throbber
1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`UNCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT, NOT PROOFED, READ, EDITED
`
`**DRAFT**
`
` 1
`
`ATTACHED IS THE UNCERTIFIED
`
`ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT OF:
`
`SUMIT ROY, PH.D.
`
`MONDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2021
`
` PLEASE BE INFORMED OF THE FOLLOWING:
`
`A UNCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT is not the
`
`OFFICIAL CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT and may not be cited
`
`or quoted as the OFFICIAL CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT in
`
`any proceedings. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE USED
`
`AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE OFFICIAL CERTIFIED
`
`TRANSCRIPT.
`
`Job No. 258664
`
`Reported by: Cindy L. Sebo, RMR, CRR, RPR, CLR,
`
`CCR, CSR, RSA, NYRCR, NYACR, California CSR No.
`
`14409, Remote Counsel Reporter, LiveDeposition
`
`Authorized Reporter
`
`**CANNOT BE USED OR CITED IN COURT AS FINAL**
`
`EX. 2014 - IPR2021-00375
`Qualcomm Incorporated v. UNM Rainforest Innovations
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`UNCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT, NOT PROOFED, READ, EDITED
`
`**DRAFT** 71
`
`approaches, you know, that we discussed,
`
`Li takes advantage of OFDMA's ability to
`
`allocate different subchannels to multiple
`
`users. And in this case Li's teaching is
`
`to apply different OFDM symbol durations
`
`to different subscribers to -- to
`
`ameliorate the -- the problem --
`
`BY MR. SCHMIDT:
`
`Q.
`
`A.
`
`And then -- go ahead.
`
`-- so I was going to say that, you
`
`know, the specific example is -- there's a
`
`figure copied from Li and quoted, and so I'll
`
`just complete by reading Paragraph 99 and 100.
`
`[as read] ***Specifically, Li teaches that the
`
`system could transmit to the fast subscriber two
`
`OFDMA symbols in two slots with symbol
`
`duration -- half the symbol duration, two sub C
`
`each, so Li discloses a system high mobility
`
`users with a shorter symbol period than -- than,
`
`you know, the -- the baseline system.
`
`Q.
`
`Would a shorter symbol period also
`
`imply that you will get more pilot signal
`
`symbols per unit of time?
`
`MR. DETRIXHE: Same objection.
`
`**CANNOT BE USED OR CITED IN COURT AS FINAL**
`
`EX. 2014 - IPR2021-00375
`Qualcomm Incorporated v. UNM Rainforest Innovations
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`UNCERTIFIED ROUGH DRAFT, NOT PROOFED, READ, EDITED
`
`**DRAFT** 72
`
`Form.
`
`THE WITNESS: So depending on how
`
`you -- there's a nuance how you framed
`
`that question, yes, because if we mean by
`
`density, you know, the number of pilot
`
`symbols we are unit time -- so let's say
`
`I have two designs in which I have a
`
`symbol duration T and then I have a
`
`symbol duration T by two, if I keep the
`
`same number of pilots in the T symbol
`
`duration compared to the T by 2 I would
`
`get more pilots per unit time but per
`
`symbol duration the number of pilots are
`
`the same, so.
`
`BY MR. SCHMIDT:
`
`Q.
`
`A POSITA would have understood that
`
`at the time of Li?
`
`A.
`
`The POSITA would have understood
`
`that, yes.
`
`Q.
`
`Okay. So do you have the
`
`Li reference in front of you?
`
`A.
`
`Q.
`
`Let me see.
`
`Li is patent application ending in
`
`387. Exhibit 1016.
`
`**CANNOT BE USED OR CITED IN COURT AS FINAL**
`
`EX. 2014 - IPR2021-00375
`Qualcomm Incorporated v. UNM Rainforest Innovations
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket