`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________________
`
`RIMFROST AS
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________________
`
`Case: IPR2020-01534
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567 B2
`
`_______________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS
`
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... i
`OBJECTIONS ............................................................................................................ 1
`
`
`Exhibit 2001: Declaration of Dr. Jacek Jaczynski in Support of Patent
`Owner’s Response ................................................................................................ 1
`FRE 602 (personal knowledge) ......................................................................... 1
`
`FRE 701 (improper lay testimony); 702 (unqualified expert testimony) .......... 1
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception) ............................................................... 2
`
`FRE 901 (authentication) ................................................................................... 2
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content) .............................................................. 2
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose) ................................................................................. 2
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65 (non-compliance with expert testimony; tests and data) ...... 2
`
`Exhibit 2002: Freeman and West (1966) Complete separation of lipid ......... 3
`classes on a single thin-layer plate, Journal of Lipid Research, ...................... 3
`Notes on Methodology, vol. 7, pages 324-327. ................................................... 3
`
`
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception) ............................................................... 3
`
`FRE 901 (authentication) ................................................................................... 3
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content) .............................................................. 3
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose) ................................................................................. 3
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`Exhibit 2003: Retardation Factor Definition from Gold Book. ..................... 3
`
`
`
`FRE 402 (relevance); FRE 403 (confusion, waste, prejudice) .......................... 3
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception) ............................................................... 4
`
`FRE 901 (authentication) ................................................................................... 4
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content) .............................................................. 4
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose) ................................................................................. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`OBJECTIONS
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Rimfrost AS, submits the following objections to evidence of the
`
`Patent Owner, Aker Biomarine Antarctic AS.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2001: Declaration of Dr. Jacek Jaczynski in Support of Patent
`Owner’s Response
`
`
`
`
`
`FRE 602 (personal knowledge)
`
`Paragraphs 26-30 include assertions for which evidence has not been introduced
`
`sufficient to show that the declarant has personal knowledge of the matters
`
`asserted.
`
`
`
`FRE 701 (improper lay testimony); 702 (unqualified expert testimony)
`
`For paragraphs 18-19, 26-32, the declarant is not qualified to opine on patent claim
`
`limitations, to construe elements recited in the asserted patent claims, and/or to
`
`perform legal analysis of patent invalidity and/or reduction to practice. The opinion
`
`testimony offered in these paragraphs is not based on scientific, technical, or other
`
`specialized knowledge, and is also not based on the declarant’s personal
`
`knowledge. The declarant’s opinion testimony includes unsubstantiated leaps and
`
`advances inaccurate, unqualified generalizations.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`For paragraphs 26-32, these paragraphs are offered to prove the truth of the matter
`
`asserted without meeting any hearsay exception.
`
`
`
`FRE 901 (authentication)
`
`Patent Owner failed to provide evidence sufficient to establish the documents
`
`referenced in paragraphs 18, 26-32 are what they are purported to be.
`
`
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content)
`
`Paragraphs 18-19, 26-31 constitutes improper summary with underlying
`
`documents not made available.
`
`
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose)
`
`If the exhibit is admitted, its use should be limited to the purpose for which
`
`it was offered in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65 (non-compliance with expert testimony; tests and data)
`
`Paragraphs 18-19, 26-32 of the exhibit rely on facts and/or technical tests and/or
`
`data from such tests without complying with the requirements of this rule.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`Exhibit 2002: Freeman and West (1966) Complete separation of lipid
`classes on a single thin-layer plate, Journal of Lipid Research,
`Notes on Methodology, vol. 7, pages 324-327.
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`
`
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception)
`
`The exhibit is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted without
`meeting any hearsay exception.
`
`
`
`FRE 901 (authentication)
`
`Patent Owner failed to provide evidence sufficient to establish the exhibit is
`
`what it is purported to be.
`
`
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content)
`
`The exhibit constitutes improper summary with underlying documents not made
`
`available.
`
`
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose)
`
`If the exhibit is admitted, its use should be limited to the purpose for which
`
`it was offered in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`
`Exhibit 2003: Retardation Factor Definition from Gold Book.
`
`
`
`FRE 402 (relevance); FRE 403 (confusion, waste, prejudice)
`
`The exhibit is not relevant to any instituted ground. The exhibit’s probative value
`
`is substantially outweighed by its confusion of the issues to be decided, its waste of
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`the Board’s and the Petitioner’s time, and the danger that it will lead to unfair
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`prejudice if used later in the proceeding or on appeal.
`
`
`
`FRE 802 (hearsay without exception)
`
`The exhibit is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted without
`
`meeting any hearsay exception.
`
`
`
`FRE 901 (authentication)
`
`Patent Owner failed to provide evidence sufficient to establish the exhibit is
`
`what it is purported to be.
`
`
`
`FRE 1006 (summary to prove content)
`
`The exhibit constitutes improper summary with underlying documents not made
`
`available.
`
`
`
`FRE 105 (limited purpose)
`
`If the exhibit is admitted, its use should be limited to the purpose for which
`
`it was offered in Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`
`Dated: August 19, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael I. Chakansky/
`Michael I. Chakansky (Reg. No. 31,600)
`Hoffmann & Baron, LLP
`4 Century Drive
`
`Parsippany, N.J. 07054
`mchakansky@hbiplaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Tel: 973.331.1700
`
`First Backup Counsel for
`Petitioner Rimfrost AS
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2020-01534
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,010,567
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on this the 19th day of August 2021, the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) was
`
`served in its entirety on the following counsel of record by electronic service by
`
`email at the email addresses as set forth below in accordance with the consent set
`
`forth in Patent Owner’s Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 (Paper
`
`No. 4).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David A. Casimir
`
`J. Mitchell Jones
`CASIMIR JONES S.C.
`2275 Deming Way, Suite 310
`Middleton, WI 53562
`
`
`
`
`
`docketing@casimirjones.com
`dacasimir@casimirjones.com
`jmjones@casimirjones.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Michael I. Chakansky/
`Michael I. Chakansky (Reg. No. 31,600)
`Hoffmann & Baron, LLP
`4 Century Drive
`
`Parsippany, N.J. 07054
`mchakansky@hbiplaw.com
`Tel: 973.331.1700
`
`
`
`6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
