throbber
3/11/2021
`
`Intel Told to Pay $2.18 Billion After Losing Patent Trial - Bloomberg
`
`Technology
`
`Intel Told to Pay $2.18 Billion After Losing Patent
`Trial
`
`By Susan Decker and Matthew Bultman
`March 2, 2021, 1:49 PM EST
`Updated on March 2, 2021, 5:32 PM EST
`
`Intel had claimed royalty demands of VLSI were ‘outrageous’
`NXP would get a share of any damage award, Intel lawyer said
`
`Intel Corp. was told to pay VLSI Technoloy LLC $2.18 billion by a federal jury in Texas after losing a
`patent-infringement trial over technoloy related to chip-making, one of the largest patent-damages
`award in U.S. history. Intel pledged to appeal.
`
`Intel infringed two patents owned by closely held VLSI, the jury in Waco, Texas, said Tuesday. The jury
`found $1.5 billion for infringement of one patent and $675 million for infringement of the second. The
`jury rejected Intel’s denial of infringing either of the patents and its argument that one patent was
`invalid because it claimed to cover work done by Intel engineers.
`
`The patents had been owned by Dutch chipmaker NXP Semiconductors Inc., which would get a cut of
`any damage award, Intel lawyer William Lee of WilmerHale told jurors in closing arguments Monday.
`VLSI, founded four years ago, has no products and its only potential revenue is this lawsuit, he said.
`
`VLSI “took two patents off the shelf that hadn’t been used for 10 years and said, ‘We’d like $2 billion,”’
`Lee told the jury. The “outrageous” demand by VLSI “would tax the true innovators.”
`
`He had argued that VLSI was entitled to no more than $2.2 million.
`
`https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-02/intel-told-to-pay-2-18-billion-after-losing-texas-patent-trial
`
`1/4
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Koss 2013
`IPR2021-00297
`
`

`

`Intel Told to Pay $2.18 Billion After Losing Patent Trial - Bloomberg
`3/11/2021
`“Intel strongly disagrees with today’s jury verdict,” the company said in a statement. “We intend to
`appeal and are confident that we will prevail.”
`
`Intel fell 2.6% to $61.24 in New York trading. The stock is up 23% since the beginning of the year.
`
`One of the patents was originally issued in 2012 to Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and the other in 2010
`to SigmaTel Inc. Freescale bought SigmaTel and was in turn bought by NXP in 2015. The two patents in
`this case were transferred to VLSI in 2019, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Law.
`
`Paid Post
`The Ex-Oil Giant That Has Shifted to Renewable Energy
`
`GE
`
`VLSI lawyer Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella said the patents cover inventions that increase the power
`and speed of processors, a key issue for competition.
`
`‘Willful Blindness’
`
`Federal law doesn’t require someone to know of a patent to be found to have infringed it, and Intel
`purposely didn’t look to see if it was using someone else’s inventions, he said. He accused the Santa
`Clara, California-based company of “willful blindness.”
`
`The jury said there was no willful infringement. A finding otherwise would have enabled District Court
`Judge Alan Albright to increase the award even further, to up to three times the amount set by the jury.
`
`“We are very pleased that the jury recognized the value of the innovations as reflected in the patents
`and are extremely happy with the jury verdict,” Michael Stolarski, chief executive of VLSI, said in an e-
`mailed statement.
`
`https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-02/intel-told-to-pay-2-18-billion-after-losing-texas-patent-trial
`
`2/4
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Koss 2013
`IPR2021-00297
`
`

`

`Intel Told to Pay $2.18 Billion After Losing Patent Trial - Bloomberg
`3/11/2021
`Officials with NXP couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
`
`The damage request isn’t so high when the billions of chips sold by Intel are taken into account, Chu
` MicroUnity Systems Engineering Corp. $300 million 2005 and in 2011 paid Nvidia
`said. Intel paid
`Corp. $1.5 billion even though a settlement in that case involved a cross license of technoloy, he said.
`
`“Operating companies are going to be disturbed by not only the size of the award but also the damages
`theory,” said Michael Tomasulo, a Winston Strawn lawyer who attended the trial. “They more or less
`seemed to have bought the entire VLSI case.”
`
`The damage award is about half of Intel’s fourth-quarter profit. The company has dominated the $400
`billion chip industry for most of the past 30 years, though it’s struggling to maintain that position.
`
`The verdict is smaller than the $2.5 billion verdict won by Merck & Co. over a hepatitis C treatment. It
`was later thrown out. Last year, Cisco Systems Inc. was told by a federal judge in Virginia to pay $1.9
`billion to a small cybersecurity companies that accused it of copying a feature to steal away
`government contracts. Cisco has asked the judge for a new trial.
`
`Paid Post
`Firms Innovate Under Covid Pressure Without Using Complex
`Code
`
`Quickbase
`
` the few in-person patent trials in recent months, with many courts pressing
`The case is among
`pause amid the coronavirus pandemic. It was delayed a week because of the winter storm that wreaked
`havoc across much of Texas.
`
` by Albright, a
`Intel had sought to postpone the case because of the pandemic, but was rejected
`former patent litigator and magistrate who was sworn in as a federal judge in 2018 and has quickly
`turned his courtroom into one of the most popular for patent owners to file suit.
`
`The case is VLSI Technoloy LLC v. Intel Corp., 2157, U.S. District Court for the Western District of
`Texas (Waco).
`
`— With assistance by Laurel Brubaker Calkins, and Ian King
`
`(Updates with VLSI comment in 12th paragraph. An earlier version corrected the spelling of law firm name
`in eighth paragraph.)
`
`https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-02/intel-told-to-pay-2-18-billion-after-losing-texas-patent-trial
`
`3/4
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Koss 2013
`IPR2021-00297
`
`

`

`3/11/2021
`In this article
`
`Intel Told to Pay $2.18 Billion After Losing Patent Trial - Bloomberg
`
`INTC
`INTEL CORP
`63.31 USD
`
`+1.06 +1.70%
`
`CSCO
`CISCO SYSTEMS
`48.80 USD
`+0.51 +1.06%
`
`AONE
`ONE - CLASS A
`12.15 USD
`+0.63 +5.47%
`
`0734746D
`SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CORP
`Private Company
`
`1016055D
`MERCK & CO
`Private Company
`
`Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Info (California) Trademarks Privacy Policy
`©2021 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved
` Contact Us Help
`Careers Made in NYC Advertise Ad Choices
`
`https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-02/intel-told-to-pay-2-18-billion-after-losing-texas-patent-trial
`
`4/4
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Koss 2013
`IPR2021-00297
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket