms appearing in a patent claim should be interpreted
`
`according to their “ordinary and customary meaning of such claim as understood
`
`by one of ordinary skill in the art and the prosecution history pertaining to the
`
`patent.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b). In that regard, I understand that the best indicator
`
`of claim meaning is its usage in the context of the patent specification as
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`understood by a POSITA. I further understand that the words of the claims should
`
`be given their plain meaning unless that meaning is inconsistent with the patent
`
`specification or the patent’s history of examination before the Patent Office. I also
`
`understand that the words of the claims should be interpreted as they would have
`
`been interpreted by a POSITA at the time of the invention was made (not today).
`
`Because I do not know at what date the invention as claimed was made, if ever, I
`
`have used the Critical Date of the ’982 patent as the point in time for claim
`
`interpretation purposes. My opinion does not change if the invention date is
`
`earlier.
`
`D.
`
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`
`30. Based upon my experience in this area and taking into account the
`
`above references, a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the ’982
`
`patent’s Critical Date (“POSITA”) would have had at least a Bachelor’s Degree in
`
`an academic area emphasizing electrical engineering, computer science, or a
`
`similar discipline, and at least two years of experience in wireless communications
`
`across short distance or local area networks. Superior education could compensate
`
`for a deficiency in work experience, and vice-versa.
`
`31.
`
`I base this characterization of a POSITA in view of my professional,
`
`academic, and personal experiences, including my knowledge of colleagues and
`
`others at the time of the invention of the ‘982 patent on or shortly before the
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`Critical Date. Specifically, my experience working with industry, undergraduate
`
`and post-graduate students, colleagues from academia, and designers and engineers
`
`practicing in industry has allowed me to become directly and personally familiar
`
`with the level of skill of individuals and the general state of the art. I am familiar
`
`with the knowledge of persons of ordinary skill in the art as of the Critical Date.
`
`VI. OVERVIEW OF PRIOR ART
`
`A. The Rosener-Hankey Combination
`
`1.
`
`Rosener
`
`32. Rosener describes wireless systems with physically and electrically-
`
`separated “data sinks.” APPLE-1004, Abstract. The data sinks include a wireless
`
`communication device, e.g., radio frequency (RF) receiver or transceiver, allowing
`
`communications with an external device, such as a cellular telephone. Id. Rosener
`
`describes that data sinks can be “audio data sinks,” and provides various examples
`
`such as “left-ear and right-ear earphones (e.g., earbuds or canalphones), left-ear
`
`and right-ear circum-aural over-the-ear headphones, stereo speakers, speakers for a
`
`surround sound system, etc.” Id., ¶[0011]. Figure 5 (reproduced below) shows an
`
`example of an embodiment with audio data sinks as left-ear and right-ear
`
`earphones.
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`APPLE-1004, FIG. 5
`
`
`
`33. The wireless system shown above is worn by a user 500 and includes
`
`“first and second wireless earphones 502, 504.” APPLE-1004, ¶[0030]. Each of
`
`earphones 502, 504 includes a respective “housing” containing components, such
`
`as “a speaker, an RF receiver or transceiver and a battery.” Id. Rosener also
`
`describes that each audio data sink included in a pair of audio data sinks (e.g.,
`
`earphones 502, 504) can also include a microphone to “allow [] data to be sent
`
`back to an electronic device.” Id., ¶[0056]. Earphones 502, 504 also use “wireless
`
`links” to communicate with external or audio devices, e.g., “cellular telephone,
`
`PDA, MP3 player, CD player, radio, personal computer, game console, etc.” Id.
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`34. Earphones 502, 504 can be configured to fit in a user’s ear in various
`
`ways. As examples, earphones 502, 504 can be an “earbud” that “fit[s] into the
`
`concha of the pinna of the user,” a “canalphone” that is “fitted within the ear canal
`
`of the user’s ear,” or an “over-the-ear circum-aural type headphone,” or “any other
`
`suitable configuration that may be attached to, worn on, or fitted within the user’s
`
`ear.” Id. Earphones 502, 504 can also include securing mechanisms, such as a
`
`“clip” or an “earloop,” to improve the manner in which earphones 502, 504 are
`
`secured to a user’s ear when worn. Id.
`
`35. Rosener describes electronic circuitry used to enable data sinks (and
`
`earphones) to transmit wireless data signals. Figure 9 (reproduced below) shows
`
`an “RF transceiver 900” that may be used in place of distinct RF transmitters and
`
`RF receivers to enable wireless connectivity. Id., ¶[0049].
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`APPLE-1004, Figure 9
`
`
`
`36. Transceiver 900 includes RF transmitter portion 902, RF receiver
`
`portion 904, antenna 906, and duplexer 908. APPLE-1004, ¶[0049]. Transceiver
`
`900 also includes analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 910, digital-to-analog (D/A)
`
`converter 912, baseband processor 914, and signal conditioning circuits 916, 920.
`
`Id.
`
`37. Rosener also describes wireless systems with earphones capable of
`
`receiving separate data streams (or channels) from an external audio device.
`
`APPLE-1004, ¶[0031]. Figure 6 (reproduced below) shows a wireless system 600.
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`APPLE-1004, Figure 6
`
`
`
`38. As shown above, the system 600 includes a data source 618 that sends
`
`two different audio streams (CH1 and CH2) to data sinks 602, 606 (which, together
`
`with the receivers 604 and 608, can correspond to earphones 502, 5041) through
`
`
`
`1 Rosener uses the term “data sink” to refer to earphones as well as speakers of
`
`those earphones. When citing to Rosener’s disclosure, this analysis clarifies the
`
`intended meaning of the term. The earphones 502 and 504 include “data sinks” in
`
`that they receive, i.e., sink, data over the wireless access links. Similarly, the
`
`circuitry inside each earphone 502 and 504 represented by data sinks 602 and 606,
`
`respectively, are also “data sinks” in that they receive, i.e., sink, data received from
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`separate wireless communication links 612 and 616. APPLE-1004, ¶¶[0031]-
`
`[0032]. The data source 618 is capable of streaming data to the earphones through
`
`Bluetooth communication links. Id., ¶[0035].
`
`39. Rosener also provides several methods to synchronize the first and
`
`second wireless links 612 and 616 to “compensate for differential latencies
`
`between the first and second data streams” to enable stereo playback. APPLE-
`
`1004, ¶[0039]. Importantly, these techniques do not require any direct
`
`communication from one earphone to the other and each earphone is capable of
`
`operating independently from the other. In one method, Rosener includes data
`
`buffers in the RF receivers 604, 608 and controls “the buffers so that they maintain
`
`a predetermined constant occupancy.” Id. In another method, Rosener embeds
`
`into the RF carrier signals that carry the first and second data streams over the
`
`wireless links 612 and 616 a sample clock used by the transmitting end of the
`
`system 600. Id., ¶[0040]. The receivers 604, 608 use the sample clock to drive
`
`their A/D converters. Id. In yet another method, Rosener adjusts the clock signals
`
`used by the receivers’ A/D converters based on the occupancy of the data buffers
`
`
`
`receivers 604 and 608, respectively. Data sinks 602 and 606 may be, for example,
`
`speakers. APPLE-1004, ¶¶[0011], [0038].
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`or a delay determined between the send and receive clocks of the system. Id.,
`
`¶¶[0041]-[0042]. “Accordingly, if the occupancy of a data buffer of one of the
`
`first and second RF receivers 604, 608 is too low (or the receive clock/sample
`
`clock delay is decreasing), the A/D clock is slowed down,” and “if it is determined
`
`that the occupancy of the data buffer is too high (or the delay is increasing), the
`
`A/D clock is sped up.” Id.
`
`2. Hankey
`
`40. Hankey provides techniques to implement a headset within “a small
`
`compact unit” capable of wirelessly communicating with an external host device
`
`through a Bluetooth connection. APPLE-1005, ¶¶[0093], [0103]; APPLE-1008,
`
`¶¶[0011], [0093], [0148-150]. To integrate electronic components/assemblies
`
`(e.g., connectors, microphone, speaker, antenna) into the limited volume of a small
`
`headset, Hankey divides the headset’s electronic components/assemblies “into
`
`small multiple [groups of] components that can be positioned at different locations
`
`(discretely) within the headset.” APPLE-1005, ¶[0098]; APPLE-1008, ¶¶[0011],
`
`[0093], [0144-150]. Hankey then places such small groups of components into the
`
`headset and electrically couples them together by using flexible electrical
`
`connectors that “can be folded into a small compact form in order to fit inside
`
`tightly spaced internal volumes.” Id., ¶¶[0098-99]; APPLE-1008, ¶¶[0144-150].
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`41. Hankey also provides example configurations of how a headset’s
`
`electronic assemblies can be divided into multiple small groups of components that
`
`are electrically coupled together by flexible connectors. For instance, in FIGs. 1
`
`and 5 Hankey shows block diagrams of a headset 10/500 divided into two sections:
`
`earbud 12/520, and primary housing 11/510. See APPLE-1005, FIGs. 20A-C;
`
`APPLE-1008, FIGs. 1, 10A-C, ¶[0011]. Hankey then divides the headset’s
`
`electronic components/assemblies between earbud 12/520 and primary housing
`
`11/510. For example, Hankey places components such as a processor 20/526 and a
`
`speaker 13 inside the earbud 12/520, and components such as a microphone 17/514
`
`inside primary housing 11/510. APPLE-1005, ¶¶[0130-131]; APPLE-1008,
`
`¶¶[0090-93]. Hankey uses flexible circuit boards 522 and 512 to mount the
`
`electrical components inside earbud 520 and primary housing 510, respectively.
`
`Id.; APPLE-1008, ¶¶[0144-150]. The flexibility of the circuit boards allow them to
`
`fold or bend, and “fit in smaller or less traditionally-shaped earbuds.” Id. By
`
`implementing Hankey’s technique of dividing the electronic assemblies into small
`
`groups of components and coupling them together through flexible electrical
`
`connectors, Hankey discloses ways to fit and arrange electronic components within
`
`headsets, like Hankey’s headset and Rosener’s earphones, that have small form
`
`factors.
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`
`
`Right: APPLE-1005, FIG. 1; Left: Id., FIG. 5.
`
`42. Hankey’s FIGs. 10A and 20A-C provide an example headset
`
`1000/2000 designed according to Hankey’s techniques. APPLE-1005, ¶¶[0143-
`
`144], [0202-204]; APPLE-1008, FIGs. 1A, 10A-C, ¶¶[0148-150]. Headset
`
`1000/2000 includes an earbud 1020/2014 connected to a primary housing
`
`1010/2010 through a neck 1030/2013. Id. Earbud 1020/2014 contains a flexible
`
`circuit board 2020 connecting small groups of components mounted on rigid
`
`sections 2025 and 2027 to each other. Id. A processor 2022 and a receiver 2024
`
`are mounted on section 2027, and resistors, capacitors, transistors, etc. (2026) are
`
`mounted on section 2025. Id. By using flexible circuit board 2020, top rigid
`
`section 2027 is folded over bottom rigid section 2025 “so that both sections can fit
`
`in the earbud of a headset.” Id. Primary housing circuit board 2011, on which
`
`further electrical components (e.g., a microphone) are mounted, is electrically
`
`coupled to flexible circuit board 2021 through flexible connectors such as wires,
`
`
`
`24
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`
`
`cables, or flexible circuit boards. Id.; APPLE-1005, ¶¶[0147-0149], [0157];
`
`APPLE-1008, ¶¶[0092-0095], [0103].
`
`
`
`
`Top: APPLE-1005, FIG. 10A, APPLE-1008, FIG. 1A; Bottom Left:
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 20C, APPLE-1008, FIG. 10C; Bottom Right: APPLE-
`1005, FIG. 20A (annotated with label 2024), APPLE-1008, FIG. 10A.
`
`I understand that Hankey was filed June 28, 2007 and includes a
`
`43.
`
`
`
`priority claim to U.S. Provisional Pat. No. 60/879,177, (“’177 Provisional”)
`
`(APPLE-1008). APPLE-1005. The ’177 Provisional was filed on January 6, 2007.
`
`APPLE-1008, p. 31. Counsel has informed me that a patent is entitled to claim
`
`priority to a previously filed provisional application if the previously filed
`
`provisional application described the invention claimed in the patent with
`
`
`
`25
`
`
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`2024
`
`
`
`sufficient detail that would have led a POSITA to conclude that the inventor of the
`
`’177 Provisional had possession of the invention claimed in Hankey. Based on this
`
`understanding, the ’177 Provisional satisfies this requirement since its disclosure
`
`provides sufficient detail that would have led a POSITA to conclude that the
`
`inventor of the ’177 Provisional had poss