throbber
Extraction of Lipid and Cholesterol from Fish Muscle with
`Supercritical Fluids
`
`INGIBJORG HARDARDOTTIR and JOHN E. KINSELLA
`
`Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) was explored as a method for
`removing lipids and cholesterol from fish muscle. Selected conditions
`of extraction pressure, time, temperature and sample size were eval(cid:173)
`uated for effective removal of lipid and cholesterol. Increasing carbon
`dioxide (C02) pressure from 2000 to 5000 psig and the temperature
`from 40° to S0°C had little effect on the extent of lipid removal.
`Increasing the extraction time from 3 hr to 9 hr increased lipid re(cid:173)
`moval. Ethanol as an entrainer significantly enhanced lipid extraction
`at all pressures used. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC02) and SC02
`plus ethanol removed 78% and 97% of the lipids and 97% and 99%
`of the cholesterol, respectively, from trout muscle. The solubility of
`the muscle proteins decreased following extraction.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`THE MARKET FOR PROTEINS as functional ingredients for
`existing foods and fabricated foods is expanding. Successful
`development of methods for the production of functional pro(cid:173)
`teins would facilitate greater use of the world's fishery re(cid:173)
`sources for human use. However, the oxidation of the highly
`unsaturated lipid components present a major problem with
`fish muscle proteins (Mackie, 1983). Organic solvent extrac(cid:173)
`tion while effective for lipid removal, results in protein den(cid:173)
`aturation and loss of functional properties (Pariser et al., 1978).
`However, the feasibility of reducing or removing lipids from
`fish muscle proteins with the recently developed techniques
`employing supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with carbon
`dioxide (C02) warrants evaluation. The studies of Stahl et al.
`(1980, 1984), Friedrich and Pryde (1984), Snyder et al. (1984),
`Christianson et al. (1984), Bulley et al. (1984), Taniguchi et
`al. (1985) and Lee et al. (1986) showed that SFE can be used
`to extract oil from oilseeds. Stahl et al. (1984), Duwe et al.
`(1986) and Eldridge et al. (1986) reported that SFE had min(cid:173)
`imal effects on the properties of the proteins. SFE was effective
`in fractionating fish oil esters (Eisenbach, 1984; Nilsson, 1988).
`Supercritical fluids exhibit physicochemical properties in(cid:173)
`termediate between those of liquids and gases which enhance
`their efficacy as solvents. The relatively high gas density gives
`good solvent power, while the relatively low viscosity and high
`diffusivity provide appreciably higher gas permeability into the
`solute matrix. These properties impart higher rates of mass
`transfer of solutes into a supercritical fluid than into a liquid
`(Rizvi et al., 1986). In addition the inclusion of a relatively
`small amount of entrainer in the supercritical fluid (SCF) (e.g.,
`ethanol) can improve both the solubility and selectivity of the
`solvent (Brunner and Peter, 1982). C02 is a useful solvent in
`supercritical extractions of food components because it is non(cid:173)
`toxic, nonflammable, inexpensive and readily available. It has
`relatively low critical temperature (31.1°C) and pressure (1070
`psig, 7.38 MPa) (Rizvi et al., 1986).
`Although the cholesterol content of fish muscle is only 35-
`70 mg/lOOg (Anon., 1987; Nettleton, 1985), there is great
`interest in cholesterol reduction of muscle foods for nutritional
`and marketing purposes. An attempt has been made to lower
`
`Authors Hardardottir and Kinsella are with the Institute of Food
`Science, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853.
`
`1656-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-Volume 53, No. 6, 1988
`
`the cholesterol level of butter oil by SFE (Shishikura et al.,
`1986) but the efficacy of SFE in extracting cholesterol from
`muscle has not been reported, hence the extractability of cho(cid:173)
`lesterol from fish muscle was studied.
`The objectives of this study were to explore the use of su(cid:173)
`percritical carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide/ethanol for the
`lipid and cholesterol extraction of fish muscle and to assess
`the effects of the extraction on the solubility of the muscle
`proteins.
`
`MATERIALS & METHODS
`
`Samples
`Samples of post-rigor muscle form rainbow trout (Sa/mo gairdneri)
`were cut into small pieces (1 x 1 cm), frozen in liquid nitrogen and
`ground into particles (1-2 mm diameter) to increase the surface area.
`After SFE, the samples were freeze-dried to <2% water (Labconco
`Corp. Kansas City, MS) and stored in airtight bottles under nitrogen
`at 4°C for subsequent analyses.
`
`Extraction
`
`A laboratory scale supercritical extraction system, Model X-10
`(Milton Roy, Rivera Beach, FL) was used to extract the lipids from
`the trout muscle. The C02 (a liquid at - 5°C) was pumped at a flow
`rate of 460 mL/hr and pressurized above its critical pressure (1070
`psig) in a 50 mL extraction vessel as it emerged from the metering
`pump. The temperature inside the vessel was maintained at a selected
`temperature above the critical temperature (31.1°C). The SC02 was
`passed through the muscle particles at 40-50°C and 2000-5000 psig
`(13.8-34.5 MPa). The discharged C0 2 containing the extracted lipids
`was pumped into a separator vessel where the C02 was deprcssurized
`the dissolved lipids separated from the C02 •
`For determination of the effects of extraction on the composition
`and solubility, proteins were prepared using the following conditions:
`SC02 extraction. 460 mL C02/hr were pumped through muscle
`samples (5 g) for 9 hr (total C02:3900 g).
`SCO:Jethanol extraction. 460 mL C02 + 60 mL ethanol/hr were
`pumped through (10 g) muscle samples for 6 hr (total C02:2600 g;
`total ethanol: 280 g, i.e., about 10% by weight). Extractions were
`performed at 4000 psig and 40°C.
`The extracted protein preparations from each treatment were then
`analyzed.
`
`Composition
`
`The efficiency of the lipid extraction of the fish muscle was mea(cid:173)
`sured by the residual lipids in the SC02 extracted proteins using chlo(cid:173)
`roform/methanol extraction as in the method of Bligh and Dyer (1959).
`The total phospholipid content of the lipids in the protein preparations
`were estimated by the method of Stewart (1980). The cholesterol
`content of the lipids in the muscle proteins was measured by the
`method of Rudel and Morris (1973). The fatty acid composition of
`the lipids in the muscle proteins was quantitated by gas chromatog(cid:173)
`raphy using the methods of Swanson et al. (1987).
`The protein content of the fish protein preparations was determined
`by a micro-Kjeldahl procedure (% nitrogen x 6.25). The moisture
`content of the extracted fish proteins was determined after drying to
`constant weight at 110°C for 18 hr.
`.
`Solubility of the protein was analyzed by the procedure of Morr et
`al. (1985). The composition of soluble muscle proteins following SFE
`was determined by electrophoresis using an SE-200 miniature slab gel
`electrophoresis unit (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Fransisco,
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1164 Page 0001
`
`

`

`f===l
`
`~
`.SP
`~
`i:'
`-0
`"'
`8
`'§
`g
`Ji
`~
`1
`
`·~
`
`l ~c l
`
`50'C
`
`0
`
`.E
`"' ·~
`~
`"' 0
`'§
`'O g
`"£
`"'
`·o.
`'O
`:J
`
`5000psig
`
`4000psig
`
`0 11---~~-~-~--r----.----,
`4000
`5000
`2000
`3000
`
`2-l--~~~~r---~~~--,,-~~~--,.~~~~--,
`12
`
`0
`
`Pressure (psig)
`
`Fig. 1-Effect of extraction pressure and temperature on the
`amount of lipids remaining in the protein preparations after SC02
`extraction of TOg of muscle for 6 hr at 2000 to 5000 psig and 40
`and 50°C.
`
`Time (hr)
`
`Fig. 2-Effect of extraction time on the amount of lipids re(cid:173)
`maining in the protein preparations after SC02 extraction of 5g
`of muscle at 4000 and 5000 psig and 40°C.
`
`CA) and standard electrophoresis procedures (Laemmli, 1970). The
`gels were scanned by a densitometer (7003, E-C Apparatus Corp. St.
`Petersburg, FL) and the curves integrated and printed out by a Hewlett
`Packard 3390 A Integrator (Hewlett Packard, Avondale, PA).
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`The supercritical extractions were done in duplicate under each set
`of conditions and the mean of the two values are reported. For each
`graph showing the extent of lipid removal the data were pooled and
`the error mean square (EMS), calculated from the One Way Analysis
`of Variance (ANOVA), was used to calculate 95% confidence inter(cid:173)
`vals around the mean. ·
`
`RESULTS & DISCUSSION
`
`Extraction
`There was no significant difference in the amount of total
`lipids removed from the fish muscle by extraction with SC02
`at pressures between 2000 and 5000 psig (Fig. 1). The pres(cid:173)
`sures tested were limited by the critical pressure of carbon
`dioxide at 1070 psig, and the maximum working pressure of
`the extraction unit, 5000 psig. Extraction at 50°C removed
`slightly more lipids from the trout muscle than extraction at
`40°C (Fig. 1). Increasing the extraction time from 3 hr to 9 hr
`increased the lipid removal from the muscle (Fig. 2).The sol(cid:173)
`vent power of SC02 for organic substances is highly dependent
`on its pressure and temperature. The solvent power increases
`with temperature at given density (Brogle, 1982), but at lower
`pressures (below 6000 psig) the increased solubility effect due
`to temperature may be counteracted by the decrease in density
`and related decrease in solute holding power (Friedrich and
`Pryde, 1984). The amount of lipids removed from the muscle
`was almost constant regardless of pressures and temperatures
`examined. This is in accord with the findings of Yamaguchi
`et al. (1986) for SC02 extraction of lipids from antarctic krill.
`The inclusion of ethanol as an entrainer increased the lipid
`removal from the fish muscle (Fig 3). Extractions at 4000 psig
`using SC02 with and without ethanol resulted in muscle protein
`preparations containing 0.43 and 5.86g lipids/lOOg dry weight,
`respectively. Varying extraction pressures, times, temperature,
`and sample size did not significantly affect lipid removal by
`extraction with SCO)ethanol. The addition of ethanol to the
`SCF improves the solubility of lipids in the solvent (Brunner
`and Peter, 1982). Ethanol also increases the polarity of the
`solvent and may have helped dissociate phospholipid protein
`
`0%EtOH
`
`4000
`
`5000
`
`0 ;;·~b:+=:=-.----+----~=:==I :=='.o%EtoH ~
`
`2000
`
`3000
`
`Pressure (psig)
`
`Fig. 3-Effect of using an entrainer (10 weight % ethanol) with
`the SC02 on the amount of lipids remaining in the protein prep(cid:173)
`aration after extraction of TOg of muscle for 6 hr at 2000 to 5000
`psig and 40°C.
`
`complexes and thereby, improved extraction. This was con(cid:173)
`sistent with the composition of the extracted lipids.
`
`Composition
`
`The proximate composition and the fatty acid content of
`fresh muscle and protein preparations after extraction with SC02
`with and without ethanol are shown in Table 1 and 2, respec(cid:173)
`tively. Extraction with SC02 arid SC02/ethanol at 4000 psig
`and 40°C removed 78% and 97% of the lipids from the trout
`muscle, respectively. SC02 preferably extracted the triglyc(cid:173)
`erides, whereas SCOzf ethanol extracted both triglycerides and
`phospholipids.
`SC02 extraction of krill yielded oils that were composed
`solely of nonpolar lipids, largely triglycerides without phos(cid:173)
`pholipids (Yamaguchi et al., 1986), because the phospholipids
`were less soluble in the SC02 than the triglycerides. The ad(cid:173)
`dition of ethanol to the SCF also increased the polarity of the
`solvent and may have disrupted the noncovalent bonds between
`the phospholipids and the proteins making the phospholipids
`available for extraction.
`Cholesterol was effectively removed by both solvents, i.e.,
`
`Volume 53, No. 6, 1988-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-1657
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1164 Page 0002
`
`

`

`LIPID EXTRACTION FROM MUSCLE ...
`
`Table 1- Composition of the original muscle and the lipid extracted mus(cid:173)
`cle protein preparations after extraction with SCOl and SCOi/ethanolb
`Original
`SC02
`SC021ethanol
`fish muscle extracted proteins extracted proteins
`Component
`22.5d
`97.19d
`99.19d
`Protein (%N x 6.25)c
`74.90
`1.71•
`0.68•
`Moisturec
`10.0
`2.18
`0.29
`Lipids'
`Phospholipids1
`3.69
`1.35
`0.04
`0.31
`0.01
`<0.001
`Cholesterol1
`•Conditions: 5g muscle extracted for 9 hr at 4000 psig 40'C.
`b Conditions: 10g muscle extracted for 6 hr at 4000 psig 40'C.
`c Reported as g/100g wet weight
`d Values not corrected for nonprote1n nitrogen
`• Measured after freeze-drying (see text)
`1 Reported as g/100 g dry weight
`
`Table 2-Fatty acid content of trout muscle and protein preparations after
`lipid extraction with SC02 and SCO,/ethanol (g/IDOg dry weight of ex(cid:173)
`tracted protein and % of original content in fresh muscle}
`Fatty
`Fresh SC02 extracted
`SC02/ethanol
`Name
`acid
`muscle
`proteins
`extracted proteins
`0.41" 0.06 (14.6%)b
`0.002 (0.5%)
`14:0 myristic acid
`16:0
`palmitic acid
`1.80
`0.69 (38.3%)
`0.05 (2.8%)
`16:1
`palmitoleic acid
`0.56
`0.06 (10.7%)
`0.005 (0.9%)
`0.36
`0.14 (38.9%)
`0.05 (13.9%)
`18:0
`stearic acid
`18:1
`oleic acid
`1.50
`0.26 (17.3%)
`0.03 (2.0%)
`18:2n-6 linoleic acid
`0.23
`0.03 (13.0%)
`0.004 (1.7%)
`18:3n-3 linolenic acid
`0.94
`0.11 (10.6%)
`0.009 (1.0%)
`0.07
`0.02 (28.6%)
`0.007 (10.0%)
`20:4n-6 arachidonic acid
`0.49
`0.11 (22.4%)
`0.02
`(4.1 %)
`20:5n-3 eicosopentaenoic acid
`22: 1
`erucic acid
`1.17
`0.09 (7.7%)
`0.005 (0.4%)
`0.05
`0.01 (20.0%)
`0.001 (2.0%)
`22 :4n-6 docosatetraenoic acid
`22: 5n-3 docosapentaenoic acid
`0.15
`0.04 (26. 7%)
`0.009 (6.0%)
`1.67
`0.45 (26.9%)
`0.10 (6.0%)
`22:6
`docosahexaenoic acid
`• g/100 g dry muscle protein
`b Percentage of original amount in fresh muscle
`
`97% and 99.5% of the cholesterol was removed, with the lip(cid:173)
`ids, by extraction with SC0 2 and SC02/ethanol, respectively.
`This indicated that the supercritical solvent removed choles(cid:173)
`terol more effectively than the lipids and hence might be of
`value in reducing cholesterol in foods.
`The fresh fish muscle contained 74.9% moisture, but after
`extraction, prior to freeze-drying, the moisture content of the
`protein preparations had decreased to 13.1% and 5.9% for
`SC02 and SCOzfethanol, respectively. Fresh fish muscle and
`protein preparations made by extraction with SC02 and SC02/
`ethanol contained 22.5%, 97.2% and 99.2% protein
`(%N x 6.25), respectively (Table 1). The increase in proteins
`resulted from the removal of both fat and moisture, thus con(cid:173)
`centrating the proteins in the preparations.
`The solubility of muscle proteins was reduced as a result of
`extraction. This suggested that some of the proteins might have
`been denatured during the extraction, probably reflecting in(cid:173)
`creased intermolecular protein-protein interactions. Studies by
`Weder (1980) showed that SC02 had some denaturing effects
`on ribonuclease and Christianson et al. (1984) showed that the
`SFE denatured the proteins· in the extracted corn germ flour.
`Analyses by gel electrophoresis revealed that myosin became
`insoluble during extraction (Fig. 4). The dehydration of the
`fish muscle during SFE might be responsible for the observed
`loss in solubility. Addition of dithiothreitol (DTI, lOmM) to
`the extracted protein preparation solutions did not increase the
`solubility of the proteins, whereas addition of 1 % sodium do(cid:173)
`decyl sulfate (SDS) to the protein increased protein solubility
`to that observed in fresh fish. These results indicated that for(cid:173)
`mation of intermolecular disulfide bonds was not responsible
`for the insolubility of the proteins but that secondary forces,
`i.e., hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, were re(cid:173)
`sponsible for the insolubilization of the myosin components
`during SFE. The protein preparations showed poor emulsifying
`properties and did not form gels following heating probably
`because of the limited solubility of the myosin component,
`
`048
`
`1.58
`
`1.66
`
`1.72
`
`c
`
`B
`
`0.44
`
`1.56
`
`1.6 1.76
`
`Fig. 4-Densitometric scans of the protein bands obtained fol(cid:173)
`lowing e/ectrophoretic separation of soluble proteins from fresh
`fish and protein preparations made following SC02 extraction:
`(A) Soluble proteins from fresh fish. (30 Mg protein) (0.44:myosin,
`1.56:actin, 1.62:troponin, 1.76:tropomyosin); (BJ Soluble pro(cid:173)
`teins from fresh fish after extraction with SCO:z- (30 Mg proteins)
`(1.58:actin, 1.66:troponin, 1.72:tropomyosin); (C) Soluble pro(cid:173)
`teins from fish after extraction with SC02 stirred with 1 % SDS.
`(15 Mg protein} (0.48:myosin, 1.59:actin, 1.64:troponin,
`1. 77.;tropomyosin).
`
`which is considered the most important of the fish proteins for
`both gel and emulsion formation (Asghar et al., 1985).
`
`CONCLUSION
`SUPERCRITICAL C02 extraction with and without ethanol
`removed 97% and 78% of the lipids and 99.5% and 97% of
`cholesterol from trout muscle, respectively. The solubility of
`the proteins decreased following extraction apparently because
`of myosin aggregation.
`
`REFERENCES
`Anon. 1987. Composition of seafoods. Section 8.15. In "USDA Handbook.
`The Composition of Foods." US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
`Asghar, A., Samejima, K., and Yasui, T. 1985. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci.
`Nutr. 22:27.
`Bligh, E.G. and Dyer, W.J. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction
`and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Phys. 37(8):911.
`Brogle, H. 1982. C02 as a solvent: Its properties and applications. Chem.
`and Ind. 19:385.
`Brunner, G. And Peter, S. 1982. On the solubility of !flycerides and fatty
`acids in compressed gases in the presence of an entramer. Sep. Sci. Tech(cid:173)
`nol. 17(1):199.
`Bulley, N.R., Fattori, M., Meisen, A., and Moyls, L. 1984. Supercritical
`fluid extraction of ve~etable oilseeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:1362.
`Christianson, D.D., Fnedrich, J.P., List, G.R., Warner, K., Bagley, E.B.,
`Stringfellow, A.C., and Inf?lett, G.E. 1984. Supercritical fluid extraction
`of dry-mi!led corn germ with carbon dioxide. J. Food Sci. 49:229.
`-Continued on page 1661
`
`1658-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-Volume 53, No. 6, 1988
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1164 Page 0003
`
`

`

`Table 3-Percentage compositions of fatty acids in the food material, dregs and drip obtained by extrusion cooking and its pretreatment of chum salmon
`at the spawning migration stage
`
`14:0
`4.20
`±0.45
`
`16:0
`15.81
`± 0.80
`
`16:1
`6.98
`±0.78
`
`18:0
`3.71
`±0.17
`
`18:1
`20.28
`± 1.13
`
`Sample
`Dregs through
`a screw
`press
`Oils in the drip
`
`8.70
`±0.51
`4.29
`±1.24
`
`10.32
`± 0.29
`15.41
`± 0.28
`
`Dregs + wheat
`flour (10%) through
`an extruder
`•Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation for triplicate analyses.
`
`9.55
`±0.51
`7.04
`±0.72
`
`2.77
`±0.08
`3.53
`±0.03
`
`26.60
`± 0.55
`20.74
`± 0.08
`
`Fatty acids•
`18:3
`0.60
`±0.02
`
`20:0
`0.75
`±0.06
`
`0.38
`±0.04
`0.57
`±0.06
`
`0.61
`±0.02
`0.74
`±0.04
`
`18:2
`1.76
`±0.26
`
`1.58
`±0.13
`3.68
`±2.24
`
`20:1
`7.77
`± 0.72
`
`16.75
`± 0.35
`7.83
`± 1.07
`
`20:4
`0.57
`±0.05
`
`0.18
`±0.01
`0.65
`±0.15
`
`20:5
`8.48
`±0.35
`
`3.13
`±0.14
`7.74
`±0.57
`
`22:1
`5.01
`± 0.62
`
`11.38
`± 0.18
`5.42
`± 0.53
`
`22:6
`19.29
`± 2.08
`
`3.73
`± 0.24
`17.39
`± 0.93
`
`REFERENCES
`Ando, S., Hatano, M., and Zama, K. 1985. A consumption of muscle lipid
`during spawning migration of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta. Bull.
`Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 51: 1817.
`Hatano, M., Takama, K., Kojima, H., and Zama, K. 1983. Proximate com(cid:173)
`position of fall chum salmon. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 49: 213.
`Isobe, S. and Noguchi, A. 1987. High moisture extrusion with twin screw
`extruder-Fate of soy protein during the repetition of extrusion cooking.
`J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 34: 456.
`Jacquot, R. 1961. Organic constituents of fish and other aquatic animal
`foods. "Fish as Food," Vol. 1. Borgstrom G. (Ed.) Academic Press Inc.,
`New York.
`Kinsella, J. E. 1987. "Seafoods and Fish Oils in Human Health and Dis(cid:173)
`ease," p. 1. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
`Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. "Statistical Methods," 6th ed.
`Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
`Suzuki, H., Wada, S., Hayakawa, S., and Tamura, S. 1985. Effects of oxy(cid:173)
`gen absorber and temperature on w3 polyunsaturated fatty acids of sar(cid:173)
`dine oil during storage. J. Food Sci. 50: 358.
`Suzuki, H., Hayakawa, S., Wada, 0., Yamamoto, A., and Ono, T. 1986a.
`Effect of age on the fatty acid composition of the lipids of rat brain. Jpn.
`J. Hyg. 41: 410.
`Suzuki, H., Okazaki, K., Hayakawa, S., Wada, S., and Tamura, S. 1986b.
`Influence of commercial dietary fatty acids on polyunsaturated fatty acids
`of cultured freshwater fish and comparison with those of wild fish of the
`same species. J. ~ic. Food Chem. 34: 58.
`Tsutsumi, C. 1984. 'Methods of Food Analysis," 2nd ed., Jpn. Soc. Food
`Sci. Technol., Korin, Tokyo, Japan.
`Wada, S., Suzuki, H., and Hayakawa, S. 1987. Effect offish oil diet on the
`brain polyunsaturated fatty acids, phospholipids and enzyme activities
`in aged rats. "Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Eicosanoids." Am. Oil
`Chem. Soc., Champaign, IL.
`Ms received 12/4/87; revised 6/20/88; accepted 717/88.
`
`Table 4-Effects of extrusion cooking and its pretreatment on w-3 poly(cid:173)
`unsaturated fatty acid content in chum salmon muscle during spawning
`migration
`
`w-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids•
`20:5
`22:6
`
`Whole muscle
`0.46
`0.18
`Raw material
`0.90
`0.40
`Through a screw press
`0.82
`0.36
`Through an extruder
`•Values represent the mean calculated numerically from total lipid content in the
`muscles and percentages of the acids in the lipids.
`
`g/1 OOg wet wt
`
`lipid content is equal to the total fatty acid content. The con(cid:173)
`centrations of 20:5 and 22:6 in the food material were about
`twice those in the raw materials. This is due to the increase of
`lipid content by dehydration in screw pressing.
`The present study indicates that the muscle lipids, especially
`in the outer layer, of chum salmon during spawning migration
`contain a higher percentages of w-3 PUFAs than those in the
`fish during feeding migration_ Also, w-3 PUFAs were not lost
`by extrusion cooking and its pretreatment. The production of
`foods containing a latge concentration of PUF As may be pos(cid:173)
`sible by processing chum salmon muscle during spawning mi(cid:173)
`gration.
`
`LIPID EXTRACT/ON FROM MUSCLE. .. From page 1658 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`
`Duwe, H., Sonnenkalb, W., Roethe, K.-P., and Rosahl, B. 1986. Destraktion
`von lipiden aus mikrobiellen eiweissisolaten. Die Nahrung 30:667.
`Eisenbach, W. 1984. Supercritical fluid extraction. A film demonstration.
`Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 88:882.
`Eldridge, AC., Friedrich, J.P., Warner, K., and Kwolek, W.F. 1986. Prep(cid:173)
`aration and evaluation of supercritical carbon dioxide defatted soybean
`flakes. J. Food Sci. 51:584.
`Friedrich, J.P. and Pryde, E.H. 1984. Supercritical C02 extraction of lip(cid:173)
`idbearing materials and characterization of the products. J. Am. Oil
`Chem. Soc. 61:223.
`Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly
`of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680.
`Lee, AK.K., Bulley, N.R., Fattori, M., and Meisen, A 1986. Modelling of
`supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of canola oilseed in fixed beds. J.
`Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 63:921.
`Mackie, I.M. 1983. New approaches in the use of fish proteins. Ch. 6. In
`"Developments in the Food Proteins 2," B.J.F. Hudson (Ed.), p. 215. Appl.
`Sci. Pub!., New York.
`Morr, C.V., German, B., Kinsella, J.E., Regenstein, J.M., Van Buren, J.P.,
`Kilara, A, Lewis, B.A, and Mangino, M.E. 1985. A collaborative study
`to develop a standardized food protein solubility procedure. J. Food Sci.
`50:1715.
`Nettleton, J. 1985. "Seafood and Health." Osprey Books, New York.
`Nilsson, W.B., Gauglitz, E.J., Hudson, J.K., Stout, V.F., and Spinelli, J.
`1988. Fractionation of menhaden oil ethyl esters using supercritical fluid
`C02• J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:109.
`Pariser, E.R., Wallerstein, M.B., Corkery, C.J., and Brown, N.L. 1978.
`"Fish Protein Concentrate:Panacea for World malnutrition." MIT Press,
`Cambridge, MA.
`Rizvi, S.S.H., Benado, AL., Zollweg, J.A., and Daniels, J.A. 1986. Super(cid:173)
`critical fluid extraction/rocesses. Part I. Fundamental principles and
`modelling methods. Foo Technol. 40(6):55.
`Rudel, L.L. and Morris, M.D. 1973. Determination of cholesterol using
`o-phthalaldehyde. J. Lipid Res. 14:364.
`
`Shishikura, A, Fujimoto, K., Kaneda, T., Arai, K., and Saito, S. 1986.
`Modification of butter oil by extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide.
`Agric. Biol. Chem. 50:1209.
`Snyder, J.M., Friedrich, J.P., and Christianson, D.D. 1984. Effect of mois(cid:173)
`ture and rarticle size on the extractability of oils from seeds with su(cid:173)
`percritica C02• J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:1851.
`Stahl, E., Schutz, E., and Mangold, H.K. 1984. Extraction of seed oils with
`supercritical carbon dioxide:Effect on residual proteins. J. Agric. Food
`Chem. 32:938.
`Stahl, E., Schutz, E., and Mangold, H.K. 1980. Extraction of seed oils with
`liquid and supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:1153.
`Stewart, J.C.M. 1980. Colorimetric determination of phospholipids with
`ammonium ferrothiocyanate. Anal. Biochem. 10(4):10.
`Swanson, J., Black, J.M., and Kinsella, J.E. 1987. Dietary n-3 polyunsat(cid:173)
`urated fatty acid:Rate and extent of modification of fatty acyl composi(cid:173)
`tion of lipid classes of mouse lung and kidney. J. Nutr. 117:824.
`Taniguchi, M., Tsuji, T., Shibata, M., and Kobayashi, T. 1985. Extraction
`of oils from wheat germ with supercritical carbon dioxide. Agric. Biol.
`Chem. 49:2367.
`Weder, J.K.P. 1980. Effect of supercritical carbon dioxide on proteins. Z.
`Lebensm. Untersuchung and Forschung. 171:95.
`Yamaguchi, K., Murakami, M., Nakano, H., Konosu, S., Kokura, T., Ya(cid:173)
`mamoto, H., Kosaka, M., and Hata, K. 1986. Supercritical carbon dioxide
`extraction of oils from antarctic Krill. J. Agric. Food Chem. 34:904.
`Ms received 2/12/88; revised 4/29/88; accepted 6/13/88.
`
`Supported in part by grant from the New York Sea Grant program. The help and
`advice of Prof. Syed S.H. Rizvi is gratefully acknowledged.
`
`Volume 53, No. 6, 1988-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-1661
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1164 Page 0004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket