throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN WIRELESS HEADSETS
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-943
`(Remand)
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DETERMINATION NOT TO REVIEW AN INITIAL
`DETERMINATION GRANTING A JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE
`INVESTIGATION AS TO RESPONDENT GN NETCOM A/S BASED ON A
`SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT;
`TERMINATION OF THE INVESTIGATION
`
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`ACTION:
`
`Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined not to review an initial determination ("ID") (Order No. 29) granting a joint motion
`to terminate the above-captioned remand investigation as to the last-remaining respondent, GN
`Netcom A/S d/b/a Jabra ofBallerup, Denmark ("GN"), based on a settlement agreement. The
`investigation is terminated in its entirety.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,
`telephone 202-708-2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this
`investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to
`5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
`S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the
`Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The
`public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
`(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this
`matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on
`January 13, 2015, based on a complaint filed by One-E-Way, Inc. of Pasadena, California ("One(cid:173)
`E-Way"). 80 FR 1663 (Jan. 13, 2015). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the
`sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless
`headsets by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,865,258 ("the '258
`patent") and 8,131,391 ("the '391 patent"). Id. The notice of investigation named several
`respondents, including GN Netcom A/S d/b/a Jabra of Ballerup ("GN"), Denmark; BlueAnt
`Wireless Pty, Ltd. of Richmond, Australia and BlueAnt Wireless, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois
`( collectively, "BlueAnt"); Creative Technology Ltd. of Singapore and Creative Labs, Inc. of
`
`1
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1029
`Page 001
`
`

`

`Milpitas, California (collectively, "Creative"); Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan, Sony
`Corporation of America of New York, New York, and Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego,
`California (collectively, "Sony"). Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations ("OUII") was
`also named as a party to the investigation. Id. The Commission also previously terminated other
`respondents prior to the original termination of the investigation. See Notice (Apr. 20, 2015);
`Notice (June 11, 2015).
`
`On September 21, 2015, the ALJ issued Order No. 17, granting Respondents' motion for
`summary determination that the asserted claims of the '258 and '391 patents are invalid as
`indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ,r 2 and terminated the investigation with a finding of no
`violation of section 337. Order No. 17 (Sept. 21, 2015). On May 12, 2016, the Commission
`affirmed the ID with modification. 81 FR 31257 (May 18, 2016). Thereafter, One-E-Way filed
`a notice of appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Appeal No. 2016-2105).
`
`On June 12, 2017, the Court reversed the Commission's summary determination that the
`asserted claims are invalid as indefinite under § 112, ,r 2 and remanded the investigation to the
`Commission for further proceedings. One-E-Way, Inc. v. ITC, 859 F.3d 1059 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
`On October 13, 2016, the Commission remanded the investigation to the ALJ for further
`proceedings consistent with the Court's decision. Order (Oct. 13, 2016). OUII is not
`participating in the remand proceedings. The Commission previously terminated Sony, Creative,
`and BlueAnt from the remand investigation. Order 24 (Feb. 26, 2018) (unreviewed Notice (Mar.
`20, 2018)); Order No. 25 (June 26, 2018) (unreviewed Notice (July 17, 2018)); Order No. 28
`(Aug. 1, 2018) (unreviewed Notice (Aug. 15, 2018)).
`
`On August 2, 2018, One-E-Way and GN filed a joint motion to terminate the remand
`investigation as to GN based upon a settlement and license agreement. The motion was
`unopposed, and no responses to the motion were filed.
`
`On August 6, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID pursuant to Commission Rule
`210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)), granting the joint motion to terminate GN based on a settlement
`and license agreement. The ID finds that the settlement agreement is consistent with the
`requirements of Commission Rule 210 .21 (b )(1) (19 CFR 210 .21 (b )( 1) ). The ID also finds,
`pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), that the requested
`termination does not impose any undue burdens on the public health and welfare, competitive
`conditions in the United States economy, production oflike or directly competitive articles in the
`United States, or United States consumers. No petitions for review were filed.
`
`The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. As GN is the last
`remaining respondent, the termination of GN also terminates the remand investigation in its
`entirety.
`
`2
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1029
`Page 002
`
`

`

`The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210).

`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Issued: August 17, 2018
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`3
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1029
`Page 003
`
`

`

`CERTAIN WIRELESS HEADSETS
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-943
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served upon the
`following parties as indicated on August 17, 2018.
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainant One-E-Way, Inc.:
`
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser, Esq.
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSEN & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`On Behalf of Respondents GN Netcom A/S d/b/a Jabra:
`
`William B. Nash, Esq.
`HA YNES AND BOONE, LLP
`112 East Pecan, Suite 1200
`San Antonio, TX 78205
`
`D Via Hand Delivery
`D Via Express Delivery
`IZI Via First Class Mail
`D Other: - - - - - -
`
`D Via Hand Delivery
`D Via Express Delivery
`IZI Via First Class Mail
`D Other: . _____ _
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1029
`Page 004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket