`_____________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNM RAINFOREST INNOVATIONS,
`
`Patent Owner.
`_____________________
`Case IPR2021-00375
`
`Patent No. 8,265,096 B2
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JONAH D.
`MITCHELL PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), and as authorized in the Board’s Notice of
`
`Filing Date (Paper 5), Petitioner Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm” or
`
`“Petitioner”) respectfully requests the pro hac vice admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE
`BOARD TO RECOGNIZE COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice subject to the condition that
`
`lead counsel be a registered practitioner and upon a showing that counsel is an
`
`experienced litigating attorney and has an established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter of the proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. 42.10(c); see also Unified Patents v. Parallel
`
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013). The following facts
`
`establish good cause for the Board to recognize Jonah D. Mitchell pro hac vice in
`
`this proceeding:
`
`A. Petitioner’s lead counsel, Jonathan I. Detrixhe, is a registered
`
`practitioner. Petitioner’s back-up counsel, Peter J. Chassman, is also a registered
`
`practitioner.
`
`B. Accompanying this motion as Exhibit 1030 is a Declaration of Jonah
`
`D. Mitchell in Support of this Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission.
`
`C. Mr. Mitchell is a partner with the law firm Reed Smith LLP and a
`
`member in good standing of the State Bar of California. See, Exhibit 1030 ¶ 2.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`D. Mr. Mitchell is admitted to practice before the United States District
`
`Court for the Northern of California, the United States District Court for the Central
`
`District of California, the United States District Court for the Southern District of
`
`California, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Id.
`
`E. Mr. Mitchell has never been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body. Id. ¶ 3.
`
`F.
`
`No court or administrative body has imposed sanctions or contempt
`
`citations on Mr. Mitchell. Id. ¶ 4.
`
`G. No court or administrative body has denied an application for
`
`admission to practice filed by Mr. Mitchell. Id. ¶ 5.
`
`H. Mr. Mitchell is an experienced litigation attorney. Mr. Mitchell has
`
`been practicing law since 1999 and has over 15 years of experience litigating patent
`
`infringement cases. Id. ¶ 6. Mr. Mitchell has litigated patent cases in many different
`
`district courts across the United States. Id. Mr. Mitchell’s district court patent
`
`litigation experience includes claim construction and dispositive and Daubert
`
`motions, and other patent-related motion practice, hearings and proceedings. Id. In
`
`addition, Mr. Mitchell has participated in patent trials in several different venues,
`
`including the Northern District of California, the Eastern District of Texas, and the
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`Eastern District of Virginia. Id. Among other responsibilities, Mr. Mitchell’s
`
`involvement in those trials included presenting and cross-examining lay and
`
`technical expert witnesses testimony. Id.
`
`I. Mr. Mitchell has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of
`
`title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Id. ¶ 7.
`
`J. Mr. Mitchell understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`
`Professional Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Id. ¶ 8.
`
`K. Mr. Mitchell has an established familiarity with U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,265,096 (“the ’096 Patent”) and the subject matter of this inter partes review
`
`proceeding. Id. ¶ 9. Mr. Mitchell has gained this familiarity through reviewing
`
`papers filed in this proceeding and through his role as counsel for Petitioner’s
`
`customers Dell Technologies Inc., Dell Inc., and EMC Corporation (collectively,
`
`“Dell”), in the co-pending district court proceeding captioned UNM Rainforest
`
`Innovations v. Dell Technologies Inc. et al., No. 6:20-cv-00468 (W.D. Tex.) (“the
`
`Dell litigation”), which also involves the ’096 Patent. Id. ¶ 9.
`
`L. Mr. Mitchell is in the process of seeking pro hac vice admission in
`
`IPR2021-00377 and IPR2021-00582 directed to two other patents asserted in the
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`Dell litigation, and IPR2021-00734, IPR2021-00739, and IPR2021-00741 brought
`
`by Zyxel Communications Corporation. Id. ¶ 10.
`
`M. This motion is being filed no sooner than 21 days after service of the
`
`Petition in this proceeding.
`
`N.
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner has indicated that Patent Owner does not
`
`oppose this motion.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests pro hac vice
`
`admission of Mr. Mitchell in this proceeding.
`
`IV. PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Petitioner hereby submits its current exhibit
`
`list:
`
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1001
`Ex. 1002
`Ex. 1003
`
`Ex. 1004
`
`Ex. 1005
`
`Ex. 1006
`
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,265,096 (“the ’096 patent”)
`Declaration of Dr. Sumit Roy (“Roy”)
`Sand Revolution II, LLC v. Continental Intermodal Group-Trucking
`LLC, Paper 24, IPR2019-01393 (PTAB June 16, 2020)
`Eleventh Supplemental Order Regarding Court Operations Under
`Exigent Circumstances Created by the Covid 19 Pandemic (W.D.
`Tex. Dec. 10, 2020)
`Excerpts from JEFFREY G. ANDREWS ET AL., FUNDAMENTALS OF
`WIMAX (2007)
`Five Criteria Statement for P802.16m PAR Proposal, IEEE 802.16-
`06/055r3 (Nov. 15, 2006)
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1007
`
`Ex. 1008
`Ex. 1009
`Ex. 1010
`Ex. 1011
`
`Ex. 1012
`Ex. 1013
`
`Ex. 1020
`Ex. 1021
`Ex. 1022
`
`Ex. 1024
`Ex. 1025
`
`Ex. 1026
`Ex. 1027
`
`Ex. 1028
`
`Description
`IEEE 802.16m System Requirements, IEEE 802.16m-07/002r4
`(Oct. 19, 2007)
`Listing of Challenged ’096 Patent Claims
`U.S. Provisional App. No. 60/929,798
`Excerpts from ’096 Patent File History
`Claim Construction Order in STC.UNM v. Apple Inc., No. 1-20-cv-
`00351 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 9, 2020), ECF No. 69 (“Markman Order”)
`U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0067377 A1 (“Talukdar”)
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/956,031
`Provisional”)
`Canadian Patent Application No. 2 581 166 A1 (“Wang”)
`Ex. 1014
`Ex. 1015 WIPO Handbook on
`Industrial Property
`Information and
`Documentation, “Examples and Kinds of Patent Documents” (May
`2016)
`U.S. Pub. No. 2007/0155387 A1 (“Li”)
`U.S. Pub. No. 2007/0104174 A1 (“Nystrom”)
`U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0095195 (“Ahmadi”)
`Excerpts from William Stallings, WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND
`NETWORKS (2D ED. 2005)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,460,466 B2 (“Lee”)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,462,611 B2 (“Ma”)
`Fixed, nomadic, portable and mobile applications for 802.16-2004
`and 802.16e WiMAX networks (November 2005)
`Ex. 1023 Mohammad Azizul Hasan, Performance Evaluation
`WiMAX/IEEE 802.16 OFDM Physical Layer (June 2007)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,710,910 B2 (“Ode”)
`IEEE 802.16m System Requirements, IEEE 802.16m-07/002r4 (Jan.
`12, 2007)
`U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0037215 A1 (“Hwang”)
`Yasamin Mostofi, ICI Mitigation for Pilot-Aided OFDM Mobile
`Systems (IEEE, Vol. 4, No. 2, Mar. 2005)
`Declaration of Dr. Robert Akl
`
`Ex. 1016
`Ex. 1017
`Ex. 1018
`Ex. 1019
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`
`(“Talukdar
`
`of
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`
`Description
`Scott McKeown, District Court Trial Dates Tend to Slip After PTAB
`Discretionary Denials, Patents Post Grant (available at:
`https://www.patentspostgrant.com/district-court-trial-dates-tend-to-
`slip-after-ptab-discretionary-denials/)
`Declaration of Jonah D. Mitchell in Support of Petitioners’ Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`Declaration of Christine M. Morgan in Support of Petitioners’
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1029
`
`Ex. 1030
`
`Ex. 1031
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Jonathan I. Detrixhe/
`Lead Counsel
`Jonathan I. Detrixhe (Reg. No. 68,556)
`Reed Smith LLP
`101 Second Street
`Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Tel: 415.543.8700
`Fax: 415.391.8269
`jdetrixhe@reedsmith.com
`
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Jonah D. Mitchell (will seek pro hac
`vice admission)
`Christine M. Morgan (will seek pro hac
`vice admission)
`Reed Smith LLP
`101 Second Street
`Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Tel: 415.543.8700
`Fax: 415.391.8269
`jmitchell@reedsmith.com
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`
`cmorgan@reedsmith.com
`
`Peter J. Chassman (Reg. No. 38,841)
`Reed Smith LLP
`811 Main Street
`Suite 1700
`Houston, TX 77002
`Tel: 713.469.3800
`Fax: 713.469.3899
`pchassman@reedsmith.com
`
`Ismail C. Kuru (will seek pro hac vice
`admission)
`Reed Smith LLP
`10 S. Wacker Dr. 40th Floor
`Chicago, IL, 60606
`Tel: 312.207.1000
`Fax: 312.207.6400
`ikuru@reedsmith.com
`
`Attorneys for QUALCOMM
`Incorporated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00375
`Petitioner’s Motion for PHV Admission of Jonah D. Mitchell
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e)(4) and 42.25(b), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on September 27, 2021, a complete copy of Petitioners’ Motion For Pro Hac
`
`Vice Admission Of Jonah D. Mitchell Pursuant To 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) was filed
`
`electronically through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s PTABE2E System and
`
`provided, via electronic service, to the Patent Owner by serving the correspondence
`
`address of record.
`
`Dated: September 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/ Jonathan I. Detrixhe /
`Jonathan I. Detrixhe (Reg. No. 68,556)
`Reed Smith LLP
`101 Second Street
`Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Tel: 415.543.8700
`Fax: 415.391.8269
`jdetrixhe@reedsmith.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`