throbber
Pergamon
`
`PII: S0042-207X(98)00265-6
`
`Vacuum/volume 51/number 4/pages 641to 646/1998
`ª 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd
`All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain
`0042-207X/98 Sl - see front matter
`
`High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering of
`oxide and nitride superlattice coatings
`
`W D Sproul,*, Sputtered Films, Inc., 320 Nopal Street, Santa Barbara, California 93103, U.S.A.
`
`Over the past 10 years, there have been three major advancements in reactive sputtering technology that now make it
`possible to deposit both conductive and non-conductive fully-dense films at high rates. These three advances are unba-
`lanced magnetron sputtering, partial pressure control of the reactive gas, and pulsed dc power. Multicathode unba-
`lanced magnetron sputtering systems provide a dense secondary plasma that is used for producing a well-adhered,
`fully dense film that is difficult to achieve with conventional magnetron sputtering. Online automatic partial pressure
`control of the reactive gas prevents the poisoning of the target surface during deposition, which leads to compound
`film deposition rates that approach or are equal to those for the pure metal rate. Pulsed dc power, where the polarity
`of the voltage on the sputtering target is alternately switched briefly between negative and positive, prevents arcing on
`the target surface during the deposition of nonconducting films. With both pulsed dc power and partial pressure control
`of the reactive gas, films such as aluminum oxide can now be deposited reactively at rates up to 78% of the pure metal
`rate. The reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering process is used to deposit polycrystalline nitride superlattice films
`such as TiN/NbN or TiN/VN with hardnesses exceeding 50 GPa, which is more than double the hardness of either com-
`ponent in the multilayered film. The nitride superlattice work is being extended to oxide films, and initial results are
`encouraging. Nanometer scale, multilayer Al2O3/ZrO2 and Y2O3/ZrO2 films have been deposited at high rates. The
`Al2O3/ZrO2 films are amorphous and optically clear, whereas the Y2O3/ZrO2 films are crystalline as well as being opti-
`cally clear. ª1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
`
`Introduction
`
`Unbalanced magnetron sputtering
`
`Since the middle 1980s, there have been three major advance-
`ments in sputtering technology that have greatly a€ected the
`ability to reactively sputter fully dense, well-adhered films at
`high deposition rates. In 1986, Window and Savvides1–3 intro-
`duced the concept of unbalanced magnetron sputtering, and in
`the years since, it has been widely embraced by the sputtering
`community. Combined with partial pressure control of the
`reactive gas during the reactive sputter deposition of coatings,
`unbalanced magnetron sputtering today is one of the primary
`techniques for the deposition of hard coatings.
`Most recently, the introduction of pulsed direct current (dc)
`power is already having an important e€ect on the reactive
`sputtering of non-conducting films such as aluminum oxide
`(Al2O3). The combination of partial pressure control of the
`reactive gas, unbalanced magnetron sputtering, and pulsed dc
`power is a powerful tool for the high-rate reactive deposition
`of compound films. Each of these three techniques will be
`reviewed, and then they will be looked at together to show the
`full potential for the synergistic e€ects for the deposition of
`non-conducting films.
`
`*To whom all correspondence should be addressed
`
`A conventional magnetron sputtering cathode has magnets
`located along the outer edge and the centerline or at the center
`if the cathode is round. If the strength of the inner and outer
`magnets
`is
`roughly equal,
`the magnetron is
`said to be
`balanced, and most of
`the magnetic field lines will
`loop
`between the inner and outer magnets as is shown in Figure 1.
`If one of the sets of magnets is made stronger than the other,
`then the magnetron becomes unbalanced. Typically the outer
`set of magnets in the magnetron cathode is made stronger
`than the inner ones. Although there is still linkage between
`magnetic fields of the inner and outer magnets, not all of the
`field line will make the link. The excess field lines from the
`stronger magnets will radiate away from the magnet surfaces
`as is shown in Figure 2.
`During magnetron sputtering, energetic electrons escape
`from the primary magnetic trap between the inner and outer
`magnets, and in a balanced magnetron, these electrons go to
`the anode. It is the primary electron trap that is responsible
`for the formation of the dense plasma directly in front of the
`sputtering target and for the high deposition rate of the mag-
`netron cathode compared to a diode cathode.
`In an unbalanced magnetron, the escaping energetic elec-
`trons are trapped by the excess magnetic field lines, and the
`
`641
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS EXHIBIT 1036
`
`

`

`W D Sproul: High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering
`
`Figure 1. Schematic drawing of a balanced magnetron sputtering cath-
`ode.
`
`electrons spiral along the field lines and undergo ionizing col-
`lisions with gas atoms. A secondary plasma is formed away
`from the target surface from these ionizing collisions, and this
`secondary plasma can be used for ion-assisted deposition of
`the growing film. The current density collected on the sub-
`strate during unbalanced magnetron sputtering is usually an
`order of magnitude higher than it is in conventional balanced
`magnetron sputtering, and substrate current densities are typi-
`cally 5–10 mA cm(cid:255)2 with unbalanced magnetron sputtering.
`These current densities match or exceed the substrate current
`densities found in other ion-assisted deposition techniques.
`When multiple unbalanced magnetron cathodes are used in
`the same chamber, it is important to link their magnetic fields
`in order to maximize the trapping of electrons. In an opposed,
`two cathode system, the polarity of the outer and inner mag-
`nets on one cathode should be opposite to that polarity of the
`magnets in the cathode that it is facing; i.e., north pole should
`face south pole and vice-versa. The magnetic trap cannot be
`complete if an odd number of cathodes are used. It is necess-
`
`Figure 2. Schematic drawing of an unbalanced magnetron sputtering
`cathode.
`
`642
`
`ary to have an even number of cathodes to prevent a hole in
`the magnetic trap.
`Four cathode rectangular unbalanced magnetron systems
`link magnetic fields with the cathode next to it and not to the
`one opposite it in the chamber. This linking provides good
`magnetic trapping of the electrons in one plane, but not in
`another. At the top and bottom of the cathodes, the magnetic
`field lines are in opposite directions, and there are holes in the
`magnetic trap. To overcome this problem, steel plates are
`placed at the top and bottom of the cathodes, and an electro-
`static charge on these plates prevents the electrons from escap-
`ing from the trap. The electrostatic charge can come simply by
`letting the plates electrically float in the plasma.
`Ion-assisted deposition is very important for forming fully
`dense, well-adhered hard coatings. Both the ion-current den-
`sity and the ion energy (bias voltage) play significant roles in
`ion-assisted deposition. In balanced magnetron sputtering, the
`ion current density is limited, and what is lacking in ion cur-
`rent density has to be made up with the energy of the arriving
`ions. Typical ion current densities in balanced magnetron sput-
`tering are less than 1 mA cm(cid:255)2, which produces low ion to
`arriving neutral species ratios. High bias voltages can be used
`to overcome partially the low ion to neutral ratio, but high
`bias voltages produce more damage than can be annealed out
`by the ion energy input.
`Unbalanced magnetron sputtering, by producing a dense
`secondary plasma around the substrate, provides a high ion
`current density, on the order of 1–5 mA cm(cid:255)2, and the ion
`energy does not have to be as high as it is in balanced magne-
`tron sputtering. Ion to neutral ratios greater than one are
`often reported for the unbalanced magnetron sputtering of
`hard coatings such as titanium nitride. Fully dense coatings
`are usually produced when the negative substrate bias voltage
`is in the 100–150 V range.
`
`Reactive sputtering
`
`Reactive sputtering is the sputtering of a metallic target in the
`presence of a gas that will react with the metal atom ejected
`from the target surface. Historically mass flow control has
`been used to control the amount of reactive gas flowing into
`the chamber, but flow control of the reactive gas can lead to
`problems. If the target is set at a fixed power and the flow of
`the reactive gas is increased, initially all of the reactive gas will
`be consumed by the reaction with the metal.
`However, a point is reached as is shown in Figure 3 (point
`A) for the reactive sputtering of titanium in an argon/oxygen
`atmosphere where the amount of reactive gas in the chamber
`is su(cid:129)cient to react with the surface of the target. When this
`happens and the oxide compound covers the surface of the
`target (the target is said to be poisoned), the sputtering rate
`drops rapidly because the sputtering rate of the compound is
`much less than that for the metal. Since the rate has decreased,
`not as much reactive gas is consumed, and its partial pressure
`jumps rapidly from point A to point B as is shown in Figure 3.
`With flow control, it is very di(cid:129)cult to operate between points
`A and B, and there is a range of compositions that is forbid-
`den between these two points.
`Partial pressure control of the reactive gas overcomes the
`problems of the flow control.4–6 Using a sensor such as a
`quadrupole mass spectrometer that can provide a quick feed-
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`

`W D Sproul: High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering
`
`Figure 3. Hysteresis plot for the reactive sputtering of titanium in an argon/oxygen atmosphere with flow control of the reactive gas. The target
`power was 8 kW, and the total pressure during deposition was 1.1 Pa.
`
`back signal for the partial pressure of the reactive gas, it is
`possible to control the partial pressure of the reactive gas at
`any desired set point as is shown in Figure 4 for the reactive
`sputtering of titanium in an argon/oxygen atmosphere. There
`are no forbidden compositions with partial pressure control,
`and it is possible to operate at any point between A and B in
`Figure 4. At point B, the target is fully poisoned, and the sput-
`tering rate is very low. As the partial pressure is lowered
`toward point A, the deposition rate increases, and the chal-
`lenge is to operate at as low a partial pressure that will pro-
`duce the desired composition.
`There are two main benefits of partial pressure control of
`the reactive gas. The first is that it is possible to reactively
`sputter hard compounds such as TiN at the same deposition
`rate as is found for the pure metal.4 No higher rate can be
`achieved. Secondly, partial pressure control provides precise
`
`control of the composition of the compound, and it is possible
`to produce the same compound material in every run.
`Reactive sputtering of oxides until just recently had been a
`di(cid:129)cult task. Oxygen reacts much more quickly with the target
`surface than does nitrogen, and it often forms an insulating
`compound on the target surface, which leads to di(cid:129)culty in
`sputtering the desired material. When an insulating material
`forms on the surface of the sputtering target during depo-
`sition, those insulating surfaces build up a charge and then dis-
`charge during dc reactive sputtering, which results in arcing.
`This arcing is particularly violent for reactive dc sputtering of
`Al2O3, and it can result in damage to the power supply and
`liquid droplet ejection from the target surface.
`Radio frequency (rf) power can be used for the reactive
`sputtering of oxides, but it has its own set of problems.
`Essentially half of the power is not used for sputtering, and
`
`Figure 4. Hysteresis plot for the reactive sputtering of titanium in an argon/oxygen atmosphere with partial pressure control of the reactive gas.
`The target power was 5 kW, and the total pressure during deposition was 1.1 Pa.
`
`643
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`

`W D Sproul: High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering
`
`the deposition rates for reactive rf power are much lower than
`that for the pure metal. For example, aluminum oxide reactive
`sputters with rf power at only 2–3% of the metal deposition
`rate.
`One method used to overcome the problems of using dc
`power for reactive sputtering of nonconducting coatings is to
`shield the sputtering target from the reactive gas. Typically,
`the target is enclosed in a box, with a mesh screen over the
`target to let the sputtered atoms out. The argon sputtering gas
`is injected into the system next to the target, and the reactive
`gas is injected next to the substrate. Although this method
`does allow dc power to be used for the sputtering of noncon-
`ducting coatings, the screen does reduce the sputtering rate
`since it intercepts part of the sputtered flux. Keeping the
`screen open is a problem with this method, and constant main-
`tenance of the screen is required.
`
`Pulsed dc power
`
`Within the past few years, it has been shown7–11 that bipolar
`pulsed dc power can be used for the reactive sputter deposition
`of oxides. With bipolar pulsed power, the polarity of the target
`power is switched from negative to positive, and during the
`positive pulse any charging of the oxide layer is discharged
`when electrons are attracted to the positive surface. During
`the negative pulse, ions are attracted to the target surface, and
`sputtering takes place initially from all surfaces on the target
`even those that have formed a compound since the charge on
`that surface has been neutralized during the positive pulse.
`Bipolar pulsed power is classified as either symmetric or
`asymmetric, which refers to the pulse height in the positive
`and negative directions.12 Symmetric bipolar pulsed dc power
`has equal pulse heights in both the positive and negative direc-
`tions, as is shown in Figure 5, and the width of both the posi-
`tive and negative pulses can be varied independently as can
`the time o€ between pulses. Symmetric bipolar pulsed dc
`power is often used for the reactive deposition of an oxide
`coating from two magnetron cathodes. These two cathodes,
`which are located side by side, are both connected to the same
`symmetric bipolar pulsed dc power supplied. One power lead
`goes to one cathode, and the other power lead is connected to
`the second cathode. With this electrical hookup, one sputtering
`target is the anode for the system, while the other is the cath-
`
`Figure 5. Schematic representation of symmetric bipolar pulsed dc
`power.
`
`644
`
`Figure 6. Schematic representation of asymmetric bipolar pulsed dc
`power.
`
`ode. When the polarity of the voltage on the targets changes,
`the anode and cathode switch as well. Sputtering from the
`cathode surface during the negative pulse keeps the target sur-
`face clean, and when it switches to act as an anode, it is not
`covered by an oxide. This procedure avoids the disappearing
`anode problem, which can occur in pulsed dc sputtering of ox-
`ides when all surfaces in the chamber become covered with an
`insulating oxide.
`Asymmetric bipolar pulsed dc power, on the other hand,
`has unequal pulse heights. The negative pulse height is greater
`than the positive one, and there is no o€ time between pulses
`as is shown in Figure 6. The width of the positive pulse is a
`fraction of the negative pulse width, and its width is usually
`10–20% of the width of the negative one. A significant portion
`of the power cycle is spent in the sputtering mode, and the de-
`position rate from asymmetric power can be close to that of
`pure dc power. The frequency of pulsed dc power covers a
`wide range from 0 (normal dc) up to 250 kHz, and typical
`operating frequencies for the pulsed dc power during reactive
`sputtering of oxides are in the 20–100 kHz range.
`The frequency selected is a function of the material being
`reactively sputtered. Whereas no arcing can be achieved for
`the reactive sputtering of titanium dioxide at a pulsing fre-
`quency of 30 kHz, it takes a frequency between 50 and 70 kHz
`for all arcing to disappear for aluminum oxide.11 With both
`partial pressure control of the reactive gas and asymmetric
`pulsed dc power, we have been able to reactively sputter
`aluminum oxide with no arcing at a frequency of 70 kHz.
`Although in theory pulsed dc power has a rectangular wave
`form, in fact it does not. There can be overshoot in the nega-
`tive pulse and ringing on the positive pulse as is shown in
`Figure 7. This overshoot can be significant, and the target vol-
`tage shown on the power supply can be quite misleading.13, 14
`For the example shown in Figure 7, the average target voltage
`is about (cid:255)450 volts, which was displayed on the front panel of
`the power supply, but in fact the peak-to-peak voltage was
`about 1500 volts. Such high voltages will produce much more
`energetic particles during part of the pulse cycle, and the e€ect
`of these energetic particles on the structure and properties of
`the coating is still being evaluated. Initially there has been no
`noticeable e€ect of these high energetic neutrals on the proper-
`ties of the coatings, but there may be applications where this
`high energy could be detrimental. In many ways, the voltages
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`

`W D Sproul: High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering
`
`Figure 7. Trace of pulsed dc power during the reactive sputter of aluminum in an argon/oxygen atmosphere.
`
`produced during asymmetric pulsed dc sputtering are similar
`to the voltages found in dc diode systems.
`
`Reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering of multilayered
`coatings
`
`Reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering in an opposed-
`cathode system has been used very successfully to deposit nan-
`ometer-scale multilayer nitride and oxide films that have
`enhanced physical properties.15–19 The first work in this area
`was with titanium nitride/niobium nitride (TiN/NbN) and tita-
`nium nitride/vanadium nitride (TiN/VN) coatings. Partial
`pressure control of the reactive gas was crucial to achieve the
`cubic form of NbN, and the high degree of ion bombardment
`from the unbalanced magnetron sources led to fully dense
`
`well-adhered films. The hardness of the TiN/NbN and TiN/
`VN films was greater than 50 GPa, which is more than twice
`the hardness of either component in these two multilayered
`films, when the superlattice period, which is the bilayer thick-
`ness of the TiN and NbN or TiN and VN, was in the range of
`50 to 80 A˚ . The individual
`layer thicknesses were approxi-
`mately equal.
`The importance of the combination of pulsed dc power and
`partial pressure control of the reactive gas really came into the
`spotlight with the reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering of
`non-conducting oxides
`such as aluminum oxide (Al2O3).
`Without this combination of pulsed dc power and partial
`pressure control, it really was not possible to reactively sputter
`Al2O3 at high deposition rates in a practical way. A portion of
`the hysteresis loop for the reactive sputtering of aluminum in
`
`Figure 8. Nose region of the hysteresis curve for the reactive sputtering of aluminum in an argon/oxygen atmosphere. Full curve is shown in the
`inset in the lower left corner of the diagram.
`
`645
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`

`W D Sproul: High-rate reactive DC magnetron sputtering
`
`an oxygen/argon atmosphere20, 21 is shown in Figure 8. As is
`shown in this figure, small changes in the partial pressure of
`oxygen lead to large changes in the deposition rate, and rates
`as high as 78% of the metal deposition rate can be achieved
`for an optically clear amorphous film of Al2O3. To achieve
`this sensitive control of the reactive sputtering of Al2O3, both
`pulsed dc power and partial pressure control of the reactive
`gas must be used.
`Other oxide films have also been deposited using the com-
`bined pulsed dc power and partial pressure control of the reac-
`tive gas in the unbalanced magnetron sputtering system.
`Oxides of
`titanium, zirconium, hafnium, chromium, mag-
`nesium, silicon, yttrium, tantalum, and an alloy of zirconium
`and yttrium have all been successfully deposited using this
`technology.
`Multilayered oxide films have been deposited very success-
`fully via reactive unbalanced magnetron sputtering using
`pulsed dc power and partial pressure control of the reactive
`gas. Aluminum oxide/zirconium oxide (Al2O3/Zr02) films were
`deposited simultaneously in an opposed-cathode unbalanced
`magnetron sputtering system,19 and the substrate was rotated
`between the two cathodes. The deposition rate was approxi-
`mately 75% of each metal rate, and both individual
`layer
`thicknesses of the Al2O3 and ZrO2 were about 45 A˚
`each,
`which gave a bilayer thickness of 90 A˚ . The films were opti-
`cally clear, and the structure of the multilayer film was amor-
`phous as determined by X-ray di€raction.
`Most recently, multilayer oxide films of yttrium oxide and
`zirconium oxide (Y2O3/ZrO2) have been deposited in the
`opposed-cathode unbalanced magnetron sputtering system
`again using pulsed dc power and partial pressure control of
`the reactive gas.14 The Y2O3/ZrO2 films were similar to the
`Al2O3/ZrO2 in that they were optically clear, but they were
`di€erent because the Y2O3/ZrO2 were crystalline with a cubic
`structure. The cubic structure of the Y2O3 forced the ZrO2,
`which normally has a monoclinic structure, into a cubic struc-
`ture. The overall film had a dense columnar structure, and
`within a column there was a true superlattice structure for the
`Y2O3/ZrO2 film. Satellite peaks were clearly visible in the X-
`ray di€raction patterns from these films. Work is currently
`underway to determine other properties of these multilayer
`oxide films.
`
`Summary
`
`Advances in reactive sputtering have made it much easier to
`deposit
`fully dense well adhered coatings. Non-conducting
`coatings such as aluminum oxide, which could not be done
`with conventional dc power, can now be reactively sputter
`deposited in a very controlled, stable way at very high depo-
`sition rates if pulsed dc power is used in conjunction with par-
`tial pressure control of the reactive gas. The high ion flux that
`is available with unbalanced magnetron systems assures a high
`
`ion to neutral ratio, which in turn leads to dense films. Other
`oxide coatings including oxides of silicon, titanium, zirconium,
`hafnium, chromium, and tantalum have also been deposited at
`very high rates compared to convention deposition techniques
`when pulsed dc power and partial pressure control are used.
`This advancement in reactive sputtering technology is opening
`up many new opportunities for the oxide films.
`
`References
`
`1. Window, B. and Savvides, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1986, 4(2),
`196.
`2. Window, B. and Savvides, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1986, 4(3),
`453.
`3. Window, B. and Savvides, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1986, 4(3),
`504.
`4. Sproul, W. D., Thin Solid Films, 1983, 107, 141.
`5. Sproul, W. D., Surf. Coat. Technol., 1987, 33, 73.
`6. Sproul, W. D., Rudnik, P. J., Graham, M. E., Gogol, C. A. and
`Mueller, R. M., Surf. Coat. Technol., 1989, 39/40, 499.
`7. Schiller, S., Goedicke, K., Reschke, J., Kirchho€, V., Schneider,
`S. and Milde, F., Surf. Coat. Technol., 1993, 61, 331.
`8. Frach, P., Heisig, U., Gottfried, Chr. and Walde, H., Surf. Coat.
`Technol., 1993, 59, 177.
`9. Graham, M.E. and Sproul, W.D., 37th Annual Technical
`Conference
`Proceedings,
`Society
`of
`Vacuum Coaters,
`Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1994, p. 275.
`10. Sproul, W. D., Graham, M. E., Wong, M. S., Lopez, S., Li,
`D. and Scholl, R. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A., 1995, 13(3), 1188.
`11. Schiller, S., Goedicke, K., Kirhho€, V. and Kopte, T., 38th
`Annual Technical Proceedings, Society of Vacuum Coaters,
`Albuquerque, NM, 1995, p. 293.
`12. Sellers, J., Asymmetric Bipolar Pulsed DC, ENI Tech Note, ENI,
`Division of Astec America,
`Inc.,
`100 Highpower Road,
`Rochester, NY 14623.
`13. Schneider,
`J.M., Sproul, W.D. and Matthews, A., Phase
`Formation and Mechanical Properties of Alumina Coatings
`Prepared at Substrate Temperatures <5008C by Ionized and
`Conventional Sputtering, paper presented at
`the International
`Conference on Metallurgical Coatings and Thin Films, Town and
`Country Hotel, San Diego, California, April 23, 1997 and
`accepted for publication in Surface and Coatings Technology.
`14. Sproul, W.D., Wong, M.S., Yashar, P., Wang, Y.Y., Barnett,
`S.A. and Chung, Y.W., Stabilization of Metastable Phases in
`Polycrystalline Nanometer-Scale Multilayered Coatings, paper
`presented at
`the
`International Conference on Metallurgical
`Coatings and Thin Films, Town and Country Hotel, San Diego,
`California, April 23, 1997.
`15. Chu, X., Wong, M. S., Sproul, W. D., Rohde, S. L. and Barnett,
`S. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A., 1992, 10(4), 1604.
`16. Chu, X., Wong, M. S., Sproul, W. D. and Barnett, S. A., Surf.
`Coat. Technol., 1993, 57, 13.
`17. Chu, X., Wong, M. S., Sproul, W. D. and Barnett, S. A., Mat.
`Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1993, 286, 379.
`18. Sproul, W. D., Science, 1996, 273, 889.
`19. Sproul, W. D., Surf. Coat. Technol., 1996, 86-87, 170.
`20. Schneider, J.M., Sproul, W.D., Wong, M.-S. and Matthews, A.,
`Very High Rate Pulsed DC Sputter Deposition of AlOx Coatings,
`accepted for publication in Surface and Coatings Technology.
`21. Schneider, J.M., Sproul, W.D., Lefkow, A.R.T., Rechner, J. and
`Matthews, A., 39th Annual Technical Proceedings, Society of
`Vacuum Coaters, Albuquerque, NM, 1996, p. 168.
`
`646
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket