Filed April 27, 2021
`
`By:
`
`On behalf of:
`Patent Owner Masimo Corporation
`Joseph R. Re (Reg. No. 31,291)
`Stephen W. Larson (Reg. No. 69,133)
`Jarom D. Kesler (Reg. No. 57,046)
`Jacob L. Peterson (Reg. No. 65,096)
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel.: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`E-mail: AppleIPR2020-1715-765@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715
`Patent 10,631,765
`
`
`
`
`
`MASIMO OBJECTIONS TO ADMISSIBILITY OF APPLE EVIDENCE
`SUBMITTED BEFORE TRIAL INSTITUTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`On behalf of:
`Patent Owner Masimo Corporation
`Joseph R. Re (Reg. No. 31,291)
`Stephen W. Larson (Reg. No. 69,133)
`Jarom D. Kesler (Reg. No. 57,046)
`Jacob L. Peterson (Reg. No. 65,096)
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel.: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`E-mail: AppleIPR2020-1715-765@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MASIMO CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715
`Patent 10,631,765
`
`
`
`
`
`MASIMO OBJECTIONS TO ADMISSIBILITY OF APPLE EVIDENCE
`SUBMITTED BEFORE TRIAL INSTITUTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b), Patent Owner Masimo Corporation objects
`
`as follows to the admissibility of evidence served with the initial Petition. Patent
`
`Owner reserves the right to: (1) timely file a motion to exclude these objectionable
`
`exhibits or portions thereof; (2) challenge the credibility and/or weight that should
`
`be afforded to these exhibits, whether or not Patent Owner files a motion to
`
`exclude the exhibits; (3) challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to meet
`
`Petitioner’s burden of proof on any issue, including, without limitation, whether
`
`Petitioner met its burden to prove the prior art status of the alleged prior art on
`
`which it relies, whether or not Patent Owner has objected to, or files a motion to
`
`exclude, the evidence; and (4) cross examine any Petitioner declarant within the
`
`scope of his or her direct testimony that relates to these exhibits, without regard to
`
`whether Patent Owner has objected to the testimony or related exhibits or whether
`
`the testimony or related exhibits are ultimately found to be inadmissible.
`
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`Exhibit 1003 - Declaration of
`Dr. Kenny
`
`Objections
`
`Masimo’s objections to Ex. 1003 are set forth
`below. To the extent Dr. Kenny’s declaration
`incorporates objectionable material in the cited
`paragraphs below in additional paragraphs or
`sections, Masimo’s objections apply with equal
`force to those additional paragraphs or sections.
`Incomplete, Irrelevant, Misleading (FRE 106,
`401, 403):
`incomplete, and
`¶¶21-22 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶41-42 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`¶49 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`¶51 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶57-60 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶62-67 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶68-70 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1008.
`
`¶71 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1009.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶72-74 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1010,
`1021, 1022.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶75-76 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1016.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶77-78 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1011.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶79-87 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1008.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶88-97 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1008, 1009, 1010, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1024,
`1025.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶98-102 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009, 1024.
`
`¶103 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`¶104 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1009.
`
`¶105 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1009.
`
`¶106 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1010, 1012, 1021, 1022.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶107-108 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1021, 1022.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶109-110 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1008.
`
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`¶111 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1013, 1019.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶112-115 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`¶116 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`¶117 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1013.
`
`¶118 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1013, 1019.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶120-121 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009.
`
`¶123 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`-5-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`
`¶124 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1008, 1009.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶125-127 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1008, 1010, 1020, 1021, 1022.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶129-132 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1010, 1020, 1021, 1022.
`
`¶139 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1010, 1020, 1021, 1022.
`
`¶140 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1010.
`
`¶141 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1008, 1009, 1024.
`
`¶143 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`
`-6-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`¶145 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1009.
`
`¶146 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1019.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶147-149 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009.
`
`¶150 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1009.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶151-152 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶155-157 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1010.
`
`-7-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶158-160 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009, 1010, 1017.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶164-166 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009, 1012, 1018.
`
`¶167 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`¶168 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1006.
`
`¶171 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Exs. 1006, 1009, 1010.
`
`¶172 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1001.
`
`¶193 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`
`-8-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1016.
`
`¶196 is misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant
`because it lacks support for the contentions for
`which it is cited and mischaracterizes the
`teachings of Ex. 1016.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶197-198 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1010,
`1011, 1012, 1038.
`
`incomplete, and
`¶¶200-202 are misleading,
`irrelevant because they lack support for the
`contentions for which they are cited and they
`mischaracterize the teachings of Exs. 1006,
`1009, 1010, 1011, 1020.
`
`Improper Testimony by Expert Witness
`(FRE 702):
`¶¶21-22 are not based on sufficient facts and
`data, and do not reliably apply facts and data
`using scientific principles.
`
`¶41 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶49 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶51 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`
`-9-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶58 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶60 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶80 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶82 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶86 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶87 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶90 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶91 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`-10-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`
`¶96 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶97 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶98 is not based on sufficient facts and data, and
`does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶100 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶102 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶103 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶104 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶105 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶109 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`
`-11-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶114 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶115 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶116 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶117 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶118 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶119 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶129 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶132 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`-12-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`
`¶133 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶136 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶137 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶138 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶139 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶140 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶143 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶160 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶161 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`
`-13-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶163 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶164 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶165 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶166 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶172 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶192 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶194 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶197 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`-14-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`
`Objections
`
`Exhibit 1008 - Certified English
`Translation of Inokawa and
`Translator’s Declaration
`
`Exhibit 1010 - “A Wearable
`Reflectance Pulse Oximeter for
`Remote Physiological
`Monitoring,” (“Mendelson-
`2006”)
`
`
`¶198 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶201 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`
`¶202 is not based on sufficient facts and data,
`and does not reliably apply facts and data using
`scientific principles.
`Hearsay, Authenticity (FRE 802, 901):
`The exhibit includes out-of-court statements that
`are offered for the truth of the matter asserted
`and are asserted by a declarant who lacks
`personal knowledge.
`Incomplete, Irrelevant, Misleading, Hearsay,
`Authenticity (FRE 106, 401, 403, 802, 901):
`The portions of
`this document cited by
`Petitioner, as used by Petitioner, provide an
`irrelevant,
`incomplete,
`and misleading
`characterization of the knowledge in the art as
`of the asserted date of the invention because
`Petitioner has not established it is prior art, and
`therefore confuses
`the
`issues
`in
`the case.
`Masimo objects to this document as hearsay,
`and further on relevance because Petitioner fails
`to establish it is prior art. Masimo also objects
`on the basis of authenticity
`
`-15-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`Exhibit 1020 - QuickSpecs; HP
`iPAQ Pocket PC h4150 Series
`
`Exhibit 1023 - Yao Stimulating
`Student Learning with a Novel
`In-House Pulse Oximeter
`Design
`
`Objections
`
`Incomplete, Irrelevant, Misleading, Hearsay,
`Authenticity (FRE 106, 401, 403, 802, 901):
`The portions of
`this document cited by
`Petitioner, as used by Petitioner, provide an
`irrelevant,
`incomplete,
`and misleading
`characterization of the knowledge in the art as
`of the asserted date of the invention because
`Petitioner has not established it is prior art, and
`therefore confuses
`the
`issues
`in
`the case.
`Masimo objects to this document as hearsay,
`and further on relevance because Petitioner fails
`to establish it is prior art. Masimo also objects
`on the basis of authenticity.
`Incomplete, Irrelevant, Misleading, Hearsay,
`Authenticity (FRE 106, 401, 403, 802, 901):
`The portions of
`this document cited by
`Petitioner, as used by Petitioner, provide an
`irrelevant,
`incomplete,
`and misleading
`characterization of the knowledge in the art as
`of the asserted date of the invention because
`Petitioner has not established it is prior art, and
`therefore confuses
`the
`issues
`in
`the case.
`Masimo objects to this document as hearsay,
`and further on relevance because Petitioner fails
`to establish it is prior art. Masimo also objects
`on the basis of authenticity.
`
`-16-
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`Exhibit Number and
`Description
`Exhibit 1027 - National
`Instruments LabVIEW User
`Manual
`
`Exhibit 1039 - Declaration of
`Jacob Munford
`
`Exhibit 1043 - Certified English
`Translation of Tanagi and
`Translator’s Declaration
`
`
`
`Dated: April 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Objections
`
`Incomplete, Irrelevant, Misleading, Hearsay,
`Authenticity (FRE 106, 401, 403, 802, 901):
`The portions of
`this document cited by
`Petitioner, as used by Petitioner, provide an
`irrelevant,
`incomplete,
`and misleading
`characterization of the knowledge in the art as
`of the asserted date of the invention because
`Petitioner has not established it is prior art, and
`therefore confuses
`the
`issues
`in
`the case.
`Masimo objects to this document as hearsay,
`and further on relevance because Petitioner fails
`to establish it is prior art. Masimo also objects
`on the basis of authenticity.
`Hearsay, Authenticity (FRE 802, 901):
`The exhibit includes out-of-court statements that
`are offered for the truth of the matter asserted
`and are asserted by a declarant who lacks
`personal knowledge.
`Hearsay, Authenticity (FRE 802, 901):
`The exhibit includes out-of-court statements that
`are offered for the truth of the matter asserted
`and are asserted by a declarant who lacks
`personal knowledge.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`By: /Jacob L. Peterson/
`Joseph R. Re (Reg. No. 31,291)
`Stephen W. Larson (Reg. No. 69,133)
`Jarom D. Kesler (Reg. No. 57,046)
`Jacob L. Peterson (Reg. No. 65,096)
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Masimo Corporation
`
`-17-
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01715 – Patent 10,631,765
`Apple v. Masimo
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) and with the agreement
`
`of counsel for Petitioner, a true and correct copy of MASIMO OBJECTIONS TO
`
`ADMISSIBILITY OF APPLE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BEFORE TRIAL
`
`INSTITUTION is being served electronically on April 27, 2021, to the e-mail
`
`addresses shown below:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Andrew B. Patrick
`patrick@fr.com
`Usman A. Khan
`khan@fr.com
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`IPR50095-0023IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`Dated: April 27, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`34675539
`
`
`
`
`By: /Jacob L. Peterson/
`Joseph R. Re (Reg. No. 31,291)
`Stephen W. Larson (Reg. No. 69,133)
`Jarom D. Kesler (Reg. No. 57,046)
`Jacob L. Peterson (Reg. No. 65,096)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Masimo Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
