throbber
A C T A O P H T H A L M O L O G I C A
`61 (1983) 714-727
`
`Depadment of Ophthalmology (Head: A. Sokol),
`Sentralsjukehwet i Rogaland, Stavanger, Nomay
`
`SELECTIVE TRABECULECTOMY.
`A REPORT OF A NEW SURGICAL METHOD
`FOR OPEN ANGLE GMUCOMA
`
`BY
`
`FINN SKJERPE
`
`A new instrument, the trabeculectome, and an new surgical method for
`treating open angle glaucoma is described. The double-edged instrument
`makes 2 cuts through the trabecular meshwork while being pulled through
`Schlemm’s canal, thus cutting free a strip of the trabecular meshwork and the
`inner wall of Schlemm’s canal. The results of the 21 first operations are
`presented. The observation time is 9- 19 months. The characteristic post-
`operative pressure pattern is an immediate fall to 10-20 mmHg followed by a
`period of higher pressures which then converge to the range of 8- 16 mmHg
`with most eyes in the 10-14 mmHg range. Four patients need timolol
`treatment to obtain this, the remaining 17 have no medication. The thera-
`peutic results and additional observations are discussed with special interest to
`possible physiological mechanisms.
`
`Kq words: open angle glaucoma - trabecular meshwork - selective
`trabeculectomy - aqueous humour outflow.
`
`The treatment of the chronic glaucomas has improved during the later decades as
`new pharmacological agents have enriched our therapeutic armament.
`There seems, however, to be a rising activity in the field of surgical treatment.
`This may be the result of a rising understanding of the problem of patient
`compliance and of the danger of being satisfied with an ‘acceptable’ pressure level
`
`Received on March 14th. 1983.
`
`714
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 1 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjzrpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`Fig. I.
`Histologic section of the anterior chamber angle where trabeculotomy has been performed.
`Note the very narrow slit through the trabecular lamellae. One can easily imagine that such a
`slit may close by tissue contact and scarring (haematoxylin and eosin, X 80).
`
`in the advanced glaucoma. It may also be a compensatory activity as it may have
`been hoped that the new glaucoma agents would solve the problem.
`Most advances in the surgical treatment of glaucoma have been improvements in
`making fistulas by stabbing the eyeball in more and more sophisticated ways, as in
`the different modifications of the so-called trabeculectomy, originally developed by
`Cairns (1968). But still these methods are mostly fistulizing in effect, as shown by
`Benedikt (1976) using a fluorescein technique investigating the aqueous outflow in
`normal eyes and in operated and non-operated glaucoma eyes.
`The various methods of trabeculotomy represent attempts to re-establish the
`normal drainage of the aqueous humour. Some years ago I performed trabe-
`culotomy in post-mortem eyes, removed a large corneal button and examined the
`chamber angle structures directly under the microscope. In some cases the
`trabeculotome created a flap hinged along the scleral spur. When the instrument
`was withdrawn, the flap fell back to its original position. This happened as a result
`of the elasticity of the trabecular tissue because there was no pressure gradient
`working on the flap. Even after trabeculotomy through the trabecular meshwork,
`tissue strands from the 2 sides of the slit may be brought in contact by the tissue
`elasticity and the intraocular pressure (Fig. 1). Fibrous bridges may form to close
`the slit totally or partially (personal investigation, not published).
`I have assumed that the reason why many trabeculotomies do not result in a
`desired or expected pressure level, is such a partial or total closure of the trabecular
`slit created.
`This paper presents a new instrument and a new surgical technique for the
`selective removal of the trabecular meshwork including the inner wall of Schlemm’s
`
`715
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 2 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjzrpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectorny
`
`canal through about 1/4 of its circle in order to obtain a free access for the aqueous
`humour into the collector canals. The method is built on the nylon filament probing
`technique of Smith (1962).
`
`Material and Methods
`
`The instrument
`The trabeculectome (patent pend.), a disposable instrument, is composed of a
`ring-like sharply edged cutting device attached to a flexible probe (Fig. 2). The
`edges emerging from the probe form an angle to fit to the scleral groove. The
`instrument has been under continuous development with different designs of the
`cutting parts used. All prototypes used in the first series of operations to be
`presented here, have had cutting edges made of steel attached to a 5-0 nylon
`monofilament.
`
`The working principle
`The free, blunt end of the probe is put through the canal of Schlemm over a sector
`of about 90". The cutting part is put into the anterior chamber and pulled by the
`
`Fig. 2.
`The trabeculectome. The cutting device is attached to a 0.15 mm thick flexible probe. The
`V-shaped cutting profile has in principle been the construction of the different prototype
`modifications used.
`
`716
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 3 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjserpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`Fig. 3.
`Composite cross section and gonioscopic view showing the traheculectome cutting free and
`collecting a strip of the trahecular meshwork. It leaves an opened Schlemm’s canal.
`
`probe part with the edges protruding into the anterior chamber (Fig. 3). The edges
`in this way make 2 cuts through the trabecular meshwork, one along the scleral
`spur, and the other along the line of Schwalbe. The trabeculectome thus cuts free a
`strip of the trabecular meshwork including the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal, an it
`may remove the strip like a biopsy, leaving the outer wall and the openings of the
`draining canals.
`This technique has been worked out in post-mortem eyes, and the eyes have been
`examined microscopically. Fig. 4 shows cuts through the chamber angle of a
`
`Fig. 4.
`Histologic sections of the anterior chamber angle in a post-mortem eye, a) through a normal,
`unoperated sector and h) through a sector where selective traheculectomy has been
`performed. The trahecular meshwork which has been cut free, hut in this case not removed
`from the eye, is seen in the chamber angle. (haematoxylin and eosin, x 80).
`
`717
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 4 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjaerpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`Fzg. 5.
`a) A radial incision through the deep scleral layers and the outer wall of Schlemm’s canal is
`made under a thick scleral flap. The inserted probe part of the trabeculectome is picked up
`through an angulated limbal incision about 10 mm from the first. b) Photograph shows the
`probe running through Schlemm’s canal between the two incisions.
`
`post-mortem eye, both through a not operated sector and through a sector where
`selective trabeculectomy has been performed. In these examinations no damage to
`any other intraocular structure than the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal
`was detected.
`
`The surgical procedure
`Schlemm’s canal is opened through a radial incision under a thick scleral flap,
`taking care not to cut through the inner wall and the trabecular meshwork (Fig. 5).
`The rounded probe end of the trabeculectome is inserted into the canal, clockwise
`or counterclockwise, and picked up through a new incision about 10 mm from the
`first. This second incision is angulated to make the opening big enough to let
`through the cutting part of the trabeculectome after the cut has been completed.
`The cutting part is brought into position under the scleral flap either by pushing or
`by pulling the probe through Schlemm’s canal.
`A triangular microflap is then performed at the insertion site under the scleral
`flap, making an opening big enough to allow the cutting part to be rotated and
`
`718
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 5 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjwpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`Fig. 6.
`A triangular flap is made at the insertion site to allow the cutting device to be a) put into the
`anterior chamber and b) rotated against the scleral spur and pulled into position.
`
`pushed into the anterior chamber (Fig. 6). The microflap may be closed with a
`10-0 nylon suture, and the scleral flap is closed with 6-8 interrupted 10-0 nylon
`sutures taking care to secure a watertight wound. In order to avoid instrumental
`damage to the iris, the anterior chamber is, prior to the pull, filled with air in order
`to press the iris backwards. This injection is made through a separate corneal
`incision.
`The instrument is then pulled along Schlemm’s canal while twisting the probe
`slightly to press the posterior edge against the scleral spur. A slight rasping
`resistance is felt. The globe should be fixed with a toothed forceps at the edge of the
`scleral flap.
`A trabecular strip may follow the instrument out of the eye, or it may lie in the
`opening. Any strip is cut at the canal level. A periferal iridotomy or iridectomy is
`performed. A watertight closure is made at the pull out opening using 3 inter-
`rupted 10-0 nylon sutures, an the conjunctiva is pulled over with 1 stitch. Care is
`taken to leave the conjunctiva between the 2 incisions undisturbed to keep the
`water-veins undamaged.
`
`Post-operative treatment
`All patients have been given chloramphenicol and dexamethasone drops post-
`operatively and all pre-operative glaucoma treatment has been discontinued. The
`anit-inflammatory treatment has been given for as long as 1-2 months. However,
`because of a low grade and shortlasting post-operative reaction this treatment has
`
`719
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 6 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjmpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectorny
`
`now been cut down to 1 or a few weeks duration. The first 5 patients were given
`oculoguttae atropini, but the following patients have been given shortacting
`mydriatics in case of suspected formation of posterior synechiae. Patients with a
`pre-operative shallow anterior chamber have been given pilocarpin intermittently
`when judged necessary in order to reduce the risk of goniosynechiae formation.
`
`Material
`23 eyes in 23 patients have been operated. 12 eyes had Glaucoma simplex (primary
`open angle glaucoma). 7 eyes had Glaucoma capsulare. 4 eyes had Glaucoma
`(1 posttraumatic, 2 postiridocyclitic and
`secundarium angulo aperto
`1
`haemorrhagic postrombotic glaucoma). 1 1 patients are women. 12 patients are
`men. Mean age: 74.8 years.
`All eyes have pre-operatively had maximal tolerable medical therapy and most
`patients had far advanced glaucomas with as long as 14 years treatment.
`19 eyes have been operated in an upper sector between the 10 or 1 1 o’clock and
`the 1 or 2 o’clock positions, and 2 eyes have been operated in a mid-nasal quadrant.
`4 eyes had 1-3 years previously undergone an ordinary fistulizing trabeculec-
`tomy, and one of these eyes was aphakic.
`The observation time in this material is 9- 19 months.
`
`Results
`
`Selective trabeculectomy has been carried through in 2 1 of the 23 eyes. In 2 eyes the
`operation could not be completed as intended, but was terminated as an ordinary
`fistulizing trabeculectomy. In one eye the cause was the inability to find Schlemm’s
`canal in a longstanding haemorrhagic glaucoma with fibrotic changes of the
`trabecular meshwork. In the other case the canal was found impossible to probe for
`more than 2 mm. At that time I had trabeculectomes made only for clockwise pull,
`and consequently the operation could not be continued by probing the canal in the
`opposite direction.
`In 8 patients a trabecular strip has been obtained and verified microscopically. In
`the remaining 13 patients only small strands or no trabecular tissue was obtained.
`Where the trabecular strip has been removed, there is a gonioscopically visible
`groove anterior to a thin, white line representing a naked scleral spur. In 2 of these
`cases where a strip is obtained, there is a thin sheet-like remnant with sparce
`pigmentation. It looks like the endothelial and corneal meshwork has been stripped
`off, and what remains looks like a sheet of the uveal meshwork.
`In the cases where a trabecular strip was not obtained, the trabecular meshwork
`
`720
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 7 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjaerpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`is, gonioscopically seen, ploughed up and hinged along the scleral spur creating a
`slitlike or broad opening to Schlemm’s canal. The scleral spur is, also in most of
`these cases, seen as a distinct white line. In 3 of the cases the trabecular flap has
`fallen back to its original position. These failures have been related to the use of a
`prototype modification not in use any more.
`In most cases where an opening to the canal of Schlemm is obtained, there is,
`during gonioscopy, a visible retrograde flow of blood seeping into the anterior
`chamber from red dots in the scleral groove. This phenomenon has been observed
`more than 1 year after the operation. I have never seen any sign of blood seeping
`into the anterior chamber except during gonioscopy and in 2 cases spontaneously in
`the immediate postoperative period (first post-operative day).
`Changes are seen in the episcleral venous vessels in most cases. One finding is a
`dilution of the blood running through the episcleral venous plexus with a high flow
`
`120
`4 10
`i
`
`~
`
`30
`-
`A
`,-a
`20
`I
`-
`
`-
`
`10
`r
`0 )
`E -
`E
`
`1
`
`I
`
`Trabecular strip not obtained
`
`1
`
`,
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`,
`
`1
`
`
`
`~
`
`l
`
`,
`
`,
`
`l
`
`l
`
`l
`
`l
`
`I2O 0 01 10
`] E l
`4 1 2
`n = l l
`
`l
`
`l
`
`360 420
`
`Fig. 7.
`Standard deviation curves (Mean ? 1 SD) and median values for the post-operative
`intraocular pressures in the group where a trabecular strip has been removed, are compared
`with the curves for the group where a trabecular strip has not been obtained. The separately
`plotted curve represents a patient with postoperative goniosynechiae to the operated sector.
`
`Acta ophthal. 61, 4
`
`46
`
`72 1
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 8 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjmpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectorny
`
`velocity. However, the most conspicuous observation is the appearance of
`waterveins with a broad clear fluid laminar flow which has also a very high velocity.
`Especially where small veins empty into a scleral perforant aqueous vein carrying
`clear fluid, I have seen pronounced pulsations of the flow of blood from these veins
`into the aqueous-filled bigger vessel. These pulsations are synchronous with the
`patient’s arterial pulse rate. These perilimbal findings have been most prominent
`when the operation has been performed to cover some part of the mid-nasal sector.
`In one case there is also a pronounced flow of aqueous humour through
`water-veins far away from the operated sector.
`The intraocular pressure has, as far as possible, been measured daily from the
`first post-operative day with a Goldmann applanation tonometer for 1-2 weeks
`followed by frequenty controls.
`Standard deviation curves and plotted median pressure values clearly show the
`pressure pattern in the immediate postoperative period and the end result. (Figs.
`7-8).
`After the successful removal of a trabecular strip the characteristic and rather
`constant post-operative pressure pattern is an immediate fall to the range of
`10-20 mmHg followed by a rise after about 1 week, in some cases with a need for
`temporary medical treatment (Fig. 7). In these cases timolol and acetazolamide have
`a striking pressure lowering effect. After 4-8 weeks the pressures level off, in most
`cases to 8- 14 mmHg, and the medication, if any, is discontinued. In the group
`where a strip of the trabecular meshwork is not obtained, the pattern is in principle
`the same, but there is a slightly prolonged period of unstable and high pressures. In
`the cases where the operation covers a substantial part of the nasal sector, the
`intraocular pressure seems to fall to the final level more rapidly and with a less
`pronounced high pressure period than in the other cases.
`Seven patients with a conjunctival bleb are compared with the 14 without any sign
`of a fistula. The statistical curves in principle show the same pressure pattern in
`both groups with a convergence of the pressures towards the range of
`8- 16 mmHg, as in the former groups (Fig. 8).
`Of the 21 patients operated only 4 need post-operative treatment in order to
`reach the pressure level described above. In all 4 cases timo!ol alone is sufficient to
`obtain this. One of these 4 patients also needs acetazolamide for the other, not
`operated eye. One other patient with goniosynechiae to the operated sector and
`with no sign of fistulation has had post-operative treatment with epinephrine and
`acetazolamide for 13 months (timolol not tolerated because of asthma). With this
`treatment the eye has had a pressure of 18-22 mmHg. Pilocarpine was the
`prescribed, but the patient discontinued this after 1 day because of a pain-reaction.
`At the control 3 weeks afterwards the intraocular pressure had fallen to
`12 mmHg. At the same time a water-vein has was at one end of the operated sector.
`
`722
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 9 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjaerpe
`
`::I
`
`30
`
`Selective Trabecu lectorny
`
`Visible conjunctival bleb
`
`I
`0
`
`E
`E
`
`l
`I
`I
`
`~
`
`-
`
`1
`1
`1
`dp. I0
`
`
`
`,
`
`-
`
`n=7
`
`1
`
`
`
`-
`
`I
`30
`
`50
`
`70
`
`YO
`
`1
`
`-
`
`
`
`110
`
`.--
`
`1 420
`
`Fig. 8.
`1 SD) and median values for the post-operative
`Standard deviation curves (Mean
`intraocular pressures in the group with a post-operative conjunctival bleb are compared with
`the curves for the group without any sign of a fistula. The separately plotted curve represents
`a patient with post-operative goniosynechiae to the operated sector.
`
`The medication with epinephrine has been discontinued (acetazolamide is needed
`for the other eye), and the pressure has stablized at about 14 mmHg. Because this
`patient represents an important type of complication and also shows an interesting
`course, these pressures are not taken into the statistic curves from about the 4th
`post-operative month, but are plotted separately to show the peculiar course in this
`patient (Figs 7 and 8).
`No deterioration of the visual fields has been registered during the observation
`time, except in 1 case where the change in a defect of the visual field had to be
`compared with a registration made 2 months pre-operatively.
`The complications have been as follows:
`
`Bleeding
`In 4 cases per-operative bleeding caused a post-operative hyphaema filling 1/4 of
`the anterior chamber. In 11 cases there has been a hyphaema 1 - 1.5 mmHg high.
`
`723
`
`46%
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 10 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjmpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`In the remaining 6 cases no bleeding has been seen except for some cells seen with
`the slit lamp, and a thin sheet of blood in the inferior chamber angle seen with a
`goniolens. All hyphaemas have disappeared in 1-4 weeks.
`
`Inflammation
`The inflammatory reaction has been slight with a minimal to moderate short-lasting
`flare except in 1 post-inflammatory and 1 post-traumatic glaucoma where a
`pre-existing flare has continued after the operation.
`
`Goniosynechia
`In 1 case peripheral goniosynechiae have developed in the operated sector. The
`peripheral iris covers the groove where the trabecular meshwork has been
`removed.
`
`Cataract
`In 1 case of glaucoma with a pre-operatively existing iridocyclitis there has been a
`progressive development of a posterior cataract. In 1 case a pre-operatively
`progressing senile cataract continued to progress post-operatively. In no other case
`has it been possible to detect a reduced visual acuity or any change in any existing
`cataract.
`
`Fistula
`In 7 cases a subconjunctival filtration bleb developed after 2-3 months. These blebs
`have vaned from ordinarily sized filtration blebs, as obtained after fistulizing
`procedures, to an almost invisible bleb-like formation at either of the incisions.
`Nothing has been done with these blebs except in one case in which the intraocular
`pressure fell to 6 mmHg. This fistula was closed surgically, and the intraocular
`pressure stabilized at 10- 12 mmHg which was also the pressure level before the
`fistula appeared. Four of these patients are among the first ones operated, and in
`these cases the wounds were closed with a braided suture (Dexon).
`
`Discussion
`
`The post-operative pressure pattern after selective trabeculectomy strongly indi-
`cates that the reduction of the intraocular pressure is caused by a restored flow of
`the aqueous humour through the collector canals into the water-veins. This
`statement is founded on the fact that the pressures seldom fall below a barrier of
`
`724
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 11 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjzrpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectorny
`
`about 8 mmHg and seem to converge to a level not high above this barrier. This is
`consistent with our concept of the eye as a one way pump system with a recipient
`pressure for the aqueous humour in the episcleral veins of 6-8 mmHg. In such a
`system the intraocular pressure has to build up to exceed this counterpressure with
`an addition for the flow restistance through the collector canals.
`Initial high pressures in a few cases have possibly been caused by a visible blood
`clot in the anterior chamber angle of the operated sector.
`The existence of an opening for free fluid flow between the anterior chamber
`and the episcleral veins is proved by the observation of blood seeping in thin
`streams into the anterior chamber during gonioscopy. This communication seems
`to be the anatomic foundation of the pressure lowering effect of the operation.
`The main qualification for the low and stable pressures seems to be a ‘broad’ and
`permanent opening between the anterior chamber and Schlemm’s canal. This is
`supported by the observation that the pressure lowering effect seems to be related
`to the degree of visible opening to Schlemm’s canal because in the cases where there
`is a very narrow slit or a seemingly closed slit, the pressure is higher than in the
`‘broad-opening’ cases, and medical treatment may be necessary. The reason why
`the trabecular meshwork not removed in these cases seem to have less tendency to
`retain its original position compared with the trabeculotomy cases, may be a partial
`or subtotal cut through the trabecular tissue along the scleral spur.
`A second qualification is the number of the collector canals and the size of their
`ostia which have been made accessible for the aqueous humour. There is a potential
`circumferential flow through Schlemm’s canal. In one case there is a pronounced
`flow of aqueous humour through water-veins far outside the operated sector.
`However, one should not rely on the circumferential flow, because the openings of
`Schlemm’s canal at both ends of the operated sector may close by scarring. The
`findings of large water-veins, especially nasally, and even with signs of pulsating
`flow of the aqueous humour entering these veins, together with a seemingly more
`rapid stabilization of the intraocular pressure to its final level when the operation is
`performed to cover a substantial part of the nasal sector, indicate that the collector
`canals have their greatest draining capacity in the nasal quadrants. This is most
`interesting when compared with the findings of Benedikt (1976) that the water-
`veins are most numerous and even of greater caliber in the 2 nasal quadrants.
`Therefore, it seems correct to perform the operation in a sector where the widest
`and most numerous draining canals are found, that is, as already pointed out,
`nasally.
`The pathogenesis of the post-operative period with high and unstable pressures
`is not proved. Most pressures rise after a delay of 4-10 days. A post-operative
`oedema should be most prominent during the first days after the operation, and it
`should not last as long as 1 or 2 months. A few days treatment with dexamethasone
`
`725
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 12 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjserpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`is expected to be sufficient to reduce such an oedema. Post-operative oedema
`therefore seems to be an unsatisfactory explanation of the temporarily elevated
`pressures.
`Johnston et al. (1979) have shown that the endothelial cells of the blood vessels in
`the limbal area in avian eyes are mesodermally derived. This means that the
`endothelium of Schlemm’s canal most likely is mesodermally derived, and therefore
`supposed to have the capacity of regeneration. This endothelium, damaged during
`the operation, will swell up to take a spheriod shape when multiplying. The ostia of
`the collector canals may in this way be obstructed during the endothelial repair.
`Such a swelling will of course affect the flow less where the ostia have their greatest
`diameter. A process like this, I think , is a probable explanation of the post-
`operative high pressure period.
`As a whole, by pulling the trabeculectome along Schlemm’s canal it is possible
`either to remove a strip of the trabecular meshwork including the inner wall of
`Schlemm’s canal, or to plough up the tissue so widely that it will seldom fall back to
`its original position. The operation seems to re-establish the normal drainage of the
`aqueous humour. The intraocular pressure is stabilized at a rather ideal, low level.
`Post-operative hypotension and a shallow anterior chamber is avoided. The
`operation is performed in a way that secures a retreat through an ordinary
`fistulizing trabeculectomy in case Schlemm’s canal is not found or is found
`impossible to probe. The results of 35 subsequent operations with factory made
`trabeculectomes have been similar to the results obtained in the 2 1 first patients.
`A new design of the cutting part is now under development. This cutter will be
`shaped to fit as completely as possible into the anatomical structures of the chamber
`
`Fig. 9.
`The new and improved trabeculectome is expected to be ready for production during the
`winter 1982/1983. Note that the cutting profile is shaped to fit into the scleral groove and
`around the scleral spur in order to secure an as perfect as possible removal of a trabecular
`strip in as high a percentage of the cases as possible.
`
`726
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 13 of 14
`
`

`

`Skjwpe
`
`Selective Trabeculectomy
`
`angle (Fig. 9). it will hopefully facilitate a complete removal of a trabecular strip in a
`higher persentage than up to now. If a strip is not removed, the cutter will, because
`of its shape, plough up the tissue so widely that it is not expected to fall back again to
`close the opening once obtained. The cutting part will be moulded in very hard
`plastic, a technique suitable for mass production. The trabeculectome is a
`disposable instrument. Because of its assymmetry, it will be made in 2 versions, one
`for clockwise and the other for counter-clockwise pull. Before the instrument
`comes onto the market, samples for the interested surgeon may be available by
`request to the author.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`This work has in part been supported by Sigval Bergesen & Co. DY. (Sig. Bergesen & hustru
`Nanki’s alrnennyttige Stiftelse), and Elf Aquitaine Norge AIS.
`
`References
`
`Benedikt 0 (1976): Die Darstellung des Kammerwasserabflusses normaler und glaucom-
`kranker menschlicher Augen durch Fulling der Vorderkammer mit Fluorescein. Albert
`von Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalrnol 199: 45-67.
`Cairns J E (1968): Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol
`66: 673.
`Johnston M C, Node1 D M, Hazelton R D, Coulombre J L & Coulombre A J (1979): Origins of
`avian ocular and periocular tissues. Exp Eye Res 29: 27-43.
`Smith R (1962): Nylon filament trabeculotomy in glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 82:
`439.
`
`Author’s address:
`Finn Skjzrpe, M.D., Department of Ophthalmology,
`Sentralsjukehuset i Rogaland, N-4000 Stavanger, Norway.
`
`727
`
`Petitioner - New World Medical
`Ex. 1014, p. 14 of 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket