throbber

`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`TELEPUTERS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ORACLE CORPORATION AND SUN
`MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`










`
`
`
`NO. 6:20-CV-00600
`
`
`
`PROPOSED AGREED CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Pre-Markman Deadlines
`
`Court’s Default Schedule
`
`September 30, 2020
`October 14, 2020
`(2 weeks after CMC)
`N/A
`November 18, 2020
`(7 weeks after CMC)
`
`Parties’ Proposed
`Schedule
`COMPLETED
`Same as Default
`
`October 28, 2020
`Same as Default
`
`
`
`1
`
`Event
`
`Case Management Conference
`Entry of Agreed Scheduling Order
`Deadline for Motions to Transfer.
`Entry of a Protective Order
`Defendant serves preliminary
`invalidity contentions in the form of
`(1) a chart setting forth where in the
`prior art references each element of the
`asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an
`identification of any limitations the
`Defendant contends are indefinite or
`lack written description under section
`112, and (3) an identification of any
`claims the Defendant contends are
`directed to ineligible subject matter
`under section 101. Defendant shall also
`produce (1) all prior art referenced in
`the invalidity contentions, (2) technical
`documents, including software where
`applicable, sufficient to show the
`operation of the accused product(s),
`and (3) summary, annual sales
`information for the accused product(s)
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 1
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 2 of 6
`
`for the two years preceding the filing
`of the Complaint, unless the parties
`agree to some other timeframe.
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for
`construction.
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim
`constructions.
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence.
`The parties shall disclose any extrinsic
`evidence, including the identity of any
`expert witness they may rely upon
`with respect to claim construction or
`indefiniteness. With respect to any
`expert identified, the parties shall also
`provide a summary of the witness’s
`expected testimony including the
`opinions to be expressed and a general
`description of the basis and reasons
`therefor. A failure to summarize the
`potential expert testimony in a good
`faith, informative fashion may result
`in the exclusion of the proffered
`testimony. With respect to items of
`extrinsic evidence, the parties shall
`identify each such item by production
`number or produce a copy of any such
`item if not previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow
`terms in dispute and exchange revised
`list of terms/constructions.
`
`December 2, 2020
`(9 weeks after CMC)
`December 16, 2020
`(11 weeks after CMC)
`December 23, 2020
`(12 weeks after CMC)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`December 30, 2020
`(13 weeks after CMC)
`
`January 6, 2021
`(moved back one week
`to accommodate Winter
`Holidays)
`
`
`
`2
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 2
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`Parties file Opening claim construction
`briefs, including any arguments that any
`claim terms are indefinite.
`
`Parties file Responsive claim
`construction briefs.
`
`Parties file Reply claim construction
`briefs.
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim
`Construction Statement. In addition to
`filing, the parties shall jointly submit,
`via USB drive, Box (not another
`cloud storage), or email to the law
`clerk, pdf versions of all as-filed
`briefing and exhibits. Each party shall
`deliver to Chambers paper copies of
`its Opening, Response, and Reply
`Markman Briefs, omitting
`attachments. Absent agreement of the
`parties, the Plaintiff shall be
`responsible for the timely submission
`of this and other Joint filings.
`Parties submit optional technical
`tutorials. The parties shall also jointly
`submit, via USB drive, Box (not
`another cloud storage), or email to the
`law clerk, pdf versions of all as-filed
`briefing and exhibits.
`Markman Hearing at [afternoon].
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve
`Initial Disclosures per Rule 26(a).
`
`January 6, 2021
`(14 weeks after CMC)
`
`January 27, 2021
`(17 weeks after CMC)
`
`February 10, 2021
`(19 weeks after CMC)
`
`February 17, 2021
`(20 weeks after CMC)
`
`January 13, 2021
`(moved one week to
`accommodate Winter
`Holidays)
`February 4, 2021
`(moved one week to
`accommodate Winter
`Holidays)
`February 17, 2021
`(moved one week to
`accommodate Winter
`Holidays)
`February 24, 2021
`(moved one week to
`accommodate Winter
`Holidays)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`March 5, 2021
`(23 weeks after CMC [March
`15, 2021] (but at least 1 week
`before Markman hearing))
`
`March 12, 2021
`(per E. Pearson’s 9/28/20 email)
`March 15, 2021
`(1 business day after Markman
`hearing)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 3
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`Post-Markman Deadlines
`
`Albright’s Default Schedule
`
`April 23, 2021
`(6 weeks after Markman hearing)
`May 7, 2021
`(8 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Parties’ Suggested
`Schedule
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`June 4, 2021
`(12 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`September 10, 2021
`(26 weeks after Markman)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Item
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final
`Infringement and Invalidity
`Contentions. After this date, leave
`of Court is required for any
`amendment to Infringement or
`Invalidity contentions. This
`deadline does not relieve the
`Parties of their obligation to
`seasonably amend if new
`information is identified after initial
`contentions.
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion
`is not required unless the amendment
`adds patents or patent claims.
`Deadline for the first of two meet and
`confers to discuss significantly
`narrowing the number of claims
`asserted and prior art references at
`issue. Unless the parties agree to the
`narrowing, they are ordered to contact
`the Court’s Law Clerk to arrange a
`teleconference with the Court to
`resolve the disputed issues.
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`October 8, 2021
`(30 weeks after Markman hearing)
`October 15, 2021
`(31 weeks after Markman hearing)
`November 12, 2021
`(35 weeks after Markman hearing)
`December 3, 2021
`(38 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Same as Default
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Same as Default
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 4
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`December 10, 2021
`(39 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`December 17, 2021
`(40 weeks after Markman hearing)
`December 31, 2021
`(42 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`January 14, 2022
`(44 weeks after Markman hearing)
`January 21, 2022
`(45 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`January 28, 2022
`(46 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`February 4, 2022
`(47 weeks after Markman hearing)
`
`Same as Default
`
`
`
`5
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet
`and confer to discuss narrowing the
`number of claims asserted and prior
`art references at issue to triable limits.
`To the extent it helps the parties
`determine these limits, the parties are
`encouraged to contact the Court’s
`Law Clerk for an estimate of the
`amount of trial time anticipated per
`side. The parties shall file a Joint
`Report within 5 business days
`regarding the results of the meet and
`confer.
`Dispositive motion deadline and
`Daubert motion deadline.
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists,witness lists,
`discovery and deposition designations).
`Serve objections to pretrial
`disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal
`disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial
`Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness
`lists, discovery and deposition
`designations); file oppositions to
`motions in limine
`File Notice of Request for Daily
`Transcript or Real Time Reporting. If
`a daily transcript or real time reporting
`of court proceedings is requested for
`trial, the party or parties making said
`request shall file a notice with the
`Court and e-mail the Court Reporter,
`Kristie Davis at
`kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com
`
`Deadline to meet and confer
`regarding remaining objections and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 5
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00600-ADA Document 26 Filed 10/07/20 Page 6 of 6
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`Same as Default
`
`February 15, 2022
`(3 business days before Final
`Pretrial Conference)
`February 18, 2022
`(49 weeks after Markman hearing
`(or as soon as practicable))
`March 11, 2022
`(52 weeks after Markman hearing
`(or as soon as practicable))
`
`
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining
`objections to pretrial disclosures and
`disputes on motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court
`expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court
`expects to set these dates at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`SO ORDERED this _____ day of _____________________, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Alan D. Albright
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`Oracle-1011 p. 6
`Oracle v. Teleputers
`IPR2021-00078
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket