Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alan D Albright. Markman Hearing held
`on 4/1/2021. Case called for Markman Hearing by Zoom. Parties announce ready. Defts
`begin with the plain and ordinary meaning of the term record[s/ed] and the term collect
`the visited geographic location data. Plaintiffs make counter arguments regarding the
`construction terms. Court orders that they will maintain their preliminary instruction and
`keep the plain and order meaning that the court previously determined. Plaintiff argues
`the term Detection Network Directory. Plaintiffs wishes to modify the courts preliminary
`instruction with (additional in ): A directory that stores and provides detection data
`reflecting the location of the location aware cellular phone. Court keeps their preliminary
`instruction and keeps the plain and ordinary meaning that the court previously
`determined. Plaintiffs move on to the term recordedusing a satellite-based location-
`fixing protocol and a detection network directory (704 Patent, claims 33, 46, 48). The
`defendants argue the word and in the portion of the term protocol and a detection. Court
`keeps their preliminary instruction as indicated on the record. The defendants argue
`final claim terms enable[e/ing] definition (543 Patent, claims 32, 39, 46-49, 51, 54, 72,
`73, 75; 704 Patent, claims 33, 46, 48) and enable the user to define (543 Patent, claim
`56). Defts argue that enable terms should be construed together. Plaintiffs argue that
`they court should uphold their prior determination of plain and ordinary meaning. Courts
`preliminary instruction of plain and ordinary meaning are affirmed. Court confirms that
`they already have a trial date set for January of next year but defts indicate a concern
`about the date. The parties are concerned because they were previously told trial would
`be 12 months after the markman but because the markman was twice rescheduled, that
`is no longer happening. Plaintiffs request that the court reset the trial in accordance with
`that 12- month time frame. Court considers arguments and determines that the trial will
`be reset to March 14, 2022. Parties to file an Agreed Amended Scheduling Order
`considering the revised dates. Plaintiff questions order entered yesterday indicating they
`have 3 months to develop indirect infringement claims but the date on the order was not
`3 months. Court clarified that the parties have 3 months from yesterday when the order
`was issued. Plft inquires regarding protective order issue. Parties to review courts order
`entered yesterday and determine if additional court intervention in necessary. No other
`pending matters. Hearing concluded. (Minute entry documents are not available
`electronically.) (Court Reporter Lily Reznik.)(bw) (Entered: 04/01/2021)
`
`As of April 2, 2021, PACER did not contain a publicly available document associated
`with this docket entry. The text of the docket entry is shown above.
`
`Ikorongo Texas LLC et al v. Bumble Trading Inc.
`6-20-cv-00256 (WDTX), 4/1/2021, docket entry 61
`
`Google et. al v. Ikorongo
`IPR2021-00058
`Exhibit 2012
`
`Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
`
`