throbber
Marine Biology 27, 197-204 (1974)
`© by Springer-Verlag 1974
`
`The Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids. Fatty Acid Exchange
`among Trophic Levels of the Ross Sea
`
`N.R. Bottino
`
`Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University; College Station, Texas, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`The fatty acids of 3 samples of Euphausia superba,
`7 samples of E. crystallorophias, and 12 samples
`of phytoplankton collected in the Ross Sea, Ant(cid:173)
`arctica, during Eltanin Cruise 51 were examined.
`The fatty acid profiles of the samples of E. su(cid:173)
`perba resembled each other closely. The fatty acid
`profiles of the E. crystallorophias samples were
`also similar to each other but different quanti(cid:173)
`tatively from those of E. superba. Phytoplankton
`fatty acid patterns varied with the geographical
`location and species composition of the samples.
`The fatty acids of euphausiids were compared to
`those of the phytoplankton from the corresponding
`locations. Rather similar fatty acid patterns in
`phytoplankton and E. superba corroborate the
`herbivorous nature of this euphausiid. On the other
`hand, phytoplankton and E. crystallorophias showed
`quite different fatty acid patterns. The differ(cid:173)
`ences were mostly due to the presence of waxes
`among the lipids of E. crystallorophias. It is not
`clear whether these waxes are of dietary origin or
`are synthesized endogenously.
`
`Introduction
`
`The study of krill has become intensive in recent
`times, perhaps as a result of its potential im(cid:173)
`portance as food. A variety of organisms is usual(cid:173)
`ly included under that generic name, but in the
`Southern Oceans the name Euphausia superba has
`been considered almost a synonym for krill. How(cid:173)
`ever, due to a quite defined geographical distri(cid:173)
`bution, there are certain areas in which E. su(cid:173)
`perba is replaced by other members of the same
`genus. For example, E. superba is very seldom
`found in shallow waters close to ice, such as the
`Ross Ice Shelf, but the smaller E. crystalloro(cid:173)
`phias predominates in such areas (Marr, 1962;
`Mauchline and Fisher, 1969).
`The chemical composition of Euphausia superba is
`reasonably well known. Its fatty acids, in par(cid:173)
`ticular, have been the subject of several studies
`in the past few years (Nonaka and Koizumi, 1964;
`Tsuyuki et al., 1964a, b; Hansen, 1969; Pierce et
`al., 1969; Hansen and Meiklen, 1970; Sidhu et al.,
`1970; Van der Veen et al., 1971). On the other
`hand, very little is known about the lipids of E.
`
`crystallorophias, except that they increase in the
`late austral summer and decrease gradually during
`the winter (Littlepage, 1964). The present report
`describes studies on the fatty acids of E. superba
`and E. crystallorophias from various locations in
`the Ross Sea. The fatty acid patterns of the two
`euphausiids are compared to each other as well as
`to the fatty acids of phytoplankton from corre(cid:173)
`sponding locations. An attempt is made to deter(cid:173)
`mine the flow of fatty acids through trophic levels.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Phytoplankton samples were collected with a 35 ~
`net, by vertical hauls to a depth of 200 m. After
`microscopic examination, samples containing less
`than 80% phytoplankton were discarded. Microzoo(cid:173)
`plankton constituted the major contaminant.
`Euphausiids were collected with a 1 m mid-water
`trawl, at depths varying between 0 and 300 m.
`Shortly after being sorted by hand the samples
`were extracted for lipids with a chloroform:meth(cid:173)
`anol (2:1, v/v) mixt~re (Folch et al., 1957).
`Quantities of 5 to 10 mg total lipids were con(cid:173)
`verted into fatty acid methyl esters by saponifi(cid:173)
`cation, followed by reflux with methanol in the
`presence of boron trifluoride (American Oil Chem(cid:173)
`ists' Society, 1970). The fatty acid methyl esters
`were studied by gas-liquid chromatography on a 6'
`1/8" column of siliconized polyethylene glycol
`succinate (DGSS-X, Applied Science Co., State Col(cid:173)
`lege, Pennsylvania) 10% w/w on Chromosorb (Johns(cid:173)
`Manville, Denver, Colorado) at 17o0 c. A dual-flame
`model GC-5 Beckman gas chromatograph (Fullerton,
`California) was used connected to an Infotronics
`(Columbia Scientific Industries, Austin, Texas)
`digital integrator. Results are expressed as weight
`percent. Fatty acid methyl esters were identified
`by co-chromatography with known standards and by
`plotting relative retention times versus chain
`length before, and in most cases, after hydro(cid:173)
`genation.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Fatty Acids of Euphausia superba
`
`Samples of Euphausia superba were collected from
`Stations 8, 9 and 11 of Eltanin Cruise 51 (Fig. 1).
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0001
`
`

`

`198
`
`N.R. Bottino: Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids
`
`Depart lyttelton
`January 17, 1972
`
`. I
`
`Arrive McMurdoStation
`February25,1972
`12
`
`Fig. I. Ross Sea, Antarctica: track of Eltanin
`Cruise 51, showing stations
`
`These stations are located in an area in which two
`currents of water mix (Marr, 1962), thus providing
`the turbulent environment that E. superba seems to
`prefer for a habitat (Ivanov, 1970).
`There is a remarkable similarity in the fatty acid
`compositions of the samples collected from the
`three stations (Table I). In addition, these pat(cid:173)
`terns resemble quite closely those reported by
`Hansen and Meiklen (1970) and by Sidhu et al.
`(1970). The present results, however, differ some(cid:173)
`what from those of Nonaka and Koizumi (1964) and
`of Van der Veen et al. (1971). Of all samples of
`Euphausia superba studied so far, only those of
`the present study were extracted immediately after
`capture. The others were frozen, transported and
`then extracted. This might explain some of the dif(cid:173)
`ferences.
`In two groups of krill (Stations 8 and II), the
`hepatopancreas and stomach were excised and their
`fatty acids were studied separately from those of
`the whole animal. In one case (Station JI), the
`fatty acids of the remaining carcass were also
`studied. Since the stomachs were empty in all
`cases, the values in Table I under the heading
`hepatopancreas and stomach correspond essentially
`to hepatopancreas lipids only. The remarkable simi(cid:173)
`larity among organ, remaining carcass, and whole
`
`Table I. Euphausia superba. Fatty acids (as weight per cent of total acids)
`
`Station 11
`Fatty acid a Station 8
`Station 9
`Whole krill HP+Sb Whole krill Whole krill HP+S Remaining
`carcass
`12.9 13. 5
`22.3 23.4
`I. 4
`I. 3
`8.2
`8.0
`21.8 21. 5
`I. 2
`2. I
`1.0
`3.6
`13.9
`8. I
`
`14. 3
`24.7
`I. 4
`8.9
`21. 7
`0.9
`2.0
`I. 0
`3.3
`11.4
`7.3
`
`I. I
`I. 9
`
`I. I
`3.8
`11. 6
`9.4
`
`14.9
`21. 2
`0.7
`9.0
`18.2
`0.6
`2.6
`
`I. I
`2.2
`16.0
`8.6
`
`10. 7
`21. 2
`I. 2
`6.7
`17. I
`0.9
`2.5
`I. 2
`I. 9
`22.2
`9.4
`
`12.9
`20.9
`0.9
`10. 7
`22.8
`
`I. I
`2.7
`1.4
`2.6
`11. 8
`8.3
`
`14 :0
`16:0
`18:0
`16: I (n-7)
`18: I (n-9)
`20: I (n-9)
`18:2(n-3)
`18:3(n-3)
`18:4(n-3)
`20:5(n-3)
`22: 6 (n-3)
`Minor fatty
`acidsC
`
`4.9
`
`5.0
`
`3.9
`
`3. I
`
`3.6
`
`3.3
`
`aThe number preceding the colon gives the number of carbon atoms in the
`chain, the number following the colon the number of double bonds; (n-x):
`number of c~rbons in the chain minus number of carbons between the methyl
`end and the nearest double bond.
`b Hepatopancreas plus stomach.
`
`cOnly those fatty acids present at a level of 1% or more are included.
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0002
`
`

`

`N.R. Bottino: Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids
`
`199
`
`body composition suggest that there is very little
`differentiation of organ lipids in Euphausia su(cid:173)
`perba.
`
`Fatty Acids of Euphausia crystaZZorophias
`
`In contrast to Euphausia superba, which prefers
`turbulent waters, E. crystaZZorophias is usually
`found in shallow waters in the proximity of the
`Continental Shelf (Marr, 1962; Mauchline and
`Fisher, 1969). We know from Littlepage (1964) that
`E. crystaZZorophias' lipids decrease in amount at
`the end of the austral winter and rise in late
`summer. My own studies (Bottino, in press) show
`that 20 to 40% of the lipids of E. crystaZZoro(cid:173)
`phias are waxes, the rest being mostly complex
`lipids and small amounts of neutral lipids.
`The Euphausia crystaZZorophias collected from
`Stations 11, and 13 through 17 during Eltanin
`Cruise 51 show closely similar fatty acid patterns
`(Table 2). Comparison of the fatty acids of the
`two euphausiids show (Table 3) that E. crystaZloro(cid:173)
`phias contains about twice as much oleic acid
`(average 44% of total fatty acids) as E. superba
`(average 21%). Most of this oleic acid comes from
`the waxes, since about 83% of the wax fatty acids
`is oleic acid (Bottino, in press). The levels of
`highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA), mostly
`20:5(n-3) and 22:6(n-3) are quite similar in both
`euphausiids.
`In conclusion, comparison of the fatty acids of
`both euphausiids shows that Euphausia crystaZZoro(cid:173)
`phias lipids are more unsaturated than E. superba
`
`lipids on account of the larger amount of oleic
`acid in the former. This different degree of lipid
`unsaturation might be related to the different en(cid:173)
`vironment in which the two euphausiids live. Where(cid:173)
`as E. crystallorophias dwells near the ice all
`year around, E. superba is probably in contact
`with the ice only during the winter months (Mack(cid:173)
`intosh, 1970).
`
`Phytoplankton Fatty Acids
`
`Phytoplankton samples from Stations 8, 9, 11, 13-
`15, and 18 were studied. According to microscopic
`and macroscopic observations I, the nature of the
`phytoplankton population changes with the stations,
`and this is reflected in quantitative variations
`in the fatty acid patterns (Table 3). Qualitative(cid:173)
`ly, however, the fatty acid patterns showed some
`coromon characteristics: (1) The presence in most
`samples of significant amounts (up to 15%) of Cs
`to C13 fatty acids with both even and odd carbon
`chains (Table 3); most of these acids are not de(cid:173)
`tected or are present at much lower levels in
`euphausiid lipids (Tables 1 and 2). (2) All phyto(cid:173)
`plankton samples contained HUFA, mainly 20:5(n-3)
`and 22:6(n-3) in levels ranging from less than 1%
`to about 23% (Table 3). This suggests that the
`
`1
`Dr. S. El-Sayed provided qualitative and semi(cid:173)
`quantitative microscopic data on the composition
`of the phytoplankton samples.
`
`Table 2. Euphausia crystallorophias. Fatty acids (as weight per cent of total acids)
`
`Fatty acid Station l l Station 13
`Adults Juvenile
`
`Station 14 Station 15 Station 16 Station 17
`
`14:0
`16 :O
`18:0
`16: I (n-7)
`I 8: l (n-9)
`l8:2(n-3)
`J8:3(n-3)
`18:4(n-3)
`20:4(n-6)
`20:5(n-3)
`22:6(n-3)
`Minor fatty
`acids a
`
`2.3
`15.3
`0.3
`8.6
`39.6
`l. 7
`1.0
`0.7
`0.9
`!8. 2
`9.9
`
`I. 5
`
`2.2
`12. l
`0.4
`6.5
`49.8
`2.4
`l. 0
`I. 8
`
`14. I
`7.2
`
`2.4
`13.3
`0.6
`7.9
`48.8
`2.2
`1.0
`I. 5
`
`I 2. 5
`7. 7
`
`2.5
`
`2. I
`
`2.6
`17. 2
`0.3
`7.9
`47.8
`2. I
`I. 0
`I. 2
`0.7
`12. 3
`6.0
`
`0.9
`
`2.6
`15.5
`0.5
`8.4
`49.0
`2.3
`0.8
`l. 3
`0.4
`12.8
`5.3
`
`I. l
`
`2.2
`13. I
`0.5
`9.3
`47.6
`2.3
`0.7
`0.8
`
`14.9
`5.6
`
`3.0
`
`2.6
`16.0
`0.8
`6.5
`40.7
`l. 6
`0.8
`l.O
`1.0
`16.5
`l I. l
`
`I. 4
`
`aExcept for stearic acid ( 18 :0) only those fatty acids present at a level of 1% or more
`are included.
`not detected. See footnotes to Table I for further explanation.
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0003
`
`

`

`!'-)
`0
`0
`
`z
`
`C>j
`
`Oj
`0
`rt
`rt
`
`.....
`0 ..
`
`;j
`
`"'1
`Pl
`rt
`rt
`'<
`
`> n .....
`
`p.
`Ul
`
`0 ......
`> ;j
`
`rt
`Pl
`'1 n
`.....
`rt
`
`()
`
`"1
`:::>"
`'<
`rt
`0
`'rj ,_.
`Pl
`:::i
`?;"'
`rt
`0
`:::i
`Pl
`::i
`0..
`
`trJ
`
`i:: "" ::r
`Pl
`i::
`.....
`Ul
`.....
`0..
`Ul
`
`Table 3. Fatty acids of Antarctic phytoplankton and euphausiids (as weight per cent of total acids)
`
`Fatty acid Phytoplankton at Stationsa
`8
`9a
`I la
`I lb
`
`9b
`
`13
`
`14
`
`!Sa
`
`!Sb
`
`!Sc
`
`18a
`
`18b
`
`Euphausia
`superba
`(average of
`3 stations)
`
`Euphausia
`crystallorophias
`(average of
`7 stations)
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`0.1
`2.4
`0. l
`14.6
`o.s
`
`- - - - - 7
`
`.9
`0.3
`46.2
`0.2
`-
`
`8:0
`9: ()
`In: 0
`11 :0
`12:0
`13:0
`14: 0
`IS:O
`16: (l
`
`18:0
`IO: 1 (n-?)
`ll:l(n-?)
`12:1(n-?)
`13: I (n-?)
`15: I (n-?)
`16:1(n-?)
`17: I (n-?)
`18: I (n-9)
`20:l(n-9)
`
`18:2(n-6)
`
`-
`-
`-
`0.4
`0.2
`0.3
`2.9
`0.9
`-
`I. s
`-
`I. 7
`-
`-
`-
`0.7
`2.3
`I. 3
`2.3
`1.9
`-
`-
`-
`I. 1
`lS.9
`9.7 22.S 11. S
`I. 9
`0.3
`2.6
`I. 6
`20.4 20. 1 19.9 16.0
`7.0
`2. I
`2.0
`3.3
`-
`0.6
`2.2
`2.S
`-
`-
`-
`0.7
`-
`I. s
`2.8
`I. 6
`-
`-
`o.s
`I. 0
`o.s
`0.7
`0.6
`I. 3
`12.4
`8.3
`6.2
`7.5
`0.3
`0.6
`I. 6
`0.9
`12. I 16.0
`IS. 6 16.2
`-
`0.4
`trace
`0.8
`2. I
`0.1
`0.3
`0.2
`
`-
`-
`-
`I. 0
`I. 2
`I. s
`0.2
`0. I
`2.S
`I. 4
`-
`0. I
`2.4
`4.0
`0.9
`trace
`I. I
`I. 2
`I. 9
`I. 3
`2.2
`2.0
`0.4
`0.4
`2.S
`-
`-
`0.8
`3.0
`0.4
`22.9 2S.S 20.7 17.4 19. 3
`-
`2.6
`I. 7
`3.4
`0.7
`18.8 21. 7 18.S 18.7 17. 2
`2.0
`2.6
`2.2
`I. 9
`I .8
`-
`-
`-
`-
`0.8
`-
`2.0
`0.1
`I. 9
`I. 3
`0.2
`2.4
`0.7
`I. 2
`I. 6
`-
`0.1
`0.6
`1.8
`1.4
`1.0
`0.6
`I. 2
`2.7
`0.4
`S.7
`5.3
`3.4
`7.8
`3.6
`-
`0.3
`0.2
`0.3
`0.3
`16 .3 24.8 11.4 20.2
`18.3
`-
`-
`I. 7
`O. I
`trace
`-
`-
`-
`O. I
`O. I
`
`0.7
`I. 7
`2.2
`0.3
`0.8
`-
`S. 1
`I. l
`16. I
`S.2
`-
`0.9
`0.9
`I. I
`0.7
`3.2
`trace
`12.S
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`-
`-
`9.S
`-
`
`-
`-
`0.2
`-
`13.0
`0.3
`17. 3 14.9
`I. 7
`1.S
`-
`0.2
`-
`-
`I. s
`0.3
`-
`-
`-
`I. 8
`13. 1 10.3
`1.4
`0.9
`17. 3 18.7
`0.3
`0.3
`3.8
`4. l
`
`-
`-
`0.2
`-
`14.0
`0.4
`22.3
`1.0
`-
`-
`-
`-
`trace
`9.S
`o.s
`20.8
`0.9
`0.2
`
`Continued on page 201
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0004
`
`

`

`z
`?;:I
`
`t:d
`0
`rt
`rt
`>-'·
`~
`0
`
`'Tl
`PJ
`rt
`rt
`'<
`:>
`()
`>-'•
`p.
`
`"'
`0 ,_.,
`:>
`~
`rt
`PJ
`'1
`()
`rt
`>-'·
`()
`
`'i::I ::r
`'<
`rt
`0
`'O ,_.
`PJ
`~
`:>;"
`rt
`0
`~
`
`PJ
`~
`p.
`
`trj c
`'O ::r
`PJ c
`"' >-'•
`
`>-'·
`p.
`Ul
`
`~
`0
`
`18:2(n-3)
`22:2(n-6)
`22: 2 (n-3)
`18:3(n-6)
`18:3(n-3)
`20:3(n-6)
`20: 3(n-3)
`16: 4 (n-1)
`18:4 (n-3)
`20:4(n-6)
`20:4(n-3)
`22:4(n-6)
`22:4(n-3)
`20:5(n-3)
`22:5(n-6)
`22:5(n-3)
`22:6(n-3)
`Minor fatty
`acidsb
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0005
`
`7.9
`
`8.4
`
`5.5
`
`0.9
`
`0.8
`
`0.1
`
`7. 1
`
`2. 1
`16.5
`
`7.8
`
`5.5
`
`1 LO
`
`0.2
`8. 1
`
`3.3
`
`l. 5
`
`4.3
`
`4.6
`
`1.0
`
`3.2
`
`0.6
`
`4.0
`
`2.8
`
`l. 8
`
`0.5
`
`0.9
`
`0.8
`
`7.5
`
`0.4
`
`aMicroscopic examination indicated that the following genera predominated in each station. Station 9: Eudorina, Pando(cid:173)
`rina; Station JO: Thalassiosira, Fragilaria, Nitzchia, Corethron, Silicoflagellates; Station 11: Corethron, Fragilaria,
`Chaetoceros, Silicoflagellates; Station 12: Corethron, Fragilaria, Nitzchia, Tintinnids; Station 13: Complex mixture;
`Station 14: Phaeocustis; Station 15: Phaeocystis, Chaetoceros, Nitzchia, Thalassiosira, Fragilaria; Stations 17 and 18:
`Fragilaria, Nitzchia, Coscinodiscus, Dinoflagellates, Tintinnids.
`
`bOnly those fatty acids present at a level of 1% or more are included. See footnotes to Tables 1 and 2 for further ex(cid:173)
`planation.
`
`3.7
`
`3.3
`
`2.4
`
`3.1
`
`3.3
`
`3.0
`0.8
`
`2.7
`0.9
`
`2. 1
`
`1. 6
`
`7. l
`2.0
`
`12.0
`
`l.2
`
`1.7
`
`2.4
`
`2. 1
`
`l.4
`l.4
`0.2
`0.2
`0.7
`0.7
`trace 0.9
`
`0.3
`0.7
`trace -
`
`0.2
`0.2
`0.1
`o. 3
`2.6
`trace 0.9
`
`6.0
`
`3.0
`
`2.7
`
`3.2
`
`6.2
`
`0.7
`0.3
`0.6
`
`0.3
`0.5
`3.5
`
`0.3
`
`5.2
`0.4
`0.2
`
`o. 2
`0.2
`
`0.3
`0.3
`0.1
`0.2
`
`2.2
`
`2.5
`
`0.3
`0.2
`
`O. I
`1.0
`6.3
`0.9
`4.7
`
`0. I
`
`trace
`
`0.2
`
`0.2
`
`I. 2
`
`0.5
`
`2.7
`0.4
`0.4
`0.2
`
`0.1
`0.9
`
`0.3
`
`I. 2
`0.4
`0.1
`
`trace -
`9.2
`7.0
`
`6.4
`
`1. 7
`
`2. I
`
`trace -
`5.3
`6.0
`
`trace
`trace
`2. I
`
`18.4 23.4
`
`13. I
`
`14 .4
`
`0.6
`0.3
`0.7
`0.2
`0.2
`
`0.3
`0.9
`0.4
`0.2
`
`2.0
`
`3. 1
`
`0.2
`
`l. 3
`11.4
`I. 1
`0.3
`6. 1
`
`4.8
`
`0.3
`4.9
`
`

`

`202
`
`N.R. Bottino: Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids
`
`HUFA of the marine food-chain originate in phyto(cid:173)
`plankton. Holz (1969) has reached a similar con(cid:173)
`clusion from studies on laboratory-grown Protozoa.
`
`Comparison of Trophic Levels
`
`Whereas most euphausiids are considered omnivores,
`there is good evidence that Euphausia superba
`feeds on phytoplankton (Mauchline and Fisher,
`1969). Whether the preferred food is Fragilaria as
`stated by many (Raymont, 1963; Nemoto, 1968), or
`whether E. superba has a wider range of selec(cid:173)
`tivity (Pavlov, 1970), is still in doubt. Although
`generally considered a phytoplankton feeder (An(cid:173)
`driashev, 1968; Knox, 1970), the evidence on the
`food preference of E. crystallorophias seems to be
`only of indirect nature, e.g. the finding by
`Littlepage (1964) of parallel changes in seasonal
`phytoplankton abundance and the lipid content of
`E. crystallorophias, and the study by Mauchline
`(1967) showing striking similarities between the
`feeding appendages of E. crystallorophias and E.
`superba.
`It was of interest, therefore, to compare the
`fatty acid patterns of Euphausia superba and E.
`crystallorophias collected during Eltanin Cruise
`SI with the fatty acids of phytoplankton from the
`corresponding stations. It was hoped that the
`feeding habits would be reflected in similarities
`in the fatty acid patterns of the related trophic
`levels. This obviously assumes that euphausiids
`add very little endogenously-made fatty acids to
`those they acquire from the diet. Since the lipid
`content of phytoplankton is relatively high, be(cid:173)
`tween 2 and 20% of their dry weight (Parsons et
`aL, 1961; Andriashev, 1968), their ingestion by
`zooplankton should markedly diminish the lipo(cid:173)
`genetic activity of the zooplankton. Recent ex(cid:173)
`periments by Jeffries (1972) show that the dietary
`origins of the body lipids of omnivorous fish can
`be determined with a simple budget of fatty acid
`flow from diet to body lipids. The feasibility of
`these determinations is supported by the findings
`of Owen et al. (1972) who, confirming previous
`work by others, have shown that the fatty acid
`composition of fish lipids reflects the compo(cid:173)
`sition of the dietary lipids. Additional support
`is given by experiments in my laboratory (Warman
`and Bottino, 1974) which indicate that, in salt(cid:173)
`water fish-liver the degree of lipogenesis is
`equally low whether the animals are starved, fed
`fat, or fed a fat-free diet. Most probably, the
`same is true for other marine organisms including
`euphausiids.
`It is possible that certain fish-lipid classes
`such as triglycerides may reflect changes in diet(cid:173)
`ary lipids better than other classes of a more
`structural nature. It is shown below that this is
`not true in the present case. Finally, the similar
`fatty acid composition of euphausiid whole body
`and hepatopancreas (shown above) rules out the
`possibility of a preferential incorporation of
`dietary fatty acids into certain tissues. Owen et
`al. (1972) reached the same conclusion while study-
`
`ing the ingestion of polyunsaturated fatty acids
`by fish.
`Table 3 includes in the columns to the right av(cid:173)
`erages of the Euphausia superba and E. crystalloro(cid:173)
`phias fatty acids to facilitate comparisons. Com(cid:173)
`parisons can be made quantitative by determining
`the "distance" between fatty acid profiles with
`the formula (Mcintire et al., 1969; De Mort et al.,
`1972):
`
`where Djh is the degree of difference between the
`jth and hth species and Pij is the percentage of
`the total fatty acid content represented by the
`ith fatty acid in the jth species. For example,
`the distance between the results of two gas(cid:173)
`chromatographic analyses of the same sample of mar(cid:173)
`ine fatty acids is about 2.2 ± 1.8 (average! l
`standard deviation). The average distance between
`the 3 samples of E. superba fatty acids (Table !)
`was 6.3 ~ 1.2. The average distance among the 6
`samples of E. crystallorophias fatty acids (Table
`2) was 7.7 ± 3.5. The distance between the average
`of E. superba and the average of E. crystalloro(cid:173)
`phias (Table 3) was 29.0.
`In comparing the euphausiids with the phyto(cid:173)
`plankton samples of the corresponding stations,
`the distances between the average of Euphausia
`superba and the phytoplankton profiles (Stations 8,
`9a and 9b) ranged between JO and IS, whi~h are
`reasonably low values. The distances between the
`average of E. crystaZZorophias and phytoplankton
`(Stations 11, 13, 14, 15 and 182) were in the 30
`to 40 range. Thus, the fatty acids of E. superba
`compare well both in nature and concentration with
`those of phytoplankton of the corresponding lo(cid:173)
`cations. However, there are marked quantitative
`differences between the fatty acid profiles of E.
`crystallorophias and those of phytoplankton. It
`was mentioned earlier that the lipids of E.
`crystallorophias differ from those of E. superba
`in that they contain 20 to 40% waxes very rich in
`oleic acid (Bottino, in press). Thus, the dif(cid:173)
`ference in fatty acid profiles between the two
`euphausiids and between E. crystaZZorophias and
`phytoplankton may be due to the presence of these
`waxes. To assess this possibility, the average
`fatty acid profile of E. crystaZZorophias was re(cid:173)
`calculated eliminating the oleic acid contributed
`by the waxes, and distances were determined be(cid:173)
`tween the new set of values and those of E. super(cid:173)
`ba and phytoplankton. The distance between the
`corrected average of E. crystallorophias and the
`average of E. superba was 14.J. The distances be(cid:173)
`tween the corrected values of E. crystaZZorophias
`
`.
`2
`Despite the fact that no samples of Euphausia
`crystaZZorophias from Station 18 were analyzed,
`the phytoplankton data from that station are in(cid:173)
`cluded in view of the short distance between
`Stations 18 and 17.
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0006
`
`

`

`N.R. Bottino: Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids
`
`203
`
`and phytoplankton ranged between 22 and 32 for
`Stations II to 15 and between 10 and 15 for
`Station 18. These results indicate that the pres(cid:173)
`ence of waxes in E. crystallorophias is what makes
`the fatty acid profile of this euphausid different.
`It is possible that certain lipid classes such
`as triglycerides may be more susceptible than, for
`example, complex lipids to changes in dietary
`lipids. In fact, it has been accepted for many
`years that depot lipids are more sensitive than
`structural lipids to changes in dietary fats. To
`test this possibility, distances were determined
`between the major lipid classes of both euphausiids
`and the total lipids of the phytoplankton obtained
`in corresponding stations. The results showed that
`the waxes of Euphausia crystallorophias were the
`most distant from phytoplankton (average D = 76).
`The complex lipids of both euphausiids and the
`steroid esters of E. crystallorophias showed an
`average distance of about 30 with respect to phyto(cid:173)
`plankton. The triglycerides of E. superba were the
`closer to phytoplankton with an average D = 17, a
`value which is in the same range as that of E. su(cid:173)
`perba total lipids versus phytoplankton. These re(cid:173)
`sults show that, in the present case, measuring
`distances between diet lipids and individual lipid
`classes is not better than comparing the total
`lipid fatty acids of the diet with those of total
`body lipids. In addition, the data seem to in(cid:173)
`dicate that neither the complex lipids nor the
`steroid esters, and even less the waxes of E.
`crystallorophias reflect very well the composition
`of the dietary fatty acids.
`The similarity between the corrected values for
`Euphausia crystallorophias and some of the phyto(cid:173)
`plankton values suggest that E. crystallorophias
`may be, in fact, herbivorous. Since most of the
`phytoplankton samples contained relatively small
`amounts of waxes, it is possible that E. crystal(cid:173)
`Zorophias may be able to incorporate and concen(cid:173)
`trate dietary waxes. Alternatively, waxes could
`have been synthesized, partially or totally by the
`euphausiid. Holtz et al. (1973) and Sargent et al.
`(1974) have recently characterized wax synthesiz(cid:173)
`ing systems in copepods.
`
`Acknowledgements. The author wishes to acknowl(cid:173)
`edge the identification of the species by Drs. M.
`A. McWhinnie and S.Z. El-Sayed. and the skilled
`technical assistance of Mrs. C. Wiltrout. This re(cid:173)
`search was supported by a grant from the National
`Science Foundation (GV-30413).
`
`Literature Cited
`
`American Oil Chemists' Society: Official and ten(cid:173)
`tative methods, 3rd. ed., with additions and re(cid:173)
`visions, 2 pp. Chicago: Am. Oil Chemists' Soc.
`(Method Ce-2-66) 1970
`Andriashev, A.P.: The problem of the life com(cid:173)
`munity associated with the Antarctic fast ice.
`In: S.C.A.R. Symposium on Antarctic Oceanog-
`
`raphy, Santiago - Chile, 13-16 September 1966,
`pp 147-154. Cambridge: Scott Polar Research In(cid:173)
`stitute 1968
`Bottino, N.R.: Lipid composition of two species of
`Antarctic krill. Euphausia superba and E. cry(cid:173)
`stallorphias. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (In press)
`De Mort, C.L., R. Lowry, I. Tinsley and H.K.
`Phinney: The biochemical analysis of some estu(cid:173)
`arine phytoplankton. I. Fatty acid composition.
`J. Phycol. 8, 211-216 (1972)
`Folch, J., M. Lees and G.H. Sloane-Stanley: A
`simple method for the isolation and purifi(cid:173)
`cation of total lipids from animal tissues. J.
`biol. Chem. 226, 497-509 (1957)
`Hansen, R.P.: The occurrence of phytanic acid in
`Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Aust. J.
`Sci. 32, 160-161 (1969)
`and S.M. Meiklen: Isopropenoid fatty acids in
`Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). J. Sci. Fd
`Agric. 21, 203-206 (1970)
`Holz, G.G., Jr.: Polyunsaturated fatty acids of
`marine Protozoa. In: Progress in Protozoology,
`Int. Congr. Protozool. (III, Leningrad) pp 126-
`127. Nauka 1969
`Holtz, R.B., E.D. Marquez and A.A. Benson: Wax
`ester biosynthesis by isolated membrane frac(cid:173)
`tions from calanoid copepods. Comp. Biochem.
`Physiol. 45B, 585-591 (1973)
`Ivanov, B.G.: On the biology of the Antarctic krill
`Euphausia superba. Mar. Biol. 7, 340-351 (1970)
`Jeffries, H.P.: Fatty acid ecology of a tidal
`marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 433-440 (1972)
`Knox, G.A.: Antarctic marine ecosystems. In: Ant(cid:173)
`arctic ecology, Vol. I. pp 69-96. Ed. by M.W.
`Holdgate. New York: Academic Press 1970
`Littlepage, J.L.: Seasonal variation in lipid con(cid:173)
`tent of two Antarctic marine crustacea. In:
`Biologie antarctique, pp 463-470. Ed. by R.
`Carrick, M.W. Holdgate and J. Prevoost. Paris:
`Hermann l 964
`Mackintosh, N.A.: Whales and krill in the twentieth
`century. In: Antarctic ecology, Vol. I. pp 195-
`212. Ed. by M.W. Hold.gate. New York: Academic
`Press 1970
`Marr, J.W.S.: The natural history and geography of
`the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana).
`'Discovery' Rep. 32, 33-464 (1962)
`Mauchline, J.: Feeding appendages of the Euphausia(cid:173)
`cea (Crustacea). J. Zool. Lend. 153, 1-43 ( 1967)
`and L.R. Fisher: The biology of euphausiids.
`In: Advances in marine biology, Vol. 7. 454 pp.
`New York: Academic Press 1969
`Mcintire, C.D., I.J. Tinsley and R.R. Lowry: Fatty
`acids in lotic periphyton: another measure of
`community structure. J. Phycol. 5, 26-32 (1969)
`Nemoto, T.: Feeding of baleen whales and krill,
`and the value of krill as a marine resource in
`the Antarctic. In: S.C.A.R. Symposium on Ant(cid:173)
`arctic Oceanography, Santiago - Chile, 13-16
`September 1966, pp 240-253. Cambridge: Scott
`Polar Research Institute 1968
`Nonaka, J. and C. Koizumi: Component fatty acids
`and alcohols of Euphausia superba lipid by gas(cid:173)
`liquid chromatography. Bull. Jap. Soc. scient.
`Fish. 30, 630-634 (1964)
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0007
`
`

`

`204
`
`N.R. Bottino: Fatty Acids of Antarctic Phytoplankton and Euphausiids
`
`Owen, J.M., J.W. Adron, J.R. Sargent and C.B.
`Cowey: Studies on the nutrition of marine flat(cid:173)
`fish. The effect of dietary fatty acids on the
`tissue fatty-acids of the plaice Pleuronectes
`platessa. Mar. Biol. 13, 160-166 (1972)
`Parsons, T.F., K. Stephens and J.D.H. Strickland:
`On the chemical composition of eleven species
`of marine phytoplankton. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can.
`18, 1001-1016 (1961)
`Pavlov, V.Y.: On the physiology of feeding in Eu(cid:173)
`phausia superba. [Russ.]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR.
`196, 1477-1480 (1970). [Engl. transl. Dokl.
`(Proc.) Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 196, 147-150 (1971)]
`Pierce, R.W., J. Vander Veen and H.S. Olcott:
`Proxima~e and lipid analyses of krill (Euphausia
`species) and red crab (Pleurocodes planipes).
`J. agric. Fd Chem. 17, 367-369 (1969)
`Raymont, J.E.G.: Plankton and productivity in the
`oceans, 660 pp. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1963
`Sargent, J.R., R.R. Gatten and R. Mcintosh: Bio(cid:173)
`synthesis of wax esters in cell-free prep(cid:173)
`arations of Euchaeta norvegica. Comp. Biochem.
`Physiol. 4?B, 217-227 (1974)
`Sidhu, G.S., W.A. Montgomery, G.L. Holloway, A.R.
`Johnson and D.M. Walker: Biochemical composition
`
`and nutritive value of krill (Euphausia superba
`Dana). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 21, 29 3-296 ( 1970)
`Tsuyuki, H., V. Naruse, A. Mochizuki and S. Ito:
`Studies on the lipids of Euphausiacea, Euphausia
`superba. I. Acetone-soluble lipid. J. Japan Oil
`Chem. Soc. 13, 203-206 (1964a)
`---- Studies on the lipids of Euphausiaceae, Eu(cid:173)
`phausia superba. II. Properties of phospho(cid:173)
`lipids. J, Japan Oil Chem. Soc. 13, 477-480
`(1964b)
`Van der Veen, J., B. Medwadowski and H.S. Olcott:
`The lipids of krill (Euphausia species) and red
`crab (Pleuroncodes planipes). Lipids 6, 481-485
`( 1971)
`Warman, A.W. and N.R. Bottino: Acetyl-CoA carboxy(cid:173)
`lase and fatty acid synthetase from fish liver:
`properties and response to dietary fats. Proc.
`Am. Oil Chem. Soc., Philadelphia, September 1974
`
`Dr. N.R. Bottino
`Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
`Texas A & M University
`College Station, Texas 77843
`USA
`
`Date of final manuscript acceptance: June 28, 1974. Connnunicated by J. Bunt, Miami
`
`RIMFROST EXHIBIT 1007 page 0008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket