throbber
KDB Competitive
`
`Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0001
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Agenda
`Combating the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome MST}
`
`Company Overview
`
`Product Overview
`
`Rei mbursement Landscape
`
`Messaging
`
`Resources
`
`- Medical Affairs {Internal FYI- Data Review}
`
`- Medical Education {Internal Use &Customer Facing}
`
`-Marketing {Sales to Customer Facing}
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0002
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`MST �Microsurgical Technology)
`Combating the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome MST}
`
`i
`
`T:_
`
`At a glance...
`
`• Portfolio caters to Cataract surgeons &
`procedures that require additional
`technologies (loose zonules, floppy iris,
`Micro instruments}
`
`• Likely to leverage cataract surgeon
`relationships
`
`• May add sleeve to Goniotome to help
`maintain anterior chamber during
`procedure.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0003
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Trabectome
`Combating the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome MST}
`
`TRABECTO ME
`
`micro-surgical monogement of oduit & infontrle gioucomo
`
`Conversation points
`
`• Ramp to do it right
`• Trabectome/Goniotome DO NOT have a ramp to lift ,
`stretch, and precisely excise the TM.
`
`• Intuitive technology
`• No additional staff or capital equipment investment
`needed to utilize the Kahook Dual Blade
`
`• Trabectome leaves behind bigger leaflets and runs the risk of
`the remaining leaflets to fibrose'. In addition, Trabectome is
`also a cumbersome technology because it requires
`attachment to capital equipment, which takes additional
`time for proper set-up.
`
`IRi$atiDn port
`
`aore��
`
`tootp�ate
`
`'� Aspiration port
`Return electrode
`Active electrodB
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0004
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Goniotome Overview
`Co mbating the co mpetition: Trabectome/Gonioto me MST}
`
`Width of footplate
`Width of each
`blade2
`
`Kahook Dual Blade
`230 microns
`12.7 microns
`
`Goniotome*
`345 microns (1.5X larger)
`47.5 microns (3.7X larger}
`
`• Goniotome has serrated blades which are 3.4X larger
`than the dual blades for KDB which is designed specifically
`for precise excision of trabecular meshwork. Goniotome blades
`can result in imprecise cuts, as the blades cross the TM upon
`insertion into the canal and so the cutting happens before any
`lifting and stretching of the TM.
`
`• Trabectome leaves behind bigger leaflets and runs the
`risk of the remaining leaflets to fibrose' . In addition ,
`Trabectome is also a cumbersome technology because it
`requires attachment to capital equipment, which takes
`additional time for proper set-up.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0005
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`Kahook Dual Blade*
`
`47.5
`
`Goniotome*
`
`

