1
`
`Patent Owner Masimo Corporation’s
`Demonstratives For Trial Hearing
`
`February 9, 2022
`
`Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent 10,702,194)
`
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195)
`
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366)
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564)
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Masimo Corporation’s
`Demonstratives For Trial Hearing
`
`February 9, 2022
`
`Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation
`IPR2020-01716 (Patent 10,702,194)
`
`IPR2020-01733 (Patent 10,702,195)
`
`IPR2020-01737 (Patent 10,709,366)
`
`IPR2020-01713 (Patent 10,624,564)
`
`
`
`Patents-At-Issue
`
`U.S. Patent 10,702,194
` IPR2020-01716
`
`U.S. Patent 10,702,195
` IPR2020-01733
`
`U.S. Patent 10,709,366
` IPR2020-01737
`
`U.S. Patent 10,624,564
` IPR2020-01713
`
`-1716 Ex. 1001; -1733 Ex. 1001; -1737 Ex. 1001; -1713 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`’194 Patent Claim 1
`
`-1716 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`
`
`’194 Patent Claims 13, 17, 29
`
`-1716 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`’195 Patent Claim 1
`
`-1733 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`
`
`’366 Patent Claim 1
`
`-1737 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`
`
`’564 Patent Claim 1
`
`-1713 Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Asserted Level Of Ordinary Skill In The Art
`
`Petitioner asserts a POSITA:
`
`“would have been a person with a working knowledge of physiological
`monitoring technologies. The person would have had a Bachelor of
`Science degree in an academic discipline emphasizing the design of
`electrical, computer, or software technologies, in combination with
`training or at least one to two years of related work experience with
`capture and processing of data or information, including but not
`limited to physiological monitoring technologies.”
`
`-1716 Pet. 3; -1733 Pet. 3; -1737 Pet. 3; -1713 Pet. 8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Art
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`
`
`Aizawa
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Sensor
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 2; -1716 POR 35; -1733 POR 33; -1737 POR 34;
`-1713 POR 27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Sensor
`
`• Four phototransistors 22 (also
`referred to as “photodetectors”)
`
`• A drive detection circuit 24 for
`detecting a pulse wave by
`amplifying the outputs of the
`photodetectors 22
`
`• A transmitter 4
`
`• A transparent plate 6
`
`— Ex. 1006 ¶[0023]
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 1B; -1716 POR 54, 57-59; -1733 POR 53, 55-57;
`-1737 POR 53, 56-58; -1713 POR 41-44
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Sensor
`
`Ex. 1006 Figs. 1A, 4A; -1716 POR 55-62; -1733 POR 55-60;
`-1737 POR 56-61
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Sensor
`
`Ex. 1006 Figs. 1A, 4A, 4B; -1716 POR 21-22, 19-20, 55-62;
`-1733 POR 19-21, 55-60; -1737 POR 19-21, 56-61
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`
`
`Palm-Side Of Forearm/Wrist Showing Arteries
`
`Ex. 2010 at 44 (Plate 429); -1716 POR 35-37; -1733 POR 33-35;
`-1737 POR 34-36; -1713 POR 27-29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`
`
`Back-Side Of Forearm/Wrist
`
`Ex. 2010 at 42 (Plate 427); -1716 POR 35-37, -1733 POR 33-35;
`-1737 POR 34-36; -1713 POR 27-29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Positioning
`
`“[E]ven when the attachment position of the pulse rate detector 1 is dislocated,
`one of the photodetectors 22 is located near the artery 11….” — Ex. 1006 ¶[0027]
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 2, ¶[0027], Ex. 2010 at 44; -1716 POR 34-40,
`-1733 POR 32-38; -1737 POR 33-39; -1713 POR 25-32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Output
`
`“FIG. 3 schematically shows the waveform of a pulse wave which is the output of
`the above photodetector 22.” — Ex. 1006 ¶[0028]
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 3, ¶¶[0019], [0023], [0028], Ex. 2026 76:13-22;
`-1716 POR 57-59, Ex. 2004 ¶102; -1733 POR 55-57; -1737 POR 56-58
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`19
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2003’s Sensor
`
`“we found that by combining both PD sets to simulate a single large
`PD area, it is possible to further reduce the driving currents of the
`LEDs….” — Ex. 1024 at 4
`
`Ex. 1024 Fig. 1; -1716 POR 59-63; -1733 POR 57-62; -1737 POR 58-63
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2003’s Sensor
`
`“[T]o produce constant PPG
`amplitudes, significantly higher
`currents are required to drive the
`LEDs when backscattered light is
`measured by the outer PD set
`compared to the inner set.”
`— Ex. 1024 at 4
`
`Ex. 1024 Fig. 1; -1716 POR 59-63; -1733 POR 57-62; -1737 POR 58-63
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2003’s Sensor
`
`“[B]attery longevity could be
`extended considerably by
`employing a wide annular PD and
`limiting SpO2 measurements to
`the forehead region.”
`— Ex. 1024 at 4
`
`Ex. 1024 Fig. 1; -1716 POR 59-63; -1733 POR 57-62; -1737 POR 58-63
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`
`
`Mendelson-2006’s Forehead Sensor
`
`Fig. 2: System block diagram (excerpt)
`
`“The battery operated device…incorporates an annular photodetector
`to reduce power consumption.”
`— Ex. 1016 at 1
`
`Ex. 1016 at 1, 2, 4, Fig. 2; -1716 POR 66-67
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`
`
`Ohsaki
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`25
`
`
`
`Ohsaki’s Pulse Detector
`
`Ex. 1014 Fig. 2, ¶[0019]; -1716 POR 12-14; -1733 POR 11-13;
`-1737 POR 11-13; -1713 Ex. 1009, POR 10-11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`
`
`Ohsaki’s Pulse Detector
`
`Ex. 1014 Figs. 1-2, ¶[0019]; -1716 POR 40-43; -1733 POR 38-41;
`-1737 POR 39-42; -1713 POR 32-35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`
`
`Ohsaki and Anatomy
`
`“[T]he user feels uncomfortable if the pressure applied to the user’s wrist…is too
`high.” — Ex. 1014 ¶[0018]
`
`If detecting element 2’s “longitudinal direction…agrees with the circumferential
`direction of the user's wrist 4, it has a tendency to slip off.” — Ex. 1014 ¶[0019]
`
`-1716 POR 18-20, 26-28; -1733 POR 16-18, 24-26;
`-1737 POR 16-18, 25-27; -1713 POR 13-15, 18-20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`
`
`Ohsaki’s Front/Back Wrist Comparison with Convex Board
`
`Ex. 2008 157:5-158:1, 158:15-20, Ex. 1014 Figs. 3A-B, ¶¶[0023]-[0024];
`-1716 POR 41-43; -1733 POR 39-41; -1737 POR 40-42; -1713 POR 33-35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`
`
`Ohsaki’s Back Of Wrist Shape Comparison
`
`Ex. 2008 156:18-158:1, 158:15-20; Ex. 1014 Figs. 4A-B, ¶¶[0024]-[0025];
`-1716 POR 41-43; -1733 POR 39-41; -1737 POR 40-42; -1713 POR 33-35
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`
`
`Aizawa v. Ohsaki
`
`Front (Palm) Side
`
`Flat acrylic plate improves adhesion and
`detection efficiency
`
`Flat
`
`Ex. 1006 (Aizawa) ¶[0013]; see also
`¶¶[0026], [0030], [0034], Fig. 1B
`
`Back Side
`
`Tends to slip
`
`Ex. 1014 (Ohsaki) ¶[0025],
`Figs. 4A-4B
`
`(Aizawa’s sensor)
`
`Tends to slip
`
`Convex
`
`Ex. 1014 (Ohsaki) ¶[0023],
`Figs. 3A-3B
`
`Longitudinal convex board
`provides intimate contact
`
`Ex. 1014 (Ohsaki) ¶¶[0024]-[0025],
`Figs. 4A-4B
`
`(Ohsaki’s sensor)
`
`Ex. 1006 ¶[0013]; Ex. 1014 ¶[0023]-[0025], Figs. 3, 4;
`-1716 POR 43-46; -1733 POR 41-44; -1737 POR 42-45; -1713 POR 35-38
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Combinations
`
`IPR
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`4th Ref.
`
`10,702,194
`
`IPR2020-01716
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Mendelson-2006
`
`10,702,195
`
`IPR2020-01733
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,709,366
`
`IPR2020-01737
`
`Aizawa
`
`Mendelson-2003
`
`Ohsaki
`
`Goldsmith
`
`10,624,564
`
`IPR2020-01713
`
`Aizawa
`
`Goldsmith
`
`Ohsaki
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Alleged Motivations to Combine: Convex Cover
`
`IPR2020-01716, -1733, -1737, -01713:
`
`“improve adhesion between the user’s wrist and the sensor’s
`surface”
`
`“improve detection efficiency”
`
`“protect the elements within the sensor housing”
`
`-1716 Pet. 24-25, -1733 Pet. 25; -1737 Pet. 28-29; -1713 Pet. 22-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Aizawa + Ohsaki Combinations
`
`-1716 Pet. 45, 63, 68; -1733 Pet. 26, Reply 12;
`-1737 Pet. 29, 61, 69; -1713 Pet. 23, Reply 11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`34
`
`
`
`Aizawa + Ohsaki
`
`Aizawa:
`Palm-side sensor
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 2
`
`Ohsaki:
`Back-side sensor
`Ex. 1014 Fig. 1
`
`-1716 POR 18-20, 34-46; -1733 POR 16-18, 32-44;
`-1737 POR 16-18, 33-45; -1713 POR 13-15, 25-38
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`
`
`Circular Sensor On Anatomy
`
`Aizawa
`
`-1716 POR 28-31; -1733 POR 26-29; -1737 POR 27-30; -1713 POR 20-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Alleged Motivations to use Two Streams
`
`IPR2020-01716, -1733, -1737 Petitions:
`
`“power savings”
`
`create “a single, large detector, which is what the ring of detectors in
`Aizawa is in effect trying to mimic”
`
`“determine when the sensor device is so severely located that its position
`should be adjusted” (based on non-ground Mendelson ’799)
`
`“keep each ring separately wired and connected to its own amplifier”
`
`“common practice”
`
`-1716 Pet. 32-38; -1733 Pet. 18-21, 41-46; -1737 Pet. 20-24, 43-48
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`37
`
`
`
`Aizawa’s Sensor v. Alleged Combination
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 4A; -1716 POR 59-62; -1733 POR 57-60; -1737 POR 58-61
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Argument
`
`“[A] measurement scenario where the backscattered light only reaches the area
`highlighted in yellow would not result in light detection without the presence of
`additional sensors provided by the second ring.”
`
`-1716 Reply 35; -1733 Reply 35; -1737 Reply 34
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Argument
`
`-1716 Sur-Reply 27-28; -1733 Sur-Reply 26-27; -1737 Sur-Reply 26-27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Reply Argument
`
`-1716 Sur-Reply 27-28; -1733 Sur-Reply 26-27; -1737 Sur-Reply 26-27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Expert
`
`“I think one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that in
`Inokawa the objective is to concentrate light at the detector,
`which is in the center axis of the drawing and that the lens is
`capable of providing that benefit.
`
`If we’re going to move the lenses and the LEDs and detectors around
`and ask different questions, it’s -- it isn’t so obvious that Inokawa is
`specifically considering those scenarios. It’s a little more
`hypothetical.”
`
`— Ex. 2006 86:19-87:6 (emphases added)
`
`-1716 Sur-Reply 18-19; -1733 Sur-Reply 18; -1737 Sur-Reply 18-19;
`-1713 Sur-Reply 18-19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Expert
`
`“more light in the center than at the outer edge in this example.”
`
`— Ex. 2006 204:1-13
`
`Dr. Kenny agreed “that’s because light’s being directed towards the
`center and away from the edge….”
`
`— Ex. 2006 204:14-20
`
`-1716 POR 48; -1733 POR 46; -1737 POR 47; -1713 POR 39-40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`
`
`Convex Surface Condenses Light Toward The Center
`
`Petitioner’s expert Dr. Kenny explained that, when using a convex surface:
`
`“the incoming light is ‘condensed’ toward the center.”
`
`— Ex. 2020 ¶119
`
`-1716 POR 48; -1733 POR 46; -1737 POR 47; -1713 POR 39-40
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`
`
`Inokawa
`
`“Light-emitting
`(Claim 8)
`vital sensor set forth in any
`of Claims 1 through 7,
`characterized in that a lens
`is placed on the surface of
`the aforesaid sensor-side
`light-emitting means.”
`
`— Ex. 1008 Claim 8;
`see also ¶15
`
`— Ex. 1008 Fig. 17
`
`-1716 Reply 11, Sur-Reply 21; -1733 Reply 11, Sur-Reply 20-21;
`-1737 Reply 11, Sur-Reply 21; -1713 Reply 10, Sur-Reply 22-23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Textbook
`
`Ex. 1061 at 51; -1716 Sur-Reply 17-18; -1733 Sur-Reply 16-17;
`-1737 Sur-Reply 16-17; -1713 Ex. 1051 at 51, Sur-Reply 17-18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Randomly Diffused Light
`
`-1716 Reply 30 (modifying Ex. 1008 Fig. 2);
`-1733 Reply 29-30; -1737 Reply 28-29; -1713 Reply 30
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
