throbber
United States Patent l 191
`
`
`Wegwerth et al.
`
`[11] 3,922,440
`[45J Nov. 25, 1975
`
`F. Lesmes
`(54] SAFETY GLASS LIGHT CONTROL
`Primary Examiner-George
`
`T. McDonald
`
`Assistant Examiner-Alan
`MEDIUM
`
`
`
`
`Sell, Steldt & Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Alexander,
`Maplewood;
`[75]Inventors:
`Arthur A. Wegwerth,
`DeLaHunt
`White Bear Lake,
`R.Dean Lowrey,
`both of Minn.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`[22]Filed:Aug. 16, 1974
`
`[21]Appl. No.: 497,930
`
`(73] Assignee:
`
`Minnesota Mining and
`A humidity-resistant shatter-resistant light control me­
`
`
`
`St. Paul,
`Manufacturing Company,
`
`
`dium comprises a light collimating film with cellulose
`Minn.
`
`
`
`
`acetate or cellulose acetate-butyrate surfaces having
`
`
`
`bonded to those surfaces a polymeric adhesive ob­
`
`
`
`tained from the polymerization of monomers compris­
`ing
`I. 50-80% by weight total monomer alkyl acrylate
`
`[52]U.S. Cl. ................ 428/437;
`428/412; 428/515;
`having I to 8 carbon atoms in the alkyl
`
`
`428/481; 428/483; 428/50 l; 428/913
`
`
`substituent and/or tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate;
`(51] Int. Cl.2
`B32B 17/10; B32B 27/42;
`.
`
`
`2.20-50% of monomers further comprising
`B32B 27/30
`a. 0 to 50% by total weight of monomer
`
`[58]Field of Search ....... 161/199, 6,257,248, 183,
`N-alkylacrylamide and/or
`161/231
`
`N-alkylmethacrylamide, wherein the alkyl
`
`groups thereof have I to 8 carbon atoms, and
`References Cited
`
`b.0 to 50% by total weight of monomers
`UNITED STATES PATENTS
`N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone,
`Steel ............................... 161/199 X
`
`
`4/1961
`2,980,567
`
`
`the adhesive layer further bonded to a transparent,
`
`Brown et al. ...................... 260/80.5
`11/1966
`3,285,888
`
`
`protective covering material.
`8/1970
`
`Olsen ...................................... 161/6
`3,524,789
`
`
`Beckmann et al.................. 161 / I 99
`3,658,636
`4/1972
`
`3 Claims, No Drawings
`
`
`Blank .............................. 161/199 X
`10/1973
`3,762,981
`
`
`
`.....................
`
`
`
`( 5 6]
`
`MASIMO 2009
`Apple v. Masimo
`IPR2020-01526
`
`

`

`3,922,440
`
`1
`
`SAFETY GLASS LIGHT CONTROL MEDIUM
`
`Film or sheet materials with parallel louver elements
`or ordered louver elements are known to be able to
`provide directional control over penetrating visible ra-
`diation. Light is allowed to pass through suchfilms or
`sheets only within a controlled angle of incidence. Such
`films and methods of manufacturing them are shown in
`US. Pat. No. 3,524,789 and U.S. application Ser. No.
`284,403, filed Aug. 28, 1972, now abandoned. These
`light control films are generally comprised of a trans-
`parent synthetic resin binder and arranged louver-like
`elements which are distributed within the binder in an
`organized light screeningor light collimating fashion
`(parallel to each other and normal to the surface or
`parallel to each other and at a defined angle to the sur-
`face of the sheet).
`Twolimitations exist in the use of the films, mainly
`because they are thin sheet materials: (1) they are by
`themselves not capable of structurally withstanding ex-
`treme stresses and surface abrasions, and (2) they are
`subject to distortion from physical stress and tempera-
`tures. As it would be very difficult and expensive to
`makea light control film of sufficient thickness to be
`structurally sound and becausethis wouldstill not im-
`prove the tendencyof the surface to abrade, it is neces-
`sary to reinforce the sheets in another manner.
`Reinforcement of light collimating film materials
`presents a numberof problems peculiar to the product
`and to the materials used in the product. Whatever the
`means of reinforcement,
`the problems of structural
`weaknesses and surface abrasion must be overcome
`without adversely affecting the optical properties of the
`film. A structurally sound light control film serves no
`purpose if it is highly distorted, poorly light transmis-
`sive, and undergoes permanent color changes under
`the influence oflight. It is also necessary that any struc-
`turally reinforced light control film be able to withstand
`tests established as industrial standards for particular
`types of uses of such light control film. For example,
`the automobile safety glass industry has developed
`standard tests which are described in Federal Motor
`Vehicle Safety Standard 205 of the National Motor Ve-
`hicle Safety Act of 1966. Thesetests include minimum
`requirements applicable to safety glass for withstanding
`humidity and temperature extremes.
`It is therefore one aspect of this invention to provide
`a structurally sound, undistorted light control panel. It
`is another aspect of this invention to reinforce light
`controlfilm by laminating such film between two other
`sheet materials by means of adhesive.
`Further aspects of the present invention will be un-
`derstood from the following discussion.
`Light control films can be made of many different
`synthetic resinuous materials. The most preferred ma-
`terials, and the only materials with which the present
`invention is concernedare cellulose acetate and cellu-
`lose acetate-butyrate (i.e., polymeric films the polymer
`of whichis at least 80% by weight of these materials).
`These materials are preferred by the industry because
`of their utility in known processes of manufacturing
`light control film as well as their desirable optic proper-
`ties. The desirability of these two materials as light con-
`trol films adds but another problem to the reinforce-
`mentof the films in that such materials do not generally
`adhere well to materials useful as adhesives. Further-
`more, these films have a relatively low melting temper-
`
`2
`ature (~235°C) and will therefore also tend to distort
`more rapidly than other film materials under manypro-
`cessing conditions. This further restricts the materials
`which may be used as adhesives for securing the light
`contro! film to a structurally supporting surface.
`Only one particular class of adhesive has been found
`to provideall the necessary properties for bonding cel-
`lulose acetate and cellulose acetate-butyrate films to
`supporting surfaces such as butyral coated glass or
`resin surfaces. The broadestclass of resins useful in the
`practice of this invention are thermoplastic polymers
`derived from monomers comprising 50-80% by weight:
`1. alkyl acrylate having 1
`to 8 carbon atoms in the
`alkyl substituent thereof; and/or
`2. tetrahydrofurfury! acrylate.
`20 to 50 by weight monomers further comprising:
`1. 0 to 50% N-alkylacrylamide and/or N-alkylmetha-
`crylamide, wherein the alkyl groups thereof have 1
`to 8 carbon atoms, and
`2. 0 to 50% by weight N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone.
`Most of these resins are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
`3,285,888, issued Nov. 15, 1966 and are polymersof:
`a. 40-75 parts by weight of at least one member se-
`lected from (1) tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate and (2)
`alkyl acrylates having 1-8 carbon atoms in the
`alkyl substituent;
`b. 15-45 parts by weight of at least one memberse-
`lected from N-alkyl-acrylamide
`and N-alkyl-
`methacrylamide wherein the alkyl] groups thereof
`have 1-8 carbon atoms; and
`c. 10-30 parts by weight N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone.
`Where the monomer(a) consists essentially of tet-
`rahydrofurfuryl acrylate, the proportion of N-vinyl-
`2-pyrrolidone may vary from O to 30 parts per
`weight.
`The addition of other copolymerizable monomers to
`the polymer system tends to detract from the perfor-
`manceofthe resin, but about 10% by weight of copoly-
`merizable, optically clear materials (e.g., acrylic acid,
`styrene and otherethylenically unsaturated monomers)
`may be used without extreme deterioration in the prop-
`erties of the adhesive. Where the cellulose acetate or
`cellulose acetate butyrate light control films are to be
`bonded between transparent thermoplastic sheets (e.g.,
`polycarbonates, acrylic resins, methacrylic resins, poly-
`esters, etc.), a single film of the above adhesive, applied
`with minimum solvent, as by the use of a preformed
`thermoplastic adhesive film, is completely satisfactory
`in bonding the light control film to the sheets.
`Where the cellulose acetate or cellulose acetate-
`
`butyrate film is sandwiched between glass sheets,it is
`necessary to use a polyvinyl butyral resin (comprising
`at least 80% of polyvinyl butyral by weightsolids and at
`most 30% by weight plasticizer) between the adhesive
`on the light control film and the transparentglass sheet.
`U.S. Pat. No. 3,285,888 which discloses adhesive
`compositions useful in the practice of this invention
`teaches only the usefulness of those adhesives on sur-
`faces such as highly plasticized polyvinyl chloride, steel
`and canvas. It is surprising that these adhesives have
`been found to provide the strong adhesion and other
`critical parameters necessary for bonding cellulosic
`light control film to other transparent surfaces.
`Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 205 of the
`National Motor Vehicle Safety Act provides a number
`of tests for tinted laminated safety glass. U.S.A. Stan-
`dard Z26.1-1966 of this Act provides three tests which
`evaluate the most significant properties of safety glass,
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`

`

`3,922,440
`
`3
`shatter resistance and humidity resistance.
`Tests 3 and 4 of this U.S.A. Standard measure humid-
`ity resistance. In the former test, a standard specimen
`of a 12 inch X 12 inch square (30.5 cm X 30.5 cm) are
`kept in a closed container over water for two weeksat
`120° to 130°F. Decomposition, formation of bubbles,
`discoloration and separation are then evaluated.
`Test 4 requires that a standard specimenbe subjected
`to water at 150°F. for three minutes and then followed
`immediately by boiling water for two hours. The tested
`laminate is then inspected for any form of defect result-
`ing from the treatment.
`Test 12 of that standard provides a measurement of
`impact resistance and shatter resistance by dropping a
`¥% pound (255 g.) smooth solid steel sphere from thirty
`feet onto a framed and secured laminate. Only mini-
`mum glass separation from the resin is allowed in the
`specifications of this test.
`In addition to the satisfaction of these functionaltest
`
`requirements,it is essential that the addition of the ad-
`hesive layers to the cover sheets and light control film
`not reducethetotal visible light transmissivity by more
`than 20%. Such a reduction oflight transmission would
`essentially render the composite undesirable as a win-
`dow.
`To examine a class of adhesive or specific adhesive,
`the tests were initially performed on an article compris-
`ing two sheets of cellulose acetate butyrate and the ad-
`hesive. If this article could undergo the test procedures
`with satisfactory results, an article comprising the glass
`sheets sandwiching the light control
`film was con-
`structed and examined. All adhesives were applied ac-
`cording to instructions provided for commercially
`available adhesives or generally recognized techniques
`for specially formulated compositions.
`The following adhesivesfailed to provide eveninitial
`securement between the films; that is, they provided
`almost no measurable bond (less than 1 Ib/inch width)
`between the sheets:
`
`polyvinyl butyral resin
`ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers
`block copolymers of styrene and butadiene
`Other materials were used with unsatisfactory results.
`Rhoplex AC34 (a copolymerof polybutyl acrylate and
`methyl methacrylate) failed to provide a bond to the
`surface of the cellulose acetate-butyrate film after 7
`days at 70% relative humidity and 95°F.
`GT Butvar(a polyacrylate blended with polyvinyl bu-
`tyral) generated bubbles within the adhesive during the
`boiling water test. The bubbles diminished the optical
`properties of the film. When the adhesive was used to
`laminate the light control film to glass with polyvinyl
`butyral,
`the glass was found to separate too readily
`from the film when shattered, thus not providing im-
`portant safety glass characteristics.
`Poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate) failed the humidity test
`after fourteen days, developed bubbles during testing
`and generally provided too weak a bond to the cellu-
`lose acetate butyrate surface.
`Commercially available polyethylene terephthalate
`adhesive separated cleanly from the film and failed to
`maintain any bondin boiling water.
`A copolymer of ethyl acrylate and acrylic acid did
`not provide sufficient initial bonding strength and also
`failed to provide any bond in boiling water.
`The general epoxy resin adhesives form goodinitial
`bonds but lose all bond strength at high humidity and in
`the boiling water test. Another class of adhesives, the
`
`4
`:
`cyanoacrylates, give strong initial bonds butfail in the -
`boiling water test. Polyurethane adhesives generally
`failed during humidity and boiling tests and/or devel-
`oped coloration which significantly reduced the trans-
`parencyof the laminate (e.g., 30% reduction in trans-
`missiveness).
`invention can be con-
`Laminates of the present
`structed as follows: The adhesive is spread ona silicon
`treated release paper at 4 to 5 mils wet with a 20% by
`weight solids solution. The solvent is evaporated in a
`drying oven at 130°F. and then 250°F. A chipboardis
`placed in a metal platen and the adhesiveis placed in a
`metal platen and the adhesive is placed thereon with
`the release paper next to the board. A cellulose acetate
`butyrate light control film is placed over the adhesive
`layer, anda second adhesive layer-release paper com-
`posite is placed over the film with the adhesive in
`contact with the light control film. A second chipboard
`and metal place sandwich in the unbondedstructure
`which is then pressed at 100 psi and 280°F. for a few
`seconds, then cooled, and the release paper stripped
`from the laminate. The adhesive coated light control
`film is thus prepared for direct bonding to a clear resin
`surface.
`
`Bonding to a clear resin surfacing film can be accom-
`plished by placing the adhesive coated light control
`film between preformed thermoplastic sheets or par-
`tially curing thermoset resin sheets and the unbonded
`sandwich of materials placed within a heated platen
`and pressed. With light control films having the louvers
`directed perpendicularly to the surface, temperatues of
`about 280°F may be used to bond the sandwich. With
`light control films having louvers not perpendicularly
`aligned with the surface, temperatures not exceeding
`240°F should be used to avoid random procession of
`the louvers towards the perpendicular.
`EXAMPLEI
`
`A safety glass-light control film laminate was made as
`follows.
`Two adhesive films of polymers prepared according
`to the method shown in Example 2 of U.S. Pat. No.
`3,285,888, having an original monomer
`ratio of
`(55/25/20) ethyl acrylate/t-butyl acrylamide/n-vinyl-2-
`pyrrolidone, were formed by coating silicone release
`paper with a 5 mil wet coat of the resin solution and
`dried at about 250°F.
`A sandwich was then formed between these two ad-
`hesive sheets (with the release paper maintained on the
`outside surface of the sandwich) by placing cellulose
`acetate butyrate films against the interior surfaces of
`the adhesive films and a skived, louvered cellulose ace-
`tate butyrate light control element having 0° (perpen-
`dicular) louveres, made according to U.S. patent appli-
`cation Ser. No. 284,403, filed Aug. 28, 1972, between
`the two cellulose acetate butyrate layers. This five part
`sandwich (adhesive, cellulose acetate butyrate,
`lou-
`vered element, cellulose acetate butyrate, adhesive)
`was placed between metalplates with chipboard covers
`at 100 lbs/in? at 275°F. for a few minutes and removed.
`Twoglass sheets having one surface of each coated
`with polyvinyl butyral resin were placed in a platen
`with the uncoated surfaces against the plate surfaces
`with the five layer sandwich between the glass sheets.
`The unbonded composite was heated at 190°—200°F. at
`10-15 Ibs/in? for only sufficient time as was necessary
`to secure the layers; then the composite is cooled to
`room temperature. The final bond was secured in an
`
`_ 0
`
`20
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`

`

`3,922,440
`
`5
`autoclave with 125 lbs/in? pressure at 275°-280°F. for
`1% hours and then cooledin the pressurized autoclave.
`The product was subjected to the humidity and boil-
`ing water tests with no adverse results. The laminate
`also performed according to required standardsin the
`shatter test. There was sufficient transmission through
`the safety-glass laminate product to enable its use as a
`window material.
`
`EXAMPLESII —- V
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`surfaces a transparent adhesive derived from the poly-
`merization of
`to 8
`1. 50-80% by weight alkyl acrylates having 1
`carbon atomsin the alkyl substituent and/or tetra-
`hydrofurfuryl acrylate,
`2. 20 to 50% by weight of monomersfurther compris-
`ing 0 to S0% N-alkylacrylamide and/or N-alkylme-
`thacrylamide with the alkyl groups thereof having 1
`to 8 carbon atoms,and 0 to. 50% by weight N-viny]l-
`2-pyrrolidone,
`and secured to the adhesive a transparent synthetic
`According to the above method of laminating safety
`resin or the butyral surface of glass bonded to an at
`glass products, four different adhesives within the de-
`least 70% by weight polyvinyl butyral resin coating.
`fined adhesive class of this invention were used. The
`Whatweclaim is:
`adhesives used were:
`1. A humidity-resistant shatter-resistant light control
`1. Ethyl acrylate/t-butyl acrylamide/n-vinyl-2-pyr-
`medium comprising a light collimating film with cellu-
`rolidone (55/25/20) terpolymer.

`lose acetate or cellulose acetate-butyrate surfaces hav-
`2. The above terpolymer modified with the addition
`ing bondedto those surfaces a polymeric adhesive ob-
`of less than 10% by weight total of a butadiene-
`tained from the polymerization of monomers compris-
`acrylonitrile copolymer, malic acid, and naturales-
`ing
`ters of abietic acid.
`1. 50-80% by weight total monomeralkyl acrylate
`3. A copolymer of ethyl acrylate/t-butyl acrylamide
`having | to 8 carbon atomsin the alky! substituent
`(65/35).
`and/or tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate;
`4. A copolymer of ethyl acrylate/n-vinyl-2-pyrroli-
`2. 20-50% of monomers further comprising
`done (65/35).
`a. 0 to 50% by total weight of monomer N-alkyla-
`crylamide and/or N-alkylmethacrylamide, wherein
`All four composites were subjected to the humidity,
`the alkyl groups thereof have 1 to 8 carbon atoms,
`boiling water and shatter tests, and all four composites
`and
`passed. The adhesives werealso colorless and reduced
`b. 0 to 50% by total weight of monomers N-vinyl-2-
`transmissiveness by less than 10%. All exhibited ac-
`pyrrolidone,
`ceptable peel strength (i.e., greater than 8 lbs. per inch
`the adhesive layer further bondedto a transparent, pro-
`width) and the first three adhesives exhibited peel
`tective covering material.
`strengths exceeding 15 lbs./in. width.
`2. The light control medium of claim 1 wherein the
`The above examples show that only the presently
`protective covering material
`is glass having an im-
`cited class of adhesives have been able to perform satis-
`proved bonding surface of butyral resin against the said
`factorily in the light controlsafety glass structures pres-
`polymeric adhesive layer.
`ently described.
`3. The light control medium of claim 1 wherein the
`A light collimating laminate comprisingalight colli-
`protective covering materialis a transparent polymeric
`mating, transparent, cellulose acetate or cellulose ace-
`layer.
`*
`*
`Eo
`*
`*
`" tate butyrate film having bonded on the opposed major
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket