throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: February 18, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`SONY CORPORATION, and
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NEODRON LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2020-01682
`IPR2020-01683
`Patent 8,749,251 B21
`____________
`
`Before MIRIAM L. QUINN, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Settlement Prior to Institution and
`Granting Joint Requests to Treat Settlement Agreements as
`Business Confidential Information
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`1 This Order applies to both proceedings. We exercise our discretion to
`issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties are not authorized to
`use this style heading for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01682, IPR2020-01683
`Patent 8,749,251 B2
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
`Sony Corporation, and Sony Mobile Communications Inc. (“Petitioner”) and
`Noedron Ltd. (“Patent Owner”), (collectively “the Parties”) request that the
`above-identified inter partes review proceedings be terminated pursuant to a
`settlement. With our authorization, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to
`Terminate in each of the above-identified proceedings (“Joint Motion”).
`Paper 10.2
`The Parties also filed copies of Patent License Agreements,
`Settlement Agreements, Escrow Agreements, and an Exhibit A to the
`Escrow Agreements (Ex. 2001; Ex. 2002; Ex. 2003; Ex. 2004; Paper 12,3
`collectively “Settlement Agreements”) and filed a Joint Request to Keep
`Separate (Paper 11, “Joint Request”) in each of the above-identified
`proceedings.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`In the Joint Motions, the Parties represent that they have reached an
`agreement to jointly seek termination of these inter partes review
`proceedings, that the filed copies of the Settlement Agreements are true
`
`
`2 For expediency, we cite to the Papers and Exhibits filed in IPR2020-01682,
`unless otherwise indicated. Similar Papers and Exhibits were filed in
`IPR2020-01683.
`3 Exhibit A to the Escrow Agreement was filed as a paper instead of as an
`exhibit. We determine this to be a harmless error. The parties are reminded
`that evidences such as the Settlement Agreement must be filed as exhibits.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(a) (“Evidence consists of affidavits, transcripts of
`depositions, documents, and things. All evidence must be filed in the form
`of an exhibit.”).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01682, IPR2020-01683
`Patent 8,749,251 B2
`
`copies, and there are no other collateral agreements between the parties
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of these
`proceedings. Joint Motion 1–3. Further, the Settlement Agreements
`indicate they are complete agreements. Ex. 2001, 12; Ex. 2002, 7; Ex. 2003,
`12; Ex. 2004, 13. The Parties also represent that their disputes have been
`resolved. Joint Motion 1–3.
`We have not yet instituted a trial on the above-identified proceedings.
`Nor have we decided the merits of the proceedings, and final written
`decisions have not been entered in the proceedings. The Parties have shown
`adequately that termination of the proceedings is appropriate. Under these
`circumstances, we determine that good cause exists to terminate the
`proceedings with respect to the Parties.
`The Parties also requested that the Settlement Agreements be treated
`as business confidential information and be kept separate from the file of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,749,251 (“the ’251 patent”). Joint Request 1–2. After
`reviewing the Settlement Agreements, we find that the Settlement
`Agreements contain confidential business information regarding the terms of
`settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`Agreements between the Parties as business confidential information
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motions to Terminate are granted, and each
`of IPR2020-01682 and IPR2020-01683 is terminated with respect to
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01682, IPR2020-01683
`Patent 8,749,251 B2
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Requests are granted, and the
`Settlement Agreements shall be kept separate from the file of the ’251 patent
`and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request,
`or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01682, IPR2020-01683
`Patent 8,749,251 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`John Kappos
`Nicholas Whilt
`Nancy Schroeder
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`jkappos@omm.com
`nwhilt@omm.com
`nschroeder@omm.com
`Randy Pritzker
`Marc Johannes
`WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS P.C.
`rpritzker-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`mjohannes-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Kent Shum
`Reza Mirzaie
`Neil Rubin
`Philip Wang
`C. Jay Chung
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`kshum@raklaw.com
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`pwang@raklaw.com
`jchung@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket