`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________________________________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. AND
`APPLE, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC
`
`Patent Owner.
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2021-00145
`U.S. Patent No. 8,812,993
`_________________________
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.10(c)
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board recognize Mr. Zachary Loney
`
`as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`1.
`
`Time For Filing
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed no sooner than
`
`twenty-one (21) days after service of the petition in accordance with the “Order --
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639,
`
`Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative
`
`Orders, Decisions, and Notices.”
`
`2.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`As required by the Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice, the
`
`following statement of facts shows that there is good cause for the Board to
`
`recognize Mr. Loney pro hac vice.
`
`Mr. Loney is an experienced litigation attorney, with experience in
`
`numerous litigations involving patent infringement in District Courts across the
`
`country, including experience Markman hearings and oral arguments in patent
`
`infringement litigation.
`
`Mr. Loney has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this proceeding. Petitioner wishes to continue using Mr. Loney as counsel in this
`
`proceeding and has executed a Power of Attorney designating Mr. Loney as
`
`2
`
`
`
`backup counsel. Counsel for Patent Owner does not oppose Mr. Loney appearing
`
`pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`Therefore, Petitioner respectfully submits that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Mr. Loney as counsel pro hac vice during this proceeding.
`
`3.
`
`Affidavit or Declaration of Individual Seeking to Appear
`
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a Declaration
`
`of Mr. Loney (Exhibit 1050) as required by Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac
`
`Vice in Case IPR2013-00639.
`
`November 24, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /David L. Holt/
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`David L. Holt, Reg. No. 65,161
`Tiffany C. Miller, Reg. 52,032
`James M. Heintz, Reg. No. 41,828
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission and Exhibit 1050 have been served via Electronic Mail upon
`
`the following on November 24, 2021:
`
`Robert M. Asher (rasher@sunsteinlaw.com)
`Bruce D. Sunstein (bsunstein@sunsteinlaw.com)
`Timothy M. Murphy (tmurphy@sunsteinlaw.com)
`Arne Hans (ahans@sunsteinlaw.com)
`Phil J. Graves (philipg@hbsslaw.com)
`Greer N. Shaw (greers@hbsslaw.com)
`Mark S. Carlson (markc@hbsslaw.com)
`
`/Crena Pacheco/
`Crena Pacheco
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(617) 956-5938
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
