throbber
IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION and EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
`LLC,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`COLIBRI HEART VALVE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2020-01649
`Patent No. 9,125,739 B2
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR ADMISSION
`PRO HAC VICE OF MEGAN E. DELLINGER
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Exhibit
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`Description
`
`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`EX1001
`
`EX1002
`
`EX1003
`
`EX1004
`
`EX1005
`
`EX1006
`
`EX1007
`
`EX1008
`
`EX1009
`
`EX1010
`
`EX1011
`
`EX1012
`
`EX1013
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,125,739 (Paniagua et al.)
`
`File History for U.S. Patent No. 9,125,739 (Paniagua
`et al.)
`Andersen et al., Transluminal Implantation of Artificial
`Heart Valves. Description of a New Expandable Aortic
`Valve and Initial Results with Implantation by Catheter
`Technique in Closed Chest Pigs, European Heart Journal
`13:704-708 (1992)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,411,552 (Andersen et al.)
`
`Bailey, Percutaneous Expandable Prosthetic Valves,
`Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, Chapter 75
`(1994)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,855,601 (Bessler et al.)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,332,402 (Teitelbaum)
`
`Moazami et al., Transluminal Aortic Valve
`Placement A Feasibility Study with a Newly
`Designed Collapsible Aortic Valve, ASAIO J.,
`M381-385 (Sept.-Oct. 1996)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2002/0032481 (Gabbay)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,425,916 (Garrison et al.)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,652,578 (Bailey et al.)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,957,949 (Leonhardt et al.)
`
`Ebeid et al., Use of Balloon-Expandable Stents for
`Coarctation of the Aorta: Initial Results and
`Intermediate-Term Follow-Up, 30 J. Am. C.
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`EX1014
`
`EX1015
`
`EX1016
`
`EX1017
`
`EX1018
`
`EX1019
`
`EX1020
`
`EX1021
`
`EX1022
`
`EX1023
`
`EX1024
`
`EX1025
`
`EX1026
`
`Cardiology 7, 1847-52 (Dec. 1997)
`Edwards Receives European Approval for Advanced
`SAPIEN 3 Valve (Jan. 27, 2014)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2005/0113910 (Paniagua et al.)
`Rösch et al., The Birth, Early Years, and Future of
`Interventional Radiology, J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.,
`14:841-853 (2003)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,908,481 (Cribier)
`
`File History for U.S. Patent No. 8,308,797 (Paniagua
`et al.)
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
`2001/0044633 (Klint)
`Declaration of Steven L. Goldberg, M.D.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,308,797 (Paniagua et al.)
`
`Infringement Chart from Colibri Heart Valve LLC v.
`Medtronic CoreValve LLC, No. 8:20-cv-847-DOC-
`JDE, D.I. 30-3 (C.D. Cal. June 12, 2020) (Exhibit A
`to First Amended Complaint).
`U.S. Patent No. 6,730,118 (Spenser et al.)
`
`Press Release, Edwards Lifesciences Receives CE
`Mark for Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart
`Valve Edwards Lifesciences (Sept. 5, 2007)
`Colibri’s Opposition to Medtronic’s Motion to
`Dismiss First Amended Complaint [DKT. 38],
`Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic CoreValve
`LLC, No. 8:20-cv-847-DOC-JDE, D.I. 46 (C.D. Cal.
`Aug. 14, 2020)
`U.S. Patent No. 8,900,294 (Paniagua et al.)
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`

`Exhibit
`
`EX1027
`
`EX1028
`
`EX1029
`
`EX1030
`
`EX1031
`
`EX1032
`
`EX1033
`
`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`Description
`
`CoreValve Receives CE Mark Approval for its
`ReValving™ System and Announces Plans to Initiate
`Expanded Clinical Evaluation, Business Wire (May
`16, 2007)
`Edwards SAPIEN XT Transcatheter Valve and
`Delivery Systems Receive CE Mark (Mar. 2, 2010)
`Edwards Lifesciences Receives FDA Approval for
`First Catheter-Based Aortic Heart Valve in the U.S.
`(Nov. 2, 2011)
`Medtronic CoreValve® System Obtains Early FDA
`Approval on Exceptional Clinical Performance (Jan.
`17, 2014)
`Bonhoeffer et al., Percutaneous Replacement of
`Pulmonary Valve in a Right-Ventricle to Pulmonary-
`Artery Prosthetic Conduit with Valve Dysfunction,
`Lancet 356:1403-05 (2000)
`Pavcnik et al., Aortic and Venous Valve for
`Percutaneous Insertion, Min Invas Ther & Allied
`Technol 9(3/4) 287-92 (2000)
`Declaration of Megan E. Dellinger in Support of
`Petitioners’ Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Megan E. Dellinger Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`iii
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.10(c), and as authorized in the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board’s (“Board”) Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (Paper 3),
`
`Petitioners Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and
`
`Edwards Lifesciences AG (collectively, “Petitioners”) respectfully request pro
`
`hac vice admission of Megan E. Dellinger as counsel in this proceeding.
`
`II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`37 C.F.R. §42.10(c) states:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and
`to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`example, where
`the
`lead counsel
`is a registered
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The facts, supported by the accompanying Declaration of Megan E. Dellinger in
`
`Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Dellinger Decl.”, Ex. 1033),
`
`establish good cause to admit Ms. Dellinger pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`1. Lead counsel Brian P. Egan is a registered practitioner and is
`
`experienced in inter partes proceedings in the USPTO.
`
`2. Backup counsel Gregory S. Cordrey is a registered practitioner and
`
`is experienced in inter partes proceedings in the USPTO.
`
`3. Megan E. Dellinger is an experienced litigation attorney. Ms.
`
`Dellinger has been a litigating attorney for more than 8 years. (Dellinger Decl. ¶ 1.)
`
`Ms. Dellinger has been litigating patent cases for all of that time. (Id. ¶ 2.) Ms.
`
`Dellinger is a member in good standing of the Delaware State Bar since 2012 with
`
`no suspensions or disbarments from practice, nor any application for admission to
`
`practice denied, nor any sanctions or contempt citations, and is admitted to practice
`
`in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (Id. ¶¶ 3-6.)
`
`4. Ms. Dellinger has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in this proceeding, including U.S. Patent No. 9,125,739, its prior art, and the
`
`field of transcatheter aortic heart valves, including by assisting in preparation of the
`
`Petition, and by assisting in other cases for Petitioners related to transcatheter aortic
`
`heart valve technology, in particular Boston Scientific Corporation v. Edwards
`
`Lifesciences Corporation, C.A. No. 16-275-JFB-SRF (D. Del. 2016), and the related
`
`inter partes review proceeding Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Boston
`
`Scientific Scimed, Inc., IPR2017-00060, and the appeal therefrom, Boston Scientific
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`Scimed, Inc. v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, No. 2018-2004 (Fed. Cir.). (Id.
`
`at ¶ 10.)
`
`5. Ms. Dellinger has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R, and she agrees to be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional
`
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§10.20 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`under 37 C.F.R. §11.19(a). (Id. ¶¶ 7-8.) Ms. Dellinger has not applied to appear pro
`
`hac vice in other proceedings before the Office in the last three (3) years. (Id. ¶9.)
`
`6. Patent Owner Colibri Heart Valve LLC has indicated that this
`
`Motion will not be opposed.
`
`III. ANALYSIS
`
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Dellinger Declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Ms. Dellinger pro
`
`hac vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. §42.10. Lead and backup counsel are
`
`registered practitioners, Ms. Dellinger is an experienced patent litigation attorney,
`
`and Ms. Dellinger has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`the proceeding.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Megan E. Dellinger pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`

`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Brian P. Egan____________
`Brian P. Egan (Reg. No. 54,866)
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`Email: began@morrisnichols.com
`Telephone: 302-351-9454
`Facsimile: 302-498-6216
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey (Reg. No. 44,089)
`Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell, LLP
`3 Park Plaza, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Email: gcordrey@jmbm.com
`Telephone: 949-623-7200
`Facsimile: 949-623-7201
`
`for Petitioners Edwards
`Attorneys
`Lifesciences Corporation and
`Edwards Lifesciences LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`IPR2020-01649
`Paper No. 12
`
`I hereby certify that on May 26, 2021, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Petitioners’ Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Megan E. Dellinger
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 to be served via electronic mail on the Patent Owner
`
`at the following correspondence addresses of record for the ’739 Patent:
`
`Sarah E. Spires
`Paul J. Skiermont
`Skiermont Derby LLP
`1601 Elm St., Ste. 4400
`Dallas, TX 75201
`sspires@skiermontderby.com
`pskiermont@skiermontderby.com
`
`Dated: May 26, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brian P. Egan____________
`Brian P. Egan (Reg. No. 54,866)
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket