`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS
`COMMUNICATION DEVICES, AND
`RELATED COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
` Inv. No. 337-TA-1180
`
`
`
`
`ORDER NO. 41:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INITIAL DETERMINATION EXTENDING THE TARGET
`DATE DUE TO CORONAVIRUS
`
`(August 13, 2020)
`
`The Target Date for completion of this Investigation was originally March 31, 2021. (See
`
`Order No. 2 (Oct. 17, 2019); Order No. 5 at App. A (Nov. 5, 2019).). Accordingly, the Initial
`
`Determination on Violation (“ID”) in this Investigation was due on November 30, 2020. (Order
`
`No. 5 at App. A (Nov. 5, 2019).).
`
`On April 17, 2020, due to extensions for all remaining deadlines in this Investigation as a
`
`result of the Coronavirus, including problems with disrupted travel and discovery, I extended the
`
`Target Date for completion of this Investigation to June 4, 2021 (“First Extension”). (Order No.
`
`23 (Apr. 17, 2020).).
`
`Since the First Extension, the Coronavirus has necessitated additional extensions to
`
`deadlines, including the need to postpone the evidentiary hearing to at least early November
`
`2020, in order to work out logistical issues associated with holding the evidentiary hearing by
`
`remote video conference. Therefore, I am hereby extending the Target Date for completion of
`
`this Investigation to August 16, 2021. The new date for the issuance of the ID is now April 16,
`
`2021.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1028, 0001
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.42(h), this Initial Determination shall become the
`
`determination of the Commission unless a party files a petition for review of the Initial
`
`Determination pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.43(a), or the Commission orders on its own motion a
`
`review of the Initial Determination pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.44.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1028, 0002
`
`
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, AND
`RELATED COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1180
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached INTIAL DETERMINATION has
`been served via EDIS upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Vu Bui, Esq., and the
`following parties as indicated, on August 13, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Behalf of Complainant Innovation Sciences LLC:
`
`Donald L. Jackson, Esq.
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST JACKSON & GOWDEY, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Email: djackson@dbjg.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Resideo Technologies, Inc.:
`
`John M. Caracappa
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`Email: jcaracappa@steptoe.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondents HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.:
`
`Yar R. Chaikovsky
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`875 15th St NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Email: yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`Petitioners Samsung and Sony Ex-1028, 0003
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
