throbber
Modified Goniotomy for Inflammatory Glaucoma
`Histologic Evidence for the Mechanism of Pressure Reduction
`Jonathan Herschler, MD, E. Barry Davis
`
`\s=b\A modified goniotomy (trabeculodial-
`ysis) was performed on both eyes of a
`33-year-old woman who had glaucoma
`secondary to sarcoid uveitis. One month
`after trabeculodialysis, a cataract extrac-
`tion was performed on one eye and a
`histologic specimen was obtained from
`the area of the filtration angle that was
`previously incised. Successful control of
`intraocular pressure has been maintained
`in both eyes for 18 months following tra-
`beculodialysis. By
`light and electron
`microscopic examination,
`there was a
`nonhealed incision between the anterior
`chamber and Schlemm's canal. Trabecu-
`lodialysis, it is concluded, works by pro-
`viding direct communication between the
`anterior chamber and Schlemm's canal,
`and might be effective in all
`trabecular
`obstructive glaucoma of short duration
`before secondary changes occur in the
`outer drainage channels.
`(Arch Ophthalmol 98:684-687, 1980)
`
`glaucoma secondary to uveitis has
`remained a frustrating and diffi¬
`cult problem. If medical control is not
`adequate, filtering operations have a
`low rate of success. Poor results with
`filtering operations are most
`likely
`due to the young age of patients who
`have uveitis and the increase in
`inflammation caused by the operative
`insult. Haas1 first suggested, several
`years ago, that goniotomy (trabecu-
`
`Accepted for publication May 23, 1979.
`From the Department of Ophthalmology, Bas-
`com Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami
`School of Medicine.
`Reprint requests to Department of Ophthal-
`mology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Universi-
`ty of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016880,
`Miami, FL 33101 (Dr Herschler).
`
`lodialysis) be applied to inflammatory
`glaucoma. He reported an encourag¬
`ing but small series of modified goni-
`otomies performed on patients with
`uveitis who were aphakic. Because of
`its simplicity, easy repeatability, and
`inflammatory re¬
`seeming lack of
`sponse, the procedure was thought to
`be well suited for treating inflamma¬
`In a recent article,
`tory glaucoma.
`Hoskins et al4 reviewed their experi¬
`ence with the surgical
`treatment of
`inflammatory glaucoma and also rec¬
`ommended trabeculodialysis as a use¬
`technique, especially in
`ful surgical
`glaucoma secondary to Still's disease
`(juvenile rheumatoid arthritis).
`Trabeculodialysis is performed in a
`manner very similar to the classical
`Barkan goniotomy.4 However, rather
`than being incised,
`the trabecular
`meshwork is scraped from the scierai
`sulcus with the flat side of a gonioto¬
`my blade. This scraping maneuver is
`performed because elasticity of
`the
`limbic tissue in adults is less than in
`infants, and a simple incision tends to
`close up. The trabecular sheets are
`quite friable in inflammatory glauco¬
`ma and may be easily scraped away.
`trabeculodialysis low¬
`Presumably,
`ers intraocular pressure by increasing
`outflow facility, but
`the mechanism
`by which this occurs has never been
`documented histologically. The mech¬
`anism of successful goniotomy in pri¬
`mary infantile glaucoma has not been
`established either, even though it has
`been the preferred procedure for
`many years.4
`This case report describes a 33-year-
`old woman who had sarcoid uveitis,
`secondary glaucoma, and cataracts.
`Over a two-year period, the secondary
`
`glaucoma became medically uncon¬
`trollable, and trabeculodialysis was
`performed on both eyes. One month
`later, a cataract extraction was per¬
`formed on one eye, and a histologie
`specimen was obtained from the tra¬
`becular meshwork incised by the tra¬
`beculodialysis (Fig 1).
`REPORT OF A CASE
`facial numbness, pain
`In July 1974,
`around the mouth, red eyes, lymphadenop¬
`athy, and night sweats developed in a
`33-year-old woman. A chest
`roentgeno-
`gram showed hilar adenopathy and a liver
`biopsy specimen indicated noncaseating
`granulomas. Both findings supported the
`diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis. The
`patient was treated with oral prednisone
`for one month. Although her condition
`improved systemically, her ocular symp¬
`toms continued, and she received injections
`of prednisolone acetate in the sub-Tenon's
`space four times in the right eye and three
`times in the left eye.
`She first came to the Bascom Palmer
`Eye Institute, Miami, in February 1975 for
`evaluation of her uveitis and secondary
`glaucoma. Her medications at
`the time
`included topical 1% prednisolone acetate
`four times a day in both eyes, topical 1%
`atropine sulfate twice a day in both eyes,
`and 500 mg of oral acetazolamide twice a
`day. Visual acuity was 20/25 in both eyes.
`The IOP determined by Goldmann appla¬
`nation tonometer was 20 mm Hg in both
`eyes. She had irregular posterior syne¬
`chiae, early posterior subcapsular cata¬
`racts, mild cell and flare in the anterior
`chamber, and some cells in the vitreous.
`Scattered peripheral anterior synechiae
`were seen gonioscopically in the nitration
`angles. The optic discs showed early glau¬
`comatous cupping, but no rim loss was
`noted. There was no evidence of periphlebi¬
`tis. Visual fields showed a shallow paracen-
`tral defect superiorly in the right eye. The
`visual field of the left eve was full.
`
`Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by david klann on 06/09/2021
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1037, p. 1 of 4
`New World Medical, Inc. v. MicroSurgical Tech., Inc., IPR2020-01573
`
`

`

`Right Eye
`Left Eye
`
`.
`

`
`Trabeculodialysis
`
`'-''
`
`r_~-,' Trabeculectomy and'*
`Cataract Extraction
`(Right Eye)
`
`1974
`
`Feb 1975
`
`Jan 1976
`
`Nov 1976
`
`Dec 7,1976
`
`Dec 13,1976
`
`Dec 20, 1976
`
`Jan 6,1977
`
`50
`
`40
`
`-
`
`-
`
`1%A,
`
`l%Pa
`
`4%R 1%E, l%Pa
`
`Right Eye
`-Left Eye-
`
`4%R 1%E. l%Pa
`4%R 1%E,
`l%Pa
`
`^ .-·-*7 7 - —-^^*> None.
`/v0„-^is-
`^ 4%P, 1%E-^ 4%P —^
`1%
`
`March 7,1977 March 28.1977 May 1977
`Nov 1978
`Jan 17,1977 Jan 24,1977
`Dec 1977
`Feb 1977
`Fig 1 .—Clinical course of patient. Distance between adjacent points is not
`time elapsed. = pilocarpine once a day; 1% , 1%
`to actual
`proportional
`pilocarpine four times a day; 4% P, 4% pilocarpine four times a day; 1% E, 1%
`epinephrylborate twice a day; Ac, 500 mg of acetazolamide twice a day; 1 % A, 1 %
`atropine twice a day; 1 % Pa, 1 % prednisolone acetate four times a day; and None,
`no medication.
`
`trabeculectomy specimen from area of
`Fig 2.—Phase contrast photomicrograph of
`filtration angle incised by trabeculodialysis one month previously. Trabecular meshwork
`(TM) has been disrupted and shows no signs of healing. Schlemm's canal (SC) is bared
`to anterior chamber (paraphenylenediamine, 275).
`
`Over the next year and a half, she contin¬
`ued to suffer from chronic uveitis with
`moderate cell and flare in the anterior
`chamber of both eyes. The treatment for
`this consisted of 1% prednisolone four
`times a day, 1% atropine twice a day, 1%
`epinephrylborate twice a day (all topically
`applied to both eyes), and 500 mg of oral
`acetazolamide twice a day. By January
`1976, the IOP was 29 mm Hg in the right
`eye and 14 mm Hg in the left eye on this
`regimen. Visual acuity was
`treatment
`reduced to 20/70 in the right eye and
`20/200 in the left eye.
`By November 1976, the peripheral ante¬
`rior synechiae had become more extensive
`in both eyes, associated with IOPs consis¬
`tently above 40 mm Hg in the right eye and
`around 30 mm Hg in the left eye. Visual
`acuity had decreased to finger counting at
`30 cm in the right eye and finger counting
`at 240 cm in the left eye due to advanced
`cataracts. The discs were difficult to evalu¬
`ate but the right cup appeared to be enlarg¬
`ing.
`A trabeculodialysis procedure, stripping
`away the nasal trabecular sheets, was per¬
`formed through a temporal approach on
`the right eye on Dec 7, 1976.
`Postoperatively, because the acetazolam¬
`ide therapy was stopped, the IOP rose in
`the left eye to 48 mm Hg and corneal
`edema developed. One week following the
`surgery on the right eye, a trabeculodialy¬
`sis was performed on the left eye. Postop¬
`eratively,
`the patient was treated with
`intensive topical and oral prednisone and
`1% pilocarpine hydrochloride medication.
`The IOP rose in both eyes over the next
`two weeks, and the patient was restarted
`on a regimen of 500 mg of acetazolamide
`i% pilocarpine four times a
`twice a day,
`day, and 1% epinephrine twice a day in
`both eyes. The patient was scheduled for
`combined cataract extraction and trabecu¬
`lectomy in the right eye. However, on
`admission for surgery one month after the
`trabeculodialysis,
`the IOP was 17
`initial
`mm Hg in the right eye and 16 mm Hg in
`the left eye. There was no corneal edema
`present and, by gonioscopic examination, a
`trabecular cleft could be seen in the area of
`trabeculodialysis in both eyes. Because of
`the patient's need for better vision, a cata¬
`ract extraction was performed on the right
`eye (first eye to have trabeculodialysis).
`Since the future course of the IOP regula¬
`tion was uncertain, a trabeculectomy was
`combined with the cataract extraction.
`Care was taken to excise the trabeculecto¬
`my specimen from the nasal end of the
`cataract section so that the specimen would
`include the trabecular meshwork that had
`previously undergone trabeculodialysis.
`A bleb developed initially following tra¬
`beculectomy, but closed within six weeks.
`Associated with the closure of the bleb, the
`IOP rose to 30 mm Hg in the right eye, and
`1% pilocarpine therapy was restarted. This
`was increased to 4% pilocarpine and epi¬
`nephrine, and has since been gradually
`tapered. The right eye has a visual acuity
`of 20/20, moderate glaucomatous cupping,
`and an early visual field defect. The IOP
`has remained below 20 mm Hg since March
`
`Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by david klann on 06/09/2021
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1037, p. 2 of 4
`New World Medical, Inc. v. MicroSurgical Tech., Inc., IPR2020-01573
`
`

`

`Fig 3.—Electron micrograph montage. Same area as in Fig 2. Areas outlined indicate fields of view in Fig 4.
`
`Fig 4—Electron micrographs of areas indicated in Fig 3. (a), Trabecular meshwork anterior to goniotomy incision.
`Adjacent collagen (AC) cores (C) are collapsed and adherent, (b), Trabecular meshwork just posterior to goniotomy
`loss and fragmentation of endothelium (E), and absence of
`incision. Note disorganization of trabecular sheets (C),
`intertrabecular spaces, (c), Endothelial cells (E) lying in sulcus exposed to anterior chamber by goniotomy. Fresh
`lined (collector) channels (arrow), (d), Sclera posterior to goniotomy
`RBCs are present. RBC is entering endothelial
`incision. Note loosely packed collagen (C) with interspersed endothelial cells (E) ( 3,300).
`
`Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by david klann on 06/09/2021
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1037, p. 3 of 4
`New World Medical, Inc. v. MicroSurgical Tech., Inc., IPR2020-01573
`
`

`

`1977 and is kept steady with a regimen of
`4% pilocarpine taken at night.
`The left eye's medication has gradually
`been tapered, and since May 1977 the eye
`has required no further medication. The
`left eye has had no further surgery (only
`the single trabeculodialysis), and continues
`to have IOP between 12 and 15 mm Hg
`with no medication required. Since the left
`eye has only had a trabeculodialysis, no
`possibility of external filtration exists, and
`the lowering of pressure can only be
`ascribed to this procedure. Although the
`situation in the right eye is more compli¬
`cated, due to the subsequent trabeculecto¬
`my operation, the IOP was normal at the
`time the histologie specimen was obtained
`and at that time no possibility of external
`filtration existed for the right eye either.
`HISTOPATHOLOGY
`OF SPECIMEN
`Light microscopic examination of
`the surgical specimen (Fig 2) showed
`superficial,
`nonhealed
`incision
`a
`through scarred trabecular meshwork
`into the area of Schlemm's canal. Elec¬
`tron microscopic examination (Fig 3)
`showed disruption in the scarred, col¬
`lapsed trabecular meshwork.
`In the trabecular meshwork anteri¬
`or to the incision (Fig 4, a), adjacent
`collagen cores were cemented togeth¬
`er with loss of endothelial covering
`and absence of intertrabecular spaces.
`The posteriorly hinged flap of trabec¬
`ular meshwork created by the trabec¬
`ulodialysis incision shows the same
`collapsed structure (Fig 4, b).
`In the cleft created surgically, endo¬
`lined channels communicate
`thelial
`with the anterior chamber (Fig 4, c).
`These may represent either preexist¬
`ing collector channels or newly formed
`
`the col¬
`aqueous channels. However,
`lagen that
`lies at
`the base of
`the
`incision is loosely packed and disor¬
`ganized with bands of endothelial cells
`interspersed (Fig 4, d). This may
`reflect a change in the collagen pro¬
`duced by exposure to aqueous humor,
`filtering
`as occurs in the lining of
`blebs.4
`
`COMMENT
`In his original study, Haas4 pointed
`that goniotomy is presumed to
`out
`work by reducing the resistance to
`outflow of
`through the
`aqueous
`trabecular meshwork, but
`that
`the
`mechanism by which this occurs had
`not yet been established. The opening
`produced by goniotomy or trabeculo-
`tomy in nonglaucomatous experimen¬
`tal animals (such as the rhesus mon¬
`key) scars within one month after
`surgery.4" Tears in the trabecular
`meshwork in rhesus monkeys also scar
`soon after injury.7 In contrast,
`the
`human eye with glaucoma seems to
`have a different healing tendency, as
`shown by the histologie specimen in
`this case. One possible explanation is
`that in a glaucomatous eye there is a
`generalized
`increased
`trabecular
`resistance, and when the resistance to
`flow is reduced over a small area (eg,
`with goniotomy), the aqueous humor
`is routed through this area, keeping
`the surgical site open. However, in an
`eye with normal outflow facility (such
`as the normal eye of an experimental
`animal),
`there is a continued flow
`through the nonincised trabecular
`the injured area
`meshwork, and
`undergoes healing and scarring.
`
`References
`
`Our observations in this case sug¬
`gest that in glaucomatous eyes with
`filtration channels
`functional outer
`(Schlemm's canal and the outer collec¬
`tor channels), satisfactory control of
`IOP may be achieved through the
`normal drainage pathways by estab¬
`lishing a patent communication be¬
`tween the outer channels and the
`anterior chamber, provided this com¬
`munication remains open.
`This is consistent with the clinical
`experience that goniotomies work
`well in early cases of infantile glauco¬
`ma,48 and in inflammatory glauco¬
`ma.12 On rare occasions, goniotomy
`has been applied successfully to corti¬
`costeroid-induced glaucoma." All three
`types of glaucoma have in common the
`relatively short duration of elevated
`pressure prior to surgery. In contrast,
`goniotomy is less successful late in the
`course of infantile glaucoma,3-8 or in
`chronic
`in
`open-angle
`glaucoma
`adults.10 Perhaps the poor results of
`goniotomy in these two instances are
`due to secondary changes that have
`occurred in Schlemm's canal, the col¬
`lector channels, or both, due to the
`long interval of elevated pressure
`prior
`to surgical
`intervention. An
`alternate, but more unlikely, explana¬
`tion is that chronic open-angle glauco¬
`ma and late infantile glaucoma are
`due to a primary malfunction of
`Schlemm's canal or the collector chan¬
`nels.
`
`This investigation was supported in part by
`Public Health Service research grant EY-00031
`from the National Eye Institute.
`
`1. Haas J: Goniotomy in aphakia, in Welsh R
`(ed): The Second Report on Cataract Surgery.
`Miami, Miami Educational Press, 1971, pp 551\x=req-\
`554.
`2. Hoskins HD, Hetherington J Jr, Shaffer
`RN: Surgical management of the inflammatory
`glaucomas. Perspect Ophthalmol 1:173-181, 1977.
`3. Barkan 0: Present status of goniotomy. Am
`J Ophthalmol 36:445-453, 1953.
`4. Teng CC, Chi HH, Katzin HM: Histology
`filtering operations. Am J
`and mechanism of
`Ophthalmol 47:16-34, 1959.
`5. Dannheim R, van der Zypen E: Klinische,
`
`funktionelle, und elektronenmikroskopische Un-
`tersuchungen ueber die Regenerationsfaehigkeit
`der Kammerwinkelregion des Primatenauges
`nach Trabekulotomie. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch
`Klin Exp Ophthalmol 184:222-247, 1972.
`6. Dannheim R, Barany EM: The effect of
`trabeculotomy in normal eyes of
`rhesus and
`cynomolgus monkeys studied by anterior cham-
`ber perfusion. Doc Ophthalmol 26:90-107, 1969.
`7. Herschler J: Trabecular damage due to blunt
`anterior segment injury and its relationship to
`traumatic glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthal-
`mol Otolaryngol 83:239-248, 1977.
`
`8. Chandler PA, Grant WM: Lectures on Glau-
`coma. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1965, pp
`325-326, 330.
`Intraocular hypertension in-
`9. Herschler J:
`duced by repository corticosteroids. Am J Oph-
`thalmol 82:90-93, 1976.
`10. Richardson KT: Surgical control of chronic
`open angle glaucoma, in Symposium on Glauco-
`ma. Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of
`Ophthalmology. St Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1975, pp
`275-281.
`
`Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ by david klann on 06/09/2021
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1037, p. 4 of 4
`New World Medical, Inc. v. MicroSurgical Tech., Inc., IPR2020-01573
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket