throbber
Ari Rafilson
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Counsel, 
`
`Joshua Yi <Joshua_Yi@txwd.uscourts.gov>
`Monday, August 3, 2020 1:34 AM
`Alfonso Chan; Ari Rafilson; Michael Shore; Will Ellerman; price@ainsworth-law.com;
`brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com; Ranjini Acharya; Callie Bjurstrom
`RE: FG SRC, LLC v. Intel Corporation (6:20-cv-00315-ADA)
`
`I neglected to raise this during my pre‐CMC emails, but the Court has started a new practice of setting the estimated 
`trial date at the CMC.  Given the number of patents, the Court will set the trial date for November 8, 2021.  To the 
`extent that the parties would like to move the trial date (to an earlier or later date), please feel free to raise that at the 
`Markman hearing. 
`
`‐Josh 
`
`From: Joshua Yi  
`Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 11:17 PM 
`To: achan@shorechan.com; arafilson@shorechan.com; mshore@shorechan.com; wellerman@shorechan.com; 
`price@ainsworth‐law.com; brian.nash@pillsburylaw.com; ranjini.acharya@pillsburylaw.com; 
`callie.bjurstrom@pillsburylaw.com 
`Subject: FG SRC, LLC v. Intel Corporation (6:20‐cv‐00315‐ADA) 
`
`Counsel, 
`
`By way of introduction, I am Judge Albright's patent clerk. 
`
`A couple of notes regarding the telephonic Case Management Conference on July 30 for this case: 
`
`1. Please be aware that there are several telephonic CMCs going on back‐to‐back that day.  So to prevent
`interrupting the previous CMC, please wait until your case is announced before speaking.
`2. The Court believes that a 0.5 day Markman may be appropriate.  If you believe that you need more time, please
`let me know ASAP.
`3. The Court has a few open half days around the default date specified in the Order Governing Proceedings
`(January 7): 1/7 PM, and 1/8 PM. Please confer with the other side and e‐mail me the date that the parties agree
`to. Please let me know ASAP as the Court will reserve these dates on a first‐come, first‐served basis.  Please also
`note that the Court is now double‐booking Markman dates given that a significant percentage of Markman
`hearings are canceled based on a dismissal/settlement.
`4. Attached is the Court's Procedures Regarding Technology Tutorials, Claim Construction, and Discovery Disputes.
`5.
`If you have post‐Markman issues to discuss, please let me know so the Court can determine if we need to
`address that issue at the CMC or if it can wait until Markman.  If you have pre‐Markman issues to discuss, please
`let me know what they are after conferring with the other side.
`6. Please note that although the Court has currently scheduled several CMCs to begin at 2PM, I will follow‐up with
`the specific call‐in time for this case once I estimate how much time each CMC needs.
`If there are no pre‐Markman issues and the parties agree to a Markman date, then there is no need to have this
`CMC, so the Court will cancel it.  Similarly, if I don't hear from you, I will assume that there are no issues to
`discuss, pick a Markman date, and cancel the CMC.
`
`7.
`
`If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks. 
`
`1
`
`

`


`‐Josh 


`
`Joshua J. Yi, Ph.D.
`Law Clerk to the Honorable Alan D Albright
`United States District Court
`Western District of Texas
`joshua_yi@txwd.uscourts.gov
`254-750-1518 
`

`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket