`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3002
`
`
`From: Thomas, Henry C. <HThomas@willkie.com>
`Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 7:54 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: tpowers-PTAB@sternekessler.com; dyonan-PTAB@sternekessler.com; dbanowit-
`PTAB@sternekessler.com; kconklin-PTAB@sternekessler.com; toneill-PTAB@sternekessler.com;
`jbuchanan-PTAB@sternekessler.com; gphero-PTAB@sternekessler.com; PTAB@sternekessler.com;
`Babbitt, Michael G. <MBabbitt@willkie.com>; ProvisurTeam@willkie.com
`Subject: Case Nos. IPR2020-01556 // IPR2020-01557
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`
`Your Honors,
`
`
`Patent Owner, Provisur Technologies, Inc., inadvertently uploaded the exhibits to its Patent Owner Sur-
`Reply with the incorrect document type selected in E2E. This morning, Patent Owner re-uploaded each
`of its exhibits with the correct “Exhibit” document type on E2E. However, the PTAB E2E Assistance Line
`informed us that we would have to contact the Board to remove the mislabeled exhibits.
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.54 inadvertently referenced “the Default
`Protective order” on page 5. (See, IPR2020-01556, Paper 47; IPR2020-01557, Paper 46.) The Board has
`already entered a Modified Protective Order in these cases. (See, IPR2020-01556, Paper 12; IPR2020-
`01557, Paper 13.)
`
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests the Board to remove the mislabeled, duplicative copies of the
`exhibits from E2E:
`• From IPR2020-01556: Document Nos. 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46; and
`• From IPR2020-01557: Document Nos. 41, 42, 43, 44, and 45.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner further requests that the Board grant permission for Patent Owner to re-file its Motions
`to Seal in these cases. The re-filed Motions would contain the following correction to the final
`paragraph:
`For the reasons stated above, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board enter the
`Default Protective order and seal the undredacted version of the Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply.
`
`
`
`Petitioner does not oppose this request.
`
`
`Regards,
`Henry Thomas
`(pro hac vice)
`
`
`
`
`
`Henry C. Thomas
`Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
`300 North LaSalle Dr. | Chicago, IL 60654-3406
`Direct: +1 312 728 9021 | Fax: +1 312 728 9199
`hthomas@willkie.com | vCard | www.willkie.com bio
`
`
`
`
`Important Notice: This email message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the
`confidential information it may contain. Email messages to clients of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
`presumptively contain information that is confidential and legally privileged; email messages to non-
`clients are normally confidential and may also be legally privileged. Please do not read, copy, forward or
`store this message unless you are an intended recipient of it. If you have received this message in error,
`please forward it back. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP is a limited liability partnership organized in the
`United States under the laws of the State of Delaware, which laws limit the personal liability of partners.
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site