`
`Patent Owner Masimo Corporation’s
`Demonstratives For Trial Hearing
`
`January 19, 2022
`
`Apple Inc. v. Masimo Corporation
`IPR2020-01526
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent 6,771,994
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`
`
`‘994 Patent
`
`Ex. 1001 Figs. 5A, 5B (annotated); POR 23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`
`
`Claim 15
`
`Ex. 1001
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Asserted Level Of Ordinary Skill In The Art
`
`A POSITA would have been a person with a working knowledge of
`physiological monitoring technologies. The POSITA would have
`had a Bachelor of Science degree in an academic discipline
`emphasizing the design of electrical, computer, or software
`technologies, in combination with training or at least one to two
`years of related work experience with capture and processing of
`data or information, including but not limited to physiological
`monitoring technologies.
`
`Pet. 7-8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`5
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Art
`
`Ground
`
`1st Ref.
`
`2nd Ref.
`
`3rd Ref.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Diab
`
`Webster
`
`Fine
`
`Fine
`
`Melby
`
`Melby
`
`Benjamin
`
`Melby
`
`Benjamin
`
`Pet. 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`6
`
`
`
`Diab
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 4, 25, POR 11-13, Ex. 2001 ¶¶52-53
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`7
`
`
`
`Diab
`
`Ex. 1006 Fig. 24, POR 11-13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`
`
`Melby
`
`Ex. 1008 Fig. 1 (annotated), POR 15-16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`
`
`Melby
`
`Ex. 1008 Fig. 2 (annotated), POR 31-32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`
`
`Benjamin
`
`Ex. 1007 Fig. 1, POR 14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`11
`
`
`
`Webster
`
`Pet. 30, Ex. 1010 Fig. 7.1, POR 16-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`
`
`New & Corenman
`
`Ex. 2007 Fig. 6, 3:29-32, POR 16-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`
`
`Fine
`
`Ex. 1009 Figs. 2, 4 (annotated), POR 18-20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`14
`
`
`
`Louvers
`
`Ex. 2008 at 110; Ex. 2001 ¶111; Sur Reply 18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`
`
`Louvers
`
`Sur Reply 19, Ex. 2001 ¶¶112-113
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`
`
`Louvers
`
`Sur Reply 22, Ex. 2001 ¶120
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`
`
`Incident Light
`
`Ex. 1010 Fig. 6.6; Sur Reply 9, Ex. 2001 ¶79
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`18
`
`