`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN CAPACITIVE TOUCH
`CONTROLLED MOBILE DEVICES,
`COMPUTERS, AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`Investigation N0. 337-TA
`
`COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE
`TARIFF ACT OF 1930, AS AMENDED
`
`COMPLAINANT:
`NEODRON LTD.
`Unit 4-5
`Burton Hall Road, Sandyford
`Dublin 18, D18A094, Ireland
`Phone: (914) 570-3201
`
`COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANT:
`
`Reza Mirzaie
`Marc A. Fenster
`Brian D. Ledahl
`C. Jay Chung
`Kent N. Shum
`Amy E. Hayden
`Christian W. Conkle
`Kristopher R. Davis
`Shani Williams
`Jonathan Ma
`Russ AUGUST& KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12"‘Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`E-Mail: rak_neodron_itc@raklaw.c0m
`
`Matthew D. Aichele
`Russ AUGUST& KABAT
`800 Maine Avenue, SW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20024
`Phone: (202) 664-0623
`
`PROPOSED RESPONDENTS2
`AMAZON.COM, INC.
`410 Terry Avenue North
`Seattle, WA 98109
`Phone: (206) 266-1000
`
`APPLE INC.
`One Apple Park Way
`Cupertino, CA 95014
`Phone: (408) 996-1010
`
`ASUSTEK COMPUTERINC.
`No. 15, Li-Te Rd.
`Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`Phone: (866) 2-2894-3447
`
`ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
`48720 Kato Rd
`Fremont, CA 94538
`Phone: (510) 739-3777
`
`LG ELECTRONICSINC.
`P.O. Box 150-721
`LG Twin Towers 20 Yoido-dong
`Youngdungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea
`Phone: (822) 3777-1114
`
`LG ELECTRONICSUSA, INC.
`1000 Sylvan Ave
`Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
`Phone: (201) 266-2215
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0001
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`One Microsoft Way
`Redmond, WA 98052
`Phone: (425) 882-8080
`
`MOTOROLAMOBILITY LLC
`222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`v
`Phone: (800) 668-6765
`
`SAMSUNGEuacrnomcs C0., LTD.
`129 Sarnsung-R0
`Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu
`Suwon, 443-742, South Korea
`Phone: (822) 225-0114
`
`SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
`85 Challenger Rd.
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Phone: (201) 229-4000
`
`SONY CORPORATION
`1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku
`Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`Phone: 81-3-6748-2111
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC.
`4- 12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku
`Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`Phone: (855) 806-8464
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0002
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............
`EXHIBITS ....
`APPENDICES ...............................................................................
`I.
`INTRODUCTION .................................................................
`II. THE PARTIES .....................................................................
`A.
`COMPLAINANT ................................................ ..
`B.
`RESPONDENTS ................................................. ..
`
`¢
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`4.
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Amazon .................................................... ..
`
`Apple ........................................................ ..
`
`ASUS Respondents.......
`LG Respondents ....................................... ..
`Microsoft .................................................. ..
`
`Motorola ................................................... ..
`
`Samsung Respondents ............................. ..
`
`Sony Respondents .................................... ..
`8.
`III. THE TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTS AT ISSUE......
`IV. THE ASSERTED PATENTS ..........................................
`
`A.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 7,821,425 ............................
`l.
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership
`2.
`NontechnicalDescriptionof the Patent
`3.
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ............
`4.
`Licensees .................................................. ..
`
`B.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 7,903,092 ............................. ..
`
`1.
`2.
`3.
`4’.
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership
`NontechnicalDescriptionof the Patent
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent
`Licensees ..................................................
`
`..
`
`C.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,749,251 ............................. ..
`
`l.
`2.
`3.
`4.
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership
`NontechnicalDescriptionof the Patent
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent ............
`Licensees .................................................. ..
`
`i
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0003
`
`
`
`D.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,411,472 ......................................... ..
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`Identification of the Patent and Ownership ...........
`
`Nontechnical Description of the Patent ................
`
`Foreign Counterparts of the Patent .......................
`3.
`Licensees ............................................................. ..
`4.
`V. UNLAWFIULAND UNFAIR ACTS OF THE RESPONDENTS
`A.
`AMAZON ..........................................
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent .......................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’092 Patent .......................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’25I Patent .......................... ..
`3.
`APPLE ............................................................................ ..
`
`B.
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent .......................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’O92Patent .......................... ..
`
`- Infringement of the ’251 Patent .......................... ..
`3.
`Infringementofthe ’472Patent
`4.
`ASUS RESPONDENTS ................................................. ..
`
`1.
`2.
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent .......................... ..
`Infringement of the ’092 Patent .......................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’25l Patent .......................... ..
`3.
`LG RESPONDENTS ...................................................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent ........................... ..
`1.
`Infringement of the ’092 Patent ........................... ..
`2.
`Infringementofthe’25IPatent
`3.
`Infringement of the ’472 Patent ........................... ..
`4.
`MICROSOFT ................................................................... ..
`
`I.
`
`2.
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent ........................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’O92Patent ........................... ..
`
`Infringement of the ’251 Patent ........................... ..
`3.
`MOTOROLA ................................................................... ..
`
`1.
`2.
`
`Infringement of the ’092 Patent ........................... ..
`Infringement ofthe ’251 Patent.........
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`Infringement of the ’472 Patent ........................... ..
`3.
`SAMSUNG RESPONDENTS ......................................... ..
`
`G.
`
`1.
`
`Infringement of the ’425 Patent ........................... ..
`ii
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0004
`
`
`
`~
`
`2.
`3.
`
`Infringement of the ’O92Patent ............................................................... ..42
`Infringement of the ’2Sl Patent ............................................................... ..43
`
`Infringement of the ’472 Patent ............................................................... ..44
`4.
`SONY RESPONDENTS ..................................................................................... ..45
`
`H.
`
`Infringement of the ’092 Patent ............................................................... ..45
`1.
`Infringementofthe ’25IPatent
`2.
`VI. SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF IMPORTATION ................................................................47
`A.
`AMAZON ............................................................................................................ ..47
`B.
`APPLE ................................................................................................................. ..48
`
`C.
`D.
`
`E.
`
`ASUS RESPONDENTS ...................................................................................... ..48
`LG RESPONDENTS ........................................................................................... ..49
`
`MICROSOFT ....................................................................................................... ..49
`
`MOTOROLA ....................................................................................................... ..49
`F.
`SAMSUNG RESPONDENTS.........
`G.
`..................................... ..S1
`SONY RESPONDENTS .............................................
`H.
`VII. CLASSIFICATION OF THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS UNDER THE HARMONIZED
`TARIFF SCHEDULE .................
`
`VIII. RELATED LITIGATION
`IX. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY ....................................................................................................53
`
`A.
`B.
`
`TECHNICAL PRONG ........................................................................................ ..53
`ECONOMIC PRONG.......................................................................................... ..S4
`
`X. RELIEF REQUESTED .......................................................................................................56
`
`iii
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0005
`
`
`
`lilumbm:-
`
`t
`
`we
`
`z3'
`it e
`
`'I'><
`,
`,?"'<»
`/<}‘;;‘
`%%‘3”*§
`-.2r~;~P;>"
`
`+
`
`1
`,“.."'“i,"‘v
`:1”
`155$,
`f$;1%t§’f;?§§‘
`
`* “Q”-L
`rat?”-;‘> 1
`
`7
`
`.
`
`EXHIBITS
`
`Yéar
`
`<“‘D€SCl‘lptl0Il
`
`y
`W
`
`._,
`
`4'
`
`;
`re a
`
`1
`
`,,
`
`, Q
`
`, to
`
`~§
`15?“
`
`t
`
`‘*40%
`-fie
`
`Certified Copy of U.S. Patent No. 8,432,425
`
`Certified Copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,903,092
`
`Certified Copy of U.S. Patent N0. 8,749,251
`
`Certified Copy of U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472
`
`" ,
`
`4
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 021791-0040 (‘O92'425)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 022608-0130 (‘O92'425)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 027354-0123 ('472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 027558-0522 ('472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 030284-0692 ('251)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 030284-0752 ('25 1)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 031912-0173 ('251 ‘O92'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 038376-0001 (‘Z51‘O92'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 041715-0747. (’25l ‘092 '425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 046426-0001 ('251 ‘092 '425 '472)
`
`Certified Assigrunent at Reel/Frame 047103-0206 ('251 ‘O92'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 047976-0884 (’25l ‘O92'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 047976-0937 ('25l ‘O92'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 048201-0225 ('251)i
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 048259-0840 ('/092'425 '472)
`
`Certified Assignment at Reel/Frame 050513-0457 (251)
`
`Confidential Domestic Industry Statement
`
`Complainant’s Identification of License Agreements
`
`Microchip License Agreement
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Acer Spin 3
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Amazon Fire HD 10 Tablet
`Phot0g1'aph(s)of product and/or packaging of the ASUS VivoB00k Flip 14
`TP401MA
`t
`'
`‘
`rd
`Ph0to'graph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Apple iPad Pro 3 Gen 12 9
`
`iv
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0006
`
`
`
`v
`v
`EXlllblt,‘*7
`ii
`N mbel‘
`
`~:
`
`x<§*$
`
`t
`;fl»‘5§;fi*%’,.<*éfl<=‘?3l'§é:%‘§ITY1e}ai1i1§§§"»’?:;.“‘»,
`Mr"
`-t
`an
`re
`w
`-u
`r
`Ph0tograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Apple iPhone 11
`
`;l;_;.,,._'
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the LG Gram 14T990
`
`'
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the LG V40
`Photograph(s) of productand/or packaging of the Microsoft Surface Book 2 13.5
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Motorola G6
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Samsung Galaxy S9+'
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Samsung Notebook 9 Pro 15
`
`Photograph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Sony Xperia XZ3
`Receipt from An1azon.com showing the purchase of an ASUS VivobookFlip I 4
`Thin and Light 2-in] Laptop (I4 ” HD Touchscreen, Intel Quad-Core Pentium
`N5000 Processor, 4GB DDR4, I 28GB eMMC Storage, Windows 10) - I 4 " ("ASUS
`VivobookFlip I4 ”)
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of an Acer Spin 3 Convertible
`Laptop (I 4 ” Full HD [PS Touch, 8"’ Gen Intel Core iI-8565 U, 16GB DDR4,
`512GB PCIe NVMeSSD, Backlit KB, Fingerprint Reader, Rechargeable Active
`Stylus) - I4 ” (”Acer Spin 3 ")
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of an Amazon Fire HD I 0 Tablet
`(I 080p_fullHD display, 32GB) -10.1" (“Amazon Fire HD I0”)
`Receipt from Apple.com showing the purchase of an Apple iPad Pro (Wi-Fi 64GB)
`- 12.9” (“Apple iPad Pro I219”)
`Receipt from Apple.com showing the purchase of an Apple iPhone I I (64GB)
`12.9 ” (“Apple iPhone 11 ”)
`Receipt from Amazon.com--showingthe purchase of an LG Gram I 4T990
`U.AAS8U1(2-in-I Ultra-Lightweight Laptop with Intel Core i7 Processor with
`Wacom Pen) —I4 ” (LG Gram I 4T990).
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of an LG V-4QFactory Unlocked
`Phone (64GB) - 6.4” ("LG V40”)
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of a Microsoft Surface Book 2
`.
`(Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, 256GB) - 13.5 Y’(“Microsoft Surface.B0ok 2 13.5”)
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of a Motorola Moto G6 (32GB)
`(“Moto G6”)
`Receipt from BestBuy.com showing the purchase of two Samsung Galaxy S9+
`64GB Unlocked Midnight Black (“Samsung Galaxy S9+”)
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of two Samsung Electronics SM
`T830NZKAXARGalaxy Tab S4, 10.5” Black with Cover Keyboard, Black
`(“Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5”)
`Receipt from Samsung.com showing the purchase of a Notebook 9 Pro 15 " (256GB
`SSD) (“Samsung Notebook 9 Pro l5”)
`
`A
`
`V
`
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0007
`
`
`
`ws
`M
`WW“,
`I'~ »
`_:€
`*4
`i§~yfi‘¢i%5~il’~i§P"‘%
`a
`ma
`'
`'1 r“."--Wt
`“=1?
`1 "- -'
`V. me’,
`24".
`‘“w,,;,<4é»3
`§$ji“
`"wit
`"mg; * *
`“@;;,§};P>fiat
`5?»W 4”‘“ “ff; ‘““
`1Jl.W\’l§;;
`, »%§@%D§§§E!Fit!0U'f?i¢@Mit eta;
`M us
`.»W
`ea sf ~ flew
`4* Q F
`Receipt from Amaz0n.com showing the purchase of Sony Xperza XZ3 Unlocked
`Smarzphone (64GB) _-6” OLED Screen (“Sony Xperza XZ3 )
`Webpage re Acer Spin 3
`
`i.
`
`fa“
`
`VI’
`
`q Q1
`"Mu
`
`5
`Exhlbit
`Numbers:
`
`49
`
`50
`
`51
`
`Webpage re ASUS Vivobook Flip 14 TP401MA
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No
`maXTouch ATMXT2912TD-A)
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No
`maXTouch ATMXT2912TD-A)
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart for U.S. Patent N0
`maXTouch ATMXT2912TD-A)
`55C" Domestic Industry Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No
`maXTouch ATMXT29l2TD—A)
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`52C
`
`53C
`
`54C
`
`56C
`
`7 821 425 (Microchip
`
`7 903 092 (Microchip
`
`8 749 251 (Microchip
`
`9,411 472 (Microchip
`
`57C
`
`58C
`
`59C
`
`60C
`
`61C
`
`62C
`
`63C
`
`64C
`
`65C
`
`66C
`
`67C
`
`68C
`
`69C
`
`70C
`
`71C
`
`72
`
`73
`
`74
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Infomiation
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Microchip Financial Information '
`
`Microchip Financial Information “
`
`Microchip Financial Information
`
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.-Patent N0. 7,821 425 to Amazon (Acer Spin 3)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,821 425 to Amazon (ASUS
`VivoBook Flip 14)
`'
`I
`Infringement Claim Chart_for U.S. Patent No. 7,821 425 to Apple (Apple iPhone
`ll)
`I
`
`vi
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0008
`
`
`
`~
`orExh]b[t
`
`~ er».-»
`1. ~;~
`
`2
`
`fl.
`
`-
`
`Q. 1,.
`.. M,
`,.
`
`§,.H.,.
`
`.
`fa. ~r.,.'..:,;:“".“‘
`
`..
`E .=~.
`.»,.~1...,,,.....
`-_..=:»~-:a'ZW\.. , $11‘
`.»~w“~"
`1-ml >'T*>~.""~'Z;=E.P...;.»-»
`»-W-'.-Q-=~.~1
`,-M.-1..-r
`,
`':~'1~ - »~v=
`'~»...~*;/.?
`»,'~;. 1.
`».
`'< 'a....*~P
`».~.
`.1=l.,.;‘.
`I= ,/.'. _ -.
`1.
`.=-.~.:»*=I a-1»
`.*~.~
`.1‘. K -
`t»~
`.. M
`,,
`i
`s
`3,
`-pg:
`~
`t
`-__¢-..
`3-,:
`-~Ho§_;,§?
`“I - f’-»,,;f,';f,q*<~:¢;.;f
`op
`oaapl
`p.
`a~%al~@Woosorl*traa.
`“eaoao.
`»~.or
`=;'2al*~r"@?
`F;
`~ i
`"
`{=5-W4?“ 6*
`ii
`i 7
`’ ii
`I
`‘"5
`‘‘"
`
`='¢v.<¢:~;a§~:‘.7‘=’rl$§fY"
`:'»‘l.’.:“;’i13"‘,
`w
`Jgllmbell.
`rmaog.
`~j'j,,,_.,,,;;,.::~*l:g.;
`
`f~'}.?;.=¢y;_f-j1,;’:r'_',g ;=.),.1=fV, xi, Y1;-¢»o _¢1$\"<,_{7~‘{,g~,."="t;,\,L;>¢
`\":
`3 .;.,-¢»,.
`‘-1- K.1
`x_a:;_' 3».
`Jaw
`1*
`mi
`r"
`. Patent No . 7,821,425 to Apple (ApplehiPaCllilo’
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`3'“ Gen 12.9)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No . 7,821,425 to LG (LG Gram 14T990)
`. Patent No. 7,821,425 to Microsofi (Microsoft
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Surface Book 2 13.5)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Galaxy S9+)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`Galaxy Tab S4 10.5)
`’
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`Notebook 9 Pro 15)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,903,092 to Amazon (Acer Spin 3)
`. Patent No . 7,903,092 to Amazon (ASUS
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`VivoBook Flip 14)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`11)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S Patent No. 7,903,092 to LG (LG Gram 14T990)
`. Patent No. 7,903,092 to Microsoft (Microsoft
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Surface Book 2 13.5)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 7,903,092 to Motorola (Moto G6)
`. Patent No. 7,903,092 to Samsung (Samsung
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Galaxy S9+)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Notebook 9 Pro 15)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`XZ3)
`,
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S Patent No. 8,749,251 to Amazon (Acer Spin 3)
`Patent No. 8,749,251 to Amazon (ASUS
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`VivoBook Flip 14)
`=
`In_fringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`HD 10)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`11)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S.
`3'd Gen 12.9)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No 8,749,251 to LG (LG V40)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No 8,749,251 to.LG (LG Gram 14T990)
`. Patent No. 8,749,251 to Microsoft (Microsoft
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S
`Surface Book 2 13.5)
`.
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No 8,749,251 to Motorola (Moto G6)
`
`Patent No. 8,749,251 to Apple (Apple iPad Pro
`
`l’=-.~;.,1“
`
`.1
`
`=
`
`1 lip;
`
`- go;
`
`.-,‘7 , _ ._,,
`
`jr.‘.,
`
`=1
`
`. Patent No. 7,821,425 to Samsung (Samsung
`
`Patent No. 7,821,425 to Samsung (Samsung
`
`Patent No. 7,821,425 to Samsung‘(Samsung
`
`. Patent No. 7,903,092 to Apple (Apple iPhone
`
`Patent No. 7,903,092 to Samsung (Samsung
`
`Patent No. 7,903,092 to Sony (Sony Xperia
`
`Patent No. 8,749,251 to Amazon (Amazon Fire
`
`Patent No. 8,749,251 to Apple (Apple iPhone
`
`vii
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0009
`
`
`
`X
`
`99
`
`'100
`
`101
`
`102
`
`103
`
`104
`
`105
`
`106
`
`107
`
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 8,749,251 to Samsung (Samsung
`Galaxy S9+)
`1
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 8,749,251 to Sams_ung(Samsung
`Galaxy Tab S4 10.5)
`I
`Infringement Claim Chan for U.S. Patent N0. 8,749,251 to Samsung (Samsung
`Notebook 9iPro 15)'
`'
`4
`Infringement Claim Chan for U.S. Patent No. 8,749,251 to Sony (Sony Xperia
`XZ3)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472 to Apple (Apple iPhone
`11)
`"
`Infringement Claim Chan for U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472 to Apple (Apple iPad Pro
`3“ Gen 12.9)
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472 to LG (LG V40)
`
`»
`‘
`
`Infringement Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472 to Motorola (Moto G6)
`Infringement Claim Chan for U.S. Patent,No. 9,411,472 to Samsung (Samsung
`Galaxy S10e)
`
`108
`
`109
`
`l
`Ph0t0graph(s) of product and/or packaging of the Samsung Galaxy S 10e
`Receipt from Amazon.com showing the purchase of two Samsung Galaxy S]0e
`Factory Unlocked Phone with 128GB, (U.S. Warranty) —Prism Black (“Samsung
`Galaxy Sl0e”)
`5
`'
`110C Microchip Letter to Neodron
`
`g
`
`\
`
`viii
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0010
`
`
`
`-ma
`
`L
`
`APPENDICES
`
`‘
`
`U,
`
`,2”
`
`E:-°'*!1zZ::=i+i<»e“%:M‘:-?s='lin1-
`'\*‘('~$r' »."1*.~I,"»‘i-“,;;,v
`1,»;w_:<.»~,,~~:
`»,J; 3,13 2;
`Q,
`..
`-, .3
`. PA. W.‘
`3,.“
`.neL£....,,;T,.L,§;,.,.
`.q._...“;§¢,
`
`.,”_\, .,,,,,_,
`
`."r»=<!":-'Y
`
`1??” Gm
`
`Q
`
`7”‘
`
`‘
`
`‘=
`
`5%:
`
`422
`
`'32->
`
`“>61 "J13
`
`*5?
`
`is
`
`‘ W "T
`
`44
`
`“
`
`i
`
`FM
`
`TXW
`
`°-W“ W
`1,.
`HM,
`ffl
`end1x-
`Letter!
`-
`W-D,esgér§1p,t1on
`Q‘)
`1%
`v
`z,»
`i
`Certified copy and three additional copies of the prosecution history of U.S.
`Patent No. 7,821,425
`-
`_
`References cited in the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 7,821,425 ’
`Certified copy and three additional copies of the prosecution history of U.S.
`Patent No. 7,903,092
`_
`
`A1
`A2
`
`B1
`
`B2
`
`C1
`
`. C2
`
`D1
`D2
`
`References cited in the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 7,903,092
`
`Certified copy and three additional copies of the prosecution history of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,749,251
`i
`
`References cited in the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 8,749,251
`Certified copy and three additional copies of the prosecution history of U.S.
`Patent No. 9,41 1,472
`'
`.
`References cited in the prosecution history of U.S. Patent No. 9,411,472
`
`ix
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0011
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This Complaint
`
`is filed by Complainant Neodron Ltd.
`
`(“Neodron” or
`
`“Complainant”) pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337
`
`(“Section 337”).
`
`2.
`
`Complainant brings this action to remedy violations of Section 337 arising from the
`
`unlawful and unauthorized importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the
`
`United States, and/or the sale within the United States afier importation, of certain touch-controlled
`
`mobile devices, computers, and components thereof (the “Accused Products”) that infringe one or
`
`more of the Asserted Claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,821,425 (“’42S Patent”); 7,903,092
`
`(“’092 Patent”); 8,749,251 (“’251 Patent”); and 9,41 1,472 (‘"472 Patent”) (collectively,
`
`the
`
`“Asserted Patents”).
`
`3.
`
`Complainant asserts that the Accused Products infringe at least the following claims
`
`of one or more Asserted Patents in violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B)(i), either literally or under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents:
`
`Asserted Patent
`’425 Patent
`
`’092 Patent
`
`Asscrted Claims
`25—4O
`
`1-12
`
`1-9 and 16-20
`’251 Patent
`1-6 and 13-23
`’472 Patent
`Touchscreen technology plays a ubiquitous and important role in countless
`
`4.
`
`electronic devices today. Beyond just providing greater usability to smartphones, tablets and
`
`notebooks, touchscreens now fill our lives in public and private spaces, from our homes and cars
`
`to the restaurants and stores we visit.
`
`5.
`
`But just a few decades ago, touchscreen technology could only be found in science
`
`fiction books and film. Although the underlying science behind touch technology can be traced
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0012
`
`
`
`back to the 1940s, working touchscreens were not conceived and feasible until the mid-1960s,
`
`when the first finger-driven touchscreen was invented by E.A. Johnson in 1965 at the Royal Radar
`
`Establishment
`
`in Malvern, United Kingdom. Since then, it took several generations and major
`
`technological advancements
`
`for
`
`touchscreens
`
`to achieve the level of complexity—and
`
`convenience—we see and enjoy today.
`
`'
`
`6.
`
`Built on the fundamental breakthrough that our hands and fingers can form changes
`
`in the capacitance of electrodes and electrode-comqections when they are in close proximity to
`
`them, touch technology has developed rapidly over the years. Along the way, engineers have
`
`worked tirelessly to try to overcome the limitations and roadblocks touch technology presents.
`
`From conceiving various ways ‘to detect
`
`(and correctly ignore) unintentional
`
`touches,
`
`to
`
`minimizing signal “noise,” to reducing the latency and power consumption that comes with any
`
`complex, multi-part electrical process, there have been many advances to various aspects of the
`
`technology—each building a little on a related advancement before it—to get us to the highly
`
`advanced state we enjoy today.
`
`7.
`
`These advancements range from fundamental ones, which make basic touch
`
`technology work, to optional improvements, which typically represent one technological option
`
`that improves aspects of the user experience and functionality of a touchscreen. This infringement
`
`action is about the latter: several patented improvements—which took years of research and
`
`millions of dollars in U.S. investments to develop, and which are infringed by the Respondents
`
`Accused Products here.
`
`8.
`
`The Proposed Respondents are Arnazon.com,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Amazon”); Apple Inc.
`
`(“Apple”); ASUSTek Computer
`
`Inc., ASUS Computer
`
`International
`
`(collectively, _“ASUS
`
`Respondents”); LG Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc. (collectively, “LG”); Microsoft
`
`Corporation (“Microsoft”); Motorola Mobility LLC; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`
`4
`
`2
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0013
`
`
`
`Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung Respondents”); and Sony Corporation, Sony
`
`Mobile Communications, Inc. (collectively, “Sony Respondents”). Collectively, all of these
`
`Proposed Respondents are referred to herein as “Respondents.”
`
`9.
`
`As set forth in this Complaint, each of the Respondents imports into the United
`
`States, sells for importation into the United States, and/or sells in the United States after
`
`importation Accused Products that directly infringe the Asserted Patents, and/or indirectly infringe
`
`the Asserted Patents by induced or contributory infringement.
`
`IO.
`
`Complainant seeks, as relief for the unfair acts of Respondents,
`
`the following:
`
`(i) institution of an investigation into Respondents’ violations; (ii) a public hearing; (iii) a limited
`
`exclusion order barring from entry into the United States the Accused Products that infringe one
`
`or more of the Asserted Patents; (iv) pennanent cease and desists order prohibiting the importation,
`
`sale, sale for importation, offer for sale, and soliciting of the sale in the United States, of the
`
`Accused Products that infringe one or more the Asserted Patents; (v) the imposition of a bond
`
`during the 60-day Presidential review period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § l337(j); and (vi) such other
`
`relief as the Commission deems proper.
`
`11.
`
`A domestic industry exists as the result of activities and investments in the United
`
`States related to products that practice the Asserted Patents. These activities include the current
`
`and ongoing significant and substantial domestic investments in plant, equipment,
`
`labor, and
`
`capital of licensee Microchip Technology Incorporated (“Microchip”).
`
`II.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`12.
`
`Complainant
`
`Complainant Neodron, Ltd.
`
`is an Irish company, having its principal place of
`
`business at Unit 4-5, Burton Hall Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Dl8a094. Neodron is the sole
`
`owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in each Asserted Patent.
`
`'
`
`3
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0014
`
`
`
`13.
`
`One of Neodron’s domestic licensees is Microchip, located at 2355 W. Chandler
`
`Boulevard, Chandler, Arizona 85224. Microchip (or one of its subsidiaries) is the predecessor-in
`
`interest of each of the Asserted Patents and has a non—exclusivelicense to practice each of the
`
`Asserted Patents, each of which relates generally to touchscreen technology.
`
`.
`
`14.
`
`The patented improvements at issue in this action were made by highly regarded
`
`engineers from two U.S. companies: Atmel Corporation (“Atmel”) and Microchip. Atmel and
`
`Microchip have played separate, significant roles in the development and advancement of such
`
`improvements to touch technology—and the domestic market for them.
`
`15.
`
`Founded and headquartered in the United States, Atmel has dedicated millions of
`
`U.S. dollars to engineering, development, and technical service and support of various touch
`
`controlled products in the United States. For example, its maXTouch mXT224 controller was
`
`recognized as the first capacitive touchscreen solution able to support the touch of a finger, stylus,
`
`or fingernails for drawing or signature capture and character recognition. Indeed, Atmel is regarded
`
`as an early leader in microcontroller and touch solutions and has, in fact, won numerous awards-—
`
`from the Consumer Electronics Show Irmovations Award to the Embedded Technologies Award
`
`and many others—for its advancements in the space. In 2016, Atmel was acquired by Microchip.
`
`16.
`
`Also founded and headquartered in the United States, Microchip likewise has
`
`dedicated a similar level of U.S.
`
`investments in providing various improvements to touch
`
`technology. Before acquiring Atmel in 2016, Microchip itself already had many touch-technology
`
`improvement patents—and corresponding product offerings to go with them. After its acquisition
`
`of Atmel in 2016, Microchip’s investment in the U.S. market for touch technology only grew. In
`
`fact, through their combined maXTouch and QTouch product lines, Microchip soon became a
`
`leading supplier of capacitive sensing solutions enabling touch screens and other touch interfaces
`
`for mobile
`
`devices,
`
`automobiles,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`industrial
`
`and
`
`consumer
`
`electronic
`
`4
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0015
`
`
`
`systems. Microchip’s maXTouch architecture combines
`
`touch sensing with sophisticated
`
`algorithms, enabling the most advanced touch capabilities on screen sizes ranging from gaming
`
`controls, through mobile phones to tablet devices and larger screen computers. And more recently,
`
`with the flexibility of Microchip’s microcontroller architecture, a user is able to integrate multiple
`
`touch features, such as “proximity sensing” or gesture recognition, in a single device.
`
`17. Moreover, Microchip has continued to advance the field of touch technology, both
`
`commercially and technologically. Meanwhile,
`
`it simultaneously protected and disclosed its
`
`innovative intellectual property through hundreds of issued U.S. patents. Those patents, in tum,
`
`further advanced the space, gamering dozens of citations from later patents filed by Microchip’s
`
`competitors. Indeed, the Asserted Patents have collectively received well over 500 citations by
`
`later patent applications. Many of the, Respondents themselves have cited one or more of the
`
`Asserted Patents in seeking their own, later patents.
`
`i
`
`18.
`
`In recent years, an explosion of imported products, which, without a license,
`
`infringe the innovative Asserted Patents, has significantly eroded Microchip’s market standing and
`
`injured Microchip’s domestic industry related to these patents. Complainant Neodron, as owner of
`
`a portfolio of hundreds of touch-technology patents and in partnership with Microchip,_has
`
`undertaken the task of counteracting these unfair and unlawful acts.
`
`19.
`
`The partnership between Neodron and Microchip is intended to protect and increase
`
`American-made goods and American jobs, including jobs at Microchip’s important Arizona and
`
`Colorado facilities. Although Microchip is a third party, its interest
`
`in this case is sincere—
`
`Microchip has provided candid discovery and fully cooperated in the related Neodron ITC
`
`investigation, including producing a witness for three days of deposition, source code for the
`
`Domestic Industry products, and over 150,000 pages of documents, most of which were
`
`5
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0016
`
`
`
`confidential business information. With Microchip’s assistance, Neodron strives to protect the
`
`interests of Microchip and others by enforcing its licensed patents.
`
`B.
`
`I Respondents
`
`1.
`
`Amazon
`
`' 20.
`
`Amazon.com, Inc. is a publicly traded corporation organized under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware. Its principal place of business is at 410 Terry Avenue North, Seattle,
`
`Washington 98109.
`
`A
`
`21.
`
`On infonnation
`
`and belief, Amazon operates
`
`the
`
`e-commerce website
`
`“Amazon.com,” which offers for sale in the United States products manufactured outside of the
`
`United States, including certain Accused Products. Further, on information and belief, Amazon,
`
`by itself or through its subsidiaries, imports into the United States and/or sells for importation into
`
`the United States certain Accused Products. See Exs. 24-26, 37-39.
`
`2.
`
`Apple
`
`22.
`
`Apple Inc. is a publicly traded corporation organized under the laws of the State of
`
`California. Its principal place of business is at One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, CA 95014.
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, Apple designs and manufactures
`
`and/or has
`
`manufactured on its behalf abroad certain Accused Products that are then sold for importation into
`
`the United States, imported into the United States, and/or sold within the United States after
`
`importation. See Exs. 27-28, 40-41.
`
`3.
`
`ASUS Respondents
`
`24.
`
`ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a publicly traded corporation organized under the laws
`
`of Taiwan. It has its principal place of business at No. 15, Li-Te Rd., Beitou District, Taipei City
`
`112, Taiwan.
`
`6
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1014, 0017
`
`
`
`25.
`
`On information and belief, ASUSTeK Computer Inc. produces abroad certain
`
`Accused Products that are then sold for importation into the United States, imported into the United
`
`States, and/or sold within the United States after importation, including through its subsidiary
`
`ASUS Computer International. See Exs. 26, 37.
`
`26.
`
`ASUS Computer International is a corporation organized under the laws of the State
`
`of Califomia. Its principal place of business is at 48720 Kato Rd, Fremont, CA 94538.
`
`27.
`
`On infonnation and belief, ASUS Computer
`
`International, a subsidiary of
`
`ASUSTeK Computer Inc., produces certain Accused Products abroad, including in China, that are
`
`then sold for importation into the United States, imported into the United States, and/or sold within
`
`the United States after importation. See Exs. 26, 37.
`
`28.
`
`ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International are collectively
`
`referred to as the “ASUS Respondents.”
`
`4.
`