throbber
Perspectives in
`trabecular surgery
`
`PHILIPP C. JACOBI, THOMAS S. DIETLEIN,
`GUNTER K. KRIEGLSTEIN
`
`Abstract
`
`The aim of trabecular surgery is to selectively
`combat the diseased structure central to the
`pathogenesis of chronic open-angle glaucoma,
`thereby reducing potential hazards during and
`after conventional filtering procedures. This
`overview considers new techniques in ab
`interno trabecular surgery. Special emphasis is
`placed on the description of each novel
`technique, its instrumentation, presumed
`mechanism of action and clinical results.
`Trabecular aspiration is evaluated as a method
`of clearing intertrabecular spaces of
`extracellular debris in pseudoexfoliation
`glaucoma with or without simultaneous
`cataract surgery or goniocurettage, while laser
`trabecular ablation is discussed for the
`treatment of absolute glaucomas. Where
`corneal haze has formed visualisation of the
`anterior chamber angle structures and
`trabecular surgery is performed with the aid of
`a microendoscope. Although the results are
`very promising it should be understood that
`some of these procedures are still in the
`experimental phase and are undergoing
`careful clinical evaluation, leaving plenty of
`room for refinements and further
`developments.
`
`Key words Goniocurettage, Microendoscopy,
`Trabecular aspiration, Trabecular photoablation
`
`Enormous progress has been made in
`understanding the complexity of the underlying
`causes of chronic open-angle glaucoma.
`However, indisputable concepts for effective
`treatment are still rare. To date, conventional
`filtering surgery remains the mainstay of
`surgical therapy in the management of
`glaucoma not controlled by medication.!
`Unfortunately, treatments involving full­
`thickness filtration are scarcely selective since
`healthy structures not primarily involved in the
`disease process are subject to surgical
`intervention. The application of adjunctive
`antimetabolites for inhibition of undesired
`episcleral fibroblastic proliferation dramatically
`increased the success rates for filtering
`procedures, but had the disadvantage of
`exacerbating serious side-effects, such as flat
`
`anterior chambers, prolonged post-operative
`hypotony and late endophthalmitis from
`infected filtering blebs?,3
`Mircosurgery on Schlemm's canal and the
`human aqueous outflow system for controlling
`intraocular pressure (lOP) in chronic open­
`angle glaucoma has been evolving over the past
`few decades. Theoretical considerations indicate
`that production of approXimately 10 to 15
`fistulae, each 10 !Lm in diameter, between the
`anterior chamber and Schlemm's canal should
`restore normal outflow facility in open-angle
`glaucoma.4 The basis for most of the current
`approaches to microsurgery of Schlemm's canal
`is the finding by GrantS that the largest
`proportion of resistance to outflow is located
`within the trabecular meshwork, namely the
`cribriform layer, and can be eliminated by
`incising the trabecular meshwork and entering
`Schlemm's canal. If one agrees that the site of
`the pathological resistance to aqueous humour
`outflow is this tissue, its partial removal, taking
`the utmost possible care not to damage the
`surrounding chamber angle structures, could be
`a new alternative in antiglaucomatous surgery.
`This sort of selective non-penetrating trabecular
`surgery would be equivalent to internal
`filtration surgery without transscleral drainage
`of aqueous humour into the subconjunctival
`space, and would thereby reduce the incidence
`of post-operative complications typically
`associated with filtering procedures.
`This review discusses different ab interno
`trabecular microsurgical techniques that are
`designed to facilitate outflow along its natural
`pathway. Each new technique is described in
`detail, newly developed instrumentation is
`discussed, and the presumed mechanisms of
`action are outlined. However, the reader must
`understand that none of these new
`microsurgical procedures threatens to replace
`conventional filtering approaches, since they are
`still in the experimental phase and under
`careful clinical evaluation, and there is plenty of
`room left for further refinements and
`developments. We hope this article will give
`impetus to the search for alternative strategies
`in antiglaucomatous surgery, and focus
`attention more closely on the diseased target
`structure in chronic open-angle glaucoma: the
`trabecular meshwork.
`
`P.c. Jacobi
`T.S. Dietlein
`G.K. Krieglstein
`University Eye Hospital
`University of Cologne
`Cologne, Germany
`
`Philipp C. Jacobi, MD �
`Department of
`Ophthalmology
`University of Cologne
`Joseph-Stelzmannstrasse 9
`D-50931 Cologne, Germany
`
`Tel: +49221 4784345
`Fax: +49221 4784347
`
`Eye (2000) 14, 519-530 © 2000 Royal College of Ophthalmologists
`
`519
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 1 of 12
`
`

`

`Goniocurettage
`
`The underlying concept of goniocurettage is to remove
`rather than incise or disrupt pathologically altered
`trabecular meshwork and to open a route for aqueous
`humour to egress either into Schlemm's canal or, where
`the external wall of the canal is damaged, to ooze out
`through microsplittings in the posterior scleral wall.6 The
`procedure is conceptually similar to goniotomy, except
`that trabecular tissue is scaped away from the scleral
`sulcus using an instrument similar to a microchalazion
`curette (Fig. 1). The gonioscraper consists of a small
`handle and a slightly convex arm for intraocular use and
`closely resembles a cyclodialysis spatula. However, the
`tip of the instrument is shaped like a minature bowl,
`300 fLm in diameter, with sharpened edges. To abrade
`clockwise and counter-clockwise, the scoop is vertically
`angled at 90° to either side.
`Goniocurettage is usually performed under direct
`visualisation of the anterior chamber angle through an
`operating microscope and a surgical gonioscopy lens
`(Fig. 2). Following injection of viscoelastic, the
`gonioscraper is inserted into the anterior chamber
`through a clear corneal incision and directed against the
`trabecular meshwork on the opposite side. The scraper is
`lightly passed over 2 to 3 clock-hours to either side of the
`nasal circumference of the chamber angle. Great care is
`taken while peeling off the uveal meshwork not to
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 2. Ab interno goniocurettage is performed with the aid of an
`operating microscope under gonioscopic observation.
`
`traumatise adjacent intraocular structures, such as the
`corneal endothelium or the base of the iris.
`Intraoperatively, ragged strings of trabecular tissue can
`be seen to be removed by gonioabrasion, leaving an
`irregular pattern of a glistening white band
`corresponding to the denuded grey-white scleral sulcus
`(Fig. 3). At the end of the procedure, viscoelastic along
`with abraded trabecular debris is removed by means of
`irrigation-aspiration.
`Morphological analysis of the treatment zones in
`human donor eyes clearly indicated the potential efficacy
`of goniocurettage for completely removing the trabecular
`meshwork.6 From light microscopy of histological
`sections it is evident that, in addition to the peeling of the
`trabecular meshwork, goniocurettage also causes
`damage to intracanalicular septa and the endothelium of
`the external wall of Schlemm's canal, and in some
`instances a disruption along the posterior wall of
`Schlemm's canal. Flaps of uveal tissue, capable of
`returning to their predissection position, were not
`observed in the specimens. Scanning electron microscopy
`shows that the trabecular meshwork is pulled away from
`its attachments, leaving ragged structures of Schlemm's
`canal within the scleral sulcus exposing bare sclera
`(Fig. 4).
`
`Fig. 1. (a) The tip of the 'gonioscraper'. The external diameter of the
`bowl is 300 j.Lm and its edges are sharpened. (b) The intraocular arm of
`the gonioscraper is convex to avoid inadvertent damage to the iris-lens
`diaphragm.
`
`Fig. 3. After gonioabrasion, an irregular pattern of a glistening white
`band corresponding to the 'denuded' grey-white sulcus scleralis
`appears (black arrows).
`
`520
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 2 of 12
`
`

`

`

`

`minimal amount of blood staining the chamber angle
`could be seen to disappear within 2 or 3 days after
`surgery. However, inadvertent damage to prominent
`vessels within the chamber angle created a more serious
`intraoperative complication. Marked bleeding within the
`anterior chamber angle occurred in 16% cases leading to
`interruption of the procedure in 8%. Even careful
`observation of the target area cannot prevent this in
`every case. Tears in Descemet's membrane might be
`caused by the tip of the probe when it comes too close to
`the endothelium during rotation. Descemet's tears were
`usually small and were not followed by corneal oedema.
`Descemet's tears may, however, remain visible for a long
`period of time when blood-stained. Serious problems
`such as a shallow anterior chamber, choroidal
`haemorrhage or detachment, endophthalmitis, and
`leakage of aqueous humour under the conjunctiva did
`not occur after goniocurettage.
`In conclusion, this prospective study indicates that
`goniocurettage is an effective surgical treatment for
`various forms of chronic open-angle glaucoma, even in
`eyes with previously failed trabeculectomies. It is
`independent of conjunctival wound healing responses and
`associated with a relatively low risk profile. Although
`post-operative pressure levels after goniocurettage remain
`in the high teens, even with medication, this new
`procedure may in the future be considered as an
`alternative surgical treatment in selected cases of
`glaucoma. Further studies on glaucoma cases with an
`overall better prognosis and an evaluation of the effects of
`goniocurettage on visual field testing are required.
`
`Laser trabecular ablation
`
`Since laser trabeculopuncture was introduced by
`Krasnov in 1973,11 various lasers, such as the argon or
`Nd:YAG laser have been used in trabecular surgery.
`However, the effectiveness of these procedures decreases
`with time.12,13 Berlin and associates14 were the first to
`investigate the potential for photoablation of the
`trabecular meshwork using a XeCI-excimer laser,
`emitting at 308 nm, which can be used in conjunction
`with an optical fibre system. Vogel and co-workers15
`found that in 4 of 6 glaucomatous eyes lOP was reduced
`by 11 mmHg over a follow-up period of 5 months,
`whereas in 2 patients the lOP increased by 2 mmHg
`despite additional antiglaucomatous medication.
`However, it seems that the high initial outlay and
`running costs of such gas laser modules, as well as the
`potential hazards of intraocularly applied ultraviolet
`radiation, may render them unsuitable for routine use.
`Hill and associates16,17 have recently proposed a
`promising method for treating the trabecular meshwork
`directly. They described the use of photoablative mid­
`infrared lasers to create multiple micro-openings through
`the trabecular meshwork into Schlemm's canal with
`minimum collateral thermal damage. The authors
`achieved smooth ablations of trabecular tissue for the
`macropulsed Er:YAG (2.94 fLm) and the Er:YSSG
`(2.79 fLm) laser and termed the procedure laser
`
`522
`
`trabecular ablation. Radiation emitted from mid-infrared
`lasers is known to elicit a relatively narrow zone of
`thermal damage in biological tissue, with little
`mechanical stress. Among these the Er:YAG laser,
`emitting at a wavelength close to the absorption peak of
`water in the mid-infrared spectral region, has a short
`absorption length (25 fLm) in water-containing tissue and
`ablates with minimal thermal damage to contiguous
`structures.18,19 The Er:YAG laser thus seems to emit at
`the most favourable wavelength. It has been suggested
`that the removal of a larger segment of the trabecular
`meshwork in laser trabecular ablation may impair
`wound repair mechanisms and be another cause of
`surgical failure.17
`Laser trabecular ablation in porcine cadaver eyes,
`using a macropulsed Er:YAG laser (200 fLS; 5 mn,
`resulted in full-thickness ablation craters, with consistent
`ablation widths of 200-300 fLm; collateral thermal
`damage was less than 30 fLm (Fig. 5). Moreover, outflow
`facility measurements revealed a significant increase
`from 0.128 :±: 0.041 fLm min-1 mmHg-1 in controls to
`0.308 :±: 0.093 fLl min-1 mmHg-1 in treated eyes, thereby
`lowering outflow resistance by 70% from baseline - an
`achievement of clinical relevance,z°
`Although in vivo studies in rabbits revealed that
`ablation craters in the trabecular meshwork closed up
`within less than 60 days,21 preliminary results of laser
`trabecular ablation in adult open-angle glaucoma are
`promising. Dietlein and co-workers22 performed ab
`interno Er:YAG laser trabecular aspiration in 14 patients
`suffering from terminal optic nerve atrophy due to
`medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma, with a
`maximum follow-up of 14 months. Under gonioscopic
`observation each patient received 15 to 20 single laser
`pulses (6 mn to the trabeculum delivered via a 320 fLm
`quartz fibre endoprobe (Fig. 6). No patient was treated
`more than once, and all experienced a significant
`decrease in lOP and reduction in adjunctive medication.
`As a rule, reflux of blood from Schlemm's canal occurred
`at the site of laser ablation. Moderate reflux bleeding was
`
`Fig. 5. Scanning electron microscopy following laser trabecular
`ablation in porcine cadaver eyes. The macropulsed Er: Y AG laser
`ablation results in full-thickness ablation craters with ablation widths
`varying between 200 and 300 JLm; collateral thermal damage is less
`than 30 JLm.
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 4 of 12
`
`

`

`anterior chamber angle in many cases. Removal of the
`cloudy corneal epithelium does not always improve
`visibility, so that gonioscopic identification of the
`anterior chamber angle structures is not possible in every
`case. Intraocular microendoscopy is an exciting
`development that affords the surgeon new opportunities
`in the management of vitroretinal disease,25
`cyclophotocoagulation,26 complicated transscleral
`intraocular lens fixation,27 and possibly in the
`management of antiglaucomatous trabecular surgery.
`Following earlier in vitro studies, anterior segment
`microendoscopy has already been successfully applied as
`a diagnostic too128,29 or in combination with various
`trabecular microsurgical procedures.30,31
`Recently, we conducted a prospective, non­
`randomised study in human glaucomatous eyes in order
`to assess the surgical technique, practicability, surgical
`outcome and intraoperative complication rate of
`microendoscopic trabecular surgery.32 In 15 patients with
`medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma and
`advanced corneal opacification, visualisation of the
`anterior chamber angle structures and trabecular surgery
`was performed under microendoscopic control.
`Exclusion criteria were a visual acuity of more than
`20/200 in the treated eye, worse visual function in the
`contralateral eye, a history of uveitis, herpetic keratitis,
`ocular trauma, narrow angle, traumatic or rubeotic
`glaucoma and young age (less than 40 years).
`In this study, we used an ophthalmic microendoscope
`(Endo Optiks, Little Silver, NJ), which is basically a
`triple-function endoscope consisting of three fibre
`groupings: the image guide (3000 and 10 000 pixels), the
`light guide and a diode laser guide. In the current
`experiments the laser guide was disconnected. This
`endoscope came with a 20 gauge (0.88 mm diameter)
`probe, providing a 70° field of view and a depth of focus
`ranging from 0.5 to 15 mm. Additionally, an 18 gauge
`(1.2 mm diameter) endoscope with the same three
`components was used. The field of view in this iteration
`is 110° with a depth of focus ranging from 1 to 30 mm.
`The advantages of the larger-diameter endoscope are the
`greater clarity provided by the image bundle and the
`panoramic field of view that it creates. The
`microendoscope is used in conjunction with a light
`source, video camera, television monitor and video
`recorder. Both intraocular endoscopes were gas-sterilised
`before surgery. Trabecular surgery was performed using
`either laser trabecular ablation or goniocurettage.
`Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with one
`of the two techniques.
`Seven eyes were treated by means of laser trabecular
`ablation and 8 eyes by means of goniocurettage. The
`average age at surgery was 69.7 ± 9.1 years (mean ± SD)
`(range 55-83 years). Twelve of 15 patients had
`undergone previous antiglaucoma procedures involving
`the conjunctiva. Four eyes had failed trabeculectomy
`with adjunctive mitomycin C and 8 eyes had argon laser
`trabeculoplasty before trabecular surgery. The average
`follow-up time was 21.1 ± 3.0 months (range 19-28
`months).
`
`523
`
`Fig. 6. Under gonioscopic observation the quartz fibre tip of the
`endoprobe is inserted into the anterior chamber and directed against the
`trabeculum. The ablation process is initiated under tissue-instrument
`contact.
`
`assessed as an intraoperative sign of full-thickness
`perforation of Schlemm's canal, which is continuous with
`episcleral veins. No patient had heavy bleeding,
`hyphaema formation or undue inflammation post­
`operatively. The minimal amount of blood staining of the
`chamber angle could be seen to disappear within 2-3
`days after surgery. Melamed and associates23,24 also
`reported blood reflux as an intraoperative result of
`photodisruptive openings into Schlemm's canal. Post­
`operative gonioscopy of the treatment area revealed
`neighbouring ablation craters within the trabecular
`meshwork, easily identified in most patients by a distinct
`loss of pigmentation (Fig. 7). Long-term studies on laser
`trabecular ablation in adult glaucoma are now being
`performed to assess the full potential of this promising
`procedure.
`
`Microendoscopic trabecular surgery
`
`Of great importance to the success of trabecular surgery
`is a clear cornea to observe and identify the fine details of
`anterior chamber angle structures. Unfortunately, the
`scarring and corneal oedema frequently associated with
`lOP dysregulation hamper the gonioscopic view of the
`
`Fig. 7. Post-operative gonioscopy of the treatment area reveals
`neighbouring ablation craters within the trabecular meshwork, easily
`identified by a distinct loss of trabecular pigmentation.
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 5 of 12
`
`

`

`Fig. 8. Following the injection of viscoelastic, the microendoscope is
`introduced into the anterior chamber through a 1.2 mm paralimbal
`clear corneal tunnel incision.
`
`Intraoperatively, the microendoscope was introduced
`into the anterior chamber through a 1.2 mm paralimbal
`clear corneal tunnel incision followed by the injection of
`viscoelastic (Fig. 8). While the endoscope was pushed
`forward to the pupillary margin, the posterior cornea
`and anterior lens surface simultaneously came into view
`on the video screen. The goniocurette or the laser
`endoprobe entered the anterior chamber through a
`second paralimbal paracentesis. Following insertion the
`surgical instruments came instantly into view on the
`monitor, helping to avoid inadvertent damage to any of
`the internal structures as the endoprobes were advanced
`into the anterior chamber angle. When using the Er:YAG
`laser the He-Ne aiming beam of the laser was readily
`identified on the trabecular meshwork, and the tip of the
`microendoscope moved between 0.5 to 7.0 mm away
`from the chamber angle structures (Fig. 9).
`
`Fig. 9. Endoscopic view of the anterior chamber angle as the laser
`probe approaches the trabecular meshwork. Laser ablation craters can
`be distinguished by a 'whitening' of the trabeculum. Resolution and
`clarity of the endoscopic picture are somewhat higher when observed in
`real time than they are in a freeze-frame.
`
`524
`
`Fig. 10. Endoscopic view of the anterior chamber angle as the
`gonia curette approaches the trabecular meshwork. The white reflex at
`the tip of the instrument is the bowl of the curette.
`
`Laser trabecular ablation at 6 mJ pulse energy
`reproducibly yielded round to oval tissue whitening
`post-operatively. At the time of treatment, all 7 eyes
`demonstrated low-thermal photovaporisation of the
`trabecular meshwork and various degrees of exposure of
`the outer wall of Schlemm's canal. A reflux of blood from
`Schlemm's canal into the anterior chamber was observed
`at the treatment site. Gas bubble formation and heavy
`pigment dispersion did not, however, occur. No frank
`hyphaemas were detected.
`In endoscopically controlled goniocurettage the
`minicurette was observed to pass alongside the scleral
`spur, tending to push trabecular tissue ahead of it, but
`usually leaving the anterior portion of the trabecular
`meshwork and Schwalbe's line in place (Fig. 10).
`Endoscopically, it was possible to see strings of
`trabecular tissue being removed intraoperatively, leaving
`a white band corresponding to the scleral sulcus.
`Complications included a small peripheral
`descemetolysis and a reflux of blood from Schlemm's
`canal within the treatment area, neither of which had any
`further sequelae.
`lOP was reduced in all eyes as a result of surgery. The
`average pre-operative lOP was 34.5 ± 6.1 mmHg
`(mean ± SD) (range 27-46 mmHg), compared with
`18.5 ± 3.0 mmHg (range 13-23 mmHg) after surgery at
`last follow-up. The average number of glaucoma
`medications used before surgery was 2.3 ± 0.6
`(mean ± SD) while the average number used post­
`operatively was 1.1 ± 0.7. Considering all treated eyes,
`the mean pressure reduction after endoscopic trabecular
`surgery was 15.9 ± 4.3 mmHg (range 9-23 mmHg). This
`represents a 46% decrease from baseline (�%), which is
`statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no
`statistically significant difference in pressure-reducing
`effect between eyes receiving laser goniopuncture and
`those treated by goniocurettage. Transient phases of
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 6 of 12
`
`

`

`hypotony (lOP in the 0-6 mmHg range), choroidal
`effusion or flattening of the anterior chamber were not
`observed.
`Since the surgeon was applying microendoscopy of
`the anterior segment of the eye for the first time, great
`caution had to be exercised during the procedure. Video
`monitor control and non-stereoscopic viewing
`demanded particular technical adaption. In our series,
`however, substantial complications related to the
`endoscopy itself were not observed. Patients enrolled in
`this study were treated only once and experienced a
`decrease in lOP and reduction in adjunctive medication.
`Moderate reflux bleeding occurred in most patients and
`was assessed as an intraoperative sign of full-thickness
`perforation of Schlemm's canal. None was detected to
`have heavy bleeding, hyphaema formation or undue
`inflammatory response. The minimal amount of blood
`staining of the chamber angle was seen to disappear
`within 2 or 3 days after surgery. However, before this
`procedure can be considered as a viable concept in
`glaucoma surgery, i.e. in the treatment of primary
`infantile glaucoma, further experience in a greater
`number of patients is needed.
`
`Trabecular aspiration
`
`Despite the many different causes of secondary
`obstructive glaucomas, such as pseudoexfoliation (PEX),
`pigmentary, phacolytic and silicone oil glaucoma, all
`these conditions develop via the same pathogenetic
`pathway: lOP dysregulation arising from trabecular
`obstruction. Extraneous material within the anterior
`chamber eventually causes obstruction of the trabecular
`outflow channel, leading to a non-physiological pressure
`increase. Assuming that the primary pathogenetic factor
`in secondary obstructive glaucoma is obstruction of
`filtering pores of the trabecular meshwork (which, over
`time, become increasingly dogged by deposits of debris
`and pigment granules), a surgical procedure that relieves
`the uveal meshwork of its obstruction should, in theory,
`be effective.
`In previous studies, we described a new form of non­
`filtering glaucoma surgery - trabecular aspiration -
`designed to facilitate trabecular outflow in secondary
`glaucomas such as PEX glaucoma?3-35 Morphological
`analysis of the trabecular aspirate dearly illustrated the
`efficacy of trabecular aspiration for removing
`pretrabecular and intertrabecular debris?3 Trabecular
`aspiration in combination with extracapsular cataract
`extraction substantially lowered the lOP in a small group
`of cataractous eyes complicated by medically
`uncontrollable PEX glaucoma?4 Moreover, when applied
`as primary therapeutic surgical intervention in PEX
`glaucoma, this procedure also turned out to be an
`effective tool for pressure management.35 These early
`results were obtained with a form of trabecular
`aspiration requiring a single-handed irrigation­
`aspiration device and a deep anterior chamber
`intraoperatively in order to avoid contact with the
`anterior surface of the crystalline lens in phakic eyes
`
`Fig. 11. Single-handed irrigation-aspiration device designed to sweep
`over the trabecular meshwork with negative suction pressure, thereby
`clearing the intertrabecular filtering pores in pseudoexfoliation
`glaucoma.
`
`(Fig. 11). As a refinement of the single-handed aspiration
`technique, which is easy and safe to use in combination
`with lens extraction, we now recommend the bimanual
`technique, in which irrigation and aspiration are
`separated from each other to further increase the safety
`and efficacy of the procedure (Fig. 12)?6
`The opening of the trabecular aspirator is 400 /-Lm
`wide and angled horizontally at 45° to comply with the
`configuration of the anterior chamber angle. The
`intracameral portion of the aspiration cannula is convex
`to prevent damage to the iris-lens diaphragm during the
`intraocular manoeuvre. For irrigation, a second cannula
`with an outlet diameter of 650 /-Lm is used. The surgical
`procedure is performed under the operating microscope
`without the use of a gonioscope. lntracameral access is
`gained by two self-sealing paracenteses at the limbus.
`The aspirator probe is pushed transcamerally into the
`opposite chamber angle and is directed against the
`trabeculum. Under gentle instrument-tissue contact,
`suction pressure of 100 and 200 mmHg is applied over
`4 to 5 dock-hours of the inferior and temporal
`circumference of the chamber angle. Thereafter,
`irrigation and aspiration probes are exchanged between
`hands so that the contralateral side of the chamber angle
`is accessible for aspiration treatment. Switching probes
`yields a potential treatment area of 270°.
`
`Fig. 12. Artist's rendering of the intraoperative view of the bimanual
`technique of trabecular aspiration. The aspirator is pushed deep into the
`anterior chamber angle, while the irrigation probe just enters the eye.
`Note the convexity of the aspirator's intraocular arm. Under constant
`tissue contact and negative suction pressure, the aspirator sweeps over
`the trabecular meshwork.
`
`525
`
`Petitioner - New World Medial
`Ex. 1013, p. 7 of 12
`
`

`

`The safety and efficacy of the bimanual technique of
`trabecular aspiration as a primary antiglaucoma surgical
`procedure was substantiated in a prospective study?6
`Twenty-two eyes of 18 PEX patients were treated by
`trabecular aspiration. Follow-up was continued for a
`minimum of 14 months and a maximum of 27 months
`(mean ± SD, 20.2 ± 4.5 months). The mean pretreatment
`lOP was 31.4 ± 7.1 mmHg (range 23-42 mmHg).
`Bimanual trabecular aspiration resulted in a consistent
`pressure reduction from the first post-operative week in
`19 eyes (86%). In the remaining 3 eyes (12.5%), trabecular
`aspiration neither reduced the lOP nor had any positive
`effect on the glaucoma medication post-operatively. Most
`interestingly, all these patients had had argon laser
`trabeculoplasty (AL T) prior to the aspiration procedure.
`With regard to the successfully treated eyes (n = 19),
`the mean pressure reduction after surgery was
`12.6 ± 0.7 mmHg (range 6-22 mmHg) at the final visit.
`At 6 months, the mean reduction in lOP from baseline
`was 12.5 mmHg. The mean reduction was 12.7 mmHg at
`1 year and 13.6 mmHg at 18 months. Before surgery,
`these 19 treated eyes required 2.3 glaucoma medications
`on average to control lOP. Post-operatively, the average
`number of medications was 0.3 at 6 months and 1.5 at
`18 months. At 6 months, 75% of patients were using no
`medication, and at 18 months 45% of patients were well
`controlled without glaucoma medication.
`Trabecular aspiration was not associated with any
`serious intraoperative complications or long-lasting side­
`effects. In 10 eyes (47%) a blood reflux from Schlemm's
`canal was observed intraoperatively, with 3 eyes (14%)
`showing small blot clots in the chamber angle post­
`operatively. However, no anterior chamber angle
`bleeding, hyphaema or marked inflammatory reaction
`was noted. In 4 eyes (19%), minor descemetolyses at the
`treatment site occurred. No corneal haze was associated
`with the treatment, and no episodes of hypotony,
`flattened anterior chamber depth or choroidal effusion
`were observed.
`The clinical importance of PEX syndrome lies in its
`reported association with open-angle glaucoma and age­
`related lens opacities.37-39 PEX syndrome as such does
`not induce optic nerve head damage but presents a
`relevant risk factor for lOP elevation.4o Various studies
`suggest that optic nerve head damage, visual field
`defects, higher lOP levels and reduced lOP tolerance are
`far more severe in glaucomatous eyes complicated with
`PEX than in those without PEX.41-43 Moreover, PEX eyes
`show a weaker response to medical therapy; thus, many
`of these eyes require early surgery.44 Besides, cataracts
`are more likely and their surgical correction more
`problematic in PEX syndrome than in non-PEX patients.
`Reported intraoperative difficulties include increased
`corneo-endothelial and iris pigment epithelial fragility,
`increased vascular leakage and inflammation, fibrin
`deposition, zonular instability often associated with
`zonular dialysis and vitreous 10ss.45-49 Post-operative
`problems may include an increased risk of synechia
`formation and pupillary block, rapid development of
`capsular thickening requiring laser capsulotomy, cystoid
`
`macular oedema in the presence of capsular trauma
`resulting in vitreous loss, transient lOP spikes, and
`progression of glaucoma optic neuropathy.48,49
`Consequently, PEX glaucoma coexisting with cataract
`poses a management dilemma. On the one hand,
`considering the potential intraoperative and post­
`operative complications in exfoliative eyes it would seem
`better to avoid or minimise perioperative problems by
`keeping the surgical procedure as simple as possible, Le.
`favouring a two-stage approach rather than a combined
`operation. On the other hand, a combined approach
`eliminates extra morbidity and costs, reduces the risk of
`transient post-operative pressure spikes, and may result
`in faster rehabilitation.
`In a recent study,50 we compared a randomised series
`of combined phacoemulsification, IOL implantation and
`trabecular aspiration (asp+ IOL) with a series of
`phacoemulsification and IOL implantation alone
`(IOL-alone). Performing the cataract incision temporally
`reduced the development of against-the-rule astigmatism
`and spared the superotemporal conjunctiva in both
`groups, making subsequent filtering procedures easier to
`perform. Trabecular-aspiration-treated eyes were also
`compared with a case-matched group that had
`undergone a standard glaucoma triple procedure (triple
`procedure). With the combined cataract and filtering
`approach, a temporal clear corneal incision also reduces
`inflammation around the filter, increasing the chances of
`a successful glaucoma procedure. We evaluated the
`impact of the two different approaches (Le. filtering
`versus non-filtering approach) in glaucoma triple
`procedure on post-operative visual acuity, the efficacy of
`the glaucoma procedure in reducing lOP and
`dependence on glaucoma medication, and complications
`experienced. Further evaluation of the efficacy of
`combined cataract and glaucoma surgery should
`enhance the surgeon's ability to make an informed choice
`for each cataract patient with PEX.
`The study group consisted of 74 eyes of 74 cataract
`patients with concurrent PEX glaucoma undergoing
`phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Forty-eight
`consecutive patients were randomised to either
`adjunctive trabecular aspiration (asp+IOL group, 26
`eyes) or no trabecular aspiration (IOL-alone group; 22
`eyes). All patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket