throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-943
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS HEADSETS
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANT’S MOTION FOR TERMINATION AS TO
`RESPONDENTS BEATS ELECTRONICS, LLC AND
`BEATS ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL
`
`
`
`
`
`Complainant One-E-Way, Inc. (“One-E-Way”), by and through its undersigned counsel,
`
`pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(a), moves for the withdrawal of the allegations of the Complaint
`
`against Respondents Beats Electronics, LLC and Beats Electronics International (collectively
`
`“Beats”), and the termination of this Investigation with respect to Beats. In addition, so as to
`
`conserve the parties’ and judicial resources, One-E-Way requests that the procedural schedule be
`
`suspended with respect to Beats pending a ruling on the motion to terminate. This motion is
`
`based upon Beats’ statements in discovery responses that Beats does not presently, and did not at
`
`the time of the filing of the Complaint in this Investigation, import or sell any of the products
`
`accused of infringement in this Investigation, and that such activities have been carried out
`
`entirely by other entities during the relevant time period. With the exception of a
`
`Non-Disclosure Agreement put in place to facilitate possible settlement discussions, there are no
`
`agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between One-E-Way and Beats concerning the
`
`subject matter of this Investigation.
`
`- 1 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 001
`
`

`

`GROUND RULE 5.1.2 CERTIFICATION
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 5.1.2, One-E-Way certifies that it has made good-faith efforts to
`
`resolve the matter with all parties since March 23, 2015. Respondents Beats, BlueAnt, Creative,
`
`Jawbone, Sennheiser and Sony have no objections to the filing of this motion. Respondent GN
`
`Netcom has not taken a position. The Staff is not taking a position on the motion until its filing.
`
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 5.1.1, this Memorandum of Points and Authorities is included
`
`within the four corners of this Joint Motion because it is less than five pages in length.
`
`Commission Rule 210.21(a), 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(a), authorizes the termination of an
`
`Investigation against any respondent or respondents for good cause. “[I]n the absence of
`
`extraordinary circumstances, termination of the investigation will be granted to a complainant
`
`during the prehearing stage of an investigation.” Certain Digital Televisions and Components
`
`Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-789, Order No. 17 (Oct. 17, 2011) (quoting Certain Ultrafiltration
`
`Systems and Components Thereof, Including Ultrafiltration Membranes, Inv. No. 337-TA-107,
`
`Comm’n Action and Order at 2 (Mar. 11, 1982)). “Public policy supports termination in order to
`
`conserve public and private resources.” Certain Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products
`
`Containing Same Including Televisions, Media Players, and Cameras, Inv. No. 337-TA-709,
`
`Order No. 48 (Feb. 7, 2011). In particular, an Investigation may be terminated as to a respondent
`
`who “does not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation any accused products.”
`
`Certain Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products Containing Same Including Televisions,
`
`Media Players, and Cameras, Inv. No. 337-TA-709, Order No. 20 (Sept. 30, 2010).
`
`Here, according to Beats’ discovery responses, Beats does not presently, and did not at
`
`the time of the filing of the Complaint in this Investigation, import or sell any of the products
`
`- 2 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 002
`
`

`

`accused of infringement in this Investigation, and such activities have been carried out entirely
`
`by other entities. Beats’ counsel confirmed, in conferring with One-E-Way’s counsel, that
`
`Beats’ discovery responses were based on a good faith effort to collect and present accurate
`
`information. Accordingly, One-E-Way submits that good cause exists for the termination of the
`
`Investigation with respect to Beats only. In addition, in order to avoid unnecessary work on the
`
`part of the private parties and the Administrative Law Judge, One-E-Way proposes that the
`
`procedural schedule be suspended with respect to Beats pending a ruling on this motion to
`
`terminate. One-E-Way and Beats are in agreement that suspension is appropriate in light of the
`
`motion to terminate.
`
`One-E-Way therefore respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge (1) stay the
`
`procedural schedule with respect to Beats pending a ruling on One-E-Way’s motion to terminate
`
`Beats, (2) issue an Initial Determination granting this motion by terminating this Investigation
`
`with respect to Respondents Beats Electronics, LLC and Beats Electronics International in
`
`accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(a), and (3) certify the Initial Determination to the
`
`Commission.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 31, 2015
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`Douglas G. Muehlhauser
`Paul A. Stewart
`Payson LeMeilleur
`Alan G. Laquer
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Telephone: (949) 760-0404
`Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
`
`Counsel for Complainant, One-E-Way, Inc.
`
`- 3 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 003
`
`

`

`Via Electronic Filing (EDIS)
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I caused copies of
`that on March 31, 2015,
`The undersigned certifies
`
`COMPLAINANT’S MOTION FOR TERMINATION AS TO RESPONDENTS BEATS
`ELECTRONICS, LLC AND BEATS ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL to be filed and
`served as indicated below:
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Administrative Law Judge – U.S. International Trade Commission
`Via overnight delivery (2 copies)
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`and
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Via E-mail - Gregory.Moldafsky@usitc.gov
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`Staff Investigative Attorney – U.S. International Trade Commission
`Vu Bui, Lead Attorney
`Via E-mail – Vu.Bui@usitc.gov
`Office of Unfair Import Investigation
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Respondents
`For Respondents Sony Corporation / Sony
`Corporation of America / Sony Electronics Inc.
`
`Paul T. Qualey
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`1500 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 220-4200
`Facsimile: (202) 220-4201
`
`
`Via E-mail – Sony-ITC-943@kenyon.com
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Via E-mail –
`SennheiserITC@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`
`Via Email – BlueAntITC@novakdruce.com
`
`
`Via E-mail –
`Creative-ITC-943@farneydaniels.com
`
`
`Via E-mail –
`Beats-OEWCase@hoganlovells.com
`
`
`Via E-mail - stephen.smith@cooley.com
`Jawbone-ITC@cooley.com
`
`
`For Respondent
`Sennheiser Electronic Corporation and
`Sennheiser Electronic GmbH & Co. KG
`
`Sean DeBruine
`KILPATRICK, TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
`LLP
`1080 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`For Respondents
`BlueAnt Wireless, Inc. and BlueAnt
`Wireless Pty, Ltd.
`
`Duane H. Mathiowetz
`NOVAK DRUCE CONNOLLY BOVE +
`QUIGG LLP
`555 Mission Street, 34th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`
`For Respondents
`Creative Technology Ltd. and Creative Labs, Inc.
`
`Jonathan Baker
`FARNEY DANIELS PC
`411 Borel Avenue, Suite 350
`San Mateo, CA 94402
`
`For Respondents
`Beats Electronics, LLC and
`Beats Electronics International
`
`Celine J. Crowson
`HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP
`555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`Telephone: 202-637-5600
`For Respondent
`AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone
`
`Stephen R. Smith
`COOLEY LLP
`1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Suite 700
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: (202) 842-7800
`Fax: (202) 842-7899
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 005
`
`

`

`For Respondent
`GN Netcom A/S d/b/a Jabra
`
`William B. Nash
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`112 East Pecan Street, Suite 1200
`San Antonio, TX 78205
`Telephone: (210) 978-7000
`Facsimile: (210) 978-7450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20272168
`033015
`
`Via E-mail – GN-ITC@haynesboone.com
`
`
`/s/ Margaret H. Greenwalt
`Margaret H. Greenwalt
`Litigation Paralegal
`Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`Petitioner's Exhibit 1026
`Page 006
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket