`
`
`Al-Ali
`In re Patent of:
`10,470,695 Attorney Docket No.: 50095-0004IP2
`U.S. Patent No.:
`November 12, 2019
`
`Issue Date:
`Appl. Serial No.: 16/226,249
`
`Filing Date:
`December 19, 2018
`
`Title:
`ADVANCED PULSE OXIMETRY SENSOR
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF UNITED STATES PATENT
`NO. 10,470,695 PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. §§ 311–319, 37 C.F.R. § 42
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR .......................................................................... 2
` Grounds for Standing ................................................................................. 2
` Challenge and Relief Requested ................................................................. 3
`THE ’695 PATENT ......................................................................................... 4
` Brief Description ........................................................................................ 4
` Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art .............................................................. 5
` Claim Construction ..................................................................................... 6
` UNPATENTABILITY GROUNDS ................................................................ 6
` GROUND 1A: Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 11-13, 15-19, and 22-30 are obvious
`based on Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman .............................................. 6
`1. Overview of Mendelson-799 ................................................................. 6
`2. Overview of Venkatraman .................................................................. 10
`3. The combination of Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman ...................... 14
`4. Reasons to combine Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman ..................... 14
`5. Analysis ............................................................................................... 18
` GROUND 1B: Claims 6, 14, and 21 are obvious based on Mendelson-
`799, Venkatraman, and Chin .................................................................... 52
`1. Overview of Chin ................................................................................ 52
`2. The combination of Mendelson-799, Venkatraman, and Chin ........... 53
`3. Reasons to combine Mendelson-799, Venkatraman, and Chin .......... 53
`4. Analysis ............................................................................................... 55
` GROUND 2A: Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 11-13, 15-19, and 22-30 are obvious
`based on Mendelson-799 and Mio Alpha................................................. 56
`1. Overview of Mio Alpha ...................................................................... 56
`2. The combination of Mendelson '799 and Mio Alpha ......................... 58
`3. Reasons to combine Mendelson-799 and Mio Alpha ......................... 59
`4. Analysis ............................................................................................... 61
` GROUND 2B: Claims 3, 12, and 23 are obvious based on Mendelson-
`799, Mio Alpha, and Mendelson 2006 ..................................................... 68
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`1. Overview of Mendelson 2006 ............................................................. 68
`2. The combination of Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha, and Mendelson 2006
` ............................................................................................................. 69
`3. Reasons to combine Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha, and Mendelson
`2006 ..................................................................................................... 69
`4. Analysis ............................................................................................... 70
` GROUND 2C: Claims 6, 14, and 21 are obvious based on Mendelson-
`799, Mio Alpha, and Chin ........................................................................ 72
`1. The combination of Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha, and Chin ............... 72
`2. Reasons to combine Mendelson '799, Mio Alpha, and Chin .............. 73
`3. Analysis ............................................................................................... 74
` GROUND 2D: Claims 18, 27, and 30 are obvious based on Mendelson-
`799, Mio Alpha, and Venkatraman .......................................................... 75
`1. The combination of Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha, and Venkatraman . 75
`2. Reasons to combine Mendelson '799, Mio Alpha, and Venkatraman 76
`3. Analysis ............................................................................................... 77
` PAYMENT OF FEES ................................................................................... 78
`CONCLUSION .............................................................................................. 78
` MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.8(a)(1) ......................... 79
` Real Party-In-Interest Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1) ............................... 79
` Related Matters Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2) ......................................... 79
` Lead And Back-Up Counsel Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3) .................... 79
` Service Information .................................................................................. 79
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE-1001
`
`APPLE-1002
`
`APPLE-1003
`
`APPLE-1004
`
`APPLE-1005
`
`
`APPLE-1006
`
`APPLE-1007
`
`
`APPLE-1008
`
`
`APPLE-1009
`
`APPLE-1010
`
`
`APPLE-1011
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695 to Al-Ali (“the ’695 Patent”)
`
`Prosecution History of the ’695 Patent
`
`Declaration of Brian W. Anthony, Ph.D.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,801,799 to Mendelson (“Mendelson-799”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,998,815 to Venkatraman et al.
`(“Venkatraman”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,343,223 to Chin et al. (“Chin”)
`
`Mio ALPHA Complete User Guide,
`https://www.medisana.com/out/pictures/media/manual/mio_alp
`ha_user_guide_en.pdf (2014)
`
`DC RAINMAKER, Mio Alpha Optical Heart Rate Monitor In-
`Depth Review, https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2013/02/monitor-
`bluetooth-smartant.html (Feb. 12, 2013)
`
`Reserved
`
`Mendelson et al, A Wearable Reflectance Pulse Oximeter for
`Remote Physiological Monitoring, Proceedings of the 28th
`IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference (September
`2006) (“Mendelson 2006”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0271009 to
`Conroy (“Conroy”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,008,380 to Rees et al. (“Rees”)
`
`QuickSpecs; HP iPAQ Pocket PC h4150 Series
`
`
`APPLE-1012
`
`APPLE-1013
`
`APPLE-1014 to Reserved
`APPLE-1016
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Declaration of Jacob Munford
`
`
`
`
`APPLE-1017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Apple Inc. (“Petitioner” or “Apple”) petitions for Inter Partes Review
`
`(“IPR”) under 35 U.S.C. §§311–319 and 37 C.F.R. §42 of claims 1-6, 8, 9, 11-19,
`
`and 21-30 (“the Challenged Claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695 (“the ’695
`
`Patent”). The ’695 Patent describes a purported improvement to a “pulse oximetry
`
`sensor” to “limit[] the effect of multiple scattering of photons” by the patient’s
`
`tissue on measurement accuracy. APPLE-1001, 2:24-32. According to the ’695
`
`Patent, the addition of a circular light blocker improves the sensor’s measurement
`
`accuracy by “ensur[ing] that the only light detected by” the pulse oximetry sensor
`
`“is light that” has been emitted by the sensor and “is reflected from the” patient’s
`
`tissue. Id., 11:17-20. The prosecution history makes clear that the circular light
`
`blocker and similarly circular array of photodetectors were the features Patent
`
`Owner relied on to overcome the prior art cited by the Office. See APPLE-1002,
`
`135 (examiner interview summary indicating the amendments that led to allowance
`
`were intended to “capture the subject matter of figure 7,” which shows the circular
`
`light block configuration).
`
`But this “improvement” was not new. To the contrary, the ’695 Patent was
`
`granted without full consideration to the wide body of applicable art. As Dr. Brian
`
`Anthony explains in his accompanying declaration with respect to the applied prior
`
`art, pulse oximeters commonly included these and other features by the ’695
`
`Patent’s earliest effective filing date, and a wrist-worn physiological monitoring
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`device including each feature of the Challenged Claims would have been obvious
`
`to a POSITA. APPLE-1003, ¶¶21-103. For example, much like the ’695 Patent,
`
`Mendelson-799 describes a pulse oximetry sensor including a “light shield …
`
`between the photodiodes and the light emitting elements” to “prevent[] direct
`
`optical coupling between them, thereby maximizing the fraction of backscattered
`
`light passing through the arterially perfused vascular tissue in the detected light.”
`
`APPLE-1004, 9:33-40. Mendelson-799’s light shield and photodetectors are
`
`arranged in a circular configuration surrounding a central light source. Id., 9:22-
`
`33.
`
`Accordingly, Apple respectfully submits that an IPR should be instituted,
`
`and that the Challenged Claims should be canceled as unpatentable.
`
`
`
`REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR
`
` Grounds for Standing
`
`Apple certifies that the ’695 Patent is available for IPR. The present Petition
`
`is being filed within one year of service of a complaint against Apple in Masimo
`
`Corporation et al. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 8:20-cv-00048 (C.D. Cal.). The ’695
`
`Patent was originally asserted in this case, but has since been dropped from the
`
`case by Masimo. Apple is not barred or estopped from requesting this review
`
`challenging the Challenged Claims on the below-identified grounds.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
` Challenge and Relief Requested
`
`Apple requests an IPR of the Challenged Claims on the grounds set forth in
`
`the table below. An explanation of how these claims are unpatentable under the
`
`statutory grounds identified below is provided in the form of a detailed description
`
`that follow. Additional explanation and support for each ground of rejection is set
`
`forth in the Declaration of Brian W. Anthony, Ph.D. (APPLE-1003), referenced
`
`throughout this Petition.
`
`Ground
`
`Claims
`
`§103 Basis
`
`1-5, 8, 9, 11-13, 15-
`19, and 22-30
`
`Mendelson-799 (APPLE-1004) and
`Venkatraman (APPLE-1005)
`
`6, 14, and 21
`
`1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13,
`15-17, 19, 22, 24-26,
`28, and 29
`
`3, 12, and 23
`
`Mendelson-799, Venkatraman, and Chin
`(APPLE-1006)
`
`Mendelson-799 and Mio Alpha (NPL)
`(APPLE-1007, 1008)
`
`Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha (NPL), and
`Mendelson 2006 (APPLE-1010)
`
`6, 14, and 21
`
`Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha (NPL), and Chin
`
`18, 27, and 30
`
`Mendelson-799, Mio Alpha (NPL), and
`Venkatraman
`
`1A
`
`1B
`
`2A
`
`2B
`
`2C
`
`2D
`
`
`
`Each reference pre-dates the provisional application (filed 7/2/2015) and
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`qualifies as prior art:
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Reference
`
`Date
`
`Mendelson-799
`
`10/5/2004 (issued)
`
`Venkatraman
`
`4/7/2015 (issued)
`
`Chin
`
`1/29/2002 (issued)
`
`Section
`
`102(a1),(a2)
`
`102(a1),(a2)
`
`102(a1),(a2)
`
`Mio Alpha
`
`Articles published in 2013 and 20141
`
`102(a1)
`
`Mendelson 2006
`
`10/1/1999 (published)
`
`102(a1)
`
`
`
`None of these references were cited in any office action by the examiner
`
`during prosecution.
`
` THE ’695 PATENT
`
` Brief Description
`
`The ’695 patent, entitled “Advanced Pulse Oximetry Sensor,” issued from
`
`an application filed on December 19, 2018, and claims priority to an earlier
`
`provisional application filed on July 2, 2015 (hereinafter the “Critical Date”). See
`
`APPLE-1001, Face, page 2. The ’695 patent describes a “reflective pulse oximetry
`
`
`1 The Mio Alpha and Mendelson 2006 references were publicly available on
`
`the dates listed, and the exhibits as filed are true and correct copies of the original
`
`references. See generally APPLE-1017 (Declaration of Jacob Munford).
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`sensor” that emits light towards a “tissue measurement site” on a user’s body, such
`
`as their wrist, and “detects the emitted light that is reflected by the tissue
`
`measurement site.” Id., 10:40-45. The sensor includes “emitter” components (e.g.,
`
`light emitting diodes (LEDs)) used to emit light into the tissue measurement site,
`
`and “detector” components (e.g., photodiodes, phototransistors) that detect the
`
`reflected light and provide a corresponding signal to a processor or other
`
`component representing the intensity of the reflected light. Id., 10:52-64, 11:31-
`
`43. Based on fluctuations in the intensity of the reflected light, various
`
`physiological parameters (e.g., pulse rate, blood oxygen saturation) can be
`
`calculated. Id., 12:1-15. A “light blocker” separates the emitters from the
`
`detectors in order to “ensure[] that the only light detected by the detector 710 is
`
`light that is reflected from the tissue measurement site.” Id., 11:19-20.
`
`
`
`Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`
`A person of ordinary skill in the art relating to, and at the time of, the
`
`invention of the ’695 Patent (“POSITA”) would have been a person with a working
`
`knowledge of physiological monitoring technologies. The person would have had
`
`a Bachelor of Science degree in an academic discipline emphasizing the design of
`
`electrical, computer, or software technologies, in combination with training or at
`
`least one to two years of related work experience with capture and processing of
`
`data or information, including but not limited to physiological monitoring
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`technologies. APPLE-1003, ¶¶17-19. Alternatively, the person could have also
`
`had a Master of Science degree in a relevant academic discipline with less than a
`
`year of related work experience in the same discipline. Id.
`
` Claim Construction
`
`Petitioner submits that all claim terms should be construed according to the
`
`Phillips standard. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.100. Here, based on the evidence below and the prior art’s description
`
`of the claimed elements being similar to that of the ’695 patent specification, no
`
`formal claim constructions are necessary in this proceeding because “claim terms
`
`need only be construed to the extent necessary to resolve the controversy.”
`
`Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chem. Co., 642 F.3d 1355, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2011).
`
` UNPATENTABILITY GROUNDS
`
` GROUND 1A: Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 11-13, 15-19, and 22-30 are
`obvious based on Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman
`
`1. Overview of Mendelson-7992
`Mendelson-799 describes a reflectance pulse oximetry sensor and
`
`
`2 General descriptions provided for the references and combinations are hereby
`
`incorporated into each subsection addressing/applying those references, as are the
`
`discussions of combinations.
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`corresponding control circuitry to measure and “compute the [blood] oxygen
`
`saturation value, which is then presented on the display” to a user.” APPLE-1004,
`
`Abstract, 10:22-30. In more detail, Mendelson-799’s FIG. 8 (reproduced below)
`
`“illustrates a block-diagram of a pulse oximeter 20 utilizing … sensor 10.” Id.,
`
`8:39-40, 10:16-17.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1004, Detail of FIG. 8 (annotated).
`
`As shown, “[t]he pulse oximeter typically includes a control unit 21, which
`
`is composed of an electronic block 22 including A/D and D/A converters
`
`connectable to the sensor 10, a microprocessor 24 for analyzing measured data,
`
`and a display 26 for presenting measurement results.” Id., 10:16-22. “The
`
`measured data (i.e., electrical output of the sensor 10 indicative of the detected
`
`light) is directly processed in the block 22, and the converted signal is further
`
`processed by the microprocessor 24,” which “is operated by a suitable software
`
`model for analyzing the measured data and utilizing reference data (i.e., calibration
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`curve stored in a memory) to compute the oxygen saturation value, which is then
`
`presented on the display 26.” Id., 10:22-30.
`
`Mendelson-799’s FIG. 7 (reproduced below) illustrates the configuration of
`
`the optical sensor 10. Id., 8:37-39.
`
`
`
`APPLE-1004, Detail of FIG. 7 (annotated).
`
`The optical sensor 10 includes “a light source 12 composed of three closely
`
`spaced light emitting elements (e.g., LEDs or laser sources) 12a, 12b and 12c
`
`generating light of three different wavelengths,” “an array of discrete detectors
`
`(e.g., photodiodes),” including “a ‘far’ detector 16 and a ‘near’ detector 18,
`
`arranged in two concentric ring-like arrangements … surrounding the light
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`emitting elements; and a light shield 14.”3 Id., 9:22-33. “All these elements are
`
`accommodated in a sensor housing 17,” with “[t]he light shield 14 [being]
`
`positioned between the photodiodes and the light emitting elements” so as to
`
`“prevent[] direct optical coupling between them, thereby maximizing the fraction
`
`of backscattered light passing through the arterially perfused vascular tissue in the
`
`detected light.” Id., 9:33-40. “This arrangement allows for measuring SaO2 from
`
`multiple convenient locations on the body (e.g., the head, torso, or upper limbs),
`
`where convenient transmission mode measurements are not feasible.” Id., 2:14-28;
`
`see also Id., 3:19-28 (“measurements are made from sensors attached to the
`
`forehead, chest, or the buttock area”), 3:35-44, 4:29-32 (“forehead, forearm and
`
`the calf on humans”).
`
`In sum, Mendelson-799 depicts and describes a physiological measurement
`
`and monitoring device configured to measure blood oxygen saturation of a user at
`
`an external a tissue measurement site. Id., Abstract (“The sensor includes sensor
`
`housing, a source of radiation coupled to the housing, and a detector assembly
`
`coupled to the housing … the detector assembly is adapted to detect reflected
`
`radiation at least one predetermined frequency and to generate respective signals
`
`… used to determine the parameter of the blood”), 7:25-8:13 (“There is thus
`
`
`3 All emphasis added unless otherwise indicated.
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`provided ... a sensor for use in an optical measurement device for non-invasive
`
`measurements of blood parameters”), 2:14-28 (“This arrangement allows for
`
`measuring SaO2 from multiple convenient locations on the body (e.g., the head,
`
`torso, or upper limbs), where convenient transmission mode measurements are not
`
`feasible”), 8:37-41, 9:22-40, 10:16-30, FIGS. 7, 8; APPLE-1003, ¶¶21-25.
`
`2. Overview of Venkatraman
`Venkatraman teaches a portable biometric monitoring device with a
`
`touchscreen display that can be worn on the wrist like a watch. APPLE-1005,
`
`12:16-21, 15:19-26, 52:23-53:18. In particular, Venkatraman describes a
`
`“biometric monitoring device[] ... adapted to be worn or carried on the body of a
`
`user ... including [an] optical heart rate monitor” designed to “be a wrist-worn or
`
`arm-mounted accessory such as a watch or bracelet.” APPLE-1005, 37:29-33.
`
`Venkatraman’s monitoring device is “small in size so as to be unobtrusive for the
`
`wearer” and “designed to be able to be worn without discomfort for long periods of
`
`time and to not interfere with normal daily activity.” APPLE-1005, 14:28-36.
`
`Venkatraman device also includes a digital display with “uses capacitive touch
`
`detection,” as shown in FIG. 6B, to display data acquired or stored locally on the
`
`wristwatch. APPLE-1005, 53:19-55:51.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`APPLE-1005, Detail of FIGS. 6A, 6B (annotated).
`
`
`
`
`
`Wrist-worn
`monitoring
`device
`
`
`APPLE-1005, Detail of FIG. 7 (annotated).
`
`Like Mendelson-799, Venkatraman’s biometric monitoring device employs
`
`LEDs and photo detectors to obtain user data such as heart rate and blood oxygen
`
`saturation of a user. APPLE-1005, 1:54-:57 (“The disclosure also provides
`
`methods for operating the LED and photo detector of heart rate monitors to obtain
`
`accurate reading of heart rate tailored for different user characteristics such as skin
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`colors.”), see also 33:14-20 (“optical sensors may sample, acquire and/or detect
`
`physiological data which may then be processed or analyzed . . . to obtain data that
`
`is representative of for example, a user's heart rate, respiration, heart rate
`
`variability, oxygen Saturation (SpO), blood volume, blood glucose, skin
`
`moisture, and/or skin pigmentation level.”), see also 17:1-38, 19:32-37.
`
`Venkatraman’s biometric monitoring device uses emitters (LEDs) to emit radiation
`
`onto the user’s body, detectors to receive the reflected radiation from the user’s
`
`body, and an optical wall/light shield between the emitters and detectors to prevent
`
`the detectors from detecting radiation directly from the emitters. APPLE-1005,
`
`33:4-20, 36:38-56, FIGS. 3A, 3B (reproduced below). Venkatraman monitoring
`
`device also includes a light concentrator in the form of a lens to facilitate light
`
`collection and minimize losses. Id., 34:5-20 (“the light-transmissive structures
`
`may employ a material and/or optical design to facilitate low light loss (for
`
`example, the light-transmissive structures may include a lens to facilitate light
`
`collection …)”).
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Emitters
`Light shield
`Photodetectors
`
`
`
`APPLE-1005, FIG. 3A, 3B (annotated).
`
`The sensor in the biometric monitoring device that performs the
`
`measurements is placed on the bottom side of the device facing the wrist, as shown
`
`in FIGS. 2B and 2C. APPLE-1005, 15:35-54.
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE-1005, FIGS. 2B (left), 2C (right).
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`3.
`The combination of Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman
`A POSITA would have found it obvious to modify Mendelson-799’s pulse
`
`oximeter to be wrist-worn, and to include a touch screen, based on the teachings of
`
`Venkatraman. APPLE-1004, 2:14-28, 10:16-30, 9:22-40; APPLE-1005, 33:4-20,
`
`36:38-37:40. Additionally, in light of Venkatraman’s teaching a POSITA would
`
`have found it obvious to incorporate the “lens to facilitate light collection” of
`
`Venkatraman as a light concentrator in the optical oximetery sensor taught by
`
`Mendelson-799. APPLE-1004, 9:22-40, FIG. 7; APPLE-1005, 34:5-20; APPLE-
`
`1003, ¶¶21-29.
`
`4.
`
`Reasons to combine Mendelson-799 and
`Venkatraman
`It would have been obvious to a POSITA to combine the teachings of
`
`Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman in the manner described above because doing so
`
`would have amounted to nothing more than the use of a known technique to
`
`improve similar devices in the same way and combining prior art elements
`
`according to known methods to yield predictable results. See KSR v. Teleflex, 550
`
`U.S. 398, 417 (2007); APPLE-1003, ¶30. Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman are
`
`both related to obtaining physiological parameters by emitting radiation (e.g.,
`
`visible or infrared light) and detecting reflected radiation from human tissue.
`
`APPLE-1004, 2:14-28, 10:16-30, 9:22-40; APPLE-1005, 33:4-20, 36:38-37:40,
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`FIGS. 3A, 3B. Implementing Mendelson-799’s sensor to be wrist-worn like
`
`Venkatraman’s biometric monitoring device would minimize discomfort and
`
`interference in daily activities caused by the sensor, “which a POSITA would have
`
`recognized as beneficial.” APPLE-1003, ¶30; APPLE-1005, 14:28-36. In
`
`addition, the POSITA would have understood that integrating Mendelson-799’s
`
`sensor 10 and control unit 21 in a single, wrist-worn device, as taught by
`
`Venkatraman, results “in a simpler, less-cluttered configuration with fewer devices
`
`and external connections, which can be cumbersome to the user.” APPLE-1003,
`
`¶30; APPLE-1005, 50:36-51:45; see In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 968 (CCPA 1965)
`
`(integrating known components into a single device is “merely a matter of obvious
`
`engineering choice”). In addition, a POSITA would have understood that by
`
`“integrating the components into a single device, issues with poorly connected
`
`wires between the sensors and processing units can be mitigated, and the
`
`components and connections between them can be protected within the housing of
`
`the wrist-worn device, thereby resulting in a device that is more robust and
`
`resistant to damage.” APPLE-1003, ¶30; see, e.g., APPLE-1005, 50-36-51:61.
`
`For example, in the combination, components of Mendelson-799’s pulse oximeter
`
`(e.g., processors, emitters, detectors, etc.) are implemented by electronic circuits on
`
`discrete chips or a packaged chip connected to or integrated with a PCB, as shown
`
`in Venkatraman’s FIGS. 2C, 3A, and 3B. APPLE-1003, ¶30; APPLE-1005, 50:36-
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`51:45, FIGS. 2C, 3A, 3B. Thus, a POSITA would have been motivated to perform
`
`the combination, for example, because the resulting Mendelson-799-Venkatraman
`
`wrist-worn optical sensor would (i) make it easier and more convenient for the user
`
`to monitor physiological data (e.g., heart rate, oxygen level) throughout the day,
`
`(ii) minimize clutter caused by multiple devices, and (iii) be more robust and
`
`resistant to damage. APPLE-1003, ¶30.
`
`Additionally, it would have been obvious to a POSITA to implement a touch
`
`screen in the Mendelson-799-Venkatraman wrist-worn physiological monitoring
`
`device as doing so would allow a user to easily navigate a display and provide
`
`inputs such as activating functions in a convenient manner. APPLE-1003, ¶31; see
`
`also APPLE-1010, 4; supra §III.A.3. By implementing a touch screen, additional
`
`input devices such as a microphone for audio input or physical buttons
`
`implemented on device housing or in a connected computer can be avoided,
`
`thereby conserving space and providing a clutter free and user-friendly
`
`environment to use the physiological monitoring device. APPLE-1003, ¶31.
`
`Consequently, implementing the display of the Mendelson-799-Venkatraman
`
`device as a touch screen is nothing more than the straight forward use of a known
`
`technique to improve similar devices in the same way and a straight forward
`
`substitution of prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable
`
`results. See KSR, 550 U.S. at 417; APPLE-1003, ¶31.
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`A POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`
`implementing this combination at least because miniaturization techniques (like
`
`those employed to configure Mendelson-799’s device to be wrist-worn) were well-
`
`known and widely utilized in the art during the relevant timeframe. APPLE-1003,
`
`¶32 (noting the 11 year gap in the filing dates of Venkatraman and Mendelson-799
`
`during which the size of circuits decreased significantly and the industry followed
`
`the trend set by Moore’s law which indicates at least 10x greater density). In fact,
`
`Venkatraman itself teaches a wrist-worn device that incorporates emitters,
`
`detectors, and processors in configurations similar to the proposed combination.
`
`APPLE-1005, 50:36-51:61; APPLE-1003, ¶32.
`
`Note that, in the combined device, the operations of Mendelson-799’s LEDs,
`
`photodetectors, light shield, and data processing are unchanged. APPLE-1003,
`
`¶33. Indeed, the elements of the combined system would each perform similar
`
`functions in similar ways to those taught in Mendelson-799 and Venkatraman. Id.
`
`For example, the sensor would still be performing the same sensor operations, the
`
`processor would still be performing the same processing operations, and the
`
`display would still be performing the same display operations. Id. Accordingly,
`
`the Mendelson-799-Venkatraman combination would have been predictable to a
`
`POSITA, and the POSITA would have had a reasonable expectation of success in
`
`performing the combination. Id.
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`5.
`
`Analysis
` Claim 1
`1[p]: “A wrist-worn physiological monitoring device configured for placement
`on a user at a tissue measurement site, the device comprising:”
`In the combination, Mendelson-799 describes a pulse oximeter device that
`
`uses a sensor placed on user tissue to obtain physiological measurements of the
`
`user. APPLE-1004, 10:15-30 (“FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a pulse
`
`oximeter 20 utilizing ... sensor 10”); Abstract (“sensor for use in an optical
`
`measurement device and a method for non-invasive measurement of a blood
`
`parameter”); 5:49-59, 8:37-41, 9:22-40 (“Referring to FIG. 7, there is illustrated an
`
`optical sensor 10 … aimed at minimizing some of the measurement inaccuracies in
`
`a reflectance pulse oximeter”); APPLE-1003, ¶34. The sensor is configured for
`
`placement on a user at a tissue measurement site and includes a “sensor housing, a
`
`source of radiation coupled to the housing, and a detector assembly coupled to the
`
`housing[.]” APPLE-1004, Abstract. “[T]he detector assembly is adapted to detect
`
`reflected radiation at least one predetermined frequency and to generate respective
`
`signals … used to determine the parameter of the blood.” Id. This “reflection
`
`mode…arrangement allows for measuring SaO2 [oxygen saturation]from multiple
`
`convenient locations on the body (e.g., the head, torso, or upper limbs), where
`
`convenient transmission mode measurements are not feasible.” APPLE-1004,
`
`2:14-21, 10:16-30, FIGS. 7, 8; APPLE-1003, ¶34.
`
`18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`Also in the combination, Venkatraman teaches that a portable biometric
`
`monitoring device can be wrist-worn, as shown in FIGS. 6A, 6B, and 7
`
`(reproduced below). APPLE-1005, 12:16-21, 15:19-26, 52:23-53:18.
`
`APPLE-1005, FIGS. 6A, 6B (annotated).
`
`
`
`
`
`Wrist-worn
`monitoring
`device
`
`
`APPLE-1005, Detail of FIG. 7 (annotated).
`
`Venkatraman explains that “[b]iometric monitoring devices … are typically
`
`small in size so as to be unobtrusive for the wearer.” APPLE-1005, 14:28-30.
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket No. 50095-0004IP2
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 10,470,695
`
`
`“Biometric monitoring devices are typically designed to be able to be worn without
`
`discomfort for long periods of time and to not interfere with normal daily activity.”
`
`APPLE-1005, 14:30-36. Venkatraman also teaches the use of a digital display, as
`
`shown in FIG. 6B, to display data acquired or stored locally on the device.
`
`APPLE-1005, 53:19-55:51.
`
`As previously explained (supra, § III.A.4), a POSITA would have found it
`
`obvious to implement Mendelson-799’s pulse oximeter in the convenient and
`
`comfortable wrist-worn configuration taught by Venkatraman. APPLE-1005,
`
`14:28-36; APPLE-1003, ¶¶29-33.
`
`1[a]: “a light emission source comprising a plurality of emitters configured to
`irradiate the tissue measurement site by emitting light towards the tissue
`measurement site,”
`In the combination, Mendelson-799 describes a noninvasive optical
`
`physiological sensor that includes “a light source 12 composed of three closely
`
`spaced light emitting elements (e.g., LEDs or laser sources) 12a, 12b and 12c
`
`generating light of three different wavelengths, respectively ….” APPLE-1004,
`
`Abstract, 2:65-3:15, 7:25-8:13, 8:37-41, 9:22-40, 10:16-30, FIGS. 7, 8; APPLE-
`
`1003, ¶37; supra, §III.A.1.
`
`In more detail, the light emitting elements