throbber
Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 9
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`NO: WA:20-CV-00075-ADA
`
`§§§§§
`
`ECOFACTOR, INC.
`
`vs.
`
`GOOGLE LLC
`
`ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS – PATENT CASE
`
`This Order shall govern proceedings in this case. The following deadlines are hereby set:
`
`1. This case is SET for a telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference on Friday, June
`26, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.. Participants shall dial into the following number 5 minutes before
`the scheduled time: (866) 434-5269; access code 9678090. Lead counsel for each party,
`and all unrepresented parties, shall be present. Client representatives are welcome to
`attend, but such attendance is not required. In person attendance is permitted, but not
`required. Anyone planning to attend in person should so inform the Court by contacting
`chambers not later than two court days before the scheduled hearing so the Court can
`evaluate whether to hold the conference in the courtroom, or in chambers. The Court
`expects the parties to be prepared to discuss:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`an overview of the claims and defenses, including any unique issues the parties
`believe should be addressed at this stage of the case;
`
`issues involving the case schedule and potential amendments to the Court’s default
`scheduling order, including the date for the Markman Hearing;
`
`issues relating to claim construction, including whether a live tutorial would be of
`benefit to the Court;
`
`issues relating to discovery, including potential amendments to the Court’s default
`discovery limits or Protective Order; and,
`
`e. any other issues the parties believe would lead to the just, speedy and inexpensive
`determination of this action.
`
`2.
`
`(Not later than 7 days before the CMC). Plaintiff shall serve preliminary infringement
`contentions in the form of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s) each
`element of the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall also identify the priority date
`(i.e. the earliest date of invention) for each asserted claim and produce: (1) all documents
`evidencing conception and reduction to practice for each claimed invention, and (2) a
`copy of the file history for each patent in suit.
`
`3.
`
`(Not later than 3 business days before the CMC). Lead counsel for each party shall meet
`
`GOOGLE 1019
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 9
`
`and confer (either in person or by telephone), to discuss whether they believe the Court’s
`default Scheduling Order and default Discovery Limits are appropriate for this case, and
`any issues relating to the management of this case they intend to raise at the CMC.
`
`4.
`
`(Two weeks after the CMC). The Parties shall submit an agreed Scheduling Order. If the
`parties cannot agree, the parties shall submit a separate Joint Motion for entry of each
`Order briefly setting forth their respective positions on items where they cannot agree.
`Absent agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff shall be responsible for the timely
`submission of this and other Joint filings.
`
`5.
`
`(Two weeks after the CMC). Deadline for Motions to Transfer. The Court also adopts
`the following page limits and briefing schedule of Motions to Transfer:
`
`a. Opening - 15 pages
`
`b. Reponse - 15 pages, due 14 days after the Opening brief
`
`c. Reply - 5 pages, due 7 days after the Response brief
`
`6.
`
`(Seven weeks after the CMC). Defendant shall serve preliminary invalidity contentions
`in the form of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each element of the
`asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of any limitations the Defendant
`contends are indefinite or lack written description under section 112, and (3) an
`identification of any claims the Defendant contends are directed to ineligible subject
`matter under section 101. Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in the
`invalidity contentions, (2) technical documents, including software where applicable,
`sufficient to show the operation of the accused product(s), and (3) summary, annual sales
`information for the accused product(s) for the two years preceeding the filing of the
`Complaint,1 unless the parties agree to some other timeframe.
`
`DISCOVERY
`
`Except with regard to discovery necessary for claim construction, all other discovery is stayed
`until after the Markman hearing. Notwithstanding this general stay of discovery, the Court will
`permit limited discovery by agreement of the parties, or upon request, where exceptional
`circumstances warrant. For example, if discovery outside the United States is contemplated, the
`Court will be inclined to allow such discovery to commence before the Markman hearing.
`
`__________________________
`1With regard to expired patents, the sales information shall be provided for the two years
`preceding expiration.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 3 of 9
`
`Following the Markman hearing, the following discovery limits will apply to this case. The
`Court will consider reasonable requests to increase these limits should circumstances warrant.
`
`Interrogatories: 30 per side2
`1.
`2. Requests for Admission: 45 per side
`3. Requests for Production: 75 per side
`4. Fact Depositions: 70 hours per side (for both party and non-party witnesses combined)
`5. Expert Depositions: 7 hours per report3
`
`Electronically Stored Information. As a preliminary matter, the Court will not require general
`search and production of email or other electronically stored information (ESI), absent a showing
`of good cause. If a party believes targeted email/ESI discovery is necessary, it shall propose a
`procedure identifying custodians and search terms it believes the opposing party should search.
`The opposing party can oppose, or propose an alternate plan. If the parties cannot agree, they
`shall contact chambers to schedule a call with the Court to discuss their respective positions.
`
`DISCOVERY DISPUTES
`
`A party may not file a Motion to Compel discovery unless: (1) lead counsel have met and
`conferred in good faith to try to resolve the dispute, and (2) the party has contacted the Court's
`law clerk (with opposing counsel) to arrange a telephone conference with the Court to summarize
`the dispute and the parties respective positions. After hearing from the parties, the Court will
`determine if further briefing is required.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Pending entry of the final Protective Order, the Court issues the following interim Protective
`Order to govern the disclosure of confidential information in this matter:
`
`If any document or information produced in this matter is deemed confidential by the
`producing party and if the Court has not entered a protective order, until a protective
`order is issued by the Court, the document shall be marked “confidential” or with some
`other confidential designation (such as “Confidential – Outside Attorneys Eyes Only”) by
`the disclosing party and disclosure of the confidential document or information shall be
`limited to each party’s outside attorney(s) of record and the employees of such outside
`attorney(s).
`__________________________
`2 A "side" shall mean the plaintiff (or related plaintiffs suing together) on the one hand, and the
`defendant (or related defendants sued togther) on the other hand. In the event that the Court
`consolidates related cases for pretrial purposes, with regard to calculating limits imposed by this
`Order, a "side" shall be interpreted as if the cases were proceeding individually. For example, in
`consolidated cases the plaintiff may serve up to 30 interrogatories on each defendant, and each
`defendant may serve up to 30 interrogatories on the plaintiff.
`3 For example, if a single technical expert submits reports on both infringement and invalidity,
`he or she may be deposed for up to 14 hours in total.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 4 of 9
`
`If a party is not represented by an outside attorney, disclosure of the confidential
`document or information shall be limited to one designated “in house” attorney, whose
`identity and job functions shall be disclosed to the producing party 5 days prior to any
`such disclosure, in order to permit any motion for protective order or other relief
`regarding such disclosure. The person(s) to whom disclosure of a confidential document
`or information is made under this local rule shall keep it confidential and use it only for
`purposes of litigating the case.
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ISSUES
`
`Terms for Construction. The Court does not have a specific limit on the number of asserted
`claims or claim terms to be construed; however, the Court encourages the parties to focus on
`their top ten claim terms in order of importance. In cases with an unusually large number of
`patents or asserted claims, the Court may revisit this topic and will be open to suggestions from
`the parties.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. The Court will require simultaneous claim construction briefing
`with the following default page limits; however, where exceptional circumstances warrant, the
`Court will consider reasonable requests to adjust these limits. These page limits shall also apply
`collectively for consolidated cases; however, the Court will consider reasonable requests to
`adjust page limits in consolidated cases where circumstances warrant. In addition, the Court is
`very familiar with the law of claim construction and encourages the parties to forego lengthy
`recitations of the underlying legal authorities and instead focus on the substantive issues unique
`to each case.
`
`Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, all simultaneeous filings will take place at 5:00 p.m. CT.
`
`Page Limits for Markman Briefs
`
`Brief
`Opening
`
`1-2 Patents
`20 pages
`
`3-5 Patents
`30 pages
`
`Response
`
`20 pages
`
`30 pages
`
`Reply
`
`10 pages
`
`15 pages
`
`More than 5 patents
`30 pages, plus 5
`additional pages for
`each patent over 5 up
`to a maximum of 45
`pages
`30 pages, plus 5
`additional pages for
`each patent over 5 up
`to a maximum of 45
`pages
`15 pages, plus 2
`additional pages for
`each patent over 5 up
`to a maximum of 21
`pages
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 5 of 9
`
`Conduct of the Markman Hearing. The Court intends to set aside one half day for the
`Markman hearing; however, the Court is open to reserving more or less time, depending on the
`complexity of the case and input from the parties. The Court is open to the presentation of live
`technology tutorials when they may be of benefit. The parties may also submit tutorials in
`electronic form by the deadline for submission of the Joint Claim Construction Statement. If a
`party intends to present a live tutorial, it should be (1) directed to the underlying technology
`(rather than argument related to infringement or validity), and (2) limited to 15 minutes per side
`at the start of the Markman hearing. For the Court's convenience, the tutorial may be recorded,
`but will not be part of the record. Parties may not rely on or cite to the tutorial in other aspects of
`the litigation.
`
`The Court will consider the parties suggestions on the order of argument at the Markman
`hearing. However, if the parties do not suggest a different procedure, the Court will allow the
`Plaintiff to pick the first term and then alternate by term. As a general rule, if one side proposes
`“plain and ordinary meaning” as its construction or asserts that a term is indefinite, the other
`party shall go first.
`
`GENERAL ISSUES
`
`1. The Court does not have a limit on the number of motions for summary judgment (MSJs);
`however, absent leave of Court, the cumulative page limit for Opening Briefs for all MSJs is
`40 pages per side.
`
`2. The Court encourages the submission of Markman briefs via audio file so that the Court can
`listen to the arguments. The recordings shall be made in a neutral fashion, shall be verbatim
`transcriptions without additional colloquy (except that citations and legal authority sections
`need not be included), and each such file shall be served on opposing counsel. The Court
`does not have a preference for the manner of recording and has found automated software
`recordings, as well as attorney recordings, to be more than satisfactory. Austio files shall be
`submitted via USB drive, Dropbox (not another cloud-storage), or email to the law clerk
`(with a cc to opposing counsel) and should be submitted in mp3 format.
`
`3. The Court will entertain reasonable requests to streamline the case schedule and discovery
`and encourages the parties to contact the Court's law clerk (with opposing counsel) to arrange
`a call with the Court when such interaction might help streamline the case.
`
`
`
`ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2020.
`
`______________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 6 of 9
`
`APPENIDX A – DEFAULT SCHEDULE
`
`Deadline
`
`Item
`
`7 days before CMC
`
`Plaintiff serves preliminary4 infringement contentions in the
`form of a chart setting forth where in the accused product(s)
`each element of the asserted claim(s) are found. Plaintiff shall
`also identify the earliest priority date (i.e. the earliest date of
`invention) for each asserted claim and produce: (1) all
`documents evidencing conception and reduction to practice
`for each claimed invention, and (2) a copy of the file history
`for each patent in suit.
`
`2 weeks after CMC
`
`Deadline for Motions to Transfer
`
`7 weeks after CMC
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the
`form of (1) a chart setting forth where in the prior art
`references each element of the asserted claim(s) are found, (2)
`an identification of any limitations the Defendant contends are
`indefinite or lack written description under section 112, and
`(3) an identification of any claims the Defendant contends are
`directed to ineligible subject matter under section 101.
`Defendant shall also produce (1) all prior art referenced in the
`invalidity contentions, (2) technical documents, including
`software where applicable, sufficient to show the operation of
`the accused product(s), and (3) summary, annual sales
`information for the accused product(s) for the prior two years,
`unless the parties agree to some other timeframe.
`
`9 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties exchange claim terms for construction.
`
`11 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties exchange proposed claim constructions.
`
`_________________________
`4The parties may amend preliminary infringement contentions and preliminary invalidity contentions without leave
`of the court so long as counsel certifies that it undertook reasonable efforts to prepare its preliminary contentions and
`the amendment is based on material identified after those preliminary contentions were served, and should do so
`seasonably upon identifying any such material. Any amendment to add patent claims requires leave of court so that
`the Court can address any scheduling issues.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 7 of 9
`
`12 weeks after CMC
`
`13 weeks after CMC
`
`14 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose
`any extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert
`witness they may rely upon with respect to claim construction
`or indefiniteness. With respect to any expert identified, the
`parties shall also provide a summary of the witness’s expected
`testimony including the opinions to be expressed and a general
`description of the basis and reasons therefore. A failure to
`summarize the potential expert testimony in a good faith,
`informative fashion may result in the exclusion of the
`proffered testimony. With respect to items of extrinsic
`evidence, the parties shall identify each such item by
`production number or produce a copy of any such item if not
`previously produced.
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and
`exchange revised list of terms/constructions.
`
`Parties file Opening claim construction briefs, including any
`arguments that any claim terms are indefinite.
`
`17 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties file Responsive claim construction briefs.
`
`19 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties file Reply claim construction briefs.
`
`20 weeks after CMC
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement. In
`addition to filing, the parties shall jointly submit, via USB
`drive, cloud-storage, or email to the law clerk pdf versions of
`all as-filed briefing and exhibits. Absent agreement of the
`parties, the Plaintiff shall be responsible for the timely
`submission of this and other Joint filings.
`
`24 weeks after CMC (or as
`soon as practicable)
`
`Markman Hearing at [9:00 a.m. or 1:00 p.m.]
`
`1 week after Markman
`hearing
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per
`Rule 26(a).
`
`6 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`8 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Deadline to add parties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity
`Contentions. After this date, leave of Court is required for any
`amendment to Infringement or Invalidity contentions. This
`deadline does not relieve the Parties of their obligation to
`seasonably amend if new information is identified after initial
`contentions.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 8 of 9
`
`12 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless
`the amendment adds patents or claims.
`
`30 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`31 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`35 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`38 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`39 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`40 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to discuss narrowing the number
`of claims asserted and prior art references at issue. The parties
`shall file a Joint Report within 5 business days regarding the
`results of the meet and confer.
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`42 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`44 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`45 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine.
`
`46 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations); file oppositions to motions in limine
`
`47 weeks after Markman
`hearing
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections
`and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`3 business days before
`Final Pretrial Conference
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on motions in limine.
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 26 Filed 06/11/20 Page 9 of 9
`
`49 weeks after Markman
`hearing (or as soon as
`practicable)
`
`52 weeks after Markman
`hearing (or as soon as
`practicable)5
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this date
`at the conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`________________________
`5If the actual trial date materially differs from the Court's default schedule, the Court will
`consider reasonable amendments to the case schedule post-Markman that are consistent with the
`Court's default deadlines in light of the actual trial date.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Addendum to Schedule filed July 16, 2020
`
`(This page is not part of the Court’s record)
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 33 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`EcoFactor Schedules
`
`—_ Pro » osed date
`Submit to Court a eed u n schedulinr order
`7-13-2020
`Deadline for Motions to Transfer
`7-13-2020
`
`8-17-2020
`
`9-1-2020
`
`9-15-2020
`
`9-22—2020
`
`Defendant serves preliminary invalidity contentions in the form of (1)
`a chart setting forth where in the prior art references each element of
`the asserted claim(s) are found, (2) an identification of any limitations
`the Defendant contends are indefinite or lack written description under
`section 112, and
`
`(3) an identification of any claims the Defendant contends are directed
`to ineligible subject matter under section 101. Defendant shall also
`produce (1) all prior art referenced in the invalidity contentions, (2)
`technical documents, including software where applicable, sufficient to
`show the operation of the accused product(s), and (3) summary, annual
`sales information for the accused product(s) for the prior two years,
`unless the parties agree to some other tirneframe.
`Parties exchan e claim terms for construction.
`
`Parties exchan - e ro uosed claim constructions.
`
`Parties disclose extrinsic evidence. The parties shall disclose any
`extrinsic evidence, including the identity of any expert witness they
`may rely upon with respect to claim construction or indefiniteness.
`With respect to any expert identified, the parties shall also provide a
`summary of the witness’s expected testimony including the opinions to
`be expressed and a general description of the basis and reasons
`therefore. A failure to summarize the potential expert testimony in a
`good faith, informative fashion may result in the exclusion of the
`proffered testimony. With respect to items of extrinsic evidence, the
`parties shall identify each such item by production number or produce
`of an such item if not reviousl
`roduced.
`
`12—8—2020
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to narrow terms in dispute and exchange
`revised list of terms-constructions.
`
`Parties file Opening claim construction briefs, including any arguments
`that any claim terms are indefinite.
`Parties file Res u nsive claim construction briefs.
`
`Parties file R 1 claim construction briefs.
`
`Parties submit Joint Claim Construction Statement. In addition to
`
`9-29-2020
`
`10-6—2020
`
`10-27-2020
`
`11-10-2020
`
`11-17-2020
`
`filing, the parties shall jointly submit, via USB drive, cloud—storage,
`or email to the law clerk pdf versions of all as-filed briefing and
`exhibits. Absent agreement of the parties, the Plaintiff shall be
`responsible for the timely submission of this and other Joint filings.
`
`Technology Tutorial DUE
`
`Court will provide preliminary claim constructions (ideally by 5 PM
`
`

`

`Case 6:20-cv-00075-ADA Document 33 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`__-_
`
`Fact Discovery opens; deadline to serve Initial Disclosures per Rule
`26 a .
`
`Deadline to add narties.
`
`Deadline to serve Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. After
`this date, leave of Court is required for any amendment to Infringement
`or Invalidity contentions. This deadline does not relieve the Parties of
`their obligation to seasonably amend if new information is identified
`after initial contentions.
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless the
`amendment adds patents or claims.
`Close of Fact Discove
`.
`
`noenin EXnert Renorts.
`
`Rebuttal Ex n ert Re n orts.
`
`Close of Ex n ert Discove
`
`.
`
`12-16-2020
`
`1-20-2021
`
`2-3-2021
`
`3-3-2021
`
`7-7-202 1
`
`8-11-2021
`
`9—1-2021
`
`9-8—2021
`
`9—15-2021
`
`9-29-2021
`
`10-13—2021
`10-20-2021
`
`10-27—2021
`
`11-3—2021
`
`11-12—2021
`
`11—17-2021
`
`7—14-202 l
`
`Deadline to meet and confer to discuss narrowing the number of claims
`asserted and prior art references at issue. The parties shall file a Joint
`Report within 5 business days regarding the results of the meet and
`confer.
`
`Dis 0nsitive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists,
`discove
`and de nosition desi u ations
`Serve ob'ections to retrial disclosures-rebuttal disclosures.
`Serve ob'ections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in Iimine.
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury instructions,
`exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and deposition designations);
`file 0 n n nsitions to motions in Iimine
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections and
`dis nutes on motions in limine.
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial disclosures
`and dis nutes on motions in Iimine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this date at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearin ' .
`
`Jury Selection-Trial. The Court expects to set this date at the conclusion
`of the Mariana" Hearinn .
`
`12-6-2021
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket