`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., AND APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00145
`Patent 8,812,993
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s e-mail of August 10, 2021, Patent Owner Neonode
`
`Case IPR2021-00145
`Patent 8,812,993
`
`
`
`
`Smartphone LLC and Petitioners Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung
`
`Electronics America, Inc., and Apple Inc. hereby stipulate that DUE DATES 1-3
`
`be modified as follows below:
`
` DUE DATE 1: September 8, 2021 September 22, 2021
`
` DUE DATE 2: December 1, 2021 December 15, 2021
`
` DUE DATE 3: January 12, 2022 January 26, 2022
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioners further stipulate to the addition of the
`
`following briefing to the schedule of the IPR:
`
` Patent Owner may file a Supplemental Brief of no more than 18 pages
`
`and supporting materials containing facts, evidence and argument
`
`arising out of discovery in Sweden, including but not limited to any
`
`testimony or documents or other materials provided by Magnus
`
`Goertz and/or Thomas Eriksson, by January 12, 2022;
`
` Petitioners may file a Supplemental Brief of no more than 18 pages
`
`and supporting materials in Opposition to Patent Owner’s
`
`Supplemental Brief, and supporting materials containing facts,
`
`evidence and argument arising out of discovery in Sweden, including
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00145
`Patent 8,812,993
`
`but not limited to any testimony or documents or other materials
`
`provided by Magnus Goertz and/or Thomas Eriksson, by February 23,
`
`2022, with any supplemental evidence served pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §
`
`42.64(b)(2) being served within five business days of service of any
`
`objections to evidence submitted with Petitioners’ Opposition Brief;
`
`and
`
` Patent Owner may file a Reply in Support of its Supplemental Brief of
`
`no more than 5 pages of argument, as well as supporting materials
`
`consisting of deposition transcripts of the cross-examination of any
`
`witness proffered in support of Petitioners’ Supplemental Brief, by
`
`March 9, 2022.
`
`Patent Owner and Petitioners propose that DUE DATES 5-8 be modified as
`
`follows below, which the Board has indicated it will consider at a later date:
`
` DUE DATE 5: February 23, 2022 March 16, 2022
`
` DUE DATE 6: March 2, 2022 March 23, 2022
`
` DUE DATE 7: March 9, 2022 March 30, 2022
`
` DUE DATE 7: March 17, 2022 April 7, 2022
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: ___August 11, 2021_____
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00145
`Patent 8,812,993
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/W. Karl Renner/
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`David L. Holt, Reg. No. 65,161
`Tiffany C. Miller, Reg. 52,032
`James M. Heintz, Reg. No. 41,828
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 11, 2021, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER was
`
`served via email, by consent, to Patent Owner by serving the correspondence email
`
`addresses of record as follows:
`
`Robert M. Asher
`Bruce D. Sunstein
`Timothy M. Murphy
`Arne Hans
`Sunstein LLP
`100 High Street
`Boston, MA 02110-2321
`Email: sunsteinip@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`
`Philip J. Graves, philipg@hbsslaw.com
`Greer N. Shaw, greers@hbsslaw.com
`Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
`301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 920
`Pasadena, CA 91101
`
`Mark S. Carlson, markc@hbsslaw.com
`Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
`1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000
`Seattle, WA 98101
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Crena Pacheco/
`Crena Pacheco
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(617) 956-5938
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
