`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`STC.UNM,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`Apple Inc.,
`
`
`
`
` Defendant.
`
`No. 1:20–CV–351–ADA
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`The Court held a telephonic Markman hearing on April 3, 2020 and a telephonic
`
`supplemental Markman hearing on April 8, 2020. During the hearings, the Court provided the
`
`below constructions. The Court will enter a Memorandum in Support of this Order shortly.
`
`
`
`’204 Patent
`
`Agreed Constructions:
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“a plurality of channel taps”
`
`“at least two samples of a channel response at different time
`delays”
`
`“channel responses”
`
`“communication channels’ responses in the time domain to
`transmitted signals”
`
`
`
`Claim Construction Rulings:
`
`Term
`
`Whether the preambles for all
`asserted claims are limiting
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Each preamble is limiting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`– 1 –
`
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1011
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00351-ADA Document 69 Filed 04/09/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`’096 Patent
`
`Agreed Constructions:
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“at least one of […] and […]” “[…] and/or […]”
`
`“symbol period”
`
`“the time it takes to transmit one symbol”
`
`
`
`Claim Construction Rulings:
`
`Term
`
`Whether the preambles for all
`asserted claims are limiting
`
`“frame structure”
`
`“symbol”
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Each preamble is limiting
`
`“a single structure comprising one or more frames, wherein
`each frame may have one or more subframes”
`
`Plain-and-ordinary meaning, wherein the plain-and-ordinary
`meaning means “a transmissible unit of information”
`
`“pilot symbols that are denser
`than”
`
`“more pilot symbols per unit time than, wherein a unit time is
`the symbol period of the first communication system”
`
`“[first & second]
`communication system”
`
`“wherein the first
`communication system’s
`symbols and the second
`communication system’s
`symbols co-exist in one
`transmission scheme”
`
`“data” / “non-data”
`
`Construction for communication system: Plain-and-
`ordinary meaning, where the plain-and-ordinary meaning is
`“a combination of hardware and software that transmits and
`receives data according to one or more communications
`standards”
`
`Plain-and-ordinary meaning where the plain-and-ordinary
`meaning is “wherein symbols of the first communication
`system and symbols of the second communication system
`exist together in one transmission scheme”
`
`Data: Plain-and-ordinary meaning
`Non-data: Plain-and-ordinary meaning
`
`“support higher mobility
`than”
`
`Not indefinite. “support higher relative velocity between a
`transmitter and a receiver than”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`– 2 –
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1011
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00351-ADA Document 69 Filed 04/09/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`’326 Patent
`
`Agreed Constructions:
`
`Term
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“with a variable length related
`to a modulation order and a
`number of transmissions”
`
`
`
`Claim Construction Rulings:
`
`Term
`
`Whether the preambles for all
`asserted claims are limiting
`
`“circular shift”
`
`“with a variable length that is related to both modulation
`order and a number of transmissions”
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`Each preamble is limiting
`
`“an operation that moves a sequence of bits from one end of
`an ordered group of bits to the other end”
`
`
`SIGNED this 9th day of April, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`– 3 –
`
`Intel Corporation Ex. 1011
`Intel Corp v. UNM Rainforest Innovations - IPR2020-01576
`Page 3 of 3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
