Attorney Ref. No. 681954.0890
`
`METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING FRAME STRUCTURES
`
`TITLE
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
`
`[0001]
`
`This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/929,798,
`
`5
`
`entitled "Frame Structure in Wireless Communication Systems," filed July 12, 2007, and
`
`60/973,157, entitled "Bandwidth Scalable OFDMA Frame Structure," filed September 17, 2007.
`
`These applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`[0002]
`
`The present invention generally relates to orthogonal frequency-division multiple
`
`10
`
`access (OFDMA) systems, and more particularly, the present invention relates to methods for
`
`constructing frame structures in OFDMA systems.
`
`[0003]
`
`Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) is a multiple access
`
`scheme for transmitting data in different subcarriers in a channel, wherein the data may come
`
`from different users and may be transmitted in disjoint subsets of sub-channels in a transmission
`
`15
`
`bandwidth. The orthogonality property among the subcarriers may allow simultaneous
`
`transmission of data from different users without interference from one other. The multiple
`
`access scheme of the OFDMA may generally be applied in various communication systems, such
`
`as those defined in IEEE standard 802.16e ("legacy system" hereafter) and IEEE standard
`
`802.16m ("new system" hereafter). The new system defined in the IEEE standard 802.16m may
`
`20
`
`be required to provide enhanced spectrum efficiency, higher speed tolerance and full backward
`
`compatibility with the legacy system defined in the IEEE standard 802.16e.
`
`[0004]
`
`FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure under the IEEE 802.16
`
`standard. Referring to FIG. 1, the frame structure may include a downlink sub-frame (DL sub(cid:173)
`
`frame) 16 and an uplink sub-frame (UL sub-frame) 18. The UL sub-frame 18 may follow the
`
`25 DL sub-frame 16 in time domain with a transmit/receive transmission gap (TTG) 17 from the DL
`
`sub-frame 16. Moreover, the frame structure may be separated from the next frame structure, led
`
`by a preamble 10-2, by a receive/transmit transmission gap (RTG) 19.
`
`[0005]
`
`The DL sub-frame 16 may include a preamble 10-1, a frame control header (FCH) 11,
`
`a downlink map (DL-MAP) 12, a downlink burst (DL burst#l) 13 and a data region (DATA) 14-
`
`1
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 1 of 65
`
`

`

`Attorney Ref. No. 681954.0890
`
`1. The UL sub-frame 18 may include a ranging sub-channel 15 and a data region (DATA) 14-2.
`
`Since the DL-MAP 12 may be used to identify the division or structure of the DATA 14-1 in the
`
`DL sub-frame 16, it may be desirable to integrate the OFDMA frame structure of an old
`
`OFDMA system with that of a new OFDMA system by using the DL-MAP 12 to define different
`
`5
`
`zones in the DATA 14-1 and DATA 14-2 of the frame structure for data of the old OFDMA
`
`system and data of the new OFDMA system.
`
`[0006]
`
`FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a placement of guiding signals (or pilot symbols) 24-1
`
`for time-domain and frequency-domain OFDMA signals under the IEEE 802.16 standard.
`
`Referring to FIG. 2, upper and lower frequency bands may serve as guard bands 22-1 and 22-2,
`
`10
`
`respectively, which may not be used to carry information. The placement of information may
`
`include a first part and a second part. For example, the first part of the placement includes a
`
`preamble 10' -1 having a fixed length, and the second part of the placement includes data and
`
`guard intervals between an upper row and a lower row of the data interlaced with the pilot
`
`symbols 24-1, represented by blocks marked with "X". In some applications such placement of
`
`15
`
`information may be inflexible to bandwidth scaling due to the fixed-length preambles 10 '-1
`
`and/or 10'-2 and the often unusable guard bands 22-1 and 22-2. Moreover, the placement may
`
`be susceptible to a Doppler effect in a high mobility scenario because the placement may be
`
`usually designed with a relatively large symbol period, which in tum may induce relatively short
`
`carrier spacing and less dense pilot symbol placement. Moreover, the limitation on pilot symbol
`
`20
`
`placement may cause channel estimation error at a receiving end because of insufficient
`
`information provided for channel estimation.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`[0007]
`
`Examples of the present invention may provide a method for constructing a frame
`
`structure for data transmission, the method comprising generating a first section comprising data
`
`25
`
`configured in a first format compatible with a first communication system, generating a second
`
`section following the first section comprising data configured in a second format compatible
`
`with a second communication system, wherein the second format is different from the first
`
`format, generating at least one non-data section containing information describing an aspect of
`
`data in at least one of the first section and the second section, and combining the first section, the
`
`30
`
`second section and the at least one non-data section to form the frame structure.
`
`2
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 2 of 65
`
`

`

`Attorney Ref. No. 681954.0890
`
`[0008]
`
`Examples of the present invention may provide a method of generating a frame for
`
`transferring data in a communication system. The communication system may include a first
`
`system and a second system. The method may include generating a first sub-frame for downlink
`
`transmission, wherein the first sub-frame comprises a first region comprising first mapping
`
`5
`
`information, a second region comprising second mapping information, and a third region
`
`carrying data to be transferred in the downlink transmission, the third region comprising a first
`
`sub-region and a second sub-region, wherein the first sub-region and second sub-region are
`
`defined by the first mapping information, the first sub-region being capable of carrying first data
`
`of the first system and the second sub-region being capable of carrying second data of the second
`
`10
`
`system in the downlink transmission, and generating a second sub-frame for uplink transmission,
`
`wherein the second sub-frame comprises a fourth region carrying data to be transferred in the
`
`uplink transmission, the fourth region comprising a third sub-region and a fourth sub-region,
`
`wherein the third sub-region and the fourth sub-region are defined by the second mapping
`
`information, the third sub-region being capable of carrying third data of the first system and the
`
`15
`
`fourth sub-region being capable of carrying fourth data of the second system in the uplink
`
`transmission.
`
`[0009]
`
`Examples of the present invention may also provide a method of generating a frame
`
`for transferring data in a communication system. The communication system may include a first
`
`system and a second system. The method may include generating a first frame comprising a first
`
`20
`
`sub-frame for downlink transmission and a second sub-frame for uplink transmission in a first
`
`band, generating a second frame comprising a third sub-frame for downlink transmission and a
`
`fourth sub-frame for uplink transmission in a second band, identifying a guard band between the
`
`first band and the second band, and generating a third frame comprising a fifth sub-frame for
`
`downlink transmission and a sixth sub-frame for uplink transmission in the guard band.
`
`25
`
`[0010]
`
`Examples of the present invention may provide a method for allocating information in
`
`a frame of a communication system. The communication system may include a first system and
`
`a second system. The frame may be used for first data transmission of the first system and
`
`second data transmission of the second system. The method may include allocating data of the
`
`first system and the second system in first mapping information, dividing a data region of the
`
`30
`
`frame to form a first sub-region and a second sub-region according to the first mapping
`
`information, performing the first data transmission of the first system by using the first sub-
`
`3
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 3 of 65
`
`

`

`Attorney Ref. No. 681954.0890
`
`region and performing the second data transmission of the second system by using the second
`
`sub-region.
`
`[0011]
`
`Examples of the present invention may provide another method for allocating
`
`information in a frame of a communication system. The frame may include a first frame, a
`
`5
`
`second frame and a band between the first frame and the second frame. The communication
`
`system may include a first system and a second system. The frame may be used for first data
`
`transmission of the first system and second data transmission of the second system. The method
`
`may include allocating data of the first system and the second system in first mapping
`
`information or second mapping information, dividing a data region of the first frame or the
`
`10
`
`second frame to form a first sub-region, a second sub-region, a third sub-region or a second sub(cid:173)
`
`region in the data region of the first frame or the second frame according to the first mapping
`
`information or the second mapping information, performing the first data transmission of the first
`
`system by using the first sub-region or the third sub-region and performing the second data
`
`transmission of the second system by using the second sub-region or the fourth sub-region.
`
`15
`
`[0012]
`
`Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be set forth in part in
`
`the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be
`
`learned by practice of the invention. The features and advantages of the invention will be
`
`realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the
`
`appended claims.
`
`20
`
`[0013]
`
`It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following
`
`detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention,
`
`as claimed.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`[0014]
`
`The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the
`
`25
`
`invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For
`
`the purpose of illustrating the invention, there are shown in the drawings examples which are
`
`presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the
`
`precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
`
`[0015]
`
`In the drawings:
`
`4
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 4 of 65
`
`

`

`Attorney Ref. No. 681954.0890
`
`[0016]
`
`FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an orthogonal frequency-division multiple access
`
`(OFDMA) frame structure under the IEEE 802.16 standard;
`
`[0017]
`
`FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a placement of guiding signals for OFDMA signals
`
`under the IEEE 802.16 standard;
`
`5
`
`[0018]
`
`FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure according to an example
`
`of the present invention;
`
`[0019]
`
`FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure supporting high mobility
`
`according to an example of the present invention;
`
`[0020]
`
`FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure with a scalable bandwidth
`
`10
`
`according to an example of the present invention;
`
`[0021]
`
`FIG. 6A is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure supporting high
`
`mobility and having a scalable bandwidth according to an example of the present invention;
`
`[0022]
`
`FIG. 6B is a diagram illustrating an OFDMA frame structure supporting high
`
`mobility and having a scalable bandwidth according to another example of the present invention;
`
`15
`
`and
`
`[0023]
`
`FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary placement of signals and pilots in time-
`
`domain and frequency-domain of an OFDMA system supporting high mobility and having a
`
`scalable bandwidth.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`20
`
`[0024]
`
`Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments of the invention,
`
`examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same
`
`reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
`
`[0025]
`
`Exampls of the present invention may allow data of an old orthogonal frequency-
`
`division multiple access (OFDMA) system (hereinafter a legacy system) and data of a new
`
`25
`
`OFDMA system to co-exist in an OFDMA frame by changing a frame structure of the OFDMA
`
`frame. The new OFDMA system may have a larger bandwidth and support higher mobility, and
`
`may use an updated transmission technology. In order to be backward compatible with the old
`
`OFDMA system, the new OFDMA system may be developed based on the old OFDMA system.
`
`5
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 5 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 6 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 7 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 8 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 9 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 10 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 11 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 12 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 13 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 14 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 15 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 16 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 17 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 18 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 19 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 20 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 21 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 22 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 23 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 24 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 25 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 26 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 27 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 28 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 29 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 30 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 31 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 32 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 33 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 34 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 35 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 36 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 37 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 38 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 39 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 40 of 65
`
`

`

`Appl. No.: 12/168,855
`Arndt. dated April 23, 2012
`Reply to Office Action of November 23, 2011
`
`Applicants' reply to the rejection of Claims 1, 11, 40, 46 and 48 regarding symbol periods
`
`As noted above, Applicants have amended independent Claims 1, 11, 40, 46 and 48. In
`
`particular, Claims 1, 11, 40, 46 and 48 have been amended to recite, "wherein the first
`
`communication system and the second communication system co-exist in one transmission
`
`scheme .... " Support for this amendment may be found at, for example, paragraph [0025] of
`
`Applicants' published specification (i.e., U.S. Patent Application Publication
`
`No. 2009/0016371).
`
`The Examiner acknowledges that Ahmadi fails to show the symbol period of each
`
`symbol. See Office Action, pages 3, 5, 8, 9 and 16. Douglas is cited to compensate for the
`
`deficiency of Ahmadi.
`
`Douglas generally relates to detecting the start of a packet (SOP) in receiver in a packet
`
`based wireless network. Douglas's SOP indicators are determined differently for DSSS packets
`
`(802.1 lb) and for OFDM packets (802.1 la,g) (Douglas, col. 11, lines 62-65). Specifically,
`
`Douglas states that the method can be applied to the DSSS transmission scheme using 2-10
`
`symbol periods in one embodiment and applied to the OFDM transmission scheme using 1-3
`
`symbol periods in another embodiment (Douglas, col. 12, lines 42-46). (It is known that the
`
`DSSS transmission scheme is used for the original IEEE802.11 and in 802.11 b. In contrast,
`
`OFDM is a transmission scheme used for IEEE802.1 la, g.)
`
`Therefore, Douglas fails to show or suggest the first communication system and the
`
`second communication system co-existing in one transmission scheme ( e.g., OFDM or DSSS).
`
`Applicants' amended Claim 1, on the other hand, recites a first communication system and a
`
`second communication system co-existing in one transmission scheme. Amended Claims 11, 40,
`
`46 and 48 have been amended to recite "generating a first sub-frame for downlink transmission
`
`within one transmission scheme .... " In other words, Applicants' amended claims recite
`
`different symbol periods co-existing in one data frame that uses the same transmission scheme.
`
`For at least this reason, namely Ahmadi and/or the other documents ofrecord failing to
`
`show or otherwise suggest each recitation of Applicants' independent Claims 1, 11, 40 and 46,
`
`Applicants' amended Claims 1, 11, 40, 46 and 48 are not made obvious by Ahmadi, Douglas
`
`and/or any other document of record. Applicants respectfully request that the rejections of
`
`Claims 1, 11, 40 and 46 be withdrawn.
`
`15 of 17
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 41 of 65
`
`

`

`Appl. No.: 12/168,855
`Arndt. dated April 23, 2012
`Reply to Office Action of November 23, 2011
`
`Applicants' reply to the rejection of Claims 6, 14, 43 and 48 regarding density of pilots
`
`Claims 6 and 14 were rejected unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Ahmadi, in
`
`view of Trachewsky'.
`
`Claim 43 was rejected as being unpatentable over Ahmadi, in view ofTrachewsky.
`
`Claim 48 was rejected as being unpatentable over Ahmadi, in view of Douglas and
`
`Trachewsky.
`
`As noted above, Applicants have amended independent Claims 6, 14, 43 and 48 to recite,
`
`"wherein the first communication system and the second communication system co-exist in one
`
`transmission scheme."
`
`The Examiner acknowledges that Ahmadi fails to show the density of the pilots. See
`
`Office Action, pages 10, 12, 14 and 17. Trachewsky is cited to fill the gap.
`
`The cited portion ofTrachewsky, however, does not show the second communication
`
`system has more pilot symbols than that in the first communication system. Rather, Trachewsky
`
`shows that compared to the number of pilot symbols on sub-carriers -2, -1, + 1 and + 2 that are
`
`used in conventional 802.11 g/802.12a device, four extra pilot symbols are placed on sub(cid:173)
`
`carriers -2, -1, +land +2 in Trachewsky's invented device. As such, Trachewsky fails to show a
`
`comparison between two communication systems within one transmission scheme in one device.
`
`Hence, Ahmadi and/or Trachewsky fail to show or otherwise suggest "wherein the first
`
`communication system and the second communication system co-exist in one transmission
`
`scheme."
`
`For at least this reason, namely Ahmadi and/or the other documents of record failing to
`
`show or otherwise suggest each recitation of Applicants' independent Claims 6, 14, 43 and 48,
`
`Applicants' amended Claims 6, 14, 43 and 48 are not made obvious by Ahmadi, Trachewsky
`
`and/or any other document of record. Applicants respectfully request that the rejections of
`
`Claims 6 and 14 be withdrawn.
`
`Applicants' reply to the rejections of dependent Claims 2-4, 8-10, 12, 16-22, 41, 45 and 50
`
`For at least the foregoing reasons, independent Claims 1, 6, 11, 14, 40, 43, 46 and 48 are
`
`patentable over the various rejections. Since Claims 2-4, 8-10, 12, 16-22, 41,45 and 50 depend
`16 of 17
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 42 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 43 of 65
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`PATENT
`
`Appl. No.:
`Applicant(s):
`Filed:
`Art Unit:
`Title:
`
`12/168,855
`Yan-Xiu Zheng
`July 7, 2008
`2473
`METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING FRAME STRUCTURES
`
`Jeffrey M Rutkowski
`Examiner:
`Confirmation No.: 8234
`
`054788/347709
`Docket No.:
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`TELEPHONIC INTERVIEW SUMMARY
`
`Applicants' undersigned attorney wishes to thank Examiner Rutkowski for the courtesies
`
`extended during the telephonic interview conducted on April 27, 2012. During the interview,
`
`Examiner Rutkowski and Applicants' undersigned attorney discussed amendments to the claims
`
`that would place the claims in condition for allowance. In particular, the Examiner suggested
`
`amending all the claims, except previously allowed Claims 23-39 and 51, to recite the first and
`
`second systems' symbols co-exist in one transmission scheme (as opposed to the first and second
`
`systems co-existing in one transmission scheme). Although Applicants' undersigned attorney
`
`needed to obtain Applicants approval of such amendments, such approval has since been
`
`obtained and Applicants agree to make such amendments to the claims by way of an Examiner's
`
`amendment. Applicants welcome Examiner Rutkowski to contact Applicants' attorney should
`
`any other concerns or issues arise prior to the issuance of a patent in this patent application.
`
`Adam M. Kaplan
`Registration No. 59,109
`
`Customer No. 00826
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280-4000
`Tel Charlotte Office (704) 444-1000
`Fax Charlotte Office (704) 444-1111
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED USING THE EFS-WEB ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT &
`TRADEMARK OFFICE ON April 30, 2012.
`LEGAL02/33275374Vl
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 44 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 45 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 46 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 47 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 48 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 49 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 50 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 51 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 52 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 53 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 54 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 55 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 56 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 57 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 58 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 59 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 60 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 61 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 62 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 63 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 64 of 65
`
`

`

`Intel Corporation Ex. 1010
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 65 of 65
`
`