`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0001
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`Ex.1046, p. 2 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0002
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`Ex.1046, p. 4 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0003
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`Ex.1046, p. 9 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0004
`
`
`
`Dr. Netland’s Testing Provides Further
`Confirmation
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex.1030, ¶¶17‐26; Ex.1031‐1033; see
`IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 13‐14; IPR2020‐
`01711, Paper 27, 11‐13; IPR2021‐00017,
`Paper 26, 12‐14; IPR2021‐00065, Paper 24,
`12‐14; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 14‐16.
`
`10
`
`Ex.1046, p. 10 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0005
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`Ex.1046, p. 11 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0006
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`Ex.1046, p. 12 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0007
`
`
`
`…But Dr. Condon Testified He Did Not Read or
`Understand the Patents
`• Dr. Condon merely “flipped through”
`the ‘729 patent
`• Ex.1041, 176:2‐4
`• Dr. Condon “didn’t drill down into []
`the requirements of the ‘729 patent”
`• Ex.1041, 214:13‐15
`• Dr. Condon “would not be
`comfortable telling [NWM’s counsel]
`what [is] required” in the patents at
`issue
`• Ex.1041, 214:21‐22
`
`• Dr. Condon testified he had “not seen
`this before” when given the Notice of
`Allowance from the ‘729 patent file
`history
`• Ex. 1042, 239:11‐20
`• Dr. Condon testified regarding the
`‘905 patent: “I don’t remember
`reading the whole thing”
`• Ex.1042, 266:3‐7
`• Dr. Condon “didn’t analyze [the ‘155
`patent] other than to look at … the
`claim language.”
`• Ex.1042, 281:18‐282:1
`
`IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 2‐3; IPR2020‐01711, Paper 27, 2‐3;
`IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 2‐4; IPR2021‐00065, Paper 24, 2‐4;
`IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 2‐4.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`Ex.1046, p. 14 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0008
`
`
`
`…And Dr. Condon Testified He Does Not
`Understand Patent Claims
`• Dr. Condon testified he
`cannot tell the difference
`between a device or
`method claim
`• Ex.1042, 276:8‐12
`• Dr. Condon testified “I don’t even
`know if I’m capable of dissecting
`that exact piece of information
`out of the claim” when asked if
`claims require certain elements
`• Ex.1042, 257:4‐9
`IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 2‐3; IPR2020‐01711, Paper 27, 2‐3; IPR2021‐00017,
`Paper 26, 2‐4; IPR2021‐00065, Paper 24, 2‐4; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 2‐4.
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`Ex.1046, p. 15 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0009
`
`
`
`…And Dr. Condon Testified He Does Not
`Understand Anticipation or Obviousness
`• Dr. Condon testified he
`“would have to say no” and
`“couldn’t explain it” when
`asked if he has an
`understanding of obviousness
`• Ex.1042, 257:10‐14
`• Dr. Condon testified “it’s not
`crystal clear to me” when
`asked if he has an
`understanding of anticipation
`• Ex.1041, 178:10
`
`IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 2‐3; IPR2020‐01711, Paper 27, 2‐3; IPR2021‐00017,
`Paper 26, 2‐4; IPR2021‐00065, Paper 24, 2‐4; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 2‐4.
`
`IPR2020‐01573 Ex.2019, ¶267 (see Paper 29, 12; Paper 35, 2; Paper 52, 10‐11) see also IPR2020‐01711, Ex.2019, ¶245 (see Paper 17, 13;
`Paper 27, 2; Paper 39, 10‐12); IPR2021‐00017, Ex.2019, ¶191 (see Paper 17, 10; Paper 26, 2; Paper 38, 10‐12); IPR2021‐00065, Ex.2019,
`¶135 (see Paper 18, 10; Paper 24, 2; Paper 41, 10‐11); IPR2021‐00066, Ex.2019, ¶224 (see Paper 17, 12; Paper 25, 2; Paper 39, 10‐11).
`.
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`Ex.1046, p. 16 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0010
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence v. Patent Owner’s Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`Ex.1046, p. 18 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0011
`
`
`
`Quintana Discloses Creating a “Strip” of TM (‘729,
`cl.1 / ’155, cl.1 / ’885, cl.1 / ’905, cl.1)
`
`• Quintana (Ex.1004) discloses:
`• improvement on prior techniques that failed due to reclosure/scarring of
`incision
`• “achiev[ing] a section” of TM
`• “stripping” TM
`• “remaining cells can enlarge”
`• Dr. Netland confirms Quintana creates/removes “strips” of TM
`(Ex.1003)
`• Dr. Netland’s additional testing confirms Quintana discloses “strips” of
`TM (Ex.1030)
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`Ex.1046, p. 28 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0012
`
`
`
`Spencer and Becker Show Incising TM Does
`Not Work
`
`Becker (Ex.1035)
`
`Ex.1035, 2; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 8‐9; IPR2020‐01711,
`Paper 27, 7‐8; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 8; IPR2021‐00065, Paper
`24, 8; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 11.
`
`Spencer (Ex.1036)
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex.1036, 5‐6; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 8‐9;
`IPR2020‐01711, Paper 27, 7‐8; IPR2021‐00017, Paper
`26, 8; IPR2021‐00065, Paper 24, 8; IPR2021‐00066,
`Paper 25, 11.
`
`30
`
`Ex.1046, p. 30 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0013
`
`
`
`Dr. Condon Did Not Review Becker or Spencer
`
`IPR2020‐01573, Ex.1041, 91:9‐11, 132:20‐22; IPR2020‐01711, Ex.1041, 91:9‐
`11, 132:20‐22; IPR2021‐00017, Ex.1041, 91:9‐11, 132:20‐22; IPR2021‐00065,
`Ex.1041, 91:9‐11, 132:20‐22; IPR2021‐00066, Ex.1041, 91:9‐11, 132:20‐22.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`Ex.1046, p. 31 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0014
`
`
`
`Dr. Netland’s Testing Confirms Quintana Obtained
`“Strips” of TM
`
`Ex.1030, ¶17‐26; Ex.1031‐1033; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 13‐14; IPR2020‐
`01711, Paper 27, 11‐13; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 12‐14; IPR2021‐00065, Paper
`24, 12‐14; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 14‐16.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`Ex.1046, p. 35 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0015
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Reimagines Quintana
`
`• Dr. Condon admits Quintana’s procedure could leave TM on needle
`tip thereby admitting removal of TM
`• Patent Owner wrongly equates Quintana’s use of terms “section” and
`“stripping” with “incising” or “opening”
`• Quintana’s “key concern” was improving on prior techniques that
`failed due to reclosure of incision (and Patent Owner ignores Spencer
`and Becker)
`
`IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 13.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`Ex.1046, p. 36 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0016
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Offers No Definition of “Stripping”
`Because It Means “Removing”
`
`Ex.1037, 2; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 11; IPR2020‐01711,
`Paper 27, 10; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 10‐11; IPR2021‐00065,
`Paper 24, 10‐11; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 13.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`Ex.1038, 1; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 11; IPR2020‐01711,
`Paper 27, 10; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 10‐11; IPR2021‐00065,
`Paper 24, 10‐11; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 13.
`42
`
`Ex.1046, p. 42 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0017
`
`
`
`Dr. Condon’s Testimony and Annotated Figure
`Demonstrate Quintana’s Needle Has Two Cutting
`Parts and Thus Meets the Board’s Constructions
`
`Ex.1043, 192; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 17‐18; IPR2020‐
`01711, Paper 27, 15; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 16; IPR2021‐
`00065, Paper 24, 16‐17; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 18.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`Ex.1046, p. 50 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0018
`
`
`
`Dr. Condon’s Testimony and Annotated Figure
`Demonstrate Quintana’s Needle Has Two Cutting
`Parts and Thus Meets the Board’s Constructions
`• “dual blade device”
`• “dual refers to two, and
`blade in context, refers to a
`cutting part”(IPR2020‐01573, Paper
`22, 17)
`• “knife blades”
`• “knife refers to a cutting
`instrument, and blades, in
`context, refers to plural
`cutting parts”(IPR2020‐00065,
`Paper 11, 16)
`
`Ex.1043, 192; see IPR2020‐01573, Paper 35, 17‐18; IPR2020‐
`01711, Paper 27, 15; IPR2021‐00017, Paper 26, 16; IPR2021‐
`00065, Paper 24, 16‐17; IPR2021‐00066, Paper 25, 18.
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`51
`
`Ex.1046, p. 51 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0019
`
`
`
`Dr. Condon Testifies Patent Provides No Indication
`How to Measure Bluntness or Sharpness
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`70
`
`IPR2020-01711, Ex.1042, 281:5-282:9 (see Paper 27, 20 n.9).
`
`Ex.1046, p. 70 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0020
`
`
`
`Petitioner Has Shown By Preponderance of the
`Evidence That the Challenged Claims of the ‘729,
`‘155, ‘885, 905, and ‘544 Patents Are Unpatentable
`
`Petitioner’s Evidence
`• Quintana
`• Jacobi
`• Dr. Netland
`• Testing
`
`Patent Owner’s Evidence
`• Quintana’s Affidavit
`
`• Dr. Condon
`
`Petitioner New World Medical, Inc., IPR Nos. 2020‐01573,
`2020‐01711, 2021‐00017, 2021‐00065, 2021‐00066
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`92
`
`Ex.1046, p. 92 of 98
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2035-0021
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