`

`Goniotome
`Combatinc the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`�*�•
`Conversation points 4� ���
`
`• The Irrigation/Aspiration {I/A) feature may cause AC instability,
`iris billowing, and may not open the angle to a degree that
`makes visualization adequate.
`
`• Goniotome has serrated blades which are 3.4X larger than the
`dual blades for KDB which is designed specifically for precise
`excision of trabecular meshwork. Goniotome blades can
`result in imprecise cuts, as the blades cross the TM upon
`insertion into the canal and so the cutting happens before
`any lifting and stretching of the TM.
`
`• Goniotome + I/A is also a cumbersome technology because it
`requires attachment to capital equipment, which takes
`additional time for proper set-up.
`
`• Trabectome/Goniotome DO NOT have a ramp to lift ,stretch,
`and cleanly excise the TM.
`
`GONtOTOME +l/A
`
`Goniotome with Irrigation & Aspiration as well as serrated dual blade cleanly excise
`TrafJeCular Meshwork (TM) and aspirates TM, while maintaining a clear anterior chamber
`with its Irrigation and Aspiration, creating ideal angle visualization during surgery.
`
`a Handpfece w/ indicat es
`6 Aspvoilon Connector
`c Mgatlon Connector
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0006
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Product Comparison
`Combatinc the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome {MST} Supportive Comparative info
`
`Trabectome/ Goniotome Class 2 Device
`
`• Ramp to do it right :The ramp elevates and places
`the TM on stretch prior to a clean excision of
`diseased tissue.
`
`• Broad treatment opportunity : Excisional goniotomy
`with KDB can be performed as a stand-alone
`procedure or during cataract procedures. At a
`lower price point and established code for
`goniotomy.
`
`• Intuitive technology: KDB does not require
`additional capital equipment or staff to operate.
`
`• Trabectome &Goniotome DO NOT have a ramp to
`lift or stretch the TM
`
`• Goniotome &Trabectome + IA requires additional
`staff to operate capital equipment.
`
`• Capital equipment &support may be a barrier to
`adoption of the technology.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0007
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Reimbursement Landscape
`Combating the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`.
`�
`�' b �= �,
`
`• Established code 65820
`
`• Excisional goniotomy
`
`• Surgeon allowable � $769
`• ASC Allowable $1,772
`• Hospital allowable -$3610
`
`• Single use Manually Operated Instrument
`
`Trabectome/ Goniotome Class 2 Device
`
`• Utilizes 65820 cpt code
`
`• Goniotomy (Goniotome) w/o a ramp
`
`• Surgeon allowable � $769
`• ASC Allowable $1,772
`• Hospital allowable $3610
`
`• Single use Manually Operated Instrument (w/o IA)
`• Single Use Equipment assisted instrument (w/ IA)
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0008
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Messaging
`Combatinc the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`Trabectome/ Goniotome Class 2 Device
`
`• The Irrigation/Aspiration (I/A) feature may cause AC instability, iris billowing,
`and may not open the angle to a degree that makes visualization
`adequate.
`
`• Goniotome has serrated blades which are 3.4X larger than the dual blades
`for KDB which is designed specifically for precise excision of trabecular
`meshwork. Goniotome blades can result in imprecise cuts, as the blades
`cross the TM upon insertion into the canal and so the cutting happens
`before any lifting and stretching of the TM.
`
`• Trabectome leaves behind bigger leaflets and runs the risk of the remaining
`leaflets to fibrose'. In addition, Trabectome is also a cumbersome
`technology because it requires attachment to capital equipment, which
`takes additional time for proper set-up.
`
`• Trabectome/Goniotome DO NIOT have a ramp to lift ,stretch, and cleanly
`excise the TM.
`
`'Goniotome is a trademark of Neomedix Corporation
`
`1.
`2.
`
`Seibold LK et al. Preclinical Investigation of Ab Interno Trabeculectomy Using a Novel Dual Blade Device. Am J Ophthalmol 2013.
`
`
`Data on file. New World Medical.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0009
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`Objections &Barrier Handling
`Combatinc the competition: Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`Objection
`
`Response
`
`Closing reminders
`
`"I love the serrated blades of the Goniotome"
`
`" KDB doesn't have I/A Functionality"
`
`Kahook Dual blade is designed with excisional
`goniotomy in mind. the ramp lifts and stretches
`the TM allowing the dual blades to precisely
`excise the diseased tissue.
`
`Kahook dual blade does not require additional
`materials to perform a precise excisional
`goniotomy.
`
`The Kahook Dual Blade is designed to fit into
`Schlemm's canal and precisely excise
`diseased TM. Goniotome is larger.
`
`Kahook dual blade does not require
`additional costs of materials such as BSS,
`tubing or capital equipment. It also does not
`burden your OR staff with additional duties to
`complete the goniotomy procedure
`
`• I/A will require additional tubing and supplies;
`Kahook dual blade is designed to maneuver
`in the eye with no additional materials
`needed.
`
`"Goniotome excises the TM just like KDB"
`
`Kahook dual blade uses a ramp which lifts
`and stretches the TM allowing the dual blades
`to precisely excise diseased TM.
`
`You need the ramp to do it right. Placing the TM
`on stretch allows for a clean excision and helps
`prevent leaflets that can potentially scar over
`time.
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 2005-0010
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

`

`D i s c u s si o n
`
`Trabectome/Goniotome {MST}
`
`Patent Owner Ex. 200 x0011
`NE W WORLD MEDICAL
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket