throbber
European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 12 no. 5, 2002 / pp. 401-405
`
`Ab-interno trabeculo-canalectomy: surgical
`approach and histological examination
`
`E. FERRARI1, F. BANDELLO1, F. ORTOLA NI2, L. PETRELLI2, M. MARCHINI2, D. PONZIN3
`
`1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Udine
`2 Department of Medical and Morphological Research, University of Udine
`3 Veneto Eye Bank Foundation, Venezia-Mestre - Italy
`
`PURPOSE. To evaluate, on eye bank eyes, a new surgical approach aimed at removing a quadrant of
`the trabecular meshwork (TM), with an ab interno approach.
`METHODS. Gonioscopically controlled ab interno removal of the TM was done with a sub-
`retinal forcep on six human bank eyes. Serial histological sections were obtained from the
`treated and untreated part of each globe to assess the effect of the technique on intraoc-
`ular tissues.
`RESULTS. Under the gonioscope, the TM was easily removed in strings of varying length.
`Histological examination showed, unexpectedly, that this resulted in a well-defined deep
`furrow in the middle of the trabecular region involving both the TM and the inner wall of
`Schlemm’s canal. The operation created a direct communication between the anterior cham-
`ber and Schlemm ’s canal lumen without any evident damage to the outer canal wall and
`adjacent ocular structures such as the iris base and corneal endothelium.
`CONCLUSIONS. Our small series on human bank eyes showed that the procedure involves
`both the TM and the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal and is therefore called ab interno tra-
`beculocanalectomy (AITC). The intraoperative findings and the histological evidence are
`encouraging, and suggest that the procecedure could have potential clinical application.
`(Eur J Ophthalmol 2002; 12: 401-5)
`KEY WORDS. Ab-interno trabecular surgery, Irido-corneal angle surgery, Glaucoma surgery
`Accepted: October 16, 2001
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Trabecular meshwork surgery aims to increase the
`outflow of aqueous humor through its normal pathway
`and lower intraocular pressure (IOP) (1-3). The basis
`of
`this approach
`is
`to relieve
`the resistance
`to
`aqueous humor outflow within the TM, in juxtacana-
`licular tissue and the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal (4-
`7). Many surgical and laser techniques have been
`
`proposed to boost aqueous humor outflow through
`the anterior chamber angle (1-3, 8-13). However, the
`choice remains controversial because of the lack of
`convincing evidence of the superiority of any one ap-
`proach over the others. Theoretically, a therapeutic
`option that removes the resistance to aqueous out-
`flow as far as possible, without damaging the outer
`outflow pathways and the surrounding ocular struc-
`tures, such as the base of the iris and the corneal en-
`
`© Wichtig Editore, 2002
`
`1120-6721/401-06$03.00/0
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1018, p. 1 of 5
`
`

`

`Ab-in terno trabeculo-canalectomy: surgical approach and histological examination
`
`dothelium, offers better chances of success.
`The present study was designed to evaluate, on eye
`bank eyes, the histological effect of a new surgical
`technique designed to remove TM mechanically. This
`procedure, uses a peeling-like approach, to remove
`the TM rather than cutting, disrupting or scraping the
`trabeculum as already described (1-3, 13).
`
`METHODS
`
`The procedures were carried out on six human eye
`bank eyes unsuitable for keratoplasty (cadaver time
`less than 24 hours). Surgery was done under direct
`observation of the anterior chamber angle with an
`operating microscope and a surgical gonioprism. After
`an 8.5 mm
`trephination
`the central cornea was
`removed as during a conventional keratoplasty; the
`anterior chamber was filled with viscoelastics and the
`globe was tilted so as to be able to observe the
`anterior chamber angle structures. The central cornea
`was removed because of its poor transparency; the
`goniopri-sm was necessary to properly visualize the
`fine details of the anterior chamber angle. A subretinal
`vi-trectomy forceps (Thomas horizontal subretinal for-
`ceps, Synergetics Inc. MO, USA) was introduced into
`the anterior chamber through a limbal paracente-sis
`and directed towards the irido-corneal angle. The
`trabecular membrane was then pinched and removed
`with a peeling-like approach. The goal of the operation
`was to remove one quadrant of TM (three clock
`hours). The part of the globe subjected to the proce-
`dure was marked so as to be able to recognize the
`treated area afterwards. Great care was taken while
`removing the trabecular membrane to avoid damaging
`adjacent ocular structures such as the base of the iris
`or corneal endothelium. At the end of the surgery the
`viscoelastics was
`removed with an automated
`irrigation-aspiration unit.
`
`Histology
`
`All the samples were (a) fixed with 2.5% formaldehy-
`de + 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer,
`pH 7.4, for 24h at room temperature; (b) dehydrated
`in graded ethanols and (c) embedded in paraffin. Pa-
`raffin blocks were embedded and mounted in such a
`way that microtome cuts were made along meridio-
`
`nal planes. Serial 5 µm thick sections were stained
`with hematoxylin and eosin. Serial sections were ob-
`tained from the treated and the untreated parts of ea-
`ch globe. Samples excised from untreated areas ser-
`ved as controls.
`
`RESULTS
`
`During the procedures the TM was apparently removed
`in strings longer than one clock hour (1-3 hours) in four
`eye globes. In two eyes the membrane was friable,
`resulting
`in strings shorter
`than one clock hour.
`Gonioscopically a membrane that apparently corre-
`sponded to the TM was easily pinched and removed
`from all the eyes. During the procedures no damage
`was detected to the structures adjacent to the TM such
`as the corneal endothelium and the iris base. The
`gonioscopically detectable effect of treatment at the
`end of the surgery was an apparent TM depigmenta-
`tion in the treated area and some trabecular debris
`floating in the viscoelastics in the angular recess. On
`histological section of the control specimens, all the
`structures of the anterior chamber angle were fairly
`well preserved (Fig. 1). The TM appeared to be formed
`of intact thin sheets and the walls of Schlemm’s canal
`were well-preserved. As usual for samples that had
`undergone standard processing for light microscopy,
`topical deformations or even sporadic detachments of
`the endothelium lining the canal walls were observed.
`Another minor artifact was some degree of corneal
`and/or scleral swelling due to slight separation of the
`collagen lamellae. The iris structure was intact but it
`lost its linear course causing a different angular width
`of the recess.
`In histological sections corresponding to the regions
`subjected to peeling, tissue conditions were similar to
`the control specimens, except
`for
`the
`trabecular
`region. Here, in the middle portion of the trabeculum,
`there was a full-thickness lack of trabeculum involving
`both the trabecular meshwork and the inner wall of
`Schlemm’s canal (Fig. 2). This deep cleft caused an
`evident opening of the lumen of Schlemm’s canal into
`the anterior chamber. However, the remaining canal
`wall was intact and was lined by an undamaged
`endothelium (Fig. 2). These histological findings were
`evident for the whole of the trabeculum that had
`undergone the “procedure”. In addition, the sizes of
`
`4 0 2
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1018, p. 2 of 5
`
`

`

`Ferrari et al
`
`Fig. 1 - Histological section of human irido-corneal angle (con-
`trol sample). All the anterior chamber angle structures are fairly
`well preserved: the trabecular meshwork is formed of intact thin
`sheets and Schlemm ’s canal (asterisk) has well-preserved
`walls. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin (x 170).
`
`the clefts were comparable to those of the membra-
`nes removed. Extremely fine trabecular debris was
`detectable along the peeled area but none of the spe-
`cimens contained any flaps of uveal tissue capable of
`returning to its pre-treatment position.
`This histological evidence indicated that the proce-
`dure resulted in the removal of both the TM and Sch-
`lemm’s canal inner wall. It was therefore called ab-
`interno trabeculocanalectomy (AITC). Like in the con-
`trol specimens, there were artifacts such as corneal-
`scleral swelling or different width of the angular re-
`cess.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Ab-interno trabecular surgery comprises many diffe-
`rent procedures with the same purpose: to improve
`aqueous outflow through conventional pathways. The
`rationale for these approaches is to remove the resi-
`stance to outflow within the TM, in juxtacanalicular
`tissue and in the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal (4-7,
`14). Experimental studies have shown that incising
`the TM and Schlemm’s canal can increase outflow
`(15, 16). Clinical studies confirmed that trabecular in-
`cision or trabecular scraping can reduce intraocular
`
`Fig. 2 - Histological section corresponding
`the region
`to
`subjected to AITC. A full thickness trabecular lack involving both
`the tra becular meshwork and the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal
`is evi dent. This creates a direct communication between the
`lumen of the canal (asterisk) and the anterior chamber (curved
`arrows). The outer wall of the canal (double arrows) is intact and
`is
`lined with an undamaged endothelium. Staining with
`hematoxylin and eosin (x 170).
`
`pressure (1-3, 12, 13).
`Microsurgical dissection of the TM was first described
`by Tailor (17) and De Vincentiis (18). The procedure
`has been modified over the years (1-3, 8) and is now
`attracting renewed interest among ophthalmologists
`for the treatment of juvenile glaucoma (19, 20) and for
`chronic open angle glaucoma (12, 21-23). New
`surgical and laser approaches such as goniocuretta-
`ge (13), goniopuncture (24), Erbium:YAG (10) or ex-
`cimer laser trabecular ablation (11) have been pro-
`posed to reduce IOP in glaucomas. This search for
`novel approaches is seeking a technique that can re-
`store a physiological route of aqueous outflow without
`the complications of filtering surgery.
`To date there is no convincing evidence of the supe-
`riority of any one trabecular approach over the other.
`The creation of small holes with the goniopuncture
`approach or the disruption of the TM with the trabe-
`culotomy technique removes little tissue and may be
`followed by filling and scarring with subsequent clo-
`sure of the trabecular opening (9, 25, 26).
`AITC is a new experimental surgical procedure devi-
`sed to mechanically remove the TM, with the func-
`tional purpose of opening an exit route for aqueous
`humor into Schlemm’s canal and out through the nor-
`mal pathway. Histological examination showed that
`
`4 0 3
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1018, p. 3 of 5
`
`

`

`Ab-in terno trabeculo-canalectomy: surgical approach and histological examination
`
`our original idea of peeling away the TM alone ac-
`tually removed both the TM and the inner wall of
`Sch-lemm’s canal. This unexpected result might
`possibly achieve a better outflow than TM removal
`alone. Considering that the site of major resistance
`to
`the outflow of aqueous humor
`is at
`the
`juxtacanalicular portion of the TM and the inner wall
`of Schlemm’s canal and that often, during non-
`penetrating
`filtering
`surgery
`better
`aqueous
`percolation is achieved by peeling the inner wall of
`the canal (27, 28), we suggest that removal of both
`the TM and the inner wall of Sch-lemm’s canal would
`ensure better outflow than removal of the TM alone.
`However, with non-penetrating
`filtering surgery
`outflow can also be improved by an ab externo
`approach, leaving the TM intact (27-30).
`We found that the histological effects of AITC were
`different from with the classical goniotomy and tra-
`beculotomy procedures (25). These latter produce a
`deep incision in the trabecular tissue with close edges
`of the wound. The histological picture after AITC also
`differs
`from goniocurettage.
`In
`this procedure
`trabecular removal is associated with damage to the
`posterior wall of Schlemm’s canal and collector ves-
`sels (13).
`Although our histological findings on cadaver eyes
`are encouraging problems may be encountered in cli-
`nical application of AITC. The fine details of anterior
`chamber angle structures cannot be clearly visualized
`in every case: corneal opacities, corneal edema
`
`or the presence of blood in the anterior chamber may
`render gonioscopic observation inadequate.
`Like other ab-interno procedures, other pre-requisites
`for AICT are a stable anterior chamber and wide irido-
`corneal angle. Although viscoelastics can be used to
`stabilize the anterior chamber, sufficient widening of
`the irido-corneal angle cannot be achieved in every
`case. Predictable risks with AITC are: lens or corneal
`endothelium contacts, bleeding from the trabecular
`vessels and/or from Schlemm’s canal, early intrao-
`cular pressure rise due to retention of viscoelastics,
`iris root damage, inadvertent cyclodialysis, bulbar hy-
`potony.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`The authors thank the Veneto Eye Bank Foundation for their
`kind co-operation.
`Supported by funds from the Department of Surgical Sciences,
`University of Udine.
`
`Reprint requests to:
`Ettore Ferrari, MD
`Department of Ophthalmology
`University of Udine
`Viale Venezia 410
`33100 Udine
`ettore.ferrari@dsc.uniud.it
`
`REFERENCES
`
`for chronic glaucoma.
`1. Barkan O. A new operation
`function by opening
`Restoration of physiological
`Schlemm’s canal under direct magnified vision. Am J
`Ophthalmol 1936; 19: 951-66.
`2. Burian HM. A case of Marfan’s syndrome with bilater-
`al glaucoma. A description of a new type of operation
`for developmental glaucoma (trabeculotomy ab exter-
`no). Am J Ophthalmol 1960, 50: 1187-95.
`3. Smith R. A new technique for opening the canal of Schlemm.
`Preliminary report. Br J Ophthalmol 1960; 44: 370-5.
`4. Nesterov AP, Batmanov YrE. Study on morphology and
`function of drainage area of the eye of a man. Acta
`Ophthalmol 1972; 50: 337-41.
`5. Nesterov AP, Batmanov YE. Trabecular wall of Schlemm’s
`
`canal in the early stage of primary open-angle glaucoma.
`Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 639-47.
`0. Murphy CG, Johnson M, Alvarado JA. Juxtacanalicu-lar
`tissue in pigmentary and primary open angle glau-
`coma: the hydrodynamic role of pigment and other con-
`stituents. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1779-85.
`1. Lütjen-Drecoll E, Shimizu T, Rohrbach M, Rohen JW.
`Quantitative analysis of “plaque material” in the inner
`and outer wall of Sclemm’s canal in normal and glau-
`comatous eyes. Exp Eye Res 1986; 42: 443-455.
`2. Bietti GB, Quaranta CA. Indications for and results of
`iridocorneal
`angle
`incision.
`(Goniotomy,
`goniotra-
`beculotomy or trabeculectomy). Trans Ophthal Soc New
`Zeal 1968; 20 (suppl): S20-42.
`3. Melamed S, Pei J, Puliafito CA, Epstein DL. Q-switched
`neodymium:YAG laser trabeculopuncture in monkeys.
`
`4 0 4
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1018, p. 4 of 5
`
`

`

`Ferrari et al
`
`13.
`
`Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 129-33.
`10. Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Krieglstein GK. Erbium:YAG laser
`trabecular ablation (LTA) in the surgical treatment of
`glaucoma. Lasers Surg Med 1998; 23: 104-10.
`11. Vogel M, Lauritzen K, Quentin CD. Targeted ablation
`of the trabecular meshwork with excimer laser in
`primary open-angle glaucoma. Opthalmologe 1996;
`93: 5658.
`12. Quaranta L, Hitchings RA, Quaranta CA. Ab-interno go-
`niotrabeculotomy versus mitomycin C trabeculectomy for
`adult open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:
`1357-62.
`Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Krieglestein GK. Technique of
`goniocurettage: a potential
`treatment
`for advanced
`chronic open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;
`81: 302-7.
`14. Grant WM. Further studies on facility of flow through
`the trabecular meshwork. Arch Ophthalmol 1958; 60:
`523-33.
`15. Grant WM. Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucle-ated
`human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 69: 783-91.
`16. Grant WM. Laboratory research. Microsurgery of outflow
`channels
`(symposium). Trans Am Acad Ophthal-mol
`Otolaryngol 1972; 76: 398-402.
`17. Tailor U. Sulla incisione dell’angolo irideo (Contribuzione
`alla cura del glaucoma). Ann Oftalmol 1891; 20: 117-27.
`18. De Vincentiis C. Sulla cosiddetta sclerotomia interna. In:
`Lavori della clinica oculistica dell’Università di Napoli.
`Napoli: Pasquale V; 1894-1896: 227-35.
`19. Anderson DR. Trabeculectomy compared to gonioto-
`my for glaucoma in children. Ophthalmology 1983; 90:
`805-6.
`20. McPherson SD Jr, Berry DP. Goniotomy vs external tra-
`
`beculotomy for developmental glaucoma. Am J Oph-thalmol
`1983; 95: 427-31.
`21. Tanihara H, Negi A, Akimoto M, Terauki H, et al. Sur-
`gical effects of trabeculotomy ab externo on adult eyes
`with primary open-glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation
`syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1993, 111: 1653-61.
`22. Schwenn O, Grehn F, Olbert D. Cataract extraction com-
`bined with trabeculotomy. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993;
`203: 144-52.
`23. Gimbel HV, Meyer D, DeBroff BM, et al. Intraocular
`pressure response to combined phacoemulsification
`and
`trabeculotomy
`versus
`ab
`externo
`phacoemulsification alone
`in primary open-angle
`glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995; 14: 650-5.
`24. Epstein DL, Melamed S, Puliafito CA, Steinert RF.
`Neodymi-um:YAG laser trabeculopuncture in open angle
`glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 931-7.
`Ito S, Nishikawa M, Tokura T, et al. Histopathological study
`of trabecular meshwork after trabeculotomy in monkeys.
`Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1994; 98: 811-9.
`26. Van der Zypen E, Fankhauser F. The ultrastructural
`features of laser trabeculopuncture and cyclodialysis:
`problems related to successful treatment of chronic
`simple glaucoma. Opthalmologica 1979; 179: 189-200.
`27. Mermoud A, Ravinet E. Aqueous outflow mechanism and
`glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 365-7.
`28. Mermoud A, Schnyder CC. Non-penetrating filtering surgery
`in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2000; 11: 151-7.
`29. Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy:
`a pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 1998; 8: 57-61.
`30. Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for
`open angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract
`Refract Surg 1999; 25: 316-22.
`
`25.
`
`4 0 5
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1018, p. 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket