throbber
ISSN 0003-3022
`
`January 1989
`ANESAV
`
`
`
`The Journal of
`The American Society of
`Anesthesiologists,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`Volume 70
`

`
`Number1
`
`Complete Contents
`
`Pages 3, 5, 7,9, and 11
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1011
`
`

`

`Anesthesiology
`
`THE JOURNAL OF
`THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS,INC.
`Editor-in-Chief
`LAWRENCEJ. SAIDMAN, M.D., San Diego, California
`Editors
`David E. Longnecker, M.D.
`Julien F. Biebuyck, M.B., D.Phil.
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`Hershey, Pennsylvania
`Dennis T. Mangano, Ph.D., M.D.
`John J. Downes, M.D.
`San Francisco, California
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`Kai Rehder, M.D.
`H. Barrie Fairley, M.B., B.S.
`Rochester, Minnesota
`Stanford, California
`Donald R. Stanski, M.D.
`Simon Gelman, M.D., Ph.D.
`Stanford, California
`Birmingham, Alabama
`Michael M. Todd, M.D.
`Carol A. Hirshman, M.D.
`Iowa City, lowa
`Baltimore, Maryland
`Warren M. Zapol, M.D., Boston, Massachusetts
`
`
`
`and
`
`i
`
`Associate Editors
`Charles W. Buffington, M.D.
`Carl Lynch III, M.D., Ph.D.
`Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
`Charlottesville, Virginia
`David H. Chestnut, M.D.
`Mervyn Maze, M.B., Ch.B.
`Stanford, California
`lowa City, lowa
`Henry Rosenberg, M.D.
`Jeffrey B. Cooper; Ph.D.
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
`Boston, Massachusetts
`Gary R.Strichartz, Ph.D.
`Dennis M.Fisher, M.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts
`San Francisco, California
`Tony L. Yaksh, Ph.D.
`Thomas F. Hornbein, M.D.
`San Diego, California
`Seattle, Washington
`
` correspondencerelating to editorial management,and Letters to the Editor should be mailed to Lawrence
`Manuscripts for publication,
`T-015, University of California—San Diego, San Diego, California 92093. Books for review should
`J. Saidman, M.D., Anesthesiology,
`1
`The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, One Children's Plaza, 34th
`be mailed to John J. Downes, M.D., Department of Anesthesia,
`Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
`—
`All articles are accepted for publication with the understanding that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal and become the
`property of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Statements or opinions expressed in the Journal reflect the views of the
`author(s) and do not represent official policy of the American Society of Anesthesiologists unless so stated.
`For details and recommendations concerning the preparation of manuscripts see GUIDE FOR AUTHORS, which appearsin the January
`ehecuanasde related correspondence should be addressed to Advertising Manager, ANESTHESIOLOGY,J. B. Lippincott Company,
`East Washington Square, Philadelphia, Pa. 19105. Publication ofan advertisementin ANESTHESIOLOGYdoesnot constitute endorsement
`by ANESTHESIOLOGYofthe product described therein or of any representations madeby the advertiser with respect to the product.
`(003-3022) is published 13 times a year (monthly except September, in which two issues are published)
`esthesiologists, Inc., by J. B. Lippincott Company, at Downsville Pike, Route 3, Box 20-B, Hagerstown,
`ANESTHESIOLOGY (ISSN 0
`East Washington Square, Philadelphia, PA 19105. Printed in the U. S. A. © Copyright 1989
`for the American Society of An
`MD 21740. Business offices are located at
`s, Inc. Secondclass postage paid at Hagerstown, MD,andat additional mailing offices.
`by the American Society of Anesthesiologist
`ndence related to membership and change of address should be mailed to the Executive
`Notice of Change of Address: All correspo!
`of Anesthesiologists, 515 Busse Highway, Park Ridge, Illinois 60068. Correspondence regarding nonmember
`S
`j
`very
`aibecrieersact agen iJournal Fulfillment Department, Lippincott/Harper, Downsville Pike, Route 3, Box 20-B, Hagerstown,
`Maryland 21740,or call 1-800-638-3030; in Maryland, call collect 301-824-7300. Correspondence regarding nonmembersubscriptions
`inJapan,including inquiriesaboutsubscriptionratesandsubscription orders,should besentto WoodbellIncorporated, 4-22-11, Kitakasai,
`Edogawaku, Tokyo 134, Japan. In India, Nepal,Eanes and Sri Lanka contact Universal Subscription Agency Pvt. Ltd., 101-102
`C
`as
`ew Delhi-110017,
`India.
`Iemmane—aOw individual, $50.00institution; all other countries exceptJapan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and
`Sri Lanka, $75.00 individual, $85.00 institution. Single copies $8.00. Rates for air mail delivery available upon request.
`—
`Ifthe Society Office or the Publisher receives a request for replacement within 60 days ofthe mailing in the U.S. or within 90 days in
`i
`iginal
`i
`is returned by
`the
`postal service as undeliverable, the issue will be replaced.
`Sonne aaae ccrorhestology: downsville Pike, Route 3, Box 20-B, Hagerstown, MD 21740.
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted byThe
`American Society ofAnesthesiologists for librariesand other users registered with the CopyrightClearance Center (CCC) Transactional
`Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of $00.80 per copy, plus $00.05 per page1s paid directly to CCC, 21 CongressSty Salem,
`MA 01970, 0003-3022/89 $00.80 + $00.05. This does not extend to other kinds ofcopying, such as copying for general distribution,
`for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.
`
`
`
`2
`
`2
`
`

`

`Anesthesiology
`
`January 1989
`
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`EDITORIAL VIEWS
`
`A Changein Formatfor ANESTHESIOLOGY.
`LawrenceJ. Saidman
`Changing Perspectives in Monitoring Oxygenation.
`
`H. Barrie Fairley
`Studies in Animals Should Precede Human UseofSpinally Administered Drugs.
`Tony L. Yaksh andJ. G. Collins
`
`9
`
`4
`
`7
`
`13
`
`19
`
`CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
`The Influence of Renal Failure on the Pharmacokinetics and Duration of Action of
`Pipecuronium Bromide in Patients Anesthetized with Halothane and Nitrous
`Oxide.
`James E. Caldwell, P. Claver Canfell, Kay P. Castagnoli, Daniel P. Lynam, Mark R.
`Fahey, Dennis M.Fisher, and Ronald D. Miller
`Effect of Intercostal Nerve Blockade on Respiratory Mechanics and CO, Chemosen-
`sitivity at Rest and Exercise.
`Bernice R. Hecker, Robert Bjurstrom, and Robert B. Schoene
`ocardiographic, Mechanical, and Metabolic In-
`Comparison of Hemodynamic, Electr
`dicators of Intraoperative Myocardial Ischemia in Vascular Surgical Patients with
`Coronary Artery Disease.
`Soren Haggmark, Per Hohner, Margareta Ostman, Arnold Friedman, George Diamond,
`Edward Lowenstein, and Sebastian Reiz
`mall Doses of Sufentanil or Fentanyl: Dose Versus EEG
`Induction of Anesthesia with S
`and Thiopental Requirement.
`Response, Speed of Onset,
`T. Andrew Bowdle and RichardJ. Ward
`Relationship of Mivacurium Chloride in Humans during Nitrous
`Oxide-Fentany!or
`Nitrous Oxide-Enflurane Anesthesia.
`Mark R. Fahey, Daniel P. Lynam, and
`James E. Caldwell, John B. Kitts, Tom Heier,
`Ronald D. Miller
`Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Serum Glycine Levels, and Ocular Evoked
`Potentials.
`Janice Mei-Li Wang, DonnellJ. Creel, and K. C. Wong
`(Continued onpage 5)
`———ee
`
`The Dose-Response
`
`26
`
`31
`
`36
`
`3
`
`

`

`January 1989ANESTHESIOLOGY
`
`CONTENTS
`
`(Continued from page 5)
`
`Lower Esophageal Contractility Predicts Movement during Skin Incision in Patients
`Anesthetized with Halothane, but Not with Nitrous Oxide and Alfentanil.
`Daniel I. Sessler, Randi Sten, ChristineI. Olofsson, and Franklin Chow
`
`Determination of Intra-abdominal Pressure Using a Transurethral Bladder Catheter:
`Clinical Validation of the Technique.
`ThomasJ. Iberti, Charles E. Lieber, and Ernest Benjamin
`
`LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
`Epidural Clonidine Analgesia in Obstetrics: Sheep Studies.
`James C. Eisenach, Maria I. Castro, David M. Dewan, andJames C. Rose
`The Enhancementof Proton/Hydroxyl Flow across Lipid Vesicles by Inhalation An-
`esthetics.
`Douglas E. Raines and David S. Cafiso
`The Influence of Dextrose Administration on Neurologic Outcome after Temporary
`Spinal Cord Ischemia in the Rabbit.
`John C. Drummond and Suzanne S. Moore
`Tachyphylaxis to Local Anesthetics Does Not Result from Reduced DrugEffectiveness
`at the NerveItself.
`Peter Lipfert, Holger Holthusen, andJoachim O. Arndt
`Comparisonof the Effects of Halothane on Skinned Myocardial Fibers from Newborn
`and Adult Rabbit. L. Effects on Contractile Proteins.
`ElliotJ. Krane and Judy ¥. Su
`Regional Differences in Left Ventricular Wall Motionin the Anesthetized Dog.
`Johan Diedericks, BruceJ. Leone, and Pierre Foex
`e’”’ on Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia, Tolerance, and Physical De-
`Effects of ‘‘Nitrendipin
`pendence.
`S.J. Dolin and H. J. Little
`
`MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE ARTICLE
`
`Pulse Oximetry.
`Kevin K. Tremper and Steven J. Barker
`
`42
`
`47
`
`5]
`
`-
`
`“a
`
`we
`
`"6
`
`82
`
`af
`
`98
`
`i —
`
`(Continued on page7)
`
`4
`
`

`

`January 1989 ANESTHESIOLOGY
`
`CONTENTS
`
`(Continued from page 5)
`
`LABORATORY REPORTS
`Laudanosine Does Not Displace Receptor-specific Ligands from the Benzodiazepinergic
`or Muscarinic Receptors.
`Yeshayahu Katz and Moshe Gavish
`Effects of Methemoglobinemia on Pulse Oximetry and Mixed Venous Oximetry.
`Steven J. Barker, Kevin K. Tremper, and John Hyatt
`Hyperbilirubinemia Does NotInterfere with Hemoglobin Saturation Measured by Pulse
`Oximetry.
`Francis Veychemans, Philippe Baele, J. E. Guillaume, Eric Willems, Annie Robert, and
`Thierry Clerbaux
`Evaluation of a Blood Gas and Chemistry Monitor for Use during Surgery.
`G. Bashein, Wesley K. Greydanus, and Margaret A. Kenny
`A Model for Determining the Influence of Hepatic Uptake of Nondepolarizing Muscle
`Relaxants in the Pig.
`Johann Motsch, PimJ. Hennis, Franz Alto Zimmermann, and Sandor Agoston
`Transtracheal Doppler: A New Procedure for Continuous Cardiac Output Measure-
`ment.
`Jerome A. Abrams, Roland E. Weber, and Kenneth D. Holmen
`
`CASE REPORTS
`
`Managementof Acute Elevation of Intracranial Pressure during Hepatic Transplan-
`tation.
`D. Brajtbord, R. 1. Parks, M. A. Ramsay, A. W. Paulsen, T. R. Valek, T. H. Swygert,
`and G. B. Klintmalm
`Treatmentof Isorhythmic A-V Dissociation during General Anesthesia with Propran-
`olol.
`Russell F. Hill
`
`00
`
`112
`
`a6
`
`123
`
`8
`
`ae
`
`139
`
`14]
`
`144
`
`146
`
`(Continued onpage 9)
`
`Fiberoptic Endobronchial Intubation for Resection ofan Anterior Mediastinal Mass.
`Dirk Younker, Randall Clark, and Lewis Coveler
`Postpartum Seizure after Epidural Blood Patch andIntravenousCaffeine Sodium Ben-
`on, Craig H. Leicht, and Thomas S. Scanlon
`
`zoate.
`
`Vincent E. Bol
`
`it
`
`5
`
`

`

`January 1989ANESTHESIOLOGY
`
`CONTENTS
`
`.
`7
`Caudal Epidural Anesthesia in an Infant with Epidermolysis Bullosa.
`Lawrence L. Yee, Joel B. Gunter, and Charles B. Manley
`
`(Continued frompage 7)
`ia
`
`Recurrent Respiratory Depression after Alfentanil Administration.
`Rory S. Jaffe and Dennis Coalson
`Pain of Delayed Traumatic Splenic Rupture Maskedby Intrapleural Lidocaine.
`William W. Pond, Gregory M. Somerville, Siong H. Thong, James A. Ranochak, and
`Gregory A. Weaver
`Dose-response Relationship for Succinylcholinein a Patient with Genetically Determined
`Low Plasma Cholinesterase Activity.
`Charles E. Smith, Geraint Lewis, Francois Donati, and David R. Bevan
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`Determination of Decay Constants from Time-varying Pressure Data.
`Charles Beattie, Linda S. Humphrey, and Gary Maruschak
`Reply. Clifford R. Swanson and William W. MuirIIT
`Use Caution when Extrapolating from a Small Sample Size to the General Population.
`David J. Benefiel, Edward A. Eisler, and Rodger Shepherd
`Reply. Imad H. Abdul-Rasool, Daniel H.Sears, and Ronald L. Katz
`Succinylcholine and Trismus.
`Frederic A. Berry and Carl Lynch III
`Reply. Henry Rosenberg
`An Infant Modelto Facilitate Endotracheal TubeFixationin the Pediatric ICU Patient.
`Patrick K. Birmingham and Babette Horn
`An Alternative Method for ManagementofAccidental Dural Puncture for Labor and
`Delivery.
`Shaul Cohen, Jonathan S. Daitch, and Paul L. Goldiner
`High-pressure Uterine Displacement.
`Michael J. Dorsey and Walter L. Millar
`Calculating the Potency of Mivacurium.
`Aaron F. Kopman
`Reply. John J. Savarese
`
`151
`
`154
`
`Ke
`
`159
`
`166
`160
`
`161
`a
`o
`163
`
`‘ee
`
`16
`
`166
`
`166
`
`(Continued on page 11)
`i
`
`6
`
`

`

`January 1989—ANESTHESIOLOGY
`
`CONTENTS
`
`|
`
`|
`
`Midazolam in a Malignant Hyperthermia-susceptible Patient.
`Juliana H. J. Brooks
`Exchange Autotransfusion Using the Cell Saver during Liver Transplantation.
`Marc R. Brown, Michael A. E. Ramsay, and Thomas H. Swygert
`Air Entrainment Through a Multiport Injection System.
`Dean Gilbert, TheodoreJ. Sanford, Jr., and Brian L. Partridge
`Reply. Thelma Macedo
`A Tracheal Tube Extension for Emergency Tracheal Reanastomosis.
`
`Robert S. Holzman
`
`The Relationship Between Malignant Hyperthemia and Neuroleptic Malignant Syn-
`drome.
`Haggai Hermesh, Dov Aizenberg, Margo Lapidot, and Hanan Munitz
`Reply. Stanley N. Caroff, Stephan C. Mann, Henry Rosenberg, Jeffrey E. Fletcher, and Terry
`D. Heiman-Patterson
`
`Appropriate Facilitation of Intravenous Regional Techniques in RSD.
`Kevin Foley, Linda Schatz, and Randall L. Martin
`
`REPORTOF SCIENTIFIC MEETING
`
`ANNOUNCEMENT
`
`1]
`
`(Continued from page 9)
`
`167
`
`168
`
`169
`170
`170
`
`_
`
`(ep
`
`173
`
`174
`
`173
`
`issue,
`
`The Guide for Authors is published in the January andJuly issues. It may be found on page 33A ofthis
`
`GUIDE TO AUTHORS
`
`ANESAV is a code word (“coden") used by the Chemical Abstract Service to identify the journal.
`
`ae
`
`7
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`8
`
`

`

`Anesthesiology
`V 70, No 1, Jan 1989
`
`PULSE OXIMETRY
`
`99
`
`
`
`
`
`
`%O,SATURATION
`
`
`
`
`ny|AE1 :
`
`
` oeEe
`
`
`
`i ee
`
`
`
`leoes
`ate
`hal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-TCoe H gees
`
`
`
`
`WO ay 16
`i)
`
`me
`
`12
`
`iron
`
`Fic. 1. This figure is from a 1951 article in ANESTHESIOLOGY. It
`reveals dramatic desaturation in a 4-yr-old patient during a tonsillec-
`tomy. Reproduced from Stephen RC, Slater HM, Johnson AL,Sekelj
`P; The oximeter—A technicalaid for the anesthesiologist. ANESTHE-
`SIOLOGY 12:548, 1951, with permission.
`
`The Physics and Physiology of Pulse Oximetry
`
`BEER’s LAw
`
`In the 1930s, Matthes used spectrophotometry to de-
`termine hemoglobin oxygen saturation.? This methodis
`based on the Beer-Lambert law, which relates the con-
`centration of a solute to theintensity oflight transmitted
`through a solution.
`
`Tans = ie
`
`(1)
`
`(la)
`A = DCe
`whereI,rans = intensity of transmittedlight;Ij, = intensity
`of incidentlight; A = absorption; D = distancelightis
`transmitted through the liquid (path length); C = con-
`centration of solute (hemoglobin); ¢ = extinction coeffi-
`cient ofthe solute (a constantfor a given solute at a spec-
`ified wavelength). Thus, if a knownsoluteis in a clear
`solution in a cuvette of known dimensions, the solute con-
`centration can be calculated from measurements of the
`incident and transmitted light intensity at a known wave-
`length, The extinction coefficient¢ is a property oflight
`absorption for a specific substance at a specified wave-
`length. In a one-component system, the absorption A is
`the product of the path length, the concentration, and
`the extinction coefficient, equation la. If multiple solutes
`
`becamea standard clinical and laboratory tool in pul-
`monary medicine. Although it was demonstrated to be
`accurate for intraoperative monitoring,’® its size and ex-
`pense, and the cumbersomenature of the ear probe pre-
`vented its acceptance as a routine monitor. At this time,
`all oximeters produced variouslight source wavelengths
`by filtering white light. The filtered light was then trans-
`mitted to and from thetissue throughfiberoptic cables.
`In the mid 1970s, Takuo Aoyagi, an engineer working
`for Nihon Kohden Corporation, made an ingeniousdis-
`covery regarding oximetry. He was developing a method
`to estimate cardiac output semi-noninvasively by detecting
`the washout curve of dye injected into a peripheral vein
`as it perfused the ear. This washout curve was measured
`in the ear with a red andinfrared light densitometer sim-
`ilar to the Millikan ear oximeter. He noticed that his
`washoutcurves contained pulsations dueto thearterial
`pulse in the ear. To moreeasily analyze the dye washout
`curve, he subtracted these pulsations fromthe curve, and
`in doing so he discovered that the absorbanceratio of the
`pulsations at the two wavelengths changed with arterial
`hemoglobin saturation. He soon realized that he could
`build an ear oximeter that measuredarterial hemoglobin
`saturation withoutheating the ear by analyzingpulsatile
`light absorbances.” This first pulse oximeter, developed
`by Nihon Kohden, used filtered light sourcessimilar to
`Millikan’s ear oximeter. The device was evaluated clini-
`cally in the mid 1970s and marketed withlittle success.”
`In the late 1970s, Scott Wilber in Boulder, Colorado,
`developedthefirst clinically accepted pulse oximeter by
`making two modifications of
`the Nihon Kohden
`method.''+ First, he produced a lightweight sensor by
`using light emitting diodes (LEDs) as light sources and
`photodiodesas detectors. Consequently, the instrument
`was connectedtoits earclip sensor only by a smallelectrical
`cable. Wilber also improved thesaturation estimates by
`using a digital microprocessorto store a complex calibra-
`tion algorithm based on humanvolunteer data.'* This
`methodwill be discussed in more detail below. This device
`was developedby Biox Corporation of Boulder, Colorado,
`and wassuccessfully marketed to pulmonary function lab-
`oratories in the early 1980s.
`Theclinical utility of the noninvasive oximeter in the
`operating room wasrediscoveredin the 1980s by William
`New,an anesthesiologist at Stanford University. Realizing
`that a continuous, noninvasive monitor of oxygenation
`would be useful to anesthesiologists, New developed and
`marketed a pulse oximeterto this group.'® The Nellcor
`model N100 had by 1985 become almost synonymous
`with the term “‘pulse oximeter.”
`
`+ Wilber S: Blood constituent measuring device and method. US
`Patent #4, 407, 290 April 1, 1981.
`
`9
`
`

`

`K. K. TREMPER ANDS. J. BARKER
`
`Anesthesiola,
`V 70, No 1, Jan 1989
`
`HEMOGLOBIN EXTINCTION CURVES
`
` hemoglobin ExtinctionCoefficient
`
`
`
`
`04
`600 640
`
`:
`
`carboxyhemoglobin |
`—.
`z
`
`680
`
`720
`
`760
`
`800
`
`840
`
`880
`
`920
`
`960
`
`By the above definition of oxygen saturation, the two
`forms of hemoglobin that do not bind oxygen (COHb
`and MetHb)are notincluded. This is the origin of what
`is now referred to as “functional hemoglobin saturation,”
`defined as (Severinghaus JW, personal communication);
`
`With the advent of multiwavelength oximeters that can
`measureall four species of hemoglobin, “fractionalsat-
`uration” has been defined as the ratio of oxyhemoglobin
`to total hemoglobin:
`
`Infaed
`
`methemoglobin
`
`|| |
`
`| |
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OsHb
`oxyhemoglobin
`onto e eee ane,
`Functional SaO, =O.Hb+HbxX 100%.
`(2)
`
`reduced
`!
`\
`
`Wavelength \ (nm)
`
`Fractional SaO»
`
`Fic, 2. Transmitted light absorbance spectra of four hemoglobin
`species: oxyhemoglobin, reduced hemoglobin, carboxyhemoglobin, and
`methemoglobin. Adapted from Barker SJ and Tremper KK: Pulse
`Oximetry: Applications and limitations, Advances in Oxygen Moni-
`toring, International Anesthesiology Clinics. Boston, Little, Brown and
`Company, 1987, pp. 155-175.
`
`OsHb
`——————TT————OOoooTo * 100%.
`fs
`O2Hb + Hb + COHb + MetHb
`The fractional hemoglobin saturation is also called the
`“oxyhemoglobin fraction,” or ““oxyhemoglobin %.”’"*
`Whenoximetry is used to measure hemoglobin satu-
`ration, Beer’s law mustbe applied to a solution containing
`four unknownspecies: O2Hb, Hb, COHb, and MetHb.
`Expanding equation 1a toa four-componentsystem results
`in an absorption given by:
`
`A= D,Cye; ah DoCo€s + DsCseé5 + DsCaeq.
`
`(1b)
`
`The subscripts 1 through 4 correspond to the four he-
`moglobin species. If the path lengths are the same, then
`D can be factored out:
`
`A= D(Cye; + Co€9 Fi Cs€5 + C4€,).
`
`(1c)
`
`are present, A is the sum of similar expressions for each
`solute. The extinction coefficient can vary dramatically
`with the wavelength of the light. The extinction coeff-
`cients for various hemoglobin species in the red and in-
`frared wavelength range are shownin figure 2.
`Laboratory oximeters use this principle to determine
`hemoglobin concentration by measuring the intensity of
`light transmitted through a cuvette filled with a hemo-
`globin solution produced from lysed red blood cells."*
`For Beer’s law to be valid, both the solvent and the cuvette
`through e€4 are constantsat
`The extinction coefficients €,
`must be transparentat the wavelength used,thelight path
`a given wavelength2(fig. 2). The absorption defined in
`length must be known exactly, and no absorbing species
`equation lc is determined from equation 1 by measuring
`can bepresentin the solution other than the knownsolute.
`the incident and transmittedlight intensities. From equa-
`It is difficult to fulfill these requirementsin clinical devices;
`tion lc, we see that four wavelengthsoflight are needed
`therefore, each instrumenttheoretically based on Beer’s
`to produce four equationsto solve for the unknown con-
`law also requires empirical corrections to improve accu-
`centrations C,; through C4. If COHb and MetHb were
`racy.
`not present, their contributions to the absorption would
`be zero and functional hemoglobin saturation could be
`determined by a two-wavelength oximeter(two equations
`and two unknowns). If two wavelengths existed for which
`the extinction coefficients for COHb and MetHb were
`zero, then these absorption terms would again be zero
`anda two-wavelength oximeter could measure functional
`saturation. Unfortunately,as: illustrated in figure 2, the
`extinction coefficients for COHb and MetHbarenotzero
`in the red and infrared range, and their presencewill,
`therefore, contribute to the absorption. Even though the
`definition of functional hemoglobin saturation involves
`only two hemoglobin species (O2Hb and Hb), when
`.MetHb and COHbarepresent, four wavelengths are re-
`quired to determine either functional or fractional he-
`moglobinsaturation.'*
`
`HEMOGLOBIN SATURATION DEFINITIONS
`
`Adult blood usually contains four species of hemoglo-
`bin: oxyhemoglobin (OgHb), reduced hemoglobin (Hb),
`methemoglobin (MetHb), and carboxyhemoglobin (CO-
`Hb)(fig. 2). The last two species are in small concentra-
`tions, except in pathologic conditions. There are several
`definitions of hemoglobin saturation. Historically, “‘oxy-
`gen saturation” wasfirst defined as the oxygen content
`expressed as a percentage of the oxygen capacity. The
`oxygen content(cc of oxygen per 100 cc of blood) was
`measured volumetrically by the method of Van Slyke and
`Neill (1924).'° The oxygen capacity was defined as the
`oxygen content after the blood sample had been equili-
`brated with room air (158 mmHgoxygenatsealevel).
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`Anesthesiology
`V 70, No 1, Jan 1989
`
`PULSE OXIMETRY
`
`101
`
`Absorption due to tissue
`
`PANN
`OYwyRON
`K?RRR
`
`Absorption due to pulsatile arterial blood
`Absorption due to non-pulsatile arterial blood
`%o%
`¢ | Absorption due to venous and capillary blood
`5
`ee
`/ AAA, rAt
`
`Time
`
`)"X
`
`LightAbsorption
`
`bc
`
`Fic. 3. This figure schematically illustrates the light absorption
`through living tissue. Note that the AC signalis due to the pulsatile
`componentofthe arterial blood while the DC signal is comprised of
`all the nonpulsatile absorbersin the tissue; nonpulsatile arterial blood,
`venousandcapillary blood,andall othertissues. Adapted from Ohmeda
`Pulse Oximeter Model 3700 Service Manual, 1986, p. 22.
`
`should be maximized.Asweseein figure 2, at 660 nano-
`meters, reduced hemoglobin absorbs about ten times as
`muchlight as oxyhemoglobin. (Note that the extinction
`coefficients are plotted on a logarithmicaxis.) At the in-
`frared wavelength of 940 nanometers, the absorption
`coefficient of OgHbis greater than that of Hb.
`
`Engineering Design and Physiologic Limitations
`__ Althoughthe theory on whichpulse oximetryis based
`is relatively straightforward, the application of this theory
`to the production ofa clinically useful device involves a
`
`
`
`SpOz(%)
`
`100
`90
`80
`70
`60
`
`50
`40
`30
`
`20
`10
`
`0
`
`0.4 0.6 0.8 1.01.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.22.4 2.62.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
`
`AC,,,,/DC 660
`AC,,,/DC 940
`
`Fic. 4. This is a typical pulse oximetercalibration curve. Note that
`the SaQgestimate is determined fromtheratio (R) of the pulse-added
`red absorbance at 660 nanometersto pulse-added infrared absorbance
`at 940 nanometers. The ratios of red to infrared absorbances vary
`from approximately .4 at 100% saturation to 3,4 at 0% saturation.
`Note thattheratio of red to infrared absorbanceis one at a saturation
`of approximately 85%. This curve can be approximately determined
`on a theoretical basis but, for accurate predictions of SpOg, experi-
`mental data are required. Adapted from JA Pologe: Pulse oximetry:
`Technical aspects of machine design, International Anesthesiology
`Clinics, Advances in Oxygen Monitoring. Edited by Tremper KK,
`Barker SJ. Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1987, p 142.
`
`11
`
`PULSE OXIMETRY
`
`Noninvasive oximeters measurered andinfraredlight
`transmitted througha tissue bed,effectively using thefin-
`ger or ear as a cuvette containing hemoglobin. There are
`several technical problemsin accurately estimating SaO,
`by this method. First, there are many absorbers in the
`light path other than arterial hemoglobin, includingskin,
`soft tissue, and venousand capillary blood. Theearly ox-
`imeters subtracted the tissue absorbance by compressing
`the tissue during calibration to eliminate all the blood,
`and using the absorbance of bloodless tissue as the base-
`line. These oximeters also heated the tissue to obtain a
`signal related to arterial blood with minimum influence
`of venous and capillary blood.
`Pulse oximeters deal with the effects of tissue and ve-
`nous blood absorbances in a completely different way.
`Figure 3 schematically illustrates the series of absorbers
`in a living tissue sample. At the top ofthe figure is the
`pulsatile or AC component, whichis attributed to the
`pulsating arterial blood. The baseline or DC component
`represents the absorbances of the tissue bed, including
`venous blood, capillary blood, and nonpulsatile arterial
`blood. Thepulsatile expansion of the arteriolar bed pro-
`ducesan increase in pathlength (see equation 1b), thereby
`increasing the absorbance.All pulse oximeters assumethat
`the only pulsatile absorbance between the light source
`and the photodetectoris that of arterial blood. They use
`two wavelengthsoflight: 660 nanometers (red) and 940
`nanometers(near infrared). The pulse oximeterfirst de-
`termines the AC componentof absorbanceat each wave-
`length and divides this by the corresponding DC com-
`ponentto obtain a “‘pulse-added” absorbancethatis in-
`dependentofthe incidentlight intensity. It thencalculates
`the ratio (R) of these pulse-added absorbances, whichis
`empirically related to SaOg:
`
`—_ AC60/DCe6o
`za
`ACg40/DCo40
`
`.
`
`(4)
`
`Figure 4 is an example of a pulse oximetercalibration
`curve,'® The actual curves used in commercial devices
`are based on experimental studies in humanvolunteers.
`Note that when the ratio of red to infrared absorbance
`is one, the saturation is approximately 85%. This fact has
`clinical implications to be discussedlater.
`It is a fortuitous coincidence of technology and phys-
`iology that allowed the developmentofsolid-state pulse
`oximeter sensors.'® Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are
`available over a relatively narrow range ofthe electro-
`magnetic spectrum. Amongtheavailable wavelengths are
`somethatnotonly pass throughskin butalso are absorbed
`by both oxyhemoglobin and reduced hemoglobin. For
`best sensitivity, the difference betweenthe ratios of the
`absorbances of OgHb and Hb at the two wavelengths
`
`11
`
`

`

`102
`
`K. K. TREMPER AND S. J]. BARKER
`
`va eenE
`
`DYSHEMOGLOBINS AND DYES
`
`significant engineering effort. This section will present in
`general terms the clinical and physiologic problems of
`oximeter design and their engineering solutions. The dis-
`cussion is divided into four areas: dyshemoglobins and
`dyes, LED center wavelength variability, signal artifact
`management, and accuracy and response. The reader
`should be aware that these problems can interact with
`one another.
`
`4, an absorbanceratio of one correspondsto a saturation
`of 85% on the calibration curve. Pulse oximeter error
`during methemoglobinemiahas also been confirmedin a
`clinical report.'?
`In neonatalblood,a fifth type of hemoglobinis present,
`fetal hemoglobin (HbF). HbF differs from adult Hb in
`the amino acid sequences of two of the four globin sub-
`units. Adult Hb has two a- and two §-globin chains, while
`HbFhas two a and two f chains. This difference in globin
`chains haslittle effect on the extinction curves and there-
`fore shouldnotaffect pulse oximeter readings.§{ Thisis
`Being two-wavelength devices, pulse oximeters can deal
`indeed fortunate because the fraction of HbF presentin
`with only two hemoglobin species. As noted above, this
`neonatalbloodis a function ofgestational age and cannot
`would be adequate to measure functional SaOQg if MetHb
`be accurately predicted. HbF does produce a small error
`and COHbdid not absorb red or infrared light at the
`in in vitro laboratory oximeters; OgHbF may beinter-
`wavelengths used. Unfortunately,this is not the case, and
`preted as consisting partially of COHb.”°
`therefore both MetHb and COHb will cause errorsin the
`The absorbance ratio R (equation 4) may be affected
`pulse oximeter reading.It is not intuitively obvious how
`by any substancepresentin the pulsatile blood that absorbs
`a pulse oximeter will behave in the presence of dyshem-
`light at 660 or 940 nm andwasnotpresentin the same
`oglobins. With respect to carboxyhemoglobin, we can gain
`concentration in the volunteers used to generate the cal-
`some insight from the extinction curves of figure 2. In
`ibration curve(fig. 4). Intravenous dyes provide a good
`the infrared range (940 nm), COHbabsorbsverylittle
`exampleofthis principle.?!"*? Schelleret al. evaluated the
`light; whereas, in the red range (660 nm), it absorbs as
`effects of bolus doses of methylene blue, indigo carmine,
`muchlight as does OgHb. Thisis clinically illustrated by
`and indocyanine green on pulse oximeters in humanvol-
`the fact that patients with carboxyhemoglobinemia appear
`unteers.”’ They found that methylene blue causedafall
`red. Therefore, to the pulse oximeter, COHblookslike
`in SpO, to approximately 65% for 1-2 min. Indigo car-
`O2Hb at 660 nm; while, at 940 nm COHbisrelatively
`mine produceda very small dropin saturation, while in-
`transparent. Theeffect of COHbon pulse oximeter values
`docyanine green had an intermediate effect. The detec-
`has beenevaluated experimentally in dogs.’” In this study,
`tion of intravenous dyes by pulse oximeters should not
`the pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) was foundto be given
`be surprising, because it was this effect that led Aoyagi
`approximately by:
`to the invention of pulse oximetry.”
`
`_ OgHb + 0.9 COHb
`SpO2 =
`total Hb
`
`x 100%.
`
`(8)
`
`Theeffects of methemoglobinemia on pulse oximetry
`are also partially predictable from the extinction curves
`(fig. 2). MetHb hasnearly the same absorbance as reduced
`hemoglobin at 660 nm,while it has a greater absorbance
`than the other hemoglobins at 940 nm. This is consistent
`with the clinical observation that methemoglobinemia
`produces very dark, brownish blood. Thus, it would be
`expected to producea large pulsatile absorbancesignal
`at both wavelengths. The effect of MetHb on pulse ox-
`imeter readings has also been measured in dogs.'* As
`methemoglobin levels increased, the pulse oximetersat-
`uration (SpOg) tended toward 85% and eventually became
`almost independentof the actual SaO,.'* In other words,
`in the presence of high levels of MetHb, SpOzis erro-
`neously low when SaQOzis above 85%, and erroneously
`high when SaQgis below 85%. This may be explained by
`the fact that MetHb causesa large pulsatile absorbance
`at both wavelengths, thereby adding to both the numer-
`ator and denominatorof the absorbanceratio R (equation
`4) and forcingthis ratio toward unity. As shownin figure
`
`LED CENTER WAVELENGTH VARIABILITY
`
`The LEDs used in pulse oximeter sensors are notideal
`monochromatic light sources; there is a narrow spectral
`range over which they emitlight. The center wavelength
`of the emission spectrum varies even amongdiodesofthe
`same type from the same manufacturer. This variation
`can be +15 nanometers.'® Asseen in figure 2, a shift in
`LED center wavelength will change the measured ex-
`tinction coefficient and thus produceanerrorin the sat-
`uration estimate. This source wavelength effect will be
`greatest for the red (660 nm) wavelength, because the
`extinction curves have a steeperslopeat this wavelength.
`Manufacturers have found two approaches to this prob-
`lem. Sometest all the LEDs andreject those that are out
`of their specified wavelength range, e.g., 660 + 5 nano-
`meters. This is expensive due to the number of LEDs
`
`§ Pologe JA, Raley DM: Effects of fetal hemoglobin on pulse ox-
`imetry. J Perinat VI1I:324-526, 1987.
`{ Anderson JV: The accuracy ofpulse oximetry in neonates: Effects
`of fetal hemoglobin andbilirubin. J Perinat VII:323, 1987.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`Anesthesiology
`V 70, No 1, Jan 1989
`
`PULSE OXIMETRY
`
`103
`
`rejected; i.e., narrower acceptable rangeyields improved
`accuracy but also more rejected LEDs. Alternatively,
`ot

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket