throbber
United States Patent (19)
`Sellers
`
`US005651865A
`Patent Number:
`Date of Patent:
`
`11
`45
`
`5,651865
`Jul. 29, 1997
`
`54 PREFERENTIAL SPUTTERING OF
`INSULATORS FROM CONDUCTIVE
`TARGETS
`75 Inventor: Jeff C. Sellers, Palmyra, N.Y.
`
`73) Assignee: ENI, Rochester, N.Y.
`
`21 Appl. No.: 261988
`22 Filled:
`Jun. 17, 1994
`
`56
`
`5,300,205 4/1994 Fritsche .......................... 204/298.08 X
`5,303,139 4/1994 Mark .............................. 204/298.08 X
`5,427,669 6/1995 Drummond ........................ 204/298.08
`P
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0.591675 8/1993 European Pat. Off..
`0564789A1 10/1993 European Pat. Off..
`0 636 702 7/1994 European Pat. Off..
`WO87/05053 8/1987 WTPO
`Primary Examiner-Nam Nguyen
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Trapani & Moldrem
`[51] Int. Cl. ...................... C23C 14/34
`57
`ABSTRACT
`52 U.S. Cl. ............................... 204/192.13; 204/192.12;
`204/298.03; 204/298.08
`Pulses of positive voltage are applied to the target of a dc
`58 Field of Search ......................... 204/192.12, 192.13,
`Sputtering process to create a reverse bias. This charges
`204/298.03, 298.08
`insulating deposits on the target to the reverse bias level, so
`that when negative sputtering voltage is reapplied to the
`References Cited
`target, the deposits will be preferentially sputtered away. The
`reverse bias pulses are provided at a low duty cycle, i.e.,
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`with a pulse width of 0.25-3 microseconds at a pulse rate of
`4,103,324 7/1978 vandervelden et al. ... 204298.08 x about 40-100 KHZ. This technique reduces sources for
`4,936,960
`6/1990 Siefkes et al. ................. 204/298.41 X arcing during a reactive sputtering process.
`5,241,152 8/1993 Anderson et al. ............. 204/298.08 X
`5286,360 2/1994 Szczyrbrowski et al. ......... 204/298.08
`
`5 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`24
`12
`7 Z(ZCZ42
`a SS
`NA
`%
`382
`2
`'y'82
`M S VE
`30%
`2772
`-20
`20-
`% N re-
`2a
`2
`Cs.
`O)
`%
`2 72.
`16
`2
`N
`YS
`14
`SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
`Z
`a
`%
`2
`% NA
`A
`3.SSS 2
`2 27
`122222222227 C22
`Fatim
`
`14
`
`
`
`T ---?e
`
`3
`
`DC
`POWER
`SUPPLY
`
`--
`
`40- v99
`
`50
`
`PULSE CONTROL
`WIDTH & RATE
`
`WACUUM
`PUMP
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS EXHIBIT 1007
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 29, 1997
`
`Sheet 1 of 4
`
`5,651,865
`
`14
`
`DC
`SUPPLY
`
`G.1
`
`REACTIVE
`GAS
`
`
`
`VOLTAGE
`
`- IGNITION
`
`SUPER
`GLOW
`
`- " - ARC
`DISCHARGE
`
`
`
`CURRENT DENSTY
`
`PASSIONE CURVE
`FIG.2
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 29, 1997
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`5,651,865
`
`
`
`ANODE
`
`18
`
`TARGET (AI)
`FIG.3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`28 Y
`
`N N
`2
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 29, 1997
`
`Sheet 3 of 4
`
`5,651,865
`
`
`
`-WAPP
`
`
`
`TIME -b-
`
`IG.9
`Prior Art
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jul. 29, 1997
`
`Sheet 4 of 4
`
`5,651,865
`
`
`
`00
`
`èJEM0d
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`

`5,651,865
`
`1.
`PREFERENTAL SPUTTERNG OF
`NSULATORS FROM CONDUCTIVE
`TARGETS
`
`2
`sputtering occurs. Here, shutting off the dc power serves to
`extinguish early arcing. This means that unipolar pulses of
`power at a fixed duty cycle are fed to the target. This does
`have the beneficial effect of permitting charge to build up
`only partially across the dielectric deposition on the target,
`so that arcing is less likely to occur, and also can lead to a
`small amount of resputtering of the deposition. However,
`this system while slowing down the rate of insulating
`deposit on the target, does not reverse the deposition.
`Another system previously proposed is called a low
`energy small package arc repression circuit. In that system,
`an electronic switch cycles at a rate of about 2 KHz to cut
`out the current to the target. This in effect reverses the
`voltage on the target to several volts positive, and draws
`some electrons from the plasma to the front surface of the
`insulative deposition. This neutralizes the anions on the front
`surface of the deposition, to discharge the voltage buildup
`across the layer, thereby greatly reducing the occurrence of
`dielectric breakdown and arcing. Also, discharge of the front
`surface of the insulative layer lowers the surface potential to
`approximately that of the target. Discharging of the dielec
`tric deposition also permits the argon ions in the plasma to
`collide with the insulating dielectric material. This does
`result in some resputtering of the molecules of the deposited
`material, thus slowing the rate of deposit on the target.
`However, this approach does not resputter the molecules
`of the deposited compound as effectively as the atoms of the
`target material, and so this approach has not been totally
`effective in removing deposits from the target during reac
`tive sputtering processes.
`Different materials require different voltages to be applied
`to the targets to effect sputtering. For example, because a
`gold atom is a much heavier atom than an aluminum atom,
`it requires a much more energetic ion to free it from the
`target. Typically, in a process that employs an aluminum
`target, the applied voltage needed is about-450 volts. while
`in a similar process that employs a gold target the applied
`voltage has to be about -700 volts.
`Considering that an aluminum oxide (Al2O3) molecule is
`significantly heavier than an aluminum atom, one can under
`stand that a higher potential would be required to energize
`the argon ion enough to resputter the coating. This is, of
`course, true for other materials as well.
`Another approach to solve this problem involves a pair of
`sputtering targets, with one serving as cathode and the other
`as the anode. The applied electrical voltage is periodically
`reversed so that the sputtering occurs first from the one
`target and then from the other. This process also reverses the
`charge on the deposited insulating material as well, which
`reduces the possibility of arcing and also resputters some of
`the insulating material on the targets. However, this
`arrangement, requiring plural targets, can be cumbersome
`and expensive to employ.
`These previous solutions, which employ unipolar pulsing
`or alternately cycled targets, have been effective in reducing
`voltage stress on insulating films redeposited on the targets,
`but have not been effective in removing the redeposit or in
`preventing it. None of these approaches sputters off the
`insulator from the beginning before it has a chance to
`accumulate, and none of these techniques has been effective
`in eliminating or halting the redeposition of insulating film
`on the target.
`OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE
`INVENTION
`It is an object of this invention to enhance reactive
`sputtering in a fashion which avoids accumulations of
`insulating deposition on the conductive target.
`
`5
`
`O
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`25
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to the deposition of thin films and
`is more concerned with a reactive sputtering process
`wherein atoms of a target material are freed from a conduc
`tive target and are reacted with a reactive gas to form a
`coating which is deposited on a substrate. This process can
`be employed, for example, in creating dielectric insulating
`layers on electrical parts, or wear-resistant layers on
`mechanical parts.
`The invention is more specifically directed to a dc sput
`tering process in which the dielectric coating material that
`becomes lodged on the conductive target is removed, thus
`avoiding a major cause of arcing.
`Sputtering is a vacuum deposition process in which a
`sputtering target is bombarded with ions, typically an ion
`ized noble gas, and the atoms of the target material are
`mechanically freed by momentum transfer. The target mate
`rial then coats a nearby substrate.
`In a reactive sputtering process a reactive gas is intro
`duced into the deposition chamber, and the freed target
`material reacts with the reactive gas to form a coating
`material. For example, the target material can be aluminum,
`and oxygen can be introduced as the reactive gas to produce
`a coating of aluminum oxide. A carbonaceous gas, e.g.
`acetylene can be used as the reactive gas to produce carbide
`coatings such as SiC., WC, etc., and ammonia can be
`introduced to produce a nitride coating such as TiN. In any
`event, the conductive target atoms and the reactive gas react
`in plasma in the chamber to produce the compound that
`serves as a coating. In a typical example, aluminum atoms
`freed from an aluminum target enter plasma of argon and
`oxygen to produce a deposition of aluminum oxide.
`DC sputtering is a random process and the insulating
`coating material is deposited on all available surfaces. This
`means that not only does the insulating material coat the
`article in question, but it also coats other surfaces in the
`chamber as well, including the target. Thus, in a reactive
`sputtering process for depositing aluminum oxide, mol
`ecules of Al2O land on the surface of the aluminum target.
`45
`This deposition of an insulator on the target causes severe
`problems, including a reduction of sputtering rate and a
`propensity to induce arcing.
`Contamination of the target can also result, even in
`conventional dc sputtering, due to atmospheric gases, water
`droplets, inclusions, and other contaminants. Each of these
`can be a source for arcing, and their presence will also
`reduce the deposition rate over time because of a reduced
`active sputtering area on the target. Accordingly, these
`problems necessitate a frequent cleaning of the target sur
`face.
`This problem has been known to exist for some time, but
`its causes have not been completely appreciated. Procedures
`to deal with these problems, such as arc control in reactive
`sputtering have not been completely satisfactory.
`A standard approach involves sensing the presence of
`arcing, and then interrupting current flow. This will control
`the arcing, but does nothing about the insulating coating that
`continues to cover the target.
`One early attempt to deal with arcing in a blind fashion
`involves periodically interrupting the current flow between
`the dc power supply and the plasma generator in which the
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`

`3
`It is another object to carry out reactive sputtering under
`conditions that eliminate sources of arcing and which maxi
`mizes the rate at which sputtering can take place.
`According to an aspect of the present invention, a reactive
`dc sputtering process is carried out in a plasma chamber by
`applying an electric potential to a conductive target so that
`target material is sputtered from the target and is reacted
`with a reactive gas that is introduced into the chamber. Adc
`voltage of a suitable level e.g. -500 volts, is applied from a
`power supply to the sputtering target, which serves as
`cathode, with a conductive surface in the plasma chamber
`being held at ground to serve as anode. A noble gas, e.g.,
`argon, present in the chamber is ionized and creates a
`plasma, e.g., argon anions and free electrons. The electrons
`are drawn off in the anode, and the positive argon ions are
`accelerated towards the cathode, that is, towards the con
`ductive target. The argonions knockatoms of target material
`free from the target by momentum transfer. The argon ions
`pick up electrons from the negatively charged target, and
`migrate back to the plasma. The freed target atoms enter the
`plasma and react with a reactive gas that has been introduced
`into the chamber. The reactive gas can be, for example,
`oxygen, borane, acetylene, ammonia, silane, arsene, or vari
`ous other gases. The reaction product is deposited on a
`substrate positioned adjacent the plasma. The substrate can
`be a masked semiconductor wafer on which a compound
`such as a Al2O3, SiO2, or another insulator or dielectric is to
`be deposited. In some processes, the substrate can be a drill
`bit, wear plate, valve spindle, or other mechanical part on
`which a wear resistant coating, such as WC or TiN, is
`deposited.
`As mentioned before, the reaction product of the reactive
`sputtering process is deposited randomly, and not only coats
`the workpiece substrate, but also coats other surfaces includ
`ing walls of the chamber and the sputtering target. Accu
`35
`mulation of the insulating coating can induce arcing, and
`also reduces the available area of the sputtering target,
`thereby reducing the sputtering rate over time.
`In this invention the negative dc voltage that is applied to
`the target is interrupted periodically by reverse-bias pulses
`of a positive dc voltage relative to the anode. Preferably, the
`reverse bias pulses are at a level of 50 to 300 volts above
`ground potential, and these are applied at a pulse frequency
`of 40KHz to 100 KHz with a pulse width of 1 usec to 3 usec.
`This results in low duty cycle pulses (about 10% or less).
`The reverse bias creates a reversal of the charge across the
`insulating material. These accumulations behave as a
`capacitor, with the conductive target being one plate and the
`conductive plasma being the other plate. The reverse voltage
`is applied long enough (e.g. 2 usec) for the polarity of the
`capacitive charge to be reversed, up to -300 volts, on the
`plasma side of the deposition.
`Then when the normal or negative sputtering voltage is
`again applied, the argon ions in the plasma are accelerated
`preferably towards the reverse-charged dielectric material.
`These ions are accelerated to an increased energy due to the
`additional potential difference. As a result, the molecules of
`the deposition are re-sputtered off the target. This process
`keeps the target clear of depositions, and thereby eliminates
`the main sources of arcing. This process also permits the
`active sputtering surface of the target to remain as large as
`possible.
`This process also cleans out otherinsulative contaminants
`from the surface of the target whether used for reactive
`sputtering or conventional sputtering.
`The above and many other objects, features, and advan
`tages of this invention will become more apparent from the
`
`4
`ensuing description of a preferred embodiment, which
`should be readin conjunction with the accompanying Draw
`ing.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
`FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a dc sputtering arrangement
`for explaining the principles of reactive dc sputtering.
`FIG. 2 is a Passione curve of voltage versus current
`density, showing the various regions of plasma behavior in
`a sputtering operation.
`FIGS. 3 to 5 are schematic views for explaining the
`adverse effects of film accumulations on the sputtering
`target.
`FIGS. 6 and 7 are schematic representations of an ideal
`sputtering process and one in which an arc discharge con
`dition occurs.
`FIGS. 8A and 8B are schematic views illustrating equiva
`lency of an insulative film accumulation on the sputtering
`target with a capacitor.
`FIG. 9 is a chart showing a pulse waveform for unipolar
`dic sputtering according to the prior art.
`FIG. 10 is a chart showing a pulse waveform for low duty
`cycle reverse bias dc sputtering, according to this invention.
`FIG. 11 is a waveform chart showing the behavior of
`electric potential at the plasma-facing surface of an insulator
`film accumulation on the conductive target, according to an
`embodiment of this invention.
`FIG. 12 is a schematic view of an arrangement for
`practicing reactive dc sputtering according to the principles
`of this invention.
`
`DETALED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`With reference to the Drawing and initially to FIG. 1, a dc
`sputtering arrangement 10 employs a plasma chamber 12
`and a regulated dc power supply 14. The plasma chamber is
`evacuated by a vacuum pump (not shown) and is supplied
`with a controlled amount of a noble gas, typically argon. A
`conductive target 16 is located within the chamber 12 and
`serves as a cathode. The target 16 is connected to a negative
`terminal of the power supply 14. The target 16 can be a flat
`plate of aluminum, tungsten, silicon or another conductive
`material. An anode 18 disposed within the chamber is
`coupled to the positive terminal of the power supply 14. The
`anode can have a relatively large Surface area with respect
`to the target 16. A gas conduit 20 brings a reactive gas at a
`controlled rate into the chamber to react with atoms of the
`target material that become freed from the target. This
`reaction produces a reaction product that is deposited as a
`film on surfaces within the chamber. A plasma 22 is formed
`in the noble gas in a zone between the anode 18 and the
`target 16, and a substrate 24 to be coated is positioned in the
`chamber adjacent the plasma 22. The substrate is passive in
`this process, and can be any part or element on which a
`coating is desired. For example, the substrate can be a steel
`mechanical part, such as a bearing, on which the reactive
`sputtering process deposits a layer of titanium nitride as a
`hard wear coating. As another example, the substrate can be
`a semiconductor wafer on which a dielectric layer such as
`aluminum oxide or nitride is deposited.
`The sputtering arrangement can also incorporate suitable
`means for removing heat from the target.
`Actual deposition of a film requiresignition of the plasma
`22. The plasma is created by applying a voltage to the space
`
`5,651,865
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`5,651,865
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`5
`between the anode 18 and the cathode or target 16 high
`enough to cause ionization of at least a small portion of the
`Sputtering gas, i.e., the argon.
`The intense electric field strips outer electrons from the
`gas atoms, creating anions, e.g., Art and electrons. This
`leads to a steady state which is fed by a steady state applied
`current from the dc power supply 14.
`The positive ions Art are accelerated by the steady state
`field towards the target 16 or cathode, where they recombine
`with electrons in the target. To achieve a sputtering effect,
`the ions are made energetic enough so that their kinetic
`energy will knock atoms of the target material off the target
`16 when the ions collide with it. The freed target atoms then
`enter the plasma and react with the reactive gas that is
`introduced into the chamber. The product of this reaction
`deposits itself on any available surface, and preferably on
`the substrate 24. The reaction product also redeposits on the
`target 16, as well as other surfaces in the plasma chamber.
`Accumulations of insulating deposit on the target can lead to
`arcing and other problems.
`Control of the sputtering process requires control of
`voltage, current flow, and current density.
`Current flow is required for sputtering, and all else being
`equal, higher current produces proportionately more colli
`sions of the Art ions onto the target. Therefore a high
`deposition rate requires higher current flow.
`Different target materials require different levels of
`applied voltage. For example, a gold atom is significantly
`heavier than an aluminum atom, and therefore requires a
`much more energetic ion to knockit free from the target. In
`a typical dc sputtering process that can use either a gold
`target or an aluminum target, a voltage of about 450 volts is
`required for aluminum, whereas a much higher 700 volts is
`required for gold. There is thus allower limitat which plasma
`exists, but no sputtering takes place because the ions are not
`Sufficiently energetic. Each process will have a lower limit
`On Sputtering Voltage depending on the target material.
`Current density is an important factor and has to be
`controlled. In the sputtering process it is desirable to maxi
`mize the deposition rate but it is also imperative to avoid arc
`discharges.
`The upper limit of deposition rate occurs when the current
`density of the plasma is in a so-called superglow region. This
`can be explained with reference to FIG. 2, which shows the
`relation of current density in plasma to the voltage drop
`across the plasma. This curve is the so-called Passione
`CWC.
`In an initial region shown at the extreme left side of FIG.
`2, before the plasma is ignited there, is a zero current density
`and the entire voltage necessary for ignition appears across
`the gaseous medium. For low current densities, there is a
`negative-resistance region indicated as the ignition region,
`where the voltage across the plasma drops with increased
`current density, until a generally flat region, i.e. a glow
`region, is reached. As current density increases, a superglow
`region is reached. Here the plasma becomes more energetic
`and thus more resistive to the movement of argonions across
`it; hence the Voltage increases across the plasma. Beyond
`this region the current density becomes so high that the
`plasma self-heats the ions to the point that the plasma
`generates thermal electrons and photons which then cause
`runaway ionization. This drastically increases the number of
`ions, i.e., the number of charge carriers in the plasma. The
`plasma impedance drops, and current flow increases. This
`produces a sharp negative resistance region leading to an
`arcing region where the impedance is very small and current
`
`6
`is limited only by the output impedance of the power source.
`The arcing that is produced here creates deleterious effects
`on the target, such as pitting, flaking and cracking, as well
`as localities of extreme heat. Moreover, as soon as arcing
`occurs, sputtering stops.
`Therefore, in a sputtering process, a number of factors
`come into play: deposition rates are directly related to
`current flow; applied voltages are determined by the char
`acteristics of target materials; and arc discharging directly
`follows from excess current density conditions.
`The problems that arise from redeposition of insulator
`reaction products onto the target 16 can be explained with
`reference to FIGS. 3, 4, and 5. As shown in FIG. 3, the
`potential difference between the positive anode 18 and the
`negative target 16 produces electric field lines from the
`anode to the target. An applied voltage War, typically on
`the order of about 300 to 500 volts dc, is applied from the
`dc power supply 14 to the anode 18 and target 16. In this
`example, the target is made of aluminum, the plasma 22 is
`formed of argon ions Ar", and oxygen O is introduced as a
`reactive gas. Initially, the electric field lines are distributed
`more or less uniformly over the surface of the target, so that
`the argon ions bombard the target 16 over its entire surface.
`Wherever the argon ion impacts, aluminum atoms are
`knocked free by momentum transfer. The argonions pickup
`electrons from the negative target 16, and electrons in the
`plasma are absorbed into the anode 18.
`The freed aluminum atoms enter the plasma 22 and react
`with oxygen in the plasma, forming alumina Al-O. The
`alumina molecule is neutral and non-conducting, and depos
`its itself on any convenient surface which it contacts. Some
`of the alumina lands on the target 16 and produces as a
`deposition an insulating layer 26, as shown in FIG. 4.
`Because the insulating deposition 26 is a dielectric, i.e., an
`insulator, the Surface that faces the plasma, that is the upper
`surface in FIG. 4, accumulates a positive change. This
`deflects the electric field lines around the deposition 26. The
`ions tend to follow the field lines and thus are accelerated
`towards the uncoated aluminum areas of the target. The
`argon ions collide with and sputter aluminum, but do not
`resputter the Al-O material. Consequently, the alumina
`continues to coat the exposed surface of the target, while the
`relative area of aluminum metal that is still available for
`sputtering shrinks. The result is to increase the current
`density while reducing the overall current flow, thus reduc
`ing the deposition rate. Eventually nearly the entire surface
`of the target 16 becomes coated, and only a small area of the
`target is uncovered and available for sputtering. This causes
`the electric field lines to converge on localized spots as
`shown in FIG. 5. Ions impact these spots at a high current
`density, leading to arc discharge.
`The adverse effects of insulative redeposit on the target
`can be explained with reference to FIGS. 7 and 8. Under
`glow or superglow conditions, the plasma 22 can be con
`sidered to function as thousands of high-value resistances
`connected in parallel, with leads positioned uniformly over
`the face of the target 16. In other words, the plasma can be
`considered as several thousand-megohm resistors as shown
`in FIG. 6. As the coating of insulating material develops on
`the target, the available area on the target is diminished,
`ultimately to Small uncoated gaps 28. The current density at
`the gaps 28 enters the negative resistance zone of the
`Passione curve (FIG. 2) and the current path becomes
`restricted. The effective resistance drops to a very small
`value, e.g., 0.01 ohm, as illustrated in FIG. 7. Under these
`conditions, arcing occurs.
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`7
`The above-described problem comes about because the
`insulating film 26 forms a dielectric, sandwiched between
`the electrodes formed by the conductive plasma 22 and the
`conductive target 16, respectively. The top surface, i.e., the
`plasma side of the insulating film 26, charges up to the
`applied voltage +V because of charge received from the
`positively charged argon ions.
`Because of electrostatic repulsion between the positively
`charged ions, the argon ions Ar" are steered away from the
`film-coated areas of the target toward the remaining
`uncoated metal areas. This raises the current density on
`those areas. Therefore the total current flow has to be
`reduced to keep the current density within the superglow
`range and this of course reduces the deposition rate. Also,
`because the argon ions are steered away from the coated
`areas of the target 16, there is little resputtering of the
`insulating film 26. Consequently, the redeposition of the
`insulating film continues unabated, until the sputtering pro
`cess has to be terminated.
`The Zone of insulating film can be considered a capacitor
`to which a dc voltage is applied. The insulating film 26 on
`the target 16 charges up to the applied voltage V. when
`the capacitor is charged, no further current can flow, i.e., the
`area covered by the insulating film is unavailable for sput
`tering. Plasma current is directed to the remaining areas and
`the current density increases to the remaining uncovered
`gaps 28 on the target. Eventually, the current density will
`creep up to the arc discharge region of the Passione curve
`(FIG. 2) which establishes a limit for reactive dc sputtering.
`Another problem that can arise from the accumulation of
`the dielectric layer 26 is that the dielectric layer may not be
`strong enough to tolerate the entire applied voltage V. In
`that case, the dielectric layer will punch through and fail.
`When this happens the failure region will be flooded with
`charge causing a radical increase in local conductance, and
`a consequent increase in local current density. This can
`produce local arcing, and can bring the entire plasma 22 to
`an arc discharge condition.
`Returning to the Passione curve of FIG. 2, in the glow and
`superglow regions the plasma 22 has a positive resistance
`and exhibits stable behavior. The arc discharge region is
`entered whenever the current density, even for a local area,
`exceeds the Superglow limit. The arc discharge behaves like
`a short from anode to target, and exhibits a negative resis
`tance so the more that current flows, the lower the resistance
`becomes. To stop the arc discharge, the current density in the
`plasma has to drop to the point where it crosses back to the
`glow or Superglow regions.
`The most reliable way to do this is to remove all current
`flow as quickly as possible. However, when the current flow
`resumes, there is nothing to prevent the arc conditions from
`recurring.
`Modern power supplies for dc sputtering often incorpo
`rate arc detecting circuitry which shuts the current off when
`an arc is detected. The current must remain off long enough
`for the arc current to decay. This can reduce effective net
`power to the plasma chamber 12.
`One attempt to deal with this problem of arc prevention
`has been the introduction of unipolar pulsing. This technique
`involves shutting off the power supply, creating pulses at a
`fixed rate and duty cycle. This produces alternate application
`of negative and ground voltage to the target, which allows
`the positively charged dielectric material of the layer 26 to
`be partly charged, and then partly discharged around a bias
`point. This reduces the voltage stress on the insulating layer,
`and does permit some re-sputtering of the insulating layer.
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`5,651,865
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`8
`This system can be understood with reference to FIGS.
`8A, 8B and 9. As shown in FIGS. 8A and 8B, the plasma
`chamber can be considered as a capacitor circuit in which
`the target 16 serves as one electrode or plate, the deposition
`of insulating material 26 serves as the capacitor's dielectric
`layer, and the plasma 22 serves as a series resistance 22a and
`also as the other (positive) electrode or plate 22b of the
`capacitor. The voltage applied to the target V can be a
`pulsed dc voltage alternating between the applied potential
`V and ground potential, i.e., 0 volts. The anode 18 is
`considered to be at ground potential. In this prior-art uni
`polar pulsed power system, the upper plate 22b of the
`capacitor, i.e., the dielectric layer 26 is permitted to decay
`back towards target potential. In FIG. 8B, the voltage at the
`upper capacitor plate is represented as Vcap. Typically, the
`applied voltage is interrupted for periods of 10 microseconds
`or more with a pulse rate of about 2 kilohertz, i.e., a pulse
`period of 500 microseconds. This technique is intended to
`prevent high-voltage build-up on the dielectric or insulating
`layer 26, but does not actually remove the positive charges.
`Consequently, even though some resputtering of the layer
`may occur from ion bombardment, the net effect is simply
`to slow the rate at which the insulting layer accumulates on
`the target.
`The technique of this invention can be explained with
`reference to FIGS. 10 and 11. In this technique, pulses 30 of
`reverse bias voltage --V
`are inserted onto the negative dc
`sputtering voltage -V. The effect of this is to bring the
`target voltage V above ground potential to the reverse bias
`voltage +V. This lifts the capacitor voltage Voa, i.e. the
`potential of the upper surface of the dielectric layer 26 to a
`high potential so that the layer 26 absorbs free electrons
`from the plasma 22 until it achieves ground potential, i.e.,
`corresponding to the potential of the anode 18. This decay is
`shown at curves 32 in FIG. 11.
`As shown in FIG. 10, the reverse pulses create asymmet
`ric bipolar pulsed dic. The positive reverse voltage has
`excursions of smaller magnitude than the negative sputtering
`voltage, e.g., +V-150 volts vs. -VA-300 to -700
`volts. As also shown, the pulse duty cycle is quite Small, that
`is, the pulse width of the positive reverse voltage +V is
`Small relative to its period, e.g., about 2 usec.
`Then the applied negative voltage is resumed at the end of
`the pulse. This brings the lower electrode of the capacitor,
`i.e., the target 16 to the negative voltage -V.
`The upper, or plasma-facing surface of the dielectric
`deposition layer 26 is then brought to a very negative
`potential, more negative than the target potential by the
`amount -V.
`For a practical example of a reactive sputtering system,
`e.g., Al to produce Al2O3, the applied voltage V can be
`-400 vac, and the reverse bias voltage can be +150 volts. In
`this case, the voltage V, which appears on the upper
`surface of the layer 26 follows the voltage wave form of
`FIG. 11. At the onset of applications of -400 volts to the
`target to the target 16, the dielectric voltage drops to -550
`volts. This is more negative than the target potential, and
`tends to attract the positively charged argonions towards the
`accumulations of Al2O on the target. Because of the greater
`potential, i.e. 550 volts, the ions that bombard the Al-O are
`more energetic than those that strike the uncoated target.
`These more energetic ions are able to free the relatively
`heavy oxide molecules from the insulating layer 26, and
`these molecules deposit themselves elsewhere. Thus, the
`reverse bias pulses serve to clean the target of the insulating
`deposition, so that sputtering can continue unabated until the
`target is consumed.
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`O
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`20
`
`The reverse bias pulses are also effective in re

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket