throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`MOBILE IRON, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2020-01741
`Patent 7,372,961
`
`_________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`Description of Document
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,372,961 B2 to Scott A. Vanstone et al. (filed December
`26, 2001, issued May 13, 2008)
`
`Declaration of Professor Michael Goodrich, Ph.D.
`
`Prosecution History for U.S. Patent Application No. 10/025,924, which
`issued as U.S. Patent No. 7,372,961
`
`Federal Information Processing (FIPS) Publication 186, Digital Signature
`Standard (DSS) (May 19, 1994)
`
`U.S. Patent 6,697,946 to Miyaji (PCT Application filed January 28, 1997,
`PCT Application published July 30, 1998, U.S. Patent issued February 24,
`2004)
`“‘Pseudo-random’ Number Generation Within Cryptographic Algorithms:
`The DDS case,” by Mihir Bellare, et al. (published in Proceedings of the
`Annual International Cryptology Conference (CRYPTO), pp. 277-291,
`Springer, 1997, as a part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science
`(LNCS) book series, volume 129).
`LEDA: a Platform for Combinatorial and Geometric Computing, by Kurt
`Mehlhorn & Stefan Näher, Cambridge University Press, 1999
`
`Original Complaint filed April 27, 2020 in MobileIron. Inc. v. Blackberry
`Corp., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-02877 (N.D. Cal.)
`
`First Amended Complaint filed June 29, 2020, in MobileIron. Inc. v.
`Blackberry Corp., et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-02877 (N.D. Cal.)
`
`First Amended Complaint filed in BlackBerry Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et
`al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.), Facebook’s Exhibit
`1033 from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923
`(PTAB)
`Excerpts from Menezes et al., Handbook of Applied Cryptography (1997)
`
`i
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`Description of Document
`
`Dkt. Entry 157, Corrected Final Ruling on Claim Construction/Markman
`Hearing, filed April 5, 2019, entered April 11, 2019, in BlackBerry Ltd. v.
`Facebook, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`
`Dkt. Entry 652, Civil Minutes entered February 13, 2020, in BlackBerry
`Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`
`Dkt. Entry 655, Sealed Minutes of Motion Hearing held February 27,
`2020, before Judge George H. Wu, in BlackBerry Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et
`al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`
`Dkt. Entry 656, Joint Request To Vacate Pretrial Conference and Trial
`Date, filed March 19, 2020, in BlackBerry Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et al.,
`Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`
`Dkt. Entry 657, Order dated March 24, 2020 Vacating Pretrial Conference
`and Trial Date, in BlackBerry Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:18-
`cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`Dkt. Entry 673, In Chambers – Order dated July 23, 2020, in BlackBerry
`Ltd. v. Facebook, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01844-GW-KS (C.D. Cal.)
`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed by Facebook, Inc., et al. in
`Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`Paper No. 14, Decision entered November 5, 2019, in Facebook, Inc., et
`al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB Nov. 5, 2019)
`
`Excerpts from Schneier, Applied Cryptography (2d ed. 1996), Exhibit
`1008 from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923
`(PTAB)
`Rose, Re: “Card-shuffling” algorithms, USENET, sci.crypt, sciath h 10,
`1993), Facebook’s Exhibit 1006 from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry
`Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`Excerpts from Rao, Error Coding for Arithmetic Processors (1974),
`Facebook’s Exhibit 1018 from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd.,
`IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`Excerpts from Floyd, Essentials of Data Processing (1987), Facebook’s
`Exhibit 1019 from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-
`00923 (PTAB)
`
`ii
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Description of Document
`
`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`1024
`
`Declaration of Daniele Micchiancio
`
`1025
`
`Affidavit of Elizabeth Rosenberg
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`Declaration of Sylvia Hall-Ellis, Ph.D, in Support of Petitioner’s Petition
`for Inter Partes Review
`
`Excerpts from Blackberry’s Supplemental Responses and Objections to
`Facebook’s Interrogatories, Facebook’s Exhibit 1033 from Facebook, Inc.,
`et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`Declaration of Dr. Jonathan Katz, Facebook’s Exhibit 1002 from
`Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response filed in Facebook, Inc., et al. v.
`BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`Declaration of Markus Jakobsson, Exhibit 2001 filed by Patent Owner in
`Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`1031
`
`Excerpts from Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fourth Edition, 1999
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`Federal Information Processing (FIPS) Publication 186-2, Digital
`Signature Standard (DSS) (December 15, 1998)
`
`Federal Information Processing (FIPS) Publication 186-2, Digital
`Signature Standard (DSS) (January 27, 2000)
`
`John von Neumann, Various Techniques Used in Connection with Random
`Digits, Summary by G.E. Forsythe, National Bureau of Standards Applied
`Math Series, 12 (1951), pp 36-38, reprinted in von Neumann's Collected
`Works, 5 (1963), Pergamon Press pp 768-770, Facebook’s Exhibit 1017
`from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`1035
`
`Excerpts from M.T. Goodrich and R. Tamassia, Algorithm Design and
`Analysis, Wiley, 2015
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1036
`
`Description of Document
`
`Federal Information Processing (FIPS) Publication 186-3, Digital
`Signature Standard (DSS) (June 2009), Patent Owner’s Exhibit 2003
`from Facebook, Inc., et al. v. BlackBerry Ltd., IPR2019-00923 (PTAB)
`
`1037-1054
`
` Not used.
`
`1055
`
`
`
`Settlement agreement.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively “Parties”) hereby jointly move for
`
`an order terminating the preliminary proceeding initiated by the petition for inter
`
`partes review filed on October 2, 2020, directed to Patent No. 7,372,961 (“the
`
`challenged patent”) and assigned case number IPR2020-01741.
`
`Patent Owner has yet to file a preliminary response. The Board has yet to
`
`issue a decision to institute trial.
`
`1. Reasons Why Termination Is Appropriate
`
`The Board emailed the Parties on March 3, 2021 to authorize this filing of a
`
`“Joint Motion To Terminate.” Termination is proper because the Parties are jointly
`
`requesting termination, this IPR proceeding is still in its early stages, and the Board
`
`has not yet “decided the merits of the proceeding.” Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`et al v. Neodron Ltd., IPR2020-01682, Paper 14, 3 (February 18, 2021); see also
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Fundamental Innovation Systems Int’l, IPR2018-
`
`00605, Paper 10, 2 (PTAB July 16, 2018) (noting that 35 U.S.C. § 317 “does not
`
`govern settlement prior to institution,” but explaining that “it is appropriate to
`
`dismiss the proceedings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a)”). Accordingly,
`
`termination is appropriate here.
`
`The parties are filing herewith as Exhibit 1025, a true copy of settlement
`
`agreement entered between the Parties and executed on February 22, 2021. See 37
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The settlement agreement was entered into in contemplation of
`
`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`terminating this proceeding. This settlement agreement is the only agreement or
`
`understanding between Petitioner and Patent Owner made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of terminating this proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). A request
`
`is being filed herewith to treat this agreement as “business confidential information”
`
`and to keep it separate from the files of the involved patent. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`The Parties understand that if the Board terminates this IPR proceeding, no
`
`estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e) or 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(d)(1) will attach to
`
`Petitioner. The Parties understand that if the Board terminates this petition for inter
`
`partes review before a final written decision on patentability, no preclusion will
`
`attach to Patent Owner under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(d)(3).
`
`The lawsuit between Patent Owner and Petitioner involving the challenged
`
`patent here has been dismissed. The parties do not contemplate any litigation or
`
`proceeding involving the challenged patent in the foreseeable future.
`
`2.
`
`No Future Participation by Petitioner
`
`Petitioner will not be participating further in this proceeding.
`
`3.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The parties have settled all disputes relating to the challenged patent. This
`
`inter partes review is in an early stage, and the Board has not entered a final written
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`decision on the merits in this proceeding. Accordingly, the parties respectfully
`
`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`request the Board to terminate this proceeding in its entirety.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 9, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` /R. Parrish Freeman/
`R. Parrish Freeman, Reg. No. 42,556
`Maschoff Brennan
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
` /Michael T. Hawkins/
`Michael T. Hawkins, Reg. No. 57,867
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case IPR2020-01741
`Attorney Docket No: I4520.00016
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1), the undersigned certifies that on March 9,
`
`2021 a copy of Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding and its supporting exhibit
`
`were provided via email, to Patent Owner by serving the email correspondence
`
`addresses of record as follows:
`
`
`
`
`Michael T. Hawkins
`Nicholas Stephens
`Christopher Hoff
`Andrew Dommer
`Terry J. Stalford
`FISH & RICHARDSON
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
` Email: hawkins@fr.com
` nstephens@fr.com
` hoff@fr.com
` dommer@fr.com
` stalford@fr.com
` PTABInbound@fr.com
` IPR21828-0056IP1@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/R. Parrish Freeman/
`R. Parrish Freeman
`Maschoff Brennan
`1389 Center Drive, Suite 300
`Park City, Utah 84098
`(435) 252-1360
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket