throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 23
`Entered: July 29, 2021
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DEMARAY LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2021-00103 (Patent 7,544,276 B2)
` IPR2021-00104 (Patent 7,381,657 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY and KRISTINA M. KALAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Darish Huynh
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issue in each of the above-identified
`proceedings. Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be
`filed in each proceeding. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this
`style heading in any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00103 (Patent 7,544,276 B2)
`IPR2021-00104 (Patent 7,381,657 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner filed a Motion for pro hac vice admission of Darish
`Huynh (Paper 21, “Mot.”) as well as a supporting Declaration from
`Mr. Huynh (Ex. 2008) in each of the above-listed proceedings.2 Patent
`Owner asserts that Petitioner does not oppose the Motion. Mot. 4. For the
`following reasons, the Motion is granted.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In its
`notice authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires
`the moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause
`for the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice, and an affidavit or
`declaration of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See
`Paper 4, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-
`00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (representative “Order – Authorizing
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”)).
`Having reviewed the Motion and supporting Declaration,3 good cause
`exists for granting admission pro hac vice to Mr. Huynh.
`
`
`2 Our citations to Papers and Exhibits are to those filed in IPR2021-00103.
`Similar Papers and Exhibits were filed in IPR2021-00104.
`3 In his declaration, Mr. Huynh states “I have appeared never appeared
`pro hac vice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.”
`Exhibit 2008 ¶ 10 (underlining added). The declaration does not identify
`any cases before the USPTO in which Mr. Huynh has appeared pro hac vice.
`See Unified Patents, Paper 7 at 3 (the declaration must attest to “[a]ll other
`proceedings before the Office for which the individual has applied to appear
`pro hac vice in the last three (3) years”). Accordingly, we treat the
`underlined inclusion of “appeared” as a typographical error, i.e., as though
`omitted. If this interpretation is incorrect and Mr. Hunyh has appeared pro
`hac vice before the Office in the last three years, he must file a corrected
`Declaration with the Board.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00103 (Patent 7,544,276 B2)
`IPR2021-00104 (Patent 7,381,657 B2)
`
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the Motion is granted and Mr. Huynh is authorized to
`represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in each of the above-listed
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Patent Owner as lead counsel in each of the above-identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Huynh shall comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide4 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37
`of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Huynh is subject to the USPTO’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and to
`the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file, within ten (10)
`business days of the date of this order, updated Mandatory Notices
`identifying Mr. Huynh as back-up counsel under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall submit, within
`ten (10) business days of the date of this order, a Power of Attorney for
`Mr. Huynh in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b).
`
`
`
`
`4 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00103 (Patent 7,544,276 B2)
`IPR2021-00104 (Patent 7,381,657 B2)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph Palys
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Hong Zhong
`Benjamin Hattenbach
`Crawford Wells
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`hzhong@irell.com
`bhattenbach@irell.com
`mwells@irell.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket