throbber
Low-temperature polysilicon deposition by
`ionized magnetron sputtering
`
`Cite as: Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 18, 2006 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.582463
`Submitted: 28 September 1999 . Accepted: 27 March 2000 . Published Online: 10 July 2000
`
`Junghoon Joo
`
`ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
`
` Tutorial: Reactive high power impulse magnetron sputtering (R-HiPIMS)
`Journal of Applied Physics 121, 171101 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978350
`
`23% efficient p-type crystalline silicon solar cells with hole-selective passivating contacts
`based on physical vapor deposition of doped silicon films
`Applied Physics Letters 113, 061603 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037610
`
`High power impulse magnetron sputtering discharge
`Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 30, 030801 (2012); https://
`doi.org/10.1116/1.3691832
`
`Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 18, 2006 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1116/1.582463
`
`18, 2006
`
`© 2000 American Vacuum Society.
`
`Page 1 of 7
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS EXHIBIT 1014
`
`

`

`Low-temperature polysilicon deposition by ionized magnetron sputtering
`Junghoon Jooa)
`Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunsan National University, Kunsan 573-701 Korea
`~Received 28 September 1999; accepted 27 March 2000!
`
`Ionized magnetron sputtering was successfully applied to polycrystalline silicon thin-film deposition
`on glass substrate at temperatures lower than 250 °C maintaining a deposition rate of about 133
`Å/min. Hydrogen mixing was effective up to Ar:H2510:6 by mass flow rate. Prior to deposition,
`H2 inductively coupled plasma was used for precleaning the substrate with 240 V bias. During Si
`deposition, the substrate biasing scheme was in two steps; 120 V for an initial stage and 120 to
`240 V bipolar pulse bias for the rest of the deposition time. The crystallinity was evaluated by both
`x-ray diffraction analysis and Raman spectroscopy; the average crystalline fraction was calculated
`as 70%. Grain size was measured in plan-view scanning-electron micrographs after selective etching
`of the amorphous phase by chemical solution. In 800-nm-thick samples, grains are 500–700 Å in
`diameter. Optical emission spectroscopy was used as real-time diagnostics, and ionization of
`sputtered silicon atoms distinctly increased as the hydrogen partial pressure increased. The
`successful deposition of polycrystalline silicon was explained as being due to enhanced ionization
`of sputtered and reflected neutrals and resultant energy control by bipolar substrate bias. © 2000
`American Vacuum Society. @S0734-2101~00!13104-5#
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`The thin-film transistor/liquid-crystal display ~TFT/LCD!
`industry has been experiencing a need for finer display capa-
`bility and higher charge-carrier mobility necessary in large-
`area projection devices. Currently, laser-annealed polycrys-
`talline silicon is used, but postannealing of plasma-enhanced
`chemical vapor deposited ~PECVD! amorphous silicon ~a-
`Si! requires high-power excimer laser recrystallization and
`has inherently low throughput. The cost is still high for mass
`production, and adsorbed gases during CVD will explode
`during high-power laser scaning to make blisters in addition
`to a rough surface. A new deposition technology for direct
`polycrystalline silicon should have manufacturability and
`high crystallinity. In CVD, mixed gases of SiH4 and H2 are
`used in PECVD for depositing poly- or microcrystalline Si
`film on various substrates such as quartz, glass, and single-
`crystalline silicon. Recently, Murata et al. reported that a
`two-step process could increase the crystallinity of the Si
`film at the fairly low substrate temperature of 300 °C.1 They
`maintained a very slow deposition rate of 0.2 Å/s at the
`initial nucleation stage, equivalent to one-tenth of the total
`film thickness, and made a charge-free state by installing
`strong magnets in front of a substrate. In the following step,
`normal electron cyclotron resonance PECVD was used. The
`idea of applying a magnetic field in a large-area deposition
`machine will not be easily realized; and CVD uses toxic or
`explosive gases such as SiH4 that are not environmentally
`friendly. In the magnetron sputtering arena, Yang and Abel-
`son reported that polycrystalline silicon with a mean grain
`diameter of ;400 Å was successfully deposited on a 100-Å-
`thick microcrystalline hydrogenated silicon seed layer.2 They
`also performed a kinetic study of incoming fluxes toward a
`substrate in a reactive magnetron sputtering process; fast
`
`a!Electronic mail: jhjoo@ks.kunsan.ac.kr
`
`neutral hydrogen atoms both implant and recoil, releasing
`surface H.3 In a heavily ionized process, such as pulsed laser
`ablation, there was a report from Trusso and Vasi;4 in appro-
`priate hydrogen partial pressure, polycrystalline Si film was
`successfully deposited on a glass substrate, which means de-
`positing ions with kinetic energy of several eVs that should
`assist the adatoms to crystallize without creating severe dam-
`age. In reactive magnetron sputtering of damage-sensitive
`materials, where fast reflected neutrals ~;100 eV! cause
`damage, we can control their energy either by ionizing and
`retarding with positive substrate bias, or by collision slow-
`down in high background gas pressure. In this study, we
`applied an ICP-based ionized magnetron sputtering method
`to deposit polycrystalline Si on glass substrate, where rela-
`tively high gas pressure ~.4 Pa! is used for efficient ioniza-
`tion of sputtered neutrals by electron-impact collisions. Ion-
`ization of depositing atoms ~like Si! and proper acceleration
`would increase the adatom’s surface mobility so that crystal-
`lization at low temperature becomes easier. It is very inter-
`esting that in high-density plasmas, the angular distribution
`of incoming ions has some correlation with defect formation
`and enhanced crystallization. The balance between those two
`processes can be steered by energy control of the incoming
`particles. The benefit from the ion-assisted deposition pro-
`cess results from: ~1! the parallel component of the incoming
`particle’s momentum that is induced either from collisions in
`a substrate sheath, or ~2! succeeding elastic collisions with
`adatoms present on the substrate surface, where the trans-
`ferred energy should be lower than the minimum lattice dis-
`placement energy of the growing film surface. In the case of
`using an ion gun, the incident angle determines this effect; in
`a plasma-immersed process, this occurs because of the gas
`pressure. For an example, the above ~Trusso and Vasi! re-
`ports that laser ablation of silicon deposits poly-Si on a glass;
`most of the depositing particles are ionized by high-power
`
`2006
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18(cid:132)4(cid:133), Jul(cid:213)Aug 2000
`
`0734-2101(cid:213)2000(cid:213)18(cid:132)4(cid:133)(cid:213)2006(cid:213)6(cid:213)$17.00
`
`©2000 American Vacuum Society
`
`2006
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`2007
`
`Junghoon Joo: Low-temperature polysilicon deposition
`
`2007
`
`FIG. 1. Experimental setup. ICP is powered by a 2 MHz, 2500 W generator,
`and sputtering is done by dc power supply. The substrate biasing voltage is
`generated at square pulse signal generator ~max. 10 Vpp! and fed into a
`bipolar op-amp, where it can be amplified in the range of 2100 to 1100 V
`and also has variable dc offset. During pretreatment, a continuous 220 V is
`supplied, and in an initial stage of deposition, 120 V, and during main
`deposition stage, 120 V ~25% duty! and 240 V ~75% duty! of bipolar
`pulsed voltage is used for biasing.
`
`laser absorption, and the background gas pressure is as high
`as 88.6 Pa. So the depositing particles should have highly
`randomized angular distribution, where the perpendicular
`momentum component effectively enhances the adatom’s
`mobility. In this study, we used two strategies: one is to use
`high gas pressure and the other is to use bipolar pulse bias of
`the substrate to cause the incoming ions to relax their direc-
`tionality by oscillating the sheath at several tens of kHz. We
`expect that fast reflected neutrals should be slowed down
`either by high gas pressure or ionization, followed by appro-
`priate substrate bias; depositing atoms of Si should be ion-
`ized and accelerated to optimal energy for low-temperature
`crystallization on the substrate surface.
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
`Figure 1 shows our ionized magnetron sputtering system:
`a 50-mm-diameter magnetron cathode, and a 250-mm-
`
`FIG. 2. X-ray diffraction data show microcrystalline Si is deposited with ICP
`sputtering in pure Ar environment ~sputtering power dc 400 W; ICP 2 MHz,
`500 W, 1.33 Pa, 250 C, 60 min!.
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`FIG. 3. X-ray diffraction results show that addition of hydrogen into sput-
`tering gas environment enhanced crystalline-silicon formation during depo-
`sition ~250 C, 60 min, sputtering dc 400 W, ICP 2 MHz, 400 W, 120–40
`V bipolar pulsed substrate biasing!, ~a! Ar:H2510:2, ~b! Ar:H2510:4, ~c!
`Ar:H2510:6.
`
`diameter, four turn, inductively coupled plasma-generating
`coil are installed in a 380-mm-diameter stainless-steel cham-
`ber. Substrate biasing power is supplied by a pulse signal
`generator, a bipolar operational amplifier ~Kepco, BOP™-
`100-1M!, with a low-pass filter unit to cut off interference
`from a 2-MHz-ICP power source ~ENI, GMW-2500™,
`2500W!. The pulse width can be varied from a few ns to ms,
`and the repetition rate can be increased up to 18 kHz. A
`substrate made of conventional soda-lime glass was posi-
`tioned 120 mm above the Si target, and the temperature was
`controlled from room temperature to 400 °C by a resistive
`heater block. High-purity gases ~99.999%! of Ar and H2 are
`introduced through a gas dose ring with small holes ~0.8 mm
`diameter! on the top surface. The chamber was evacuated to
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`2008
`
`Junghoon Joo: Low-temperature polysilicon deposition
`
`2008
`
`FIG. 4. X-ray diffraction analysis and SEM micrograph show that films have good structural property and grain size from 300 to 700 Å. ~a!, ~b!, and ~c! are
`deposited in high-Ar1 bombardment condition, and ~d!, ~e!, and ~f! are deposited in low Ar1 bombardment condition.
`
`about 2.6631024 Pa by a turbomolecular pump ~Alcatel,
`5400CP™, 400 L/s! and baked at 150 °C for about 1 h. Prior
`to main deposition, hydrogen discharge cleaning using ICP
`was done for 20 min with a negative bias of 240 V. In the
`deposition stages, 120 V bias was applied for 10 min and
`switched to bipolar pulse bias ~120 V to240 V! continu-
`ously. Deposited samples were investigated by x-ray diffrac-
`tion analysis ~Brucker analytical, D-5005RA™, 18 kW rotat-
`ing anode, Cu Ka!. To observe the grain structure by
`scanning electron microscopy, the amorphous phase was se-
`
`lectively etched away by a chemical solution. Grain size dis-
`tributions were measured by software developed by Leica
`~Q-win™!, and Raman spectroscopy was done in a micro-
`Raman system using a 632.8-nm-He–Ne laser ~Renishaw,
`System-2000™!. The factors that affect the crystallinity and
`structural properties were investigated: substrate tempera-
`ture, hydrogen mixing ratio, ratio of ICP to sputtering power,
`thickness, substrate bias, and total pressure. Crystalline frac-
`tion was determined from Raman spectroscopy data after de-
`coupling of the amorphous and crystalline peaks by Lorent-
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 18, No. 4, Jul(cid:213)Aug 2000
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`2009
`
`Junghoon Joo: Low-temperature polysilicon deposition
`
`2009
`
`zian fit.5 As a real-time plasma diagnostic, optical emission
`spectroscopy over the plasma volume was done through a
`quartz view port by an optical fiber and a CCD detector
`~Ocean optics, SQ-2000™!.
`
`III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`A. Effects of hydrogen mixing
`
`Sputtered silicon in an Ar gas background only produced
`amorphous or nanocrystalline Si film at a moderate tempera-
`ture range ~less than 500 °C!. This was the same for ionized
`physical vapor deposition ~I-PVD!, as shown in Fig. 2. The
`ICP power and some other process variations were tried, but
`in most cases, they gave only poorly crystalline film. In this
`study, hydrogen mixing was tried by varying the mass flow
`ratio of Ar and H2 from 10:2 to 10:10. Total pressure
`changes from 4 to 4.4 Pa, respectively, and this change is not
`believed to change the slowdown distance of the fast neutrals
`significantly. In Fig. 3, the x-ray diffraction data show that
`the mixing ratio of Ar:H2510:6 is optimal in depositing
`polycrystalline silicon film. Mota et al. report that the origin
`of hydrogen mixing effects are that the dangling bonds be-
`tween Si and Si are reduced, based on interatomic potential
`calculation.6 The halo centered around 2u522° appears to
`be from the glass substrate. A broad band from the amor-
`phous Si phase is reported to be around 2u530°. In our
`experimental setup, the substrate and target surface is in-
`clined about 15°, and in each run, three slide glasses are
`positioned at
`the substrate holder, where three different
`samples ~left, center, and right position! were made at differ-
`ent distances from the target; so, they had different thick-
`nesses and bombarding ion flux compositions ~i.e., Ar1 and
`1!. In the L position, Ar1 is the main bombarding species;
`H2
`but in the R position, the portion of Ar1 should be decreased,
`with a lower deposition rate of silicon. As noted earlier, fast
`neutrals such as hydrogen atoms are believed to break Si–H
`bonds on the surface and make them desorb as a form of H2.
`As conventional magnetron sputtering is done in gas pres-
`sure lower than 0.2 Pa reflected neutrals fly a few centime-
`ters to a substrate, which is not enough distance to slowdown
`to room-temperature neutrals. As I-PVD is done in relatively
`high gas pressure of 5 Pa or higher, the fast neutrals must be
`slowed down first, and some of them are ionized by an elec-
`tron impact collision or a Penning process. Substrate biasing
`
`FIG. 5. Raman spectroscopy measurements show that optimal hydrogen
`mixing ratio is around Ar:H2510:6, and heating up to 400 C does not show
`much improvement compared to case of 250 C.
`
`can change the incoming particles energy distribution signifi-
`cantly. In the present study, a bipolar pulse bias scheme was
`used to solve the charging of the insulating substrate and to
`control the incoming ion’s energy. Energy-selective quadru-
`pole mass spectrometry is planned for future study to con-
`firm this hypothesis.
`
`B. Grain-structure observation
`
`To measure the crystalline fraction and the grain size, the
`amorphous phase in the deposited specimen was selectively
`etched by a chemical solution. In Fig. 4, the plan view of
`samples deposited in Ar:H2510:6 at different positions re-
`veals well-developed polycrystalline silicon surfaces. The
`sample in Fig. 4~a! has a grain-size distribution of about
`300–500 Å, and Fig. 4~b! has a grain-size distribution of
`about 300–700 Å. The fraction of bright crystalline area was
`measured by an image analysis program, and the average
`result was about 73%. From the cross-sectional views, nor-
`mal columnar structure appeared, and there was no abrupt
`change in microstructure between the the initial stage and the
`main deposition stage. The positive bias of 120 V in initial
`nucleation stage on crystalline formation is thought to be due
`to the effective kinetic energy control in high-density multi-
`component plasma, i.e., Ar, H, H2, Si, and their ions. As
`mass spectrometric study is scheduled, the plasma species in
`
`TABLE I. Crystalline fraction calculated from Raman data with y50.9 in I c /(I c1yI a) after deconvolution with
`Lorentzian fit.
`
`Deposition
`conditions
`
`Specimen i.d.
`
`Ar:H2
`
`T sub ~ C!
`
`990809a-R-2
`990809b-C
`990809b-L
`990810a-C
`990811a-C
`990821a-R
`
`10:4
`10:6
`10:6
`10:8
`10:6
`10:6
`
`250
`250
`250
`250
`150
`400
`
`a-Si peak
`area
`
`c-Si peak
`area
`
`Crystalline
`fraction ~x c)
`
`2.6904
`3.1983
`1.2396
`1.7088
`1.0645
`2.2426
`
`8.1074
`6.393
`2.8873
`2.1867
`2.3799
`6.4447
`
`0.77
`0.69
`0.72
`0.58
`0.71
`0.76
`
`c-Si
`position
`~cm21!
`
`513.6
`515.6
`517.8
`514.6
`508.3
`513.6
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`2010
`
`Junghoon Joo: Low-temperature polysilicon deposition
`
`2010
`
`FIG. 6. Extended scan of Raman spectroscopy. Crystalline peak is shifted
`from 520 to 517.8 cm21 and also contains amorphous Si contribution around
`low-frequency shoulder.
`
`the ICP volume will be clarified, and we will confirm the
`results by OES. As for the ion energy distribution in I-PVD,
`Kusano et al. measured the ion kinetic energy in a metal
`sputtering system.7 In this study, Ar1 and Ti1 have peak
`energy higher than 150 eV with zero termination resistance
`of the ICP coil ~as in our study!, whereas Ti1 has a broader
`peak than Ar1. They used an unshielded metal antenna that
`draws a large electron current to the ground that induces
`large negative coil potential but in our study, the Cu tube
`antenna was shielded from plasma by an insulating material,
`so the plasma potential should not be as high as in their case.
`
`C. Raman spectroscopic measurements
`
`In Fig. 5, the frequency shift in Raman spectroscopy rep-
`resents crystallinity, and the crystalline fraction can be de-
`duced. A sample deposited at 150 °C showed a broad amor-
`phous band around 480 cm21, and the crystalline peak was
`also shifted toward 500 cm21. As a reference, the Raman
`shift of a silicon wafer was measured and gave a sharp peak
`at 520.4 cm21. Considering the peak between 500 and 520
`cm21 as a crystalline silicon peak, the crystalline fraction can
`
`FIG. 7. Optical emission spectra show sputtered Si atom is ionized and
`hydrogen atoms are present in the ICP volume.
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 18, No. 4, Jul(cid:213)Aug 2000
`
`FIG. 8. Optical emission intensity shows that Ar ionization is reduced as the
`amount of hydrogen addition in ~a!, but the ionization ratio of sputtered Si is
`steadily increasing as in ~b!. Hb/Hg remains constant while each intensity
`decreases in ~c!.
`
`be calculated as I c /(I c1yI a); y50.9. The resultant fractions
`are shown in Table I. Our samples have crystalline fractions
`between 0.58 and 0.77. Other deposition conditions were
`chosen from our previous experiences on this experimental
`system: plasma diagnostics,
`tuning network modification,
`ICP frequency effect, and sputtering power to ICP power
`ratio.8–10 The positions of the crystalline peaks range from
`508.3 to 517.8 cm21 whereas the Si wafer has a main peak at
`520.4 cm21 in this experiment. The offset from the bulk Si
`peak would indicate the quality of crystallization of the film
`and the residual stress that is common in plasma-deposited
`films. This can be confirmed from the shift of the x-ray dif-
`fraction peak. The lattice parameter of
`standard sili-
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`2011
`
`Junghoon Joo: Low-temperature polysilicon deposition
`
`2011
`
`con powder is 5.4309 Å,11 and calculated values of our cur-
`rent study range from 5.4668 to 5.4459 Å. Based on this
`lattice spacing, I-PVD silicon films of this study have a ten-
`sile strain of about 0.66%–0.28%. This can be a factor to
`shift the crystalline Raman peak as in Fig. 6.
`
`D. Plasma diagnostics: Optical emission
`spectroscopic measurements
`
`In I-PVD, gas pressure should be high enough to effec-
`tively thermalize and ionize fast-sputtered neutrals. Once
`ionized, the kinetic energy can be controlled by appropriate
`substrate bias. Optical emission spectra can be a good quali-
`tative measure in estimating the composition of volume
`plasma. In the wide-range spectrum of Fig. 7, Si0 ~576.29
`nm!, Si1 ~597.89 nm!, Ar0 ~675.28 nm!, Ar1 ~668.42 nm!,
`and Hg ~656.52nm! are detected. In other channels of an
`optical multichannel analyzer, Ha~434nm!, Hb~486nm!, and
`SiH* ~414 nm! lines are detected, as opposed to Bae et al.;
`they reported that in capacitively coupled rf plasma, Ha and
`Hb lines were not noticeable.12 The tendency of emission
`intensities was followed as hydrogen partial pressure in-
`the ratio of ionic silicon @5Si1/~Si11Si0)]
`in-
`creases;
`creases steadily whereas the argon ionization ratio remains
`constant in Figs. 8~a! and 8~b!. Among hydrogen derivatives,
`H was emitting the strongest line, and the ratio of Hb to Hg
`decreased slightly and does not change much beyond 2 sccm
`of hydrogen mixing in argon @Fig. 8~c!#. In I-PVD, the main
`advantage is thought to be the ionization of depositing sili-
`con flux and retarding the ionized fast-reflecting neutrals
`such as hydrogen atoms. This explains why the x-ray diffrac-
`tion results are insensitive to substrate temperatures between
`150 and 250 °C.
`
`E. Effects of magnetron discharge voltage
`
`In most of the cases in this study, a continuous dc power
`source was used to sputter silicon in Ar1H2. As a test, a
`bipolar pulse power supply ~ENI, RPG-10™, 10 kW, 100–
`250 kHz! was used to maintain an equivalent film deposition
`rate as the dc power source, but at most it gave smaller x-ray
`diffraction peaks. Pulsing in the several hundreds of kHz
`range tends to modulate the ion kinetic energy by sheath
`oscillation and might alter incoming ions’ energy toward
`
`higher values. The discharge voltage was found to be a sen-
`sitive parameter in depositing crystalline silicon in I-PVD.
`From a series of experiments, samples with magnetron dis-
`charge voltage higher than 600 V did not show well-
`developed polycrystalline peaks in x-ray diffraction data.
`With a 6-mm-thick target, the discharge voltage at 400 W
`was about 754 V at the beginning. Eroding the sputtering
`target ~so that the leakage magnetic flux over the racetrack in
`the target becomes strong! reduced the discharge voltage
`down to a final value of 378 V in the lifetime. This is closely
`related to the reflected fast neutrals ~mainly consisting of H!.
`In a future study, the effects of magnetic field configuration
`~field intensity, balanced, or unbalanced! should be ad-
`dressed in detail.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`Polycrystalline-silicon film was successfully deposited by
`ionized magnetron sputtering in a mixed gas environment of
`Ar and H2 at a substrate temperature as low as 250 °C, where
`the crystalline fraction based on the Raman data was around
`70% and the grain size was 500–700 Å.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`This work was supported by the G7 Project for Flat-Panel
`Display of Korea and the ministry of education of Korea,
`1998.
`
`1K. Murata, M. Ito, M. Hori, and T. Goto, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17, 1098
`~1999!.
`2Y. H. Yang and J. R. Abelson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 11~1995!.
`3J. R. Abelson, L. Mandrell, and J. R. Doyle, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1856
`~1994!.
`4S. Trusso and C. Vasi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 921 ~1999!.
`5A. T. Voutsas, M. K. Hatalis, J. Boyce, and A. Chiang, J. Appl. Phys. 78,
`6999 ~1995!.
`6F. Mota, J. F. Justo, and A. Fazzio, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1843~1999!.
`7E. Kusano, T. Saitoh, T. Kobayashi, K. Fukushima, N. Kikuchi, H.
`Nanto, and A. Kinbara, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 2360~1999!.
`8J. Joo, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 2368 ~1999!.
`9J. Joo, J. Korean Vac. Soc. 7, 225 ~1998!.
`10A. A. Mayo, S. Hamaguchi, J. H. Joo, and S. M. Rossnagel, J. Vac. Sci.
`Technol. B 15, 1788 ~1997!.
`11B. D. Cullity, Elements of X-Ray Diffraction ~Addison-Wesley, Reading,
`MA, 1978!, p. 507.
`12S. H. Bae, Y. C. Lee, and R. T. McGrath, 46th American Vacuum Society
`International Symposium 1999, Seattle, WA.
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket