throbber
United States Patent
`[19]
`[11] Patent Number:
`5,889,834
`
`Vilsmeier et al.
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Mar. 30, 1999
`
`U3005889834A
`
`[54] BLADE COLLIMATOR FOR RADIATION
`THERAPY
`
`Inventors; Stefan Vi]smeier, Poing; Michael
`Bertram, Heimstetten; Joseph Doyle,
`Munich, all of Germany; Ueli Graf,
`Mettmenstetten, Switzerland
`
`Assignee: Brainlab Med. Computersysteme
`GmbH, l-leirnstettn, Germany
`
`5,166,531
`5,297,037
`5,433,048
`5,591,983
`
`11/1992 Huntzinger .............................. 378/152
`3/1994 Iluku ........
`. 378/152
`
`7/1995 Strasscr
`52/2881
`1/1997 Yoa ...................................... 378/152
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0 245 768 m 11/1987 European Pat. Off. .
`42 03 610 C1
`8/1994 Germany ~
`
`[75]
`
`73
`
`21
`22
`
`30
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`Appl. No" 722’602
`Filed:
`Sep. 27, 1996
`
`Primary Examiner—Don Wong
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Armstrong, Westerrnan, Hattori,
`McLeland & Naughton
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Germany """""""""""" 195 36 185“
`[DE]
`Sep. 287 1995
`51
`Int. Cl.6 ................................................ G21K 1/02
`52
`U.S. Cl.
`378/147‘ 378/150‘ 378/152
`58
`Field of Search ......................... 378/146 147
`
`78/148 151 152’ 166
`
`56
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`The accuracy of radiation therapy is enhanced with the blade
`collinlator of the claimed invention. Particularly, this colli-
`n1ator includes a support device for supporting at least two
`sets of radiation attenuating blades in a single plane or layer.
`The blades are reciprocally movable within this support.
`Shaping of the therapy may be increased by constructing the
`blades to include a varying width increasing from the central
`blade toward the exterior blades.
`
`5,012,506
`
`4/1991 Span et al.
`
`.............................. 378/152
`
`24 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 1 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Mar. 30, 1999
`
`Sheet 1 0f 3
`
`5,889,834
`
`N
`
`
`
`0':
`
`La...
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 2 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Mar. 30, 1999
`
`Sheet 2 0f 3
`
`5,889,834
`
`[s
`N
`
`23
`
`—“ l
`. -fl-!-:-:--
`=g-3-E- I
`H
`- -_— _- ‘
`
`I
`
`24
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`I I I I I I
`
`-l_—l-§I'
`=I—_Q—-
`. _=_.q_=—-
`~;:Il_i—'======
`:a_-—-——l—u-
`I!
`iiiii'V
`.4
`i‘ii.al
`
`"l’lllllilll
`
`I.)F
`
`Fig.2
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 3 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Mar. 30, 1999
`
`Sheet 3 0f3
`
`5,889,834
`
`Fig.3
`
`3!
`
`I
`
`32
`
`36
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 4 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`5
`
`15
`
`The invention relates to a blade collimator for radiation
`therapy of the class described in the introductory clause of
`claim 1.
`Blade collimators are accessories of linear accelerators
`that are used especially to irradiate tumors. They were
`developed to limit the area of radiation,
`to protect vital
`tissues from radiation, and thus to replace the traditional
`shielding blocks, which must be made to order for each
`tumor and are expensive to manufacture. Although these
`shielding blocks, because they are cast separately for each
`tumor, naturally permit very good adjustment to the shapes
`of tumors, it was desirable to create and employ relatively
`adjustable, reusable devices for
`limiting the area of
`radiation, using blade collimator technology, suitable for a
`range of tumor shapes.
`Basically, blade collimators have two sets of separately
`movable blades facing each other;
`their front faces are -
`pushed together in such a way that the blades circumscribe
`an open area between the front faces that coincides fairly
`well with the contour of the tumor to be treated. The blades
`can be moved manually, electrically, or mechanically by
`means of spring mechanisms.
`Two basic classes of blade collimators are known to prior
`art. In the first class, relatively wide blades, often made of
`tungsten, are used to treat larger tumors. The width of blades
`for such collimators ranges from 6 mm to 1 cm, which
`permits irradiation of large areas of great width up to 60 cm.
`The front faces of the blades have a rectangular shape.
`This causes a problem in the use of collimators with wide
`blades: when the front faces are moved toward the contour
`of the tumor, it proves impossible to achieve a satisfactory
`match with the shape of the tumor. If the front faces of the
`blades are moved up to their first point of contact with the
`contour of the tumor, then the staircase pattern thus formed
`leaves open relatively large areas through which radiation
`can strike and damage vital tissue. This becomes an espe-
`cially serious problem when treating the brain. If the blades
`are moved tip in such a way that no vital tissue is left
`exposed to the radiation, this causes the opposite problem:
`the “stair landings” that are formed by the front faces of the
`blades cover parts of the tumor, which then cannot be
`treated. Moreover, the scattering of radiation reaches a high
`level with such collimators;
`the dose gradient becomes
`small. Overall, it may be concluded that the collimators with
`wide blades described above can indeed be used to irradiate
`large areas, but cannot be adequately adjusted to match the
`shape of the object to be irradiated.
`In order to solve this problem, a second class of blade
`collimators that employ very narrow blades was developed.
`Such blades, which are as narrow as 1 mm, in principle
`permit good adjustment of the localized radiation area to the
`shape of the tumor. Yet there are substantial disadvantages
`associated with devices of this type, particularly as regards
`the size of the area that can be irradiated.
`The number of blades that can be used is limited. This is
`because each blade must be able to be independently shifted
`by mechanical means, for which purpose each blade is
`generally equipped with an activating and shifting mecha—
`nism. These shifting mechanisms—which can be electric
`motors, for example—must all be mounted on the collimator
`or its support. This necessarily places an upper limit on the
`number of blades because too many of them would make the
`collimator,
`together with its support and activating
`mechanisms, too large and too heavy.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`1
`BLADE COLLIMATOR FOR RADIATION
`THERAPY
`
`5,889,834
`
`2
`A limited number of blades of lesser width restrict such
`a collimator to the irradiation of very small areas. Therefore,
`despite the relatively good adjustment, such a collimator is
`limited to a rather small area of application (e.g. the irra-
`diation of small tumors).
`A contour collimator for radiation therapy is known from
`European patent number specification 0 245 768, which
`describes an effective adjustment device for the blades.
`Another contour collimator is known from German patent
`specification number 42 03 610; it employs a spring mecha-
`nism and a readjustment device for the blades. These two
`collimators of prior art also operate with blades of uniform
`width; that is, they are also beset by the problems associated
`with narrow or wide blades that are described above.
`The goal of the present invention is to provide a blade
`collimator for radiation therapy that solves the aforemen-
`tioned problems. In particular, a blade collimator will be
`suggested that makes possible both good adjustment to the
`contour of the object to be irradiated and irradiation of
`relatively large areas.
`This goal is attained with a blade collimator designed
`according to the characterization part of claim 1.
`The subsidiary claims describe preferred embodiments
`of the blade collimator according to the invention.
`The main advantage of using blades of various widths
`within a blade field of the collimator is that it becomes
`possible to use narrow blades at those places where a precise
`adjustment to the contour to be irradiated is necessary, while
`wider blades can be employed at those places where they
`provide adequate adjustment—for example,
`those tumor
`contours that are relatively straight, against which the wide
`blades can be laid lengthwise with a good fit. By using both
`narrow and wide blades,
`it becomes possible to irradiate
`relatively large areas, while precise adjustment can be made
`to the difficult sites with the narrow blades, all while using
`the usual number of blades. This ensures that the diseased
`tissue is completely irradiated, while vital tissue is shielded
`from radiation and so remains undamaged. Thus the inven—
`tion incorporates the advantages of the blade collimators
`known to prior art; it has the good adjustability of the narrow
`blades and the adequate irradiation field size of the wide
`blades, while compensating for the disadvantages described
`above.
`A blade collimator according to the invention can be
`designed in several advantageous ways.
`In one embodiment, several adjacent blades are grouped
`in sets of uniform width. This configuration is especially
`well suited to objects requiring irradiation having a contour
`that is highly irregular in at least one area, but that is regular
`in other places, so that sets of the narrower blades can cover
`the irregular site, while sets of the larger blades cover the
`regularly shaped contours.
`In another advantageous embodiment, the width of the
`blades in the collimator increases from inside to outside. The
`shape of many tumors is characterized by irregular contours
`near the center. A collimator whose blade width increases
`from inside to outside can be especially well adjusted to such
`tumors, while the tumors may occupy larger areas. With this
`design in particular, the width arrangement of the blades can
`be symmetrical to an axis of symmetry lying in the direction
`of travel. In this way, the drive with its activating elements
`can be executed regularly and therefore inexpensively in
`terms of design, while a wide range of application is
`maintained for using the collimator.
`The possible means for adjusting the blade positions for
`the collimator according to the invention range from shifting
`by hand, through adjustment to a preformed contour model,
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 5 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`5,889,834
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`3
`to very expensively operated adjustment and activating
`mechanisms. In one embodiment of the invention, devices
`are mounted on the blade support for moving the blades
`separately or in sets, these devices are driven by electrical
`and/or mechanical devices, especially by springs, connect-
`ing rods or electric motors. This makes it possible to couple
`the shifting devices and their activating mechanisms to a
`control unit, which controls the activation and path adjust-
`ment of the blades by means of stored patient data, espe-
`cially data consisting of x-rays, computer tomograms or
`nuclear spin resonance tomograms. Such a control unit,
`which might operate by means of a computer, works
`together with the blade collimator according to the invention
`to facilitate precise adjustment to the irradiation contour,
`especially when radiation comes from various directions.
`Patient data or contours of the type described above are
`three-dimensional, so that the computer can adjust the blade
`collimator to the calculated contour with a good fit from any
`direction of exposure.
`the sets of -
`In another embodiment of the invention,
`blades are arranged with their support or such that they
`rotate relative to the support. The rotation of the entire array
`(i.e. the sets of blades with the support or the sets of blades
`on the support) makes possible a further improvement in the
`adjustability of the exposure boundary to the contour to be
`irradiated. Through such rotation, one can ensure that the
`narrower blades come to rest on irregular points of the
`contour, while regular sites are covered by wide blades.
`Connected with a sensor, which via the control unit monitors
`both the contour of the object
`to be irradiated and the
`rotational angle of the blade arrangement, such adjustments
`can be carried out under computer control.
`While the preceding discussion has assumed that the
`blades are permanently mounted on their support, another
`design according to the invention is conceivable in which
`the blades come as modules so that sets of them are
`interchangeable. With the use of an activating and shifting
`mechanism suited to all blade modules, a still wider range of
`adjustment to the size and/or contour of the object to be
`irradiated can be ensured through the selection of sets of
`alades of appropriate width.
`Possible end—on radiation through the sets of blades can
`3e prevented by giving them a special shape. In particular,
`JIades designed according to the invention can be equipped
`with interlocking teeth on their side faces. Another possi-
`7ility is to make use of overfocusing; in other words, to
`design the blades such that they are leak—proof and have a
`arismatic shape relative to an imaginary radiation source,
`whereby the imaginary radiation source lies higher than the
`actual radiation source used in the treatment. This yields
`Jetter radiation absorption in the actual irradiation process.
`In another preferred embodiment of the blade collimator
`according to the invention, an additional blade is inserted
`Jetween two blades; the former is positioned by means of
`mechanical devices such that its front face according to the
`direction of travel of the blades always occupies an essen—
`ially intermediate position between the front faces of the
`wo adjacent blades. In this configuration, the number of
`activating and control mechanisms, as well as the weight,
`can be reduced, because only every other blade requires a
`drive. Yet this arrangement retains the good adjustment to
`he contours without the otherwise usual formation of steps.
`Preferably,
`the sets of blades of a blade collimator
`according to the invention consist of 20 to 32 blades, with
`a preferred embodiment equipped with 26 blades. One
`advantageous configuration for 26 blades would be to
`arrange the blades symmetrically from the outside to the
`
`
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`inside so that three blades 4 mm in width, three blades 3 mm
`in width and seven 2 mm in width are provided for each side.
`A configuration such as this is low in overall weight, easily
`controllable, and can block out relatively large irradiation
`contours with a very good fit.
`Very narrow sets of blades, which in the case of the
`configuration according to the invention come into play
`when very narrow blades of uniform width are used, can
`entail a problem with secondary position measurement.
`Such secondary position measurements are especially
`needed when motor—driven sets of blades are used.
`The drive motors have an encoder which can report back
`the primary blade position; in troublesome cases, the motors
`can execute turns, even when the corresponding blade stops
`for any reason, as when it locks up. After such “no—load
`racing," the encoder reports a position that does not match
`the real position of the blade. In order to adjust for this
`mistake, blade collimators have a secondary position mea-
`surement device that ascertains the real position of the blade
`via rods connected to the blades; the ends of these rods
`communicate with individual movable contacts. These rods,
`as well as the movable contacts, occupy adjacent positions
`in a relatively wide layout that is necessitated by design
`considerations.
`the latter
`Normally,
`in collimators with wide blades,
`could be connected in a simple manner (eg. directly) to the
`straight rods of the position measurement device. With
`narrow blades, which entail blade areas that are much
`narrower than the overall array of rods belonging to the
`secondary position measurement device, this is not possible.
`In terms of the invention, this problem is solved by a
`blade collimator characterized by individual blades whose
`upper edges, towards the back, are equipped with oblong
`connecting cords whose other ends engage the rods of a
`secondary position measurement device, seen from the
`direction of travel of the blades, the connecting cords spread
`out upwards in roughly a fan shape up to the rods’ contact
`points, which are more widely separated than the blades.
`In this design, the connecting cords are made of flat
`strips, especially metal strips, which bend in their course
`from the edges of the blades to the contact points on the rods
`of the position measurement device and whose end segments
`are preferably straight.
`Secondary position measurement can be carried out at
`any time with the solutions described above, even with very
`narrow blade fields.
`Another problem with narrow blade collimators of this
`type, in which the blades have tapped holes in the direction
`of travel where threaded rods turn during the adjustment
`operation,
`is that narrow blades can accommodate only
`small tapped holes. However, the small-diameter threaded
`rods that are inserted into these holes are unstable, especially
`if one recalls that in the vertical position, the weight of a
`blade made of tungsten rests on the threaded rod and that
`frictional forces also come to bear during movement.
`Although the usual blades are offset for radiation shield—
`ing and conveyance by each other, this does not permit the
`tapping of larger-diameter holes because the individual
`sections of the blades all have the same limited thickness.
`The blade collimator according to the invention is
`designed to solve this problem, and for this purpose is
`characterized by blades which, seen from the direction of
`travel, exhibit from top to bottom a cross-sectional shape
`with widened sections on both sides of the bisecting line of
`the individual blades, and matching narrowed sections. In
`each case, the adjacent, identically shaped blades exhibit
`their widened sections and narrowed sections at correspond-
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 6 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`5,889,834
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`5
`ing longitudinally displaced sites, so that the side faces of
`the blades nestle against each other in essentially flat con—
`tact. Preferably, holes are tapped as counterparts to a drive-
`threaded rod in each of the widened cross-sectional areas of
`the blades.
`This offset configuration of the blades makes it possible
`to bring the individual blades into proper position relative to
`one another, to provide radiation shielding perpendicular to
`the direction of travel, as well as the tapping of larger-
`diameter holes and thus an increase in stability. Furthermore,
`with this symmetric design, sets of blades can be deployed
`on both sides of the collimator;
`the blades of opposing,
`identically shaped sets can slide by each another with ease
`as needed.
`The arrangement and housing of the separate drive
`motors presents another problem in the blade collimators
`described above, with their narrow blade configuration.
`Electric motors with diameters of less than approximately 16
`mm are not commercially available.Although the motors are
`arranged in a height—staggered configuration, it is not pos— -
`sible to reach each blade in a small blade area in a straight
`line via drive shafts and drive threaded rods that are attached
`to the motors. The only traditional solution is to utilize
`flexible threaded rods, which must be made of plastic.
`Unfortunately, they are unstable, and generate abrasion that
`can impair or stop the movement of the blades. Use of grease
`can clog up the entire apparatus with prolonged use.
`This problem too can be solved by a blade collimator
`according to the invention in which the blades are moved by
`electric motors and each electric motor has a drive shaft and
`a drive threaded rod; the problem is solved by staggering the
`motors one behind the other in the direction of travel of the
`JIades.
`Such a longitudinally staggered configuration of motors
`
`errnits every blade to be driven with a threaded rod running
`
`
`
`in a straight line. More than su ‘icient room remains between
`motors arranged in the same longitudinal position to permit
`he drive shaft or the threaded rod of a motor situated behind
`it to pass through.
`Embodiments of the blade collimator according to the
`invention are described more fully below with reference to
`he attached figures.
`FIG. 1 is a major cross—section of a blade configuration
`Jelonging to a blade collimator depicted as an embodiment
`of the invention;
`FIG. 2 shows a view of a set of blades of a collimator
`according to the invention in the direction of travel of the
`JIades with connecting strips mounted on the upper side of
`he blades, and these connecting strips engage a position
`measurement device; and
`FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a staggered configura-
`ion of motors according to the invention.
`FIG. 1 shows a left set of blades 1 and a right set of
`alades 2. To simplify the illustration, each set of blades is
`shown with only 16 blades, whereas the collimators accord-
`ing to the invention that are normally produced can have
`very many more blades. The configuration of blades
`depicted in the drawing is variable as regards their displace-
`ment. However, there is a symmetrical number of blades
`relative to two perpendicular axes. The blades in each set can
`be grouped in sets 3, 4 and 5 of uniform width; due to their
`symmetrical arrangement, they are labelled with references
`only in one comer of the drawing,
`Each set of blades 1, 2 consists of four outer wide blades,
`six medium—width blades adjoining them, and six inner
`narrow blades, which in this manner comprise the outer
`blade sets, the middle blade sets 4 and the inner blade sets 5.
`
`
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`The blades are depicted in section on the right and left
`sides of the drawing. Adjustment devices (not shown),
`which engage the left and right terminal faces of the indi-
`vidual blades (also not shown), are driven by activating
`mechanisms such as electric motors.
`In this drawing, the blades are shifted toward the middle
`of the collimator from left and right for irradiation of tumor
`contour K. Contour K is drawn in and hatched for purposes
`of illustration.
`The blades are shifted for radiation shielding to match
`the contour of the tumor, so that the inner open area is
`irradiated, while the region shielded by the blades remains
`unexposed. Although the blades are moved separately, they
`can be grouped in blade sets 3, 4 and 5 as described above.
`It is evident that the narrow blades contained in set 5 run up
`against the central part of the tumor, which has a very
`irregular contour. This permits a very good match of the
`radiation shielding to this irregular contour; only very small
`“stair-shaped” radiation steps remain, which means the vital
`tissue can be protected very well. For the somewhat less
`irregular contour in the outer middle range,
`the medium-
`width blades of set 4 provide an adequate fit, while the wider
`blades of blade set 3 provide a very good match to the
`regular contours of the outer part of the tumor.
`Rotation of the blade field brings it into the best possible
`position for the tumor to be treated. It is clear that a variation
`in the width of the blades facilitates excellent adjustment to
`a contour with the narrow blades, whereas the deployment
`of medium—width and wide blades permit shielding of con—
`tours of relatively large dimensions.
`The use of traditional blade collimators with blades of
`uniform width would present great difficulties in the case
`presented here, because if these blades were very narrow, the
`collimator would have to be kept small due to the limited
`selection of blades, meaning that the entire area could not be
`irradiated. Although in this case the use of traditional wide
`blades of uniform width could cover the entire area of
`exposure, large radiation leaks would occur in areas with
`irregular contours, thus exposing vital tissue to damaging
`radiation.
`The collimator according to the invention solves these
`problems with its blades of varying width, and combines the
`advantages of both classes mentioned above, as becomes
`clear in the illustrated embodiment.
`FIG. 2 shows a Vier of a set of blades belonging to a
`collimator according to the invention in the direction of
`travel of the blades with connecting strips that engage a
`position measurement device and are mounted on the upper
`side of the blades.
`In the blade collimator depicted here, oblong connecting
`cords (21) are mounted on the upper edges, toward the rear,
`of the individual blades; the other ends of these connecting
`cords engage the rods of a secondary position measurement
`device, which is not shown, via a mechanism such as a ball
`connector (27). Seen from the direction of travel of the
`blades, the connecting cords (21) spread out upwards in
`roughly a fan shape to meet contact points on the rods, which
`are more widely separated than the blades. The connecting
`cords (21) consist of flat metal strips that bend in their course
`from the edges of the blades to the contact points on the rods
`of the position measurement device (the bend runs perpen—
`dicular to the plane of the drawing and is therefore not
`visible); the end segments of these strips are straight.
`One method of connecting the lower ends of the metal
`strips to the blades is by soldering.
`FIG. 2 also shows that the blades, as seen from the
`direction of travel, exhibit from top to bottom a cross-
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 7 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`5,889,834
`
`7
`sectional shape with widened sections (23) on both sides of
`the bisecting line of the individual blades, as well as
`matching narrowed sections (22). In each case, the adjacent,
`identically shaped blades have their widened sections (25)
`and narrowed sections (26) at corresponding, longitudinally
`displaced sites such that the side faces of the blades nestle
`against each other in essentially flat contact. Tapped holes
`(24) as counterparts to a drive-threaded rod are found in the
`widened cross-sectional areas of each blade. They can be
`relatively wide in diameter and therefore accommodate
`stable threaded rods.
`FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a staggered motor
`configuration of the invention. In a blade collimator in which
`the blades are driven by electric motors (31, 34) and the
`electric motors each have a drive-shaft (32, 35) and a
`drive—connecting rod (33, 36),
`the motors (31, 34) are
`arranged in a staggered pattern one behind the other in the
`direction of travel of the blades. Depending on the number
`of motors, the stagger can be two—step or, as illustrated here,
`three-step. 'l‘he stagger can of course have still more steps in
`the longitudinal direction. The motors are also usually
`height-staggered—that is, staggered in the direction perpen-
`dicular to the plane of the drawing.
`It is clear from the schematic diagram of FIG. 3 that with
`a configuration such as this, the shaft (32) or the threaded rod
`(33) can pass between the two motors lying in front of it with
`ease, thus permitting a linear drive for the blades.
`We claim:
`1. Blade collimator for radiation therapy, comprising a
`support device,
`two opposing sets of blades mounted in one layer in said
`support device, each blade capable of reciprocable
`movement in said support device and having a dimen-
`sion perpendicular to the movement,
`each set of blades comprising a central blade adjacent to
`the blades of the other set, an exterior blade, and a blade
`interposed between the central blade and the exterior
`blade, the dimension of the exterior blade being greater
`than the dimension of the interposed blade and the
`dimension of the interposed blade being greater than
`the dimension of the central blade.
`2. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which the
`dimensions of several adjacent blades of each set are equal.
`3. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which the
`blades are leak-proof against radiation by means of recip-
`rocal interlocking of teeth.
`4. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which the
`dimensions of the respective blades are symmetrical to an
`axis of symmetry in a direction of the movement.
`5. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which mecha-
`nisms for moving the blades separately or in sets are
`mounted on the blade support, and the mechanisms are
`activated by at
`least one of electrical and mechanical
`devices.
`6. Blade collimator according to claim 5 in which the
`devices are coupled to a control unit
`that controls the
`activation and path adjustment of the blades by means of
`stored patient data.
`7. Blade collimator according to claim 6 in which the sets
`of blades are arrayed with their support or such that they
`rotate relative to it.
`8. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which sets of
`blades in modular form are interchangeable.
`9. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which the
`blades are leak-proof against radiation by means of overfo-
`cusing.
`10. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which an
`additional blade is inserted between two blades and the
`additional blade is positioned by mechanical devices such
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`4O
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`8
`that its front face in the direction of movement of the blades
`always occupies an essentially intermediate position
`between the front faces of the two blades adjacent to it.
`11. Blade collimator according to claim 1 in which the
`sets of blades consist of from 20 to 32 blades.
`12. Blade collimator according to claim 11 with 26 blades
`in which each set has:
`3 blades 4 mm in width,
`3 blades 3 mm in width and
`7 blades 2 mm in width.
`13. Blade collimator according to claim 1, in which an end
`of oblong connecting cords are mounted on upper edges,
`toward the rear, of the individual blades, whereby other ends
`of the connecting cords engage rods of a secondary position
`measurement device and the connecting cords, seen from the
`direction of movement of the blades, spread out upwards in
`roughly a fan shape to meet contact points on the rods, which
`are more widely separated than the blades.
`14. Blade collimator according to claim 13 in which the
`connecting cords consist of flat strips that bend in their
`course from the blades to the contact points on the rods of
`the position measurement device.
`15. Blade collimator according to claim 1, in which the
`blades, as seen from the direction of movement, exhibit from
`top to bottom a cross-sectional shape with widened sections
`on both sides of a bisecting line of the individual blades, as
`well as matching narrowed sections, whereby the adjacent,
`identically shaped blades exhibit their widened sections and
`narrowed sections at corresponding longitudinally displaced
`positions, so that the side faces of the blades nestle against
`each adjacent blade in essentially flat contact.
`16. Blade collimator according to claim 15 in which
`tapped ho es as counterparts to drive threaded rods are
`created in the widened cross—sectional areas of each blade.
`17. Blace collirriator according to claim 5, in which
`the blades are rrioved by electric rriotors, anc
`the elec ric motors each have a drive shaft and a drive
`threaced rod, whereby
`the motors are arranged one behind the
`staggered configuration in the direction 0
`of the blades.
`18. BlaLe collimator according to claim 13, in which
`the blades are rrioved by electric rriotors, anc
`the elec ric motors each have a drive shaft and a drive
`threaced rod, whereby
`the motors are arranged one behind the
`staggered configuration in the direction 0
`of the blades.
`19. BlaLe collimator according to claim 15, in which
`the blades are moved by electric motors, am
`the elec ric motors each have a drive shaft and a drive
`threaced rod, whereby
`the motors are arranged one behind the
`staggered configuration in the direction 0
`of the blades.
`20. Blaee collimator according to claim 5 in which the
`mechanisms are activated by springs.
`21. Blace collimator according to claim 5 in which the
`mechanisms are activated by connecting rods.
`22. Blace collimator according to claim 5 in which the
`mechanisms are activated by electric motors.
`23. Blace collimator according to claim 5 in which the
`stored patient data includes at least one of x—rays, computer
`tomograms or nuclear spin resonance tomograms.
`24. Blace collimator according to claim 14 in which the
`connecting cords consist of flat metal strips, and whose end
`segments are straight.
`
`
`
`other in a
`movement
`
`other in a
`movement
`
`other in a
`movement
`
`*
`
`*
`
`$
`
`*
`
`*
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 8 of 8
`
`ViewRay Exhibit 1028
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket